Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Endosseous Implants (endosseou + implant)
Selected AbstractsMandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized studyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 9 2009Henny J. A. Meijer Abstract Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ The ZiReal Post: A New Ceramic Implant AbutmentJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 1 2003URS BRODBECK DMD ABSTRACT Restorations in the anterior esthetic zone present significant challenges in both the surgical and prosthetic phases of implant dentistry. Titanium has been established as the material of choice for endosseous implants, resulting in a high degree of predictability. Many types of implants require transmucosal abutments to retain implant restorations. Ceramics may be the ideal material to replace natural teeth, but most transmucosal abutments are made of titanium. However, ceramics may also be used as abutments in implant restorations. This combination of ceramics for abutment and crown provides better translucency for the implant restoration than is available with metal abutments and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. Ceramic abutments and implant restorations also minimize the gray color associated with metal components that is transmitted through the peri-implant tissues. Customized emergence profiles also may be obtained with ceramic abutments; this generally improves the predictability and consistency of the esthetics obtainable in implant restorations. Zirconia as a ceramic material offers not only outstanding material properties but also a well-documented biocompatibility. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This article discusses the clinical and laboratory features of a new ceramic abutment, ZiRealÔ Post (Implant Innovations, Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida). [source] Growth analysis of a patient with ectodermal dysplasia treated with endosseous implants: 6-year follow-upJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 3 2006T. ALCAN summary, The purpose of this article is to report the clinical course and 6-year follow-up of a child with ectodermal dysplasia who was treated with implants surgery very early. This article reports placement of mandibular endosseous implants in a 4-year-old patient with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and oligodontia. This congenital anomaly does not appear to retard healing and the osseointegration remains after 6 years and 3 months of loading. Mandibular and maxillary skeletal growth and development was normal. However, because of lack of alveolar growth, in time, patient's vertical growth pattern changed to low angle. This could be corrected by changing the vertical heights of the abutment and prosthesis. As a result, in ectodermal dysplasias cases with anadontia, early implant placement and fixed prosthesis could be a good multidisciplinary treatment option for poor cooperative child. [source] Vitamin D and Bone Physiology: Demonstration of Vitamin D Deficiency in an Implant Osseointegration Rat ModelJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, Issue 6 2009James Kelly DDS Abstract Purpose: The patient population varies in nutritional deficiencies, which may confound the host response to biomaterials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a common deficiency of vitamin D on implant osseointegration in the rat model. Materials and Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were maintained under the cessation of vitamin D intake and UV exposure. The serum levels of 1,25(OH)2D3, 25 OHD3, Ca, and P were determined. Miniature cylindrical Ti6Al4V implants (2-mm long, 1-mm diameter) were fabricated with double acid-etched (DAE) surface or modified DAE with discrete crystalline deposition (DCD) of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. DAE and DCD implants were placed in the femurs of vitamin D-insufficient and control rats. After 14 days of healing, the femur-implant samples were subjected to implant push-in test and nondecalcified histology. The surfaces of recovered implant specimens after the push-in test were further evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: The decreased serum level of 25 OHD3 demonstrated the establishment of vitamin D insufficiency in this model. The implant push-in test revealed that DAE and DCD implants in the vitamin D-insufficient group (15.94 ± 8.20 N, n = 7; 15.63 ± 3.96 N, n = 7, respectively) were significantly lower than those of the control group (24.99 ± 7.92 N, n = 7, p < 0.05; 37.48 ± 17.58 N, n = 7, p < 0.01, respectively). The transcortical bone-to-implant contact ratio (BIC) was also significantly decreased in the vitamin D-insufficient group. SEM analyses further suggested that the calcified tissues remaining next to the implant surface after push-in test appeared unusually fragmented. Conclusions: The effect of vitamin D insufficiency significantly impairing the establishment of Ti6Al4V implant osseointegration in vivo was unexpectedly profound. The outcome of Ti-based endosseous implants may be confounded by the increasing prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in our patient population. [source] Ramus or Chin Grafts for Maxillary Sinus Inlay and Local Onlay Augmentation: Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity and ComplicationsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2003Jaime Clavero DDS ABSTRACT Background: The placement of endosseous implants in edentulous areas is frequently limited by inadequate bone volume of the residual ridge. Local bone grafts from the mandible are a convenient source of autogenous bone for alveolar reconstruction prior to implant placement. