Home About us Contact | |||
Endoscopic Microsurgery (endoscopic + microsurgery)
Kinds of Endoscopic Microsurgery Selected AbstractsTreatment of Laryngeal Carcinomas by Laser Endoscopic Microsurgery ,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 6 2000Pierre R. Moreau MD Abstract Objectives To determine if laser endoscopic microsurgery is a reliable and appropriate approach in the treatment of laryngeal cancers. Study Design Retrospective study of 160 patients treated from 1988 to 1996 at Liège. Analysis of indication, technique, and oncologic results. Methods Glottic tumors were treated with either type I, type II, or type III cordectomy, with or without conservation of an inferior muscular band, and extended if necessary to all or part of the contralateral cord. For supraglottic cancers, an excision limited to a part of the vestibule, a trans-preepiglottic resection, or a radical supraglottic resection was carried out. Results Our corrected actuarial survival at 5 years was 97% for the 98 infiltrative glottic tumors and 100% for the 18 infiltrative supraglottic and 27 in situ carcinomas. No local recurrences were noted, in either the group of 118 infiltrating cancers (in whom two precancerous lesions were treated with a further laser excision), or in the 27 in situ carcinomas. Local control was thus 100%. One patient died of his cancer, with lung metastases after neck recurrence. Conclusions Like Steiner and Rudert, this series demonstrates the oncologic validity of this surgical approach to the treatment of unadvanced glottic tumors. Unlike these authors' study, however, strict case selection, as in cases with significant involvement of the anterior commissure, has allowed us to avoid local recurrences and consequently to avoid salvage total laryngectomies. Our experience with supraglottic cancers is too small to confirm the oncologic validity of this type of surgery but seems promising. [source] A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer,,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2009S. P. Bach Background: The outcome of local excision of early rectal cancer using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) lacks consensus. Screening has substantially increased the early diagnosis of tumours. Patients need local treatments that are oncologically equivalent to radical surgery but safer and functionally superior. Methods: A national database, collated prospectively from 21 regional centres, detailed TEM treatment in 487 subjects with rectal cancer. Data were used to construct a predictive model of local recurrence after TEM using semiparametric survival analyses. The model was internally validated using measures of calibration and discrimination. Results: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 14·9 and 1·4 per cent respectively. The Cox regression model predicted local recurrence with a concordance index of 0·76 using age, depth of tumour invasion, tumour diameter, presence of lymphovascular invasion, poor differentiation and conversion to radical surgery after histopathological examination of the TEM specimen. Conclusion: Patient selection for TEM is frequently governed by fitness for radical surgery rather than suitable tumour biology. TEM can produce long-term outcomes similar to those published for radical total mesorectal excision surgery if applied to a select group of biologically favourable tumours. Conversion to radical surgery based on adverse TEM histopathology appears safe for p T1 and p T2 lesions. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and reliable technique even for complex rectal lesionsBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 7 2008R. J. Darwood Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for the excision of rectal lesions, with lower morbidity and mortality rates than open surgery. Following advances in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and endoscopic mucosal resection, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TEM in the treatment of complex rectal lesions. Methods: All patients were entered into a prospective database. Complex lesions were identified as high (more than 15 cm from anorectal margin), large (maximum dimension over 8 cm), involving two or more rectal quadrants, or recurrent. Results: Seventy-one lesions (13 carcinomas and 58 tubulovillous adenomas) were identified. The median duration of operation was 60 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 30,80) min, with an estimated median blood loss of 0 (i.q.r. 0,10) ml. Median hospital stay was 2 (i.q.r. 1,3) days. One patient developed postoperative urinary retention and one returned with rectal bleeding that did not require further surgery. Two patients developed rectal strictures after operation that were dilated successfully. There was no recurrence of benign lesions during a median follow-up of 21 (i.q.r. 6·5,35) months. Conclusion: TEM is a safe technique with low associated morbidity, even when used to excise complex rectal lesions. As such it remains the treatment of choice for rectal lesions not requiring primary radical resection. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in 143 consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma: results from a Danish multicenter studyCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2009G. Baatrup Abstract Objective, The long-term results are presented on total survival, cancer-specific survival and recurrence in 143 consecutive patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Method, Four Danish centres established in 1995 a database for registration of all TEM procedures. Data were supplemented from pathology reports and death certificates were checked in the Danish patient registry. Data were analysed with multivariance regression and survival analysis. Results, The T stage was as follows: T1 50%, T2 33%, T3 14%, and stage unknown 3%. TEM was performed with curative intent in 43%, for compromise in 52% and for palliation in 5%. Five-year total survival was 66% and 5-year cancer-specific survival 87%. Cancer-specific survival for T1 was 94%. The significant predictors for total survival were age and tumour size. For cancer-specific survival T stage, radical resection, tumour size and recurrence were significant predictors. Eighteen per cent had recurrence and 15% had immediate reoperation. Conclusion, The TEM provides good long-term results for pT1 cancers. In old patients and patients with co-morbidity TEM may provide acceptable long-term results for T2 cancers. Tumours larger than 3 cm should not be treated with TEM for cure. [source] Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision in early rectal cancerCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 6 2007P. G. Doornebosch Abstract Objective, Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard in rectal cancer, if curation is intended. