			Home About us Contact

Elephant Densities (elephant + density)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Elephants and water provision: what are the management links?

DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, Issue 6 2007
I. P. J. Smit
ABSTRACT In a recent paper we demonstrated that elephant bull groups and mixed herds exhibited spatial and resource segregation across the Kruger National Park. It was found, inter alia, that both bull groups and mixed herds occurred more frequently closer to rivers than expected if they were randomly distributed, but that only bull groups occurred more frequently closer to the artificial waterholes. Although Chamaillé-Jammes et al. (2007) accepted these results, they disagreed with our interpretation regarding the potential effect that closure of artificial waterholes might have. Here we address some of the specific concerns expressed and provide a broader context regarding water provision and elephant management. Although water provision can influence elephant density and distribution, we argue that the effectiveness of surface-water manipulation as a management tool will depend on (1) natural surface-water availability, (2) forage quality, (3) elephant densities, (4) position of a population on its growth trajectory, and (5) management objectives. Even though elephants are water-dependent, the effectiveness of water provision as a management tool will therefore be area- and population-specific and will depend on management objectives. [source]

Managing heterogeneity in elephant distribution: interactions between elephant population density and surface-water availability

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2007
SIMON CHAMAILLÉ-JAMMES
Summary 1Concerns over the ecological impacts of high African elephant Loxodonta africana densities suggest that it may be necessary to control their numbers locally, although the best management approach is still widely debated. Artificial water supply is believed to be a major cause of local overabundance, and could be used as a potential tool to regulate elephant distribution and impact across landscapes, but its effect on elephants at the population scale has never been studied. 2We assessed how dry-season surface-water availability constrained the distribution of an entire elephant population, using aerial and waterhole census data from Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. The study was initiated in 1986, when the population was released from culling. We studied how artificial waterholes, holding water throughout the dry season, and vegetation production, estimated from a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), influenced the long-term distribution of elephant densities. We also investigated how the elephant distribution responded to changes in population density and annual rainfall, a driver of surface-water availability. 3Long-term dry-season elephant densities across the park tended to increase with vegetation production, and increased asymptotically with the density of artificial waterholes. 4Since the culling stopped, dry-season elephant densities have increased in most areas of the park, except in areas of low vegetation production and low water availability. Interannual fluctuations in elephant distribution are linked to rainfall variability through its effect on surface-water availability. During dry years elephants concentrated in areas where artificial pumping maintained surface-water availability during the dry season. 5During dry years elephant numbers at waterholes increased because of reduced surface-water availability, and elephants were distributed more evenly across waterholes, although active waterholes were unevenly distributed across the park. 6Synthesis and applications. Surface-water availability drives the distribution and abundance of elephants within Hwange National Park, and therefore appears to be at the heart of the trade-off between elephant conservation and the extent of their impact on ecosystems. Artificial manipulation of surface water is one of the tools available for the management of elephant populations and should not be overlooked when considering options for controlling elephant numbers in places where they are considered to be overabundant. [source]

Reproductive evaluation of elephants culled in Kruger National Park, South Africa between 1975 and 1995