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to document and compare the morbidity and the frequency of complications occurring at two intraoral donor sites: the mandibular symphysis and the mandibular ramus. Material and Methods: This study reviewed 53 consecutively treated patients:29 with autogenous bone grafts from the mandibular symphysis and 24 with mandibular ramus bone grafts. Each patient received a questionnaire 18 months after surgery regarding problems that may have occurred during the postoperative period. Results: In the patients in whom bone was harvested from the mandibular ramus, there were fewer postoperative symptoms immediately after the operation than with mandibular symphysis harvesting. Twenty-two of the 29 patients with symphysis grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the skin innervated by the mental nerve 1 month after the operation. Five of the 24 patients with ramus grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the vestibular mucosa corresponding to the innervation of the buccal nerve. Eighteen months after the surgery, 15 of the 29 patients in the symphysis group still had some decreased sensitivity and presented with permanent altered sensation. Only one of the patients grafted from the mandibular ramus presented with permanent altered sensation in the posterior vestibular area. No major complication occurred in the donor sites in any of the 53 patients. Conclusion: The results of this study favored the use of the ascending mandibular ramus as an intraoral donor site for bone grafting. [source] Histomorphologic and histomorphometric evaluation of various endosseous implant healing chamber configurations at early implantation times: a study in dogsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 6 2010Charles Marin Abstract Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the early healing of endosseous implants presenting various healing chamber configurations in a beagle dog mandible model. Methods: The four premolars of 12 beagle dogs were extracted and allowed to heal for a period of 8 weeks. Implants allowing six different healing chamber configurations were placed in each dog (three per side, six configurations per dog). The animals were sacrificed after 3 and 5 weeks in vivo (n=6 per time in vivo), and the implants were non-decalcified processed to slides of ,30 ,m thickness. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) within the healing chamber were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed by a GLM ANOVA model at 5% significance level. Results: Osseointegration and healing with woven bone filling throughout all healing chambers was observed. Replacement of woven bone by lamellar bone showing primary osteonic structures was observed at 5 weeks. BIC was significantly affected by healing chamber configuration (P<0.001) and was not affected by time in vivo (P>0.42) at 3 and 5 weeks in vivo. BAFO was not affected by healing chamber configuration (P>0.14) however significantly increased over implantation time (P<0.001). Conclusion: Regardless of healing chamber design and dimensions considered, healing allowed the devices osseointegration. However, healing chamber configuration significantly affected osseointegration measurable parameters such as BIC. To cite this article: Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal, MN Coelho PG. Histomorhpologic and histomorphometric evaluation of various endosseous implant healing chamber configurations at early implantation times: a study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 577,583. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01853.x [source] Bone reactions to controlled loading of endosseous implants: a pilot studyCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 11 2008H. W. Anselm Wiskott Abstract Objectives: To validate an experimental setup designed to apply load onto bone tissue using osseointegrated implants in a rabbit model. Specifically, (1) to design an apparatus capable of generating controlled forces, (2) to assess implant placement, maintenance and loading and (3) to evaluate outcome variables using three radiological methods. Material and methods: New Zealand White rabbits were used. Two dental implants were inserted 15,18 mm apart in the animals' tibiae. After 3 months of healing, the implants were loaded normal to their long axes using a pneumatically activated device. A 15 min load regimen at 1 Hz was applied 5 days per week. Every week the applied load was increased by 5 N up to week 8 and by 10 N up to 100 N by week 14. Groups of animals (n=3) were sacrificed at load levels 25, 50 and 100 N. One unloaded controlateral implant in each group provided the baseline data. The rabbits were computer tomography (CT) scanned and radiographed using conventional frames every 4,5 weeks. After sacrifice, a volume of interest (VOI) located in the inter-implant zones and a VOI set as a ring surrounding the distal implant were analyzed using micro computer tomography (,CT). Results: A variety of osseous responses was observed, ranging from minor alterations to significant increases in porosity and lamelling of the cortical layer. ,CT data of the inter-implant VOI demonstrated an initial increase in total volume (upto 50 N) followed by stabilization. Concomitantly, bone volumetric density first decreased and then augmented until the end of the experiment. This phenomenon was not observed in the peri-implant VOI, for which volumetric density augmented from the beginning to the end of the experiment. Conclusions: 1. In future trials the loading devices must be constructed so as to sustain heavy cyclic loads over prolonged periods. 