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a much safer technique and seems to have comparable survival in early rectal cancer. The impact of both procedures on quality of life has never been compared. In this study we compared quality of life after TEM and TME. Method, Fifty-four patients underwent TEM for a T1 carcinoma. Only patients without known locoregional or distant recurrences were included, resulting in 36 eligible patients in whom quality of life after TEM was studied. The questionnaires used included the EuroQol EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38. The results were compared with a sex-and age-matched sample of T+N0 rectal cancer patients who had undergone sphincter saving surgery by TME and a sex- and age matched community-based sample of healthy persons. Results, Thirty-one patients after TEM returned completed questionnaires (overall response rate 86%). Quality of life was compared with 31 TME patients and 31 healthy controls. From the patients' and social perspective quality of life did not differ between the three groups. Compared with TEM, significant defecation problems were seen after TME (P < 0.05). A trend towards better sexual functioning after TEM, compared with TME, was seen, especially in male patients, although it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion, Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and TME do not seem to differ in quality of life postoperatively, but defecation disorders are more frequently encountered after TME. This difference could play a role in the choice of surgical therapy in (early) rectal cancer. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions. [source] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the preferred technique in a small but important group of rectal neoplasmsCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2006Najib Haboubi No abstract is available for this article. [source] Analysis of national database for TEM resected rectal cancerCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2006S. Bach Objective:, Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive alternative to rectal resection for cancer. Patients benefit from rapid recovery, excellent function and stoma avoidance. Method:, The national TEM database has prospectively collated data from 21 centres since 1993. Details of preoperative evaluation, neoadjuvant therapy, technical aspects of surgery, postoperative complications, pathological staging, salvage, recurrence and survival have been recorded for 454 patients with rectal cancer, median follow-up 35 months. Results:, Intention was curative in 69%, for compromise in 22% and palliative in 5%. The morbidity and mortality of TEM was 17.2% and 1.5%. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 8% of cases. Pathological staging: pT0 (1.8%), pT1 (52.9%), pT2 (32.8%), pT3 (9.9%) and pTx (3.1%). Margin positivity (< 1 mm) occurred in 20%; this was markedly stage dependent. 18 per cent received adjuvant radiotherapy while 13% progressed to major surgery. 5-year disease free survival was 77% pT1, 74% pT2 and 35% pT3 with local recurrence rates of 20%, 25% and 59% respectively. Age (P = 0.01), tumour area (P = 0.02) and pT stage (P = 0.07) predicted for relapse (Cox regression model). Conclusion:, TEM offers a safe alternative to major surgery curing three quarters of patients with pT1 disease. Although classical surgery must remain the standard of care we envisage future studies of TEM combined with adjuvant therapy. [source] Endoscopic transanal resection of rectal tumours using a urological resectoscope , still has a role in selected patientsCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 1 2005G. C. Beattie Abstract Introduction Transanal resection of rectal villous adenomas or adenocarcinomas can be carried out using various modalities such as operative excision, fulguration, laser coagulation or cryotherapy. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is currently not widely available. Transanal resection can provide effective palliation for locally advanced rectal tumours in patients unfit for abdomino-perineal excision of rectum. A urological resectoscope can be safely and repeatedly used to resect advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal rumours by colorectal surgeons with urological expertise. This study reports our experience of treating rectal lesions with endoscopic transanal resection (ETAR) using the urological resectoscope. Methods Patients were identified from one surgeons' prospectively collected operating data. Charts were retrieved and reviewed. Results Over a 13-year period a total of 43 ETAR procedures were carried out in 20 patients (11 males; mean age 74 years; range 54,92 years) using the urological resectoscope. Twelve (60%) patients had a single resection; 8 (40%) patients required more than one resection; the mean number of procedures per patient was 2.2 (range1,8). The median interval between resections for recurrent disease (excluding planned repeat resections) was 340 days (range 168,2337 days). Histopathology revealed rectal adenoma (with varying degrees of dysplasia) in 11 (55%) patients and adenocarcinoma in 9 (45%). The majority (30; 70%) of resections were carried out in patients with benign disease, with 13 (30%) in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Mean operating time per resection was 25 min. Thirteen (30%) resections were carried out under spinal anaesthetic. There was no procedure related mortality. There were no cases of haemorrhage, rectal perforation, ,TUR syndrome' or pelvic sepsis. No patients with benign disease subsequently developed an invasive carcinoma. Conclusions Accepting that this technique provides limited histopathological information regarding extent of resection and tumour clearance, our experience demonstrates that ETAR of rectal tumours using the urological resectoscope can provide a minimally invasive, effective and safe means of treating and palliating patients with benign and malignant rectal disease. There remains a place for this technique in selected patients. [source] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery , lessons from a single UK centre seriesCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 6 2002G. M. Lloyd Abstract Objectives Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), a minimally invasive technique has been employed in the excision of benign and selected malignant rectal tumours since 1983. We present a single surgeon's series of 102 procedures. Patients and methods A retrospective case note review of 102 procedures performed over a 6-year period between 1996 and 2001. Results One hundred and two TEM procedures were performed on 100 patients. 68 for adenomas, 19 potentially curative excisions for carcinoma, 13 palliative procedures for advanced carcinoma and 2 for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). Four adenomas recurred and were successfully treated by various procedures. None went on to develop malignancy, or a further recurrence. Of the cancers, six T1 and 10 T2 were excised with curative intent. Three T3 cancers were excised before endorectal ultrasound was available in the unit and went on to have definitive procedures. One T1 and two T2 carcinomas were not completely histologically excised. These patients were offered definitive procedure and there have been no recurrences. 11 patients underwent palliative TEM procedures, 2 went on to have a recurrence of symptoms. Both underwent a successful second TEM procedure. Conclusions Although longer term follow up is still required, TEM appears to be an effective method of excising benign tumours and T1 carcinomas of the rectum. The role of TEM in the treatment of T2 carcinomas is, as yet, unclear and needs further evaluation although the results of our series and others are encouraging. [source] |