Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Endodontic Surgery (endodontic + surgery)
Selected AbstractsApical surgery of a maxillary molar creating a maxillary sinus window using ultrasonics: a clinical caseINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 11 2010B. García García B, Peñarrocha M, Peñarrocha MA, von Arx T. Apical surgery of a maxillary molar creating a maxillary sinus window using ultrasonics: a clinical case. International Endodontic Journal, 43, 1054,1061, 2010. Abstract Aim, To describe a method of carrying out apical surgery of a maxillary molar using ultrasonics to create a lateral sinus window into the maxillary sinus and an endoscope to enhance visibility during surgery. Summary, A 37-year-old female patient presented with tenderness to percussion of the maxillary second right molar. Root canal treatment had been undertaken, and the tooth restored with a metal-ceramic crown. Radiological examination revealed an apical radiolucency in close proximity to the maxillary sinus. Apical surgery of the molar was performed through the maxillary sinus, using ultrasonics for the osteotomy, creating a window in the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus. During surgery, the lining of the sinus was exposed and elevated without perforation. The root-end was resected using a round tungsten carbide drill, and the root-end cavity was prepared with ultrasonic retrotips. Root-end filling was accomplished with MTA®. An endoscope was used to examine the cut root face, the prepared cavity and the root-end filling. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, the tooth had no clinical signs or symptoms, and the radiograph demonstrated progressing resolution of the radiolucency. Key learning points ,,When conventional root canal retreatment cannot be performed or has failed, apical surgery may be considered, even in maxillary molars with roots in close proximity to the maxillary sinus. ,,Ultrasonic sinus window preparation allows more control and can minimize perforation of the sinus membrane when compared with conventional rotary drilling techniques. ,,The endoscope enhances visibility during endodontic surgery, thus improving the quality of the case. [source] Commentary by Bun San Chong Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB (2003) A prospective clinical study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery.INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 5 2009International Endodontic Journal 3 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Co-production of vascular endothelial cadherin and inducible nitric oxide synthase by endothelial cells in periapical granulomaINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 3 2006S. Hama Abstract Aim, To clarify the mechanisms of inflammatory cell migration in human periapical granulomas by examining vascular endothelial (VE) cadherin and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-producing cells. Methodology, Periapical tissues were obtained from patients during endodontic surgery and were divided into two portions. After fixing the tissues with acetone or 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, 5- ,m-thick paraffin or cryostat sections were prepared, respectively. The paraffin sections of the inflamed tissues were evaluated histologically with haematoxylin,eosin stains. Cryostat sections of the tissue, diagnosed as periapical granulomas, were then examined by either immunohistochemistry using anti-human VE-cadherin or iNOS antibodies (Abs) for the characterization of infiltrating cells. In addition, co-localization of VE-cadherin and iNOS production was also analysed by two-colour immunofluorescence image analysis. Results, Endothelial cells were strongly stained with iNOS Abs. Macrophages, lymphocytes, polymorphonuclear leucocytes and fibroblasts also exhibited iNOS production. These iNOS-positive cells accumulated around the blood vessels. On the other hand, VE-cadherin production was exhibited in only endothelial cells. Two-colour immunofluorescence image analysis using VE-cadherin and iNOS Abs demonstrated that iNOS-producing endothelial cells also showed VE-cadherin production. Conclusions, Vascular endothelial-cadherin produced by endothelial cells could be regulated by iNOS-producing cells in periapical granulomas and might play a pivotal role in vascular permeability. [source] Resolution of persistent periapical infection by endodontic surgeryINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 1 2004F. B. A. Ferreira Abstract Aim, To examine the surfaces of a root tip removed during surgical endodontic treatment for the presence of microorganisms. Summary, The present clinical case illustrates an endodontic retreatment of a maxillary premolar tooth with a fistula and periapical reaction. The case was under treatment for 1 year, during which an intracanal medicament was replaced several times. As the lesion did not decrease and exudate was persistent through the fistula and root canal, root end resection with root end filling was performed. Microbiological samples were collected from the fistula, where Propionibacterium acnes, a species associated with endodontic failures, was detected by appropriate anaerobic technique. The resected root apex was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which revealed cocci and fungal forms surrounding one of the foramina. After 12 months, the periapical lesion had reduced. Key learning points ,,Persistent extraradicular infections are not affected by the action of antimicrobial agents such as irrigants and medicaments used during root canal treatment. ,,Apical surgery is a suitable alternative for definitive removal of an established refractory infection, promoting repair of difficult cases. [source] A prospective clinical study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgeryINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 8 2003B. S. Chong Abstract Aim, To assess the success rate of the root-end filling material, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Methodology, Referred adult patients were recruited using strict entry criteria and randomly allocated to receive MTA or IRM. A standardized surgical technique was employed: the root end was resected perpendicularly and a root-end cavity was prepared ultrasonically and filled. A radiograph taken immediately after surgery was compared with those taken at 12 and 24 months. Customised film holders and the paralleling technique were used; radiographs were assessed by two trained observers using agreed criteria. The results from 122 