Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Emergency Patients (emergency + patient)
Selected AbstractsOutcomes After Intravenous Opioids in Emergency Patients: A Prospective Cohort AnalysisACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 6 2009Alec B. O'Connor MD Abstract Objectives:, Pain management continues to be suboptimal in emergency departments (EDs). Several studies have documented failures in the processes of care, such as whether opioid analgesics were given. The objectives of this study were to measure the outcomes following administration of intravenous (IV) opioids and to identify clinical factors that may predict poor analgesic outcomes in these patients. Methods:, In this prospective cohort study, emergency patients were enrolled if they were prescribed IV morphine or hydromorphone (the most commonly used IV opioids in the study hospital) as their initial analgesic. Patients were surveyed at the time of opioid administration and 1 to 2 hours after the initial opioid dosage. They scored their pain using a verbal 0,10 pain scale. The following binary analgesic variables were primarily used to identify patients with poor analgesic outcomes: 1) a pain score reduction of less than 50%, 2) a postanalgesic pain score of 7 or greater (using the 0,10 numeric rating scale), and 3) the development of opioid-related side effects. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the effects of demographic, clinical, and treatment covariates on the outcome variables. Results:, A total of 2,414 were approached for enrollment, of whom 1,312 were ineligible (658 were identified more than 2 hours after IV opioid was administered and 341 received another analgesic before or with the IV opioid) and 369 declined to consent. A total of 691 patients with a median baseline pain score of 9 were included in the final analyses. Following treatment, 57% of the cohort failed to achieve a 50% pain score reduction, 36% had a pain score of 7 or greater, 48% wanted additional analgesics, and 23% developed opioid-related side effects. In the logistic regression analyses, the factors associated with poor analgesia (both <50% pain score reduction and postanalgesic pain score of ,7) were the use of long-acting opioids at home, administration of additional analgesics, provider concern for drug-seeking behavior, and older age. An initial pain score of 10 was also strongly associated with a postanalgesic pain score of ,7. African American patients who were not taking opioids at home were less likely to achieve a 50% pain score reduction than other patients, despite receiving similar initial and total equianalgesic dosages. None of the variables we assessed were significantly associated with the development of opioid-related side effects. Conclusions:, Poor analgesic outcomes were common in this cohort of ED patients prescribed IV opioids. Patients taking long-acting opioids, those thought to be drug-seeking, older patients, those with an initial pain score of 10, and possibly African American patients are at especially high risk of poor analgesia following IV opioid administration. [source] A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact on an Emergency Response System on Anxiety and Health Care Use among Older Emergency Patients after a FallACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2007Jacques S. Lee MD Abstract Objectives: Personal emergency response systems (PERSs) are reported to reduce anxiety and health care use and may assist in planning the disposition of older patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) to home. This study measured the impact of a PERS on anxiety, fear of falling, and subsequent health care use among older ED patients. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial comparing PERS use with standard ED discharge planning in subjects 70 years of age or older discharged home after a fall. Outcome assessors were blinded to the study objectives. Anxiety and fear of falling were measured at baseline and 30 days using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and modified Falls Efficacy Scale (mFES). Return to the ED, hospitalization, and length of stay were recorded after 30 and 60 days. Results: Eighty-six subjects were randomized and completed follow up (43 per group). There was no important difference in mean reduction in anxiety (mean change treatment , control, +0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] =,1.5 to 0.76; p = 0.55) or fear of falling (mean change, +4.5; 95% CI =,6.7 to 15.7; p = 0.70). Return visits to the ED occurred in eight of 43 patients in both the control and treatment groups (risk difference, 0.0%; 95% CI =,16% to 16%). Hospitalization occurred in six of 43 in the control group versus three of 43 in the treatment group (risk difference treatment , control =,7.0%; 95% CI =,19.8% to 5.9%). Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, there was no evidence that a PERS reduced anxiety, fear of falling, or return to the ED among older persons discharged from the ED. [source] Scandinavian clinical practice guidelines on general anaesthesia for emergency situationsACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2010A. G. JENSEN Emergency patients need special considerations and the number and severity of complications from general anaesthesia can be higher than during scheduled procedures. Guidelines are therefore needed. The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine appointed a working group to develop guidelines based on literature searches to assess evidence, and a consensus meeting was held. Consensus opinion was used in the many topics where high-grade evidence was unavailable. The recommendations include the following: anaesthesia for emergency patients should be given by, or under very close supervision by, experienced anaesthesiologists. Problems with the airway and the circulation must be anticipated. The risk of aspiration must be judged for each patient. Pre-operative gastric emptying is rarely indicated. For pre-oxygenation, either tidal volume breathing for 3 min or eight deep breaths over 60 s and oxygen flow 10 l/min should be used. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patients should be performed in the head-up position. The use of cricoid pressure is not considered mandatory, but can be used on individual judgement. The hypnotic drug has a minor influence on intubation conditions, and should be chosen on other grounds. Ketamine should be considered in haemodynamically compromised patients. Opioids may be used to reduce the stress response following intubation. For optimal intubation conditions, succinylcholine 1,1.5 mg/kg is preferred. Outside the operation room, rapid sequence intubation is also considered the safest method. For all patients, precautions to avoid aspiration and other complications must also be considered at the end of anaesthesia. [source] A New Diagnosis Grouping System for Child Emergency Department VisitsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2 2010Evaline A. Alessandrini MD Abstract Objectives:, A clinically sensible system of grouping diseases is needed for describing pediatric emergency diagnoses for research and reporting. This project aimed to create an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-based diagnosis grouping system (DGS) for child emergency department (ED) visits that is 1) clinically sensible with regard to how diagnoses are grouped and 2) comprehensive in accounting for nearly all diagnoses (>95%). The second objective was to assess the construct validity of the DGS by examining variation in the frequency of targeted groups of diagnoses within the concepts of season, age, sex, and hospital type. Methods:, A panel of general and pediatric emergency physicians used the nominal group technique and Delphi surveys to create the DGS. The primary data source used to develop the DGS was the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Core Data Project (PCDP). Results:, A total of 3,041 ICD-9 codes, accounting for 98.9% of all diagnoses in the PCDP, served as the basis for creation of the DGS. The expert panel developed a DGS framework representing a clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric emergency patients. The resulting DGS has 21 major groups and 77 subgroups and accounts for 96.5% to 99% of diagnoses when applied to three external data sets. Variations in the frequency of targeted groups of diagnoses related to seasonality, age, sex, and site of care confirm construct validity. Conclusions:, The DGS offers a clinically sensible method for describing pediatric ED visits by grouping ICD-9 codes in a consensus-derived classification scheme. This system may be used for research, reporting, needs assessment, and resource planning. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:204,213 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] Follow-up to a Federally Qualified Health Center and Subsequent Emergency Department UtilizationACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2010Tara M. Scherer MD Abstract Objectives:, Determine if 1) proximity of referral to a federally qualified health center (FQHC) improves initial follow-up rates for discharged emergency patients, 2) improved initial follow-up rates are associated with improved rates for an "ongoing relationship" with the FQHC, and 3) an ongoing relationship with an FQHC is associated with decreased subsequent emergency department (ED) utilization over a 2-year follow-up period. Methods:, An expedited referral system was initiated just prior to January 2004 for discharged ED patients referred to an FQHC. Referral categories were as follows: R1 = next-day; R2 = 2 to 7 days; R3 = 2 to 3 weeks; and R4 = follow-up as needed. The FQHC database for 2004,2006 was merged with the ED database from 2004 through 2006. The FQHC database contained all ED referrals, the referral category, whether the patient kept his or her initial ED referral appointment, all subsequent scheduled clinic appointments, and whether the patient kept any of the subsequent scheduled appointments. We compared