Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Double-blind Phase (double-blind + phase)
Selected AbstractsA Novel Gel Formulation of 0.25% Tretinoin and 1.2% Clindamycin Phosphate: Efficacy in Acne Vulgaris Patients Aged 12 to 18 YearsPEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2009Lawrence F. Eichenfield M.D. Recently, the US FDA approved the combination of 1.2% clindamycin (CLIN) and 0.025% tretinoin (RA) in a novel gel formulation for the treatment of mild to moderate acne, based on results from two 12-week, multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 trials in which patients were randomized to four treatment arms: CLIN/RA, CLIN, RA, and vehicle. The trials studied more than 4500 patients 12 years of age or older. In both trials, CLIN/RA gel produced significantly greater clinical improvements than vehicle or either monotherapy. CLIN/RA was safe and well tolerated in both trials and in a 52-week safety follow-up evaluation. The current study is a subgroup analysis that evaluates CLIN/RA's effects on acne lesion prevalence in 12- to 18-year-old patients with mild to severe baseline acne severity. CLIN/RA significantly reduced the number of inflammatory, noninflammatory, and total acne lesions after 12 weeks of treatment (p , 0.004) in 1,710 patients aged 12 to 18 years. Relatively greater improvements were seen following CLIN/RA treatment compared to CLIN or RA monotherapy, or the vehicle gel beginning as early as 2 weeks following treatment initiation. This novel CLIN/RA gel for treating acne is tolerable and safe and offers clinicians and teen aged patients a new and efficacious intervention for acne vulgaris. [Abstract amended after online publication date June 8, 2009] [source] Patient-Reported Outcomes with Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled StudyDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 2007FACS, STEVEN FAGIEN MD BACKGROUND Global patient-reported outcomes do not evaluate specific aspects of treatment that are important to patients. OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate self-perception of age and specific outcomes that are important to patients receiving botulinum toxin type A or placebo for moderate to severe glabellar lines (using the Facial Line Outcomes Questionnaire to assess how much facial lines bother them, make them look older, detract from their facial appearance, prevent a smooth facial appearance, and make them look tired, stressed, or angry). METHODS AND MATERIALS In the double-blind phase of this 12-week study, 70 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 20 U botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX Cosmetic) or placebo. At Week 4, those still with moderate or severe glabellar lines were offered open-label 20 U botulinum toxin type A. RESULTS Median glabellar line severity was significantly lower after botulinum toxin treatment than after placebo. Compared with placebo, botulinum toxin also resulted in significantly superior patient assessments and a greater proportion of patients considering they looked younger than their current age. CONCLUSIONS Botulinum toxin type A can achieve specific goals of treatment that are important to patients and help them feel that they look younger than their current age. [source] Carisbamate as adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures in adults in two randomized, placebo-controlled trialsEPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2010Michael R. Sperling Summary Purpose:, To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the investigational drug carisbamate as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures (POS). Methods:, Two identical, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in adults with POS uncontrolled for ,1 year. Therapy-refractory epilepsy patients (,16 years) remained on stable doses of prescribed antiepileptic drugs (,2) for an 8-week prospective baseline phase and were then randomized (1:1:1) to carisbamate 200 mg/day, carisbamate 400 mg/day, or placebo, for a 12-week double-blind phase. Primary efficacy end points were percent reduction in seizure frequency and responder rate (patients with ,50% reduction in POS frequency) during the double-blind phase compared with the prospective baseline phase. Results:, Of the 565 patients randomized in study 1, 93% completed the study; of the 562 randomized in study 2, 94% completed the study. Patient characteristics were similar across both studies and treatment arms: mean age, 35 years (study 1, range 16,75 years) and 36 years (study 2, range 16,74 years); approximately 50% were men. Treatment with carisbamate 400 mg/day resulted in significant improvement (p < 0.01) in both efficacy measures compared with placebo in study 1 but not in study 2. Carisbamate 200 mg/day did not differ statistically from placebo in either study. Among the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (,5% in any group), those with an incidence exceeding placebo (,3%) were dizziness (400 mg/day group) and somnolence. Conclusions:, Carisbamate 400 mg/day was effective in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures in one of these global studies. More than 200 mg/day of carisbamate is required for efficacy. Carisbamate was well-tolerated in both studies. [source] Early versus delayed initiation of entacapone in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease: a long-term, retrospective analysisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 12 2009H. Nissinen Background:, We analysed data from three clinical trials in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with wearing-off to determine whether early enhancement of levodopa therapy with entacapone can lead to better long-term outcomes than delayed entacapone treatment. Methods:,Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and their long-term, open-label extension phases. In all three studies, patients on levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) were first randomized to entacapone (,early-start' group) or placebo (,delayed-start' group) for the initial 6-month double-blind phase, after which all patients received open-label levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment for up to 5 years. Results:, A total of 488 PD patients with wearing-off were included in the analysis. A statistically significant benefit of early initiation of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone was found, with an improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (motor) score of ,1.66 (95% confidence intervals [,3.01, ,0.31]) points compared with the delayed-start treatment group (P < 0.05). Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy was well tolerated. There was no excess of dyskinesia in the early-start group. Conclusions:, These data suggest that early rather than delayed addition of entacapone to levodopa/DDCI in PD patients with wearing-off provides a modest clinical benefit over levodopa/DDCI that is maintained for up to 5 years. [source] Long-Term Migraine Prevention With Topiramate: Open-Label Extension of Pivotal TrialsHEADACHE, Issue 7 2006Alan Rapoport MD Objective.,To demonstrate that topiramate is an effective and generally well-tolerated migraine preventive therapy when used for up to 14 months. Background.,Topiramate 100 and 200 mg/d significantly reduced mean monthly migraine frequency during 2 large, 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Only a small number of clinical trials have examined the long-term (,1 year) effectiveness and safety of migraine preventive therapies. Methods.,Five hundred sixty-seven patients with an established history of migraine with or without aura were enrolled in this 8-month, open-label extension of 2 large (49 US and 52 US and Canadian medical centers), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 26-week trials of identical design. To be eligible for the open-label extension, patients were required to have either completed the double-blind phase of the 2 pivotal migraine prevention trials or withdrew after 4 weeks due to lack of efficacy. All eligible patients, regardless of type or dose of study medication (topiramate or placebo) received in the double-blind phase, were titrated to a clinically effective dose of open-label topiramate based on physician judgment of patient response. Efficacy of topiramate was measured as the change in mean monthly migraine frequency. Results.,The mean topiramate dose during the open-label extension phase was 124.7 mg/d and 150.3 mg/d for patients on placebo (n = 159) or topiramate (n = 408), respectively, during the double-blind phase (N = 567, 91% female, mean age 39.4 years). Patients on topiramate for up to 14 months had 2.2 ± 2.4 (mean ± SD) migraines per month after completion of the open-label extension phase (3.4 ± 2.6 at double-blind endpoint). Patients on topiramate during the open-label extension phase only (placebo during the double-blind phase) had 3.0 ± 2.9 migraines per month at open-label extension endpoint (4.9 ± 3.0 migraines per month at double-blind endpoint). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the double-blind phase were 22.2% for patients on topiramate and 11.0% for patients on placebo. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the open-label extension phase were 8.6% for those patients who had already received topiramate during the double-blind phase and 20.9% for those patients who had previously received placebo. Conclusions.,Patients receiving topiramate experienced a sustained reduction in migraine frequency for up to 14 months. The effectiveness and safety of topiramate was consistent with that observed during 2 26-week pivotal trials. [source] Growth Hormone Increases Bone Mineral Content in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled TrialJOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 3 2003Kerstin Landin-Wilhelmsen Abstract Eighty osteoporotic, postmenopausal women, 50,70 years of age, with ongoing estrogen therapy (HRT), were randomized to recombinant human growth hormone (GH), 1.0 U or 2.5 U/day, subcutaneous, versus placebo. This study was double-blinded and lasted for 18 months. The placebo group then stopped the injections, but both GH groups continued for a total of 3 years with GH and followed for 5 years. Calcium (750 mg) and vitamin D (400 U) were given to all patients. Bone mineral density and bone mineral content were measured with DXA. At 18 months, when the double-blind phase was terminated, total body bone mineral content was highest in the GH 2.5 U group (p = 0.04 vs. placebo). At 3 years, when GH was discontinued, total body and femoral neck bone mineral content had increased in both GH-treated groups (NS between groups). At 4-year follow-up, total body and lumbar spine bone mineral content increased 5% and 14%, respectively, for GH 2.5 U (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0006 vs. placebo). Femoral neck bone mineral density increased 5% and bone mineral content 13% for GH 2.5 U (p = 0.01 vs. GH 1.0 U). At 5-year follow-up, no differences in bone mineral density or bone mineral content were seen between groups. Bone markers showed increased turnover. Three fractures occurred in the GH 1.0 U group. No subjects dropped out. Side effects were rare. In conclusion, bone mineral content increased to 14% with GH treatment on top of HRT and calcium/vitamin D in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. There seems to be a delayed, extended, and dose-dependent effect of GH on bone. Thus, GH could be used as an anabolic agent in osteoporosis. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||