patients (58 in IRM group, 64 in MTA group) after 12 months and 108 patients (47 in IRM group, 61 in MTA group) for the 24-month review period were analysed using the ,2 test. Results, The highest number of teeth with complete healing at both times was observed when MTA was used. When the numbers of teeth with complete and incomplete (scar) healing, and those with uncertain and unsatisfactory healing were combined, the success rate for MTA was higher (84% after 12 months, 92% after 24 months) compared with IRM (76% after 12 months, 87% after 24 months). However, statistical analysis showed no significant difference in success between materials (P > 0.05) at both 12 and 24 months. Conclusions, In this study, the use of MTA as a root-end filling material resulted in a high success rate that was not significantly better than that obtained using IRM. [source] Magnification devices for endodontic therapyAUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, Issue 4 2009M Del Fabbro Background:, After the introduction of microsurgical principles in endodontics, involving new techniques for root canal treatment, there has been a continuous search for enhancing the visualization of the surgical field. It would be interesting to know if the technical advantages for the operator brought in by magnification devices like surgical microscope, endoscope and magnifying loupes, are also associated with advantages for the patient, in terms of improvement of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Objectives:, The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the effects of endodontic treatment performed with the aid of magnification devices versus endodontic treatment without magnification devices. We also aimed at comparing among them the different magnification devices used in endodontics (microscope, endoscope, magnifying loupes). Search strategy:, The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched with appropriate search strategies. Handsearching included nine dental journals. The bibliographies of relevant clinical trials and relevant articles were checked for identifying studies outside the handsearched journals. Seven manufacturers of instruments in the field of endodontics and/or endodontic surgery, as well as the authors of the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were contacted in order to identify unpublished or ongoing RCTs. There were no language restrictions. The last electronic search was conducted on 2nd April 2009, and the last handsearching was undertaken on 31st January 2009. Selection criteria:, All randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing endodontic therapy performed with or without using one or more types of magnification device, as well as randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing two or more magnification devices used as an adjunct to endodontic therapy were considered. Data collection and analysis:, Screening of studies and data extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were to be followed for data synthesis. Main results:, No trial could be included in the present review. All of the prospective trials that were identified, all dealing with endodontic surgery, had to be excluded for various reasons. Only one RCT was identified comparing three magnificators (magnifying loupes, surgical microscope, endoscope) in endodontic surgery. No RCT was found that compared the outcome of endodontic therapy using or without using a given magnification device. Authors' conclusions:, No objective conclusion can be drawn from the results of this review as no article was identified in the current literature that satisfied the criteria for inclusion. It is unknown if and how the type of magnification device affects the treatment outcome, considering the high number of factors that may have a significant impact on the success of endodontic surgical procedure. This should be investigated by further long-term RCTs with large sample size. Technical advantages of magnificators have been widely reported in low evidence level studies, but they should be systematically addressed to know if there can be the clinical indication for using a given magnification device for specific clinical situations, such as for molar teeth, or if they can all be used interchangeably. Well-designed RCTs should also be performed to determine the true difference in terms of treatment success rates between using or not using a magnification device in both conventional and surgical endodontic treatment, if any exist. Plain language summary:, Magnification devices for endodontic therapy. There are no data to draw a sound conclusion on the effect of adopting either a microscope, an endoscope, or magnifying loupes for better visualization in endodontic therapy, in terms of clinical outcomes. Though the use of magnification devices has often been associated with technical advantages for the operator and with an improved management of the root canal due to a better visualization of the operative field, it still has to be demonstrated that their use may lead to an improved treatment success rate. More long-term well-designed randomized trials with a large sample size are urgently needed to address the issues of the present review. [source] Comparative SEM study of the marginal adaptation of white and grey MTA and Portland cementAUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 1 2007Maryam Bidar dds Abstract The use of a suitable substance that prevents egress of potential contaminants into the periapical tissues is important in endodontic surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the marginal adaptation of three root-end filling materials (white mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), grey MTA and Portland cement), using scanning electron microscopy. Seventy-five single-rooted extracted human teeth were used. The canals were instrumented and filled with gutta-percha. Following root-end resection and cavity preparation, root-end cavities were filled with white MTA, grey MTA or Portland cement. Using a diamond saw, roots were longitudinally sectioned into two halves. Under scanning electron microscopy, the gaps between the material and dentinal wall were measured. The data were analysed using Kruskal,Wallis test. The mean of the gap in grey MTA, white MTA and Portland cement was 211.6, 349 and 326.3 µm, respectively. The results indicate that the gap between grey MTA and the dentinal wall is less than other materials, but there was no significant difference between the materials tested in this study (P > 0.05). [source] | ||||||||||