initial referral follow-up rates and subsequent scheduled visits to the FQHC for each referral category, over a 2-year follow-up period. We evaluated the effects of age, sex, marital status, insurance status, initial triage score, race, comorbidities, and number of prescription medications on initial follow-up, and subsequent kept appointments with the FQHC. We defined an "ongoing relationship" as one or more kept scheduled appointments annually. Finally, we compared the number of subsequent ED visits over the follow-up period between patients who maintained an ongoing relationship with the FQHC and those who did not, before and after correcting for the demographic and clinical factors. Results:, There were 520 referrals over the study period. Follow-up rates ranged from 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.5% to 69.6%) for R1 to 9.0% (95% CI = 4.4% to 17.0%) for R4. The overall ongoing relationship rate was 7.1% (95% CI = 5.2% to 9.7%) and had weak association with temporal proximity of referral. On bivariate analysis, older age, female sex, white race, one or more comorbidities, and three or more medications were associated with increased rates of initial follow-up. These factors (with the exception of race) were also associated with increased rates of developing an ongoing relationship. Patients with an ongoing relationship with the FQHC had more repeat ED visits over the study period than did patients without (3.6 vs. 1.7, p = 0.003). However, this difference was no longer evident after adjusting for age, race, comorbidities, and medication usage. Conclusions:, Overall patient follow-up to an FQHC was low, but increased with next-day or same-week referral. The ongoing relationship rate was low, but increased with temporal proximity of ED referral. Increased comorbidities and medication usage were significantly associated with increased initial follow-up rates, development of an ongoing relationship, and subsequent ED utilization. Patients with an ongoing relationship with the FQHC had higher ED utilization over the 2-year follow-up period, likely due to a higher rate of comorbidities. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:55,62 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an updateACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2005E. Søreide Liberal pre-operative fasting routines have been implemented in most countries. In general, clear fluids are allowed up to 2 h before anaesthesia, and light meals up to 6 h. The same recommendations apply for children and pregnant women not in labour. In children <6 months, most recommendations now allow breast- or formula milk feeding up to 4 h before anaesthesia. Recently, the concept of pre-operative oral nutrition using a special carbohydrate-rich beverage has also gained support and been shown not to increase gastric fluid volume or acidity. Based on the available literature, our Task Force has produced new consensus-based Scandinavian guidelines for pre-operative fasting. What is still not clear is to what extent the new liberal fasting routines should apply to patients with functional dyspepsia or systematic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Other still controversial areas include the need for and effect of fasting in emergency patients, women in labour and in association with procedures done under ,deep sedation'. We think more research on the effect of various fasting regimes in subpopulations of patients is needed before we can move one step further towards completely evidence-based pre-operative fasting guidelines. [source] Prehospital management of diabetic emergencies , a population-based intervention studyACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2003A. Holstein Background: Diabetes-related emergencies are frequent and potentially life-threatening. A study was performed to obtain reliable data about the prevalence of diabetic emergencies and to improve the quality of prehospital care of patients with diabetes-related emergencies. Methods: A prospective population-based study in a German emergency medical service district in the period from 1997 to 2000 was conducted. After initial diabetes training for the entire emergency team, a standardized protocol was introduced for prehospital emergency therapy of severe hypoglycaemia (SH) and severe hyperglycaemic disorders. A rapid blood glucose test was performed on all emergency patients with the exception of resuscitations and deaths. Indicators of treatment quality before and after these interventions were compared. Results: A rapid blood glucose test was performed in 6631 (85%) of the 7804 emergencies that occurred during the period investigated. The prevalence of acute diabetic complications was 3.1%, and 213 cases of SH and 29 severe hyperglycaemic disorders were recorded. Education of the emergency team led to a significant improvement in the quality of treatment. Larger volumes of iv 40% glucose solution (50 ± 20 ml (1997,2000) vs. 25 ± 17 ml (1993,96); P < 0.0001) were administered to patients with SH. Insulin-treated