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
Elizabeth W. Freeman
Abstract To reduce elephant densities and preserve biological diversity, 14,629 elephants were culled from Kruger National Park, South Africa (1967,1999). Data were catalogued between 1975 and 1996 on 2737 male and female elephants, including pregnancy and lactational status for 1620 females (,5 years of age) and, uterine and/or ovarian characteristics for 1279. This study used these data to investigate the effects of age and precipitation on reproduction. The youngest age of conception was 8 years (n = 6) and by 12 years of age all females were sexually mature. From the age of 14 years, the percentage of reproductively active females (pregnant and/or lactating) was >90%; however, this percentage declined when females reached 50 years of age. Overall, one-tenth of females were nonreproductive (not pregnant or lactating) at any given time, mostly in the youngest (<15 years) and oldest (>50 years) age classes. Eighteen (3.3%) of the nonpregnant females had reproductive tract pathologies, including endometrial, uterine or ovarian cysts. There was a seasonal distribution of mating activity that correlated with the rainy season. As has been demonstrated in other populations of free-ranging African elephants, most of the females in Kruger National Park were reproductively active; however, age and climate affected reproductive activity. Résumé Pour réduire la densité des éléphants et préserver la diversité biologique, 14.629 éléphants ont été abattus dans le Parc National Kruger, en Afrique du Sud, entre 1967 et 1999. Des données ont été recueillies entre 1975 et 1999, sur 2 737 éléphants mâles et femelles, y compris le statut de gestation ou de lactation de 1 620 femelles (,5 ans) et les caractéristiques utérines et/ou ovariennes de 1 279 d'entre elles. Cette étude a utilisé ces données pour rechercher les effets de l'âge et des précipitations sur la reproduction. L'âge de conception le plus précoce était de huit ans (n = 6), et à l'âge de 12 ans, toutes les femelles étaient sexuellement mâtures. À partir de l'âge de 14 ans, le pourcentage de femelles en reproduction active (pleines ou allaitantes) était >90%; cependant, ce pourcentage diminuait lorsque les femelles atteignaient l'âge de 50 ans. Globalement, à tout moment, un dixième des femelles n'avaient pas de reproduction active (ni pleines, ni allaitantes) surtout parmi les plus jeunes (<15 ans) et les plus vieilles (>50 ans). Dix-huit (3,3%) des femelles non pleines souffraient de pathologies du système reproducteur, y compris de kystes de l'endomètre, de l'utérus ou des ovaires. Il y avait une distribution saisonnière des accouplements, en corrélation avec la saison des pluies. Comme cela a déjàété montré dans d'autres populations d'éléphants africains vivant en liberté, la plupart des femelles du Parc National Kruger avaient une reproduction active; cependant, l'âge et le climat affectent l'activité reproductrice. [source]

The impact of elephants on the marula tree Sclerocarya birrea

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
Michelle E. Gadd
Abstract This study determined the abundance, density and population structure of the marula tree, Sclerocarya birrea, in three game reserves in South Africa, and assessed patterns and amounts of new and cumulative impact of elephants. Elephant feeding was very patchy so several attributes of individual trees, sampled transects and communities that might influence elephant herbivory were investigated. The incidence and type of elephant impact (bark, branch or stem breakage) were significantly related to tree diameter, but not to fruiting nor proximity to roads. At the transect level, elephant impact was influenced by density of marula trees, but was not influenced by proximity to roads, nor proportion of marula trees bearing fruits in the vicinity. At the community level, elephant impact was higher on reserves with higher total marula densities. Fourfold differences in elephant densities (0.08,0.30 elephants km,2) did not explain marula consumption: the percentage of trees with branch damage was similar across reserves and bark damage was inversely proportional to elephant density. Variation across reserves may reflect local and landscape-level marula tree abundance, differences in alternative food plants and individual feeding habits. The recorded levels of impact appeared to be sustainable because mortality rates were low, affected trees often recovered, and small trees were not preferentially preyed upon. Résumé Cette étude détermine l'abondance, la densité et la structure de la population de l'arbre à Marula, Sclerocarya birrea, dans trois réserves de faune sud-africaines et évalue le schéma et la totalité des impacts nouveaux et successifs des éléphants. Les éléphants se nourrissaient çà et là, de sorte que l'on a étudié divers attributs des arbres pris individuellement, des transects échantillons et des communautés, qui pouvaient influencer le caractère herbivore des éléphants. L'incidence et le type d'impact (écorces, branches ou jeunes pousses) étaient significativement liés au diamètre de l'arbre, mais non à la fructification, ni à la proximité des routes. Au niveau du transect, l'impact des éléphants était influencé par la densité des arbres à Marula, mais pas par la proximité des routes, ni par la proportion d'arbres à Marula en fruits dans le voisinage. Au niveau de la communauté, l'impact des éléphants était plus élevé dans les réserves qui comptaient la plus forte densité totale d'arbres à Marula. Une différence de 1 à 4 dans la densité des éléphants (0.08-0.30/km2) n'explique pas la consommation de marula : le pourcentage d'arbres présentant des branches endommagées était similaire dans toutes les réserves, et les dommages causés aux écorces étaient inversement proportionnels à la densité des éléphants. La variation observée entre les réserves pourrait refléter l'abondance des arbres à Marula tant locale que liée au paysage, des différences dans l'abondance de nourriture végétale alternative et les habitudes alimentaires individuelles. L'importance de l'impact relevé semblait être soutenable parce que le taux de mortalitéétait faible, que les arbres touchés récupéraient souvent et que les petits arbres n'avaient pas souvent la préférence des éléphants. [source]

Changes in miombo woodland cover in and around Sengwa Wildlife Research Area, Zimbabwe, in relation to elephants and fire