2. When properly handled, rabbits are cooperative animals in this application. In a third of the sites, signs of inflammation were observed. 3. In the inter-implant VOI, the cortical bone tended to react in two phases: first, as an increase in porosity and lamelling and second, as an augmentation of bone volumetric density. The peri-implant VOI adapted only by augmenting volumetric density. [source] Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort studyCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 5 2008R. Burkhardt Abstract Aim: To evaluate the healing outcome of soft tissue dehiscence coverage at implant sites. Material and methods: Ten patients with one mucosal recession defect at an implant site and a contralateral unrestored clinical crown without recession were recruited. The soft tissue recessions were surgically covered using a coronally advanced flap in combination with a free connective tissue graft. Healing was studied at 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Results: Soft tissue dehiscences were covered with a coronal overcompensation of the flap margin up to 1.2 mm after the procedure. After 1 month, the coverage shrank to a mean of 75%, after 3 months to 70% and after 6 months to 66%. Conclusions: The implant sites revealed a substantial, clinically significant improvement following coronal mucosal displacement in combination with connective tissue grafting, but in none of the sites, a could complete implant soft tissue dehiscence coverage be achieved. [source] Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiaeCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2007Jo-Young Suh Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a nanostructured calcium coating on the surfaces of blasted Ti implants on peri-implant bone formation in the rabbit tibiae. Material and methods: Threaded implants (3.75 mm in diameter, 6 mm in length) were roughened by hydroxyapatite (HA) blasting (control; blasted implants). The implants were then hydrothermally treated in a Ca-containing solution for 24 h to prepare Ca-incorporated Ti surfaces (experimental; blasted/Ca implants). Surface characterizations were performed by scanning electron microscopy and stylus profilometry before and after Ca coating. Forty-two implants (21 control and 21 experimental) were placed in the proximal tibiae of seven New Zealand White rabbits. Each rabbit received six implants. To evaluate the effects of the nanostructured Ca coating on the peri-implant bone-healing response, removal torque tests and histomorphometric analyses were performed 6 weeks after surgery. Results: The Ca coating did not significantly change the surface properties produced by blasting at the micron level. Histologically, active bone apposition was observed in the blasted/Ca implants in the marrow space. Compared with the blasted implants, the blasted/Ca implants showed significantly increased bone-to-implant contact over the total implant length (P<0.01) and greater mean removal torque values (P<0.05). Discussion and conclusion: The nanostructured, Ca-incorporated surface significantly enhanced the peri-implant bone-healing response of HA-blasted Ti implants. It may be concluded that the use of nanostructured, Ca-coated surfaces may have synergic effects in enhancing osseointegration of blasted Ti implants due to their micron-scaled surface properties and biologically active surface chemistry. [source] Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implantsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 1 2005A 5-year prospective study Abstract Objective: The aim of this 5-year prospective comparative study was to evaluate treatment outcome (survival rate, condition of hard and soft peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction, prosthetic and surgical aftercare) of mandibular overdentures supported by two or four implants. Material and methods: Sixty edentulous patients with a mandibular height between 12 and 18 mm participated. Thirty patients were treated with an overdenture supported by two IMZ implants (group A) and 30 patients were treated with an overdenture supported by four IMZ implants (group B). Standardised clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated 6 weeks after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period. Results: One implant was lost (group A) during the healing period. There were no significant differences with regard to any of the studied clinical or radiographic parameters of the peri-implant tissues between the groups. None of the patients reported sensory disturbances in the lip or chin region. No differences in satisfaction were observed between the groups. With regard to aftercare, there was a tendency of a greater need of prosthetic interventions in group A, while correction of soft-tissue problems was restricted to patients of group B. Conclusion: There is no difference in clinical and radiographical state