patients who were well educated about their diabetes were more often treated only at the emergency scene, after SH (25% vs. 8%; P = 0.007), and without complications. In 50 patients who experienced sulfonylurea-induced SH, the mandatory additional glucose infusions and hospitalization for further observation reduced mortality from 4.9% to 0% (P = 0.2). Conclusion: Training of the emergency team is an effective and efficient intervention to improve quality of treatment and prognosis outcome for patients with diabetic emergencies. Treatment of SH at the emergency scene only was demonstrated to be safe in type 1 diabetic patients who had previously received structured patient education. [source] Radiological validation of tracheal tube insertion depth in out-of-hospital and in-hospital emergency patientsANAESTHESIA, Issue 9 2009W. Geisser Summary We performed a 5-year, retrospective study using records of 1081 patients admitted to the trauma emergency room at a University Hospital to investigate the occurrence of tracheal tube malpositioning after emergency intubation in both the inpatient and outpatient settings, using chest radiographs and CT scans in the trauma emergency room. Prehospital patients and inpatients referred from peripheral hospitals were compared. This study showed that tracheal tube misplacements occur with an incidence of 18.2%, of which almost a third (5.7%) were placed in a main bronchus. We further show that tracheal intubation in emergency patients approximates the misplacement rates in the prehospital or in-hospital settings. We speculate that the skill level of the operator may be critical in determining the success of tracheal intubation. Based on our findings, all efforts should be made to verify the tube position with immediate radiographic confirmation after admission to the emergency room. [source] Anaesthesia in haemodynamically compromised emergency patients: does ketamine represent the best choice of induction agent?ANAESTHESIA, Issue 5 2009C. Morris Summary In rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in the emergency setting in shocked or hypotensive patients (e.g. ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, polytrauma or septic shock), prior resuscitation is often suboptimal and comorbidities (particularly cardiovascular) may be extensive. The induction agents with the most favourable pharmacological properties conferring haemodynamic stability appear to be ketamine and etomidate. However, etomidate has been withdrawn from use in some countries and impairs steroidogenesis. Ketamine has been traditionally contra-indicated in the presence of brain injury, but we argue in this review that any adverse effects of the drug on intracranial pressure or cerebral blood flow are in fact attenuated or reversed by controlled ventilation, subsequent anaesthesia and the greater general haemodynamic stability conferred by the drug. Ketamine represents a very rational choice for rapid sequence induction in haemodynamically compromised patients. [source] Outcomes After Intravenous Opioids in Emergency Patients: A Prospective Cohort AnalysisACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 6 2009Alec B. O'Connor MD Abstract Objectives:, Pain management continues to be suboptimal in emergency departments (EDs). Several studies have documented failures in the processes of care, such as whether opioid analgesics were given. The objectives of this study were to measure the outcomes following administration of intravenous (IV) opioids and to identify clinical factors that may predict poor analgesic outcomes in these patients. Methods:, In this prospective cohort study, emergency patients were enrolled if they were prescribed IV morphine or hydromorphone (the most commonly used IV opioids in the study hospital) as their initial analgesic. Patients were surveyed at the time of opioid administration and 1 to 2 hours after the initial opioid dosage. They scored their pain using a verbal 0,10 pain scale. The following binary analgesic variables were primarily used to identify patients with poor analgesic outcomes: 1) a pain score reduction of less than 50%, 2) a postanalgesic pain score of 7 or greater (using the 0,10 numeric rating scale), and 3) the development of opioid-related side effects. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the effects of demographic, clinical, and treatment covariates on the outcome variables. Results:, A total of 2,414 were approached for enrollment, of whom 1,312 were ineligible (658 were identified more than 2 hours after IV opioid was administered and 341 received another analgesic before or with the IV opioid) and 369 declined to consent. A total of 691 patients with a median baseline pain score of 9 were included in the final analyses. Following treatment, 57% of the cohort failed to achieve a 50% pain score reduction, 36% had a pain score of 7 or greater, 48% wanted additional analgesics, and 23% developed opioid-related side effects. In the logistic regression analyses, the factors associated with poor analgesia (both <50% pain score reduction and postanalgesic pain score of ,7) were the use of long-acting opioids at home, administration of additional analgesics, provider concern for drug-seeking behavior, and older age. An initial pain score of 10 was also strongly associated with a postanalgesic pain score of ,7. African American patients who were not taking opioids at home were less likely to achieve a 50% pain score reduction than other patients, despite receiving similar initial and total equianalgesic dosages. None of the variables we assessed were significantly associated with the development of opioid-related side effects. Conclusions:, Poor analgesic outcomes were common in this cohort of ED patients prescribed IV opioids. Patients taking long-acting opioids, those thought to be drug-seeking, older patients, those with an initial pain score of 10, and possibly African American patients are at especially high risk of poor analgesia following IV opioid administration. [source] Geriatric Emergency Medicine Educational Module: Abdominal Pain in the Older AdultACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2009Lowell Gerson The Society for Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Geriatrics Task Force has created an instructional tool to address the complaint of abdominal pain in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). This is the first module in a comprehensive, web-based geriatric emergency medicine curriculum that will address common syndromes in older adults presenting to the ED. There is no formal, residency-based curriculum in geriatric emergency medicine and there is a paucity of geriatric Continuing Medical Education (CME) opportunities for practicing emergency physicians. The amount, quality, and convenience of geriatrics training available to emergency physicians is insufficient. This educational gap is particularly concerning given the ever-growing volume of older adult emergency patients. The Task Force chose to focus first on geriatric abdominal pain because a survey of emergency physicians in the mid 1990s found that it is one of the most difficult complaints to evaluate and manage. The module comprises of six clinical cases with a pre- and post-test. Together, these cases encompass the broad differential diagnosis for geriatric abdominal pain and the core medical knowledge pertaining to the subject. The modules will expose the learner, through either content or modeling, to the six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies and to the Principles of Geriatric Emergency Medicine including rapid evaluation of functional status, communication skills, and consideration of the effect of polypharmacy and co-morbidity on the presenting complaint. This module will be available to residency programs as an "asynchronous educational session" via the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) website as well as to practicing emergency physicians via the SAEM and American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) websites. [source] Revised Pediatric Emergency Assessment Tool (RePEAT): A Severity Index for Pediatric Emergency CareACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 4 2007MSCE, Marc H. Gorelick MD Abstract Objectives: To develop and validate a multivariable model, using information available at the time of patient triage, to predict the level of care provided to pediatric emergency patients for use as a severity of illness measure. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 5,521 children 18 years of age or younger treated at four emergency departments (EDs) over a 12-month period. Data were obtained from abstraction of patient records. Logistic regression was used to develop (75% of sample) and validate (25% of sample) models to predict any nonroutine diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in the ED and admission to the hospital. Data on ED length of stay and hospital costs were also obtained. Results: Eight predictor variables were included in the final models: presenting complaint, age, triage acuity category, arrival by emergency medical services, current use of prescription medications, and three triage vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature). The resulting models had adequate goodness of fit in both derivation and validation samples. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 for the ED intervention model and 0.85 for the admission model. The Revised Pediatric Emergency Assessment Tool (RePEAT) score was then calculated as the sum of the predicted probability of receiving intervention and twice the predicted probability of admission. The RePEAT score had a significant univariate association with ED costs (r= 0.44) and with ED length of stay (r= 0.27) and contributed significantly to the fit of multivariable models comparing these outcomes across sites. Conclusions: The RePEAT score accurately predicts level of care provided for pediatric emergency patients and may provide a useful means of risk adjustment when benchmarking outcomes. [source] | ||||||||||