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2002
Isaac N. Mapaure
Abstract One of the consequences of impacts of elephants and fire on woodlands is a change in woody cover, which often results in major challenges for wildlife managers. Changes in miombo woodland cover in and around Sengwa Wildlife Research Area (SWRA) between 1958 and 1996 were quantified by analyzing aerial photographs. Woody cover in SWRA decreazed from 95.2% in 1958 to 68.2% in 1996, with a lowest mean of 62.9% in 1983. The annual absolute rate of woody cover change in SWRA increazed from ,1.1% per annum between 1958 and 1964 to a recovery of 1.6% per annum between 1993 and 1996, while the annual relative rate increazed from ,1.1% per annum between 1958 and 1964 to 3.3% per annum between 1993 and 1996. There was a strong negative correlation between elephant densities and woody cover in SWRA, suggesting that loss of woody cover was mainly due to elephants. Woodland recovery after 1983 was due to reductions in elephant populations through legal and illegal off-take and reductions in fire frequency. Surrounding areas experienced less woody cover losses than SWRA, mainly due to tree removal by locals whose densities increazed after the eradication of tsetse fly in the 1970s. Résumé Une des conséquences de l'impact des éléphants et des feux sur les forêts s'exprime par un changement du couvert ligneux qui pose souvent de fameux défis pour les gestionnaires de la faune. Les changements du couvert forestier à Miombo, qui sont survenus à l'intérieur et aux alentours de l'Aire de Recherche sur la Faune de Sengwa (SWRA) entre 1956 et 1996, ont été quantifiés grâce à l'analyse de photos aériennes. Le couvert forestier de la SWRA a diminué de 95.2% en 1958 à 68.2% en 1996, la moyenne la plus basse étant observée en 1983, avec 62.9%. Le taux annuel absolu de changement du couvert forestier dans la SWRA est passé de , 1.1% par an entre 1958 et 1964 à une restauration de 1.6% par an entre 1993 et 1996, tandis que le taux annuel relatif augmentait de , 1.1% par an entre 1958 et 1964 à 3.3% par an entre 1993 et 1996. Il existait une forte corrélation négative entre la densité des éléphants et le couvert forestier de la SWRA, ce qui laisse supposer que la perte de couvert forestier était due principalement aux éléphants. La restauration de la forêt après 1983 était due à des réductions des populations d'éléphants suite à des prélèvements, légaux ou non, et à une baisse de la fréquence des feux. Les zones adjacentes ont subi de moins fortes pertes du couvert forestier que la SWRA, et celles-ci étaient principalement dues à des coupes faites par les locaux dont la densité a augmenté suite à l'éradication de la mouche tsé-tsé dans les années 1970. [source]

Elephants and water provision: what are the management links?

Resource variability, aggregation and direct density dependence in an open context: the local regulation of an African elephant population

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2008
Simon Chamaillé-Jammes
Summary 1An emerging perspective in the study of density dependence is the importance of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of resources. Although this is well understood in temperate ungulates, few studies have been conducted in tropical environments where both food and water are limiting resources. 2We studied the regulation of one of the world's largest elephant populations in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. The study period started in 1986 when the population was released from culling. Using census data we investigated changes in elephant abundance with respect to rainfall and density across the entire park and across waterholes. 3The population more than doubled since culling stopped. The population increased continuously during the first 6 years, and then fluctuated widely at about 30 000 individuals. Immigration processes must have been involved in the increase of the population size. 4Population growth rates were negatively related to previous population density by a convex relationship, and negatively related to the ratio of previous population density on annual rainfall by a linear relationship. However, only this latter model (i.e. assuming a fluctuating carrying capacity related to annual rainfall) produced realistic dynamics. Overall, population decreased during dry years when the elephant density was high. 5During dry years there were fewer waterholes retaining water during the dry season and consequently elephant numbers at waterholes increased, while their aggregation level across waterholes decreased. On the long-run elephant numbers increased only at the less crowded waterholes. 6We suggest that the interaction between population size and the available foraging range determined by the number of active waterholes during the dry season controls the park population. 7Our results emphasize the need to understand how key-resource areas cause resource-based aggregation, which ultimately influences the strength of density dependence. More specifically, this study suggests that climate variability strongly affects local elephant population dynamics through changes in surface-water availability. Finally, as dispersal is likely to be an important driver of the dynamics of this population, our results support views that a metapopulation framework should be endorsed for elephant management in open contexts. [source]