of patients treated with an overdenture on two or four implants during a 5-year evaluation period. Patients of both groups were as satisfied with their overdentures. Résumé Le but de cette étude comparative et prospective de cinq années a été d'évaluer la guérison (taux de survie, condition des tissus paroïmplantaires mous et durs, satisfaction du patient, prothèse et chirurgie) de prothèses mandibulaires sur deux ou quatre implants. Soixante édentés avec une hauteur mandibulaire entre douze et 18 mm ont participé. Trente patients ont été traités avec une prothèse ancrées sur deux implants IMZ (groupe A) tandis que les trente autres ont été traités avec une prothèse ancrée sur quatre implants IMZ (groupe B). Les paramètres radiographiques et cliniques standards ont étéévalués six semaines après la mise en place de la prothèse et ensuite une, deux, trois, quatre et cinq années après la mise en charge fonctionnelle. Le suivi chirurgical et prothétique a étéévalué durant cette période. Un implant a été perdu dans le groupe A durant la période de guérison. Il n'y avait aucune différence significative en ce qui concerne aucun des paramètres radiographiques et cliniques étudiés des tissus paroïmplantaires entre les deux groupes. Aucun des patients n'a rapporté d'ennuis sensoriels au niveau de la lèvre ou du menton. Aucune différence dans la satisfaction n'a été observée entre les deux groupes. En ce qui concerne le maintien, une nécessité plus importante d'intervention au niveau des prothèses était constatée dans le groupe A tandis que la correction des problèmes des tissus mous n'a dûêtre effectuée que chez les patients du groupe B. Il n'y a donc aucune différence radiographique ou clinique chez les patients traités avec une prothèse ancrée sur deux ou quatre implants durant un suivi de cinq années. Les patients des deux groupes étaient autant satisfaits de leurs prothèses. Zusammenfassung Ziel: Das Ziel dieser prospektiven vergleichenden Studie über 5 Jahre war, das Behandlungsresultat (Ueberlebensrate, Zustand der peri-implantären Hart- und Weichgewebe, Patientenzufriedenheit, prothetische und chirurgische Nachsorge) von Hybridprothesen im Unterkiefer, welche von 2 oder 4 Implantaten getragen werden, zu untersuchen. Material und Methoden: An der Studie nahmen 60 zahnlose Patienten mit einer Unterkieferhöhe zwischen 12 und 18 mm teil. 30 Patienten wurden mit einer Hybridprothese getragen von 2 IMZ Implantaten versorgt (Gruppe A), und 30 Patienten erhielten eine Hybridprothese auf 4 IMZ Implantaten (Gruppe B). Standardisierte klinische und radiologische Parameter wurden 6 Wochen nach Eingliederung der Rekonstruktion und nach 1,2,3,4 und 5 Jahren funktioneller Belastung ausgewertet. Die prothetische und chirurgische Nachsorge wurde während der Beobachtungsperiode aufgezeichnet. Resultate: 1 Implantat ging während der Einheilphase verloren (Gruppe A). Es bestanden keine signifikanten Unterschiede in Bezug auf die untersuchten klinischen und radiologischen Parameter der peri-implantären Gewebe zwischen den zwei Gruppen. Keiner der Patienten beklagte Gefühlsstörungen im Bereich der Lippe oder des Kinns. Zwischen den zwei Gruppen bestanden keine Unterschiede bezüglich Zufriedenheit. Bei der Nachsorge bestand eine Tendenz eines grösseren Bedarfs an prothetischen Interventionen in Gruppe A, während Korrekturen von Weichteilproblemen auf Patienten der Gruppe B beschränkt waren. Schlussfolgerung: Es bestehen keine Unterschiede in den klinischen und radiologischen Befunden bei Patienten, welche für eine Beobachtungsperiode von 5 Jahren mit Hybridprothesen auf 2 oder 4 Implantaten versorgt worden waren. Die Patienten beider Gruppen waren mit ihren Hybridprothesen zufrieden. Resumen Objetivo: La intención de este estudio fue prospectivo comparativo de 5-años fue evaluar los resultados del tratamiento (índice de supervivencia, condiciones de los tejidos duros y blandos periimplantarios, satisfacción del paciente, mantenimiento postquirúrgico y postprotesico) de sobredentaduras mandibulares soportadas por 2 o 4 implantes. Material y Métodos: Participaron 60 pacientes edéntulos con una altura mandibular entre 12 y 18 mm. Se trataron 30 pacientes con una sobredentadura soportada por 2 implantes IMZ (grupo A) y 30 pacientes se trataron con una sobredentadura soportada por 4 implantes IMZ (grupo B). Se evaluaron parámetros clínicos y radiológicos a las 6 semanas tras conclusión del tratamiento protésico y tras 1, 2, 3, 4 y 5 años de carga funcional. Se tomó nota del mantenimiento prostético y quirúrgico durante el periodo de evaluación. Resultados: Se perdió un implante (grupo A) durante el periodo de cicatrización. No hubo diferencias significativas respecto a ninguno de los parámetros clínicos y radiográficos estudiados de los tejidos periimplantarios entre los grupos. Ninguno de los pacientes informó sobre molestias sensoriales en el labio o la región del mentón. No se observaron diferencias entre los grupos respecto a la satisfacción. Respecto al mantenimiento, hubo una tendencia a una mayor necesidad de intervenciones prostéticas en el grupo A, mientras que las correcciones en los tejidos blandos se circunscribieron al grupo B. Conclusiones: No hay diferencias en el estado clínico y radiográfico de los pacientes tratados con una sobredentadura en 2 o 4 implantes durante un periodo de evaluación de 5 años. Los pacientes de ambos grupos estaban satisfechos con sus sobredentaduras. [source]
| | |||||||||