			Home About us Contact

Dose Modifications (dose + modifications)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Ebastine in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria

ALLERGY, Issue 2008
J. Sastre
Histamine is a key mediator in the development of allergy symptoms, and oral H1 -antihistamines are among the most widely used treatments for symptomatic relief in conditions such as allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. Ebastine is a second-generation antihistamine which has been shown to be an effective treatment for both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. In controlled clinical trials in adult and adolescent patients with allergic rhinitis, ebastine 10 mg once-daily improved symptoms to a significantly greater extent than placebo and to a similar extent as loratadine 10 mg and cetirizine 10 mg (both once-daily), while ebastine 20 mg proved to be more effective than these two comparator antihistamines. In addition, ebastine was significantly more effective than placebo at relieving the symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ebastine provides efficacy throughout the 24-h dosing interval with once-daily administration and clinical benefit is seen from the first day of treatment. Small studies have found beneficial effects for ebastine in patients with other disorders, including cold urticaria, dermographic urticaria, atopic asthma, mosquito bites and (in combination with pseudoephedrine) the common cold. In addition to the regular ebastine tablet, a fast-dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation, which disintegrates in the mouth without the aid of a drink, is also available. It has been shown to be bioequivalent to the regular tablet, and to be significantly more effective than desloratadine at reducing histamine-induced cutaneous wheals. A number of patient surveys demonstrated that the majority of individuals who tried the fast-dissolving formulation reported it to be convenient for use, fast-acting and preferred it to their previous antihistamine medication. Perhaps most importantly, a large proportion of patients indicated that they would prefer to use this new formulation in the future. Ebastine has a rapid onset of action and it can be administered once-daily, with or without food. Dose modifications are not needed in elderly patients, or in those with renal or mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Ebastine is generally well-tolerated, and clinical studies showed that at usual therapeutic doses of 10 and 20 mg once-daily, it had no clinically relevant adverse effects on cognitive function and psychomotor performance or on cardiovascular function. In conclusion, ebastine is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. In addition to the regular tablet formulation, ebastine is available as a FDT, providing a treatment option that is particularly convenient for patients. [source]

The feasibility of adjuvant interferon ,-2b in children with high-risk melanoma

CANCER, Issue 4 2005
Fariba Navid M.D.
Abstract BACKGROUND It has been shown that induction high-dose interferon ,-2b (IFN-,-2b) followed by maintenance therapy improves recurrence-free survival in adults with high-risk, resected melanoma. In this study, the feasibility and toxicity of this regimen were evaluated in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with Stage III melanoma involving regional lymph nodes. METHODS Fifteen patients age , 18 years with newly diagnosed Stage III melanoma were enrolled on an institutional protocol. Patients were treated with wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymph node dissection, and adjuvant biotherapy, consisting of induction therapy with 20 million IU/m2 per day IFN-,-2b intravenously 5 times per week for 4 weeks followed by maintenance therapy with IFN-,-2b 10 million IU/m2 per day subcutaneously 3 times per week for 48 weeks. Patients were monitored for toxicity and tumor recurrence. RESULTS All patients completed induction therapy, and nine patients completed maintenance therapy. Three patients currently are receiving maintenance, 2 patients developed recurrent disease on maintenance therapy, and 1 patient stopped maintenance therapy 5 weeks early. During induction therapy, Grade 3,4 toxicities included 14 episodes of neutropenia in 11 patients, 3 episodes of leukopenia in 2 patients, and 6 episodes of liver transaminase elevations in 5 patients. Dose modifications were required in four patients. During maintenance therapy, Grade 3,4 toxicities included 23 episodes of neutropenia in 10 patients and 2 episodes of liver transaminase elevations in 2 patients. Three patients required dose modifications. All toxicities were reversible with interruption or dose modification of therapy, and no patients were taken off study due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS High dose IFN-,-2b for 4 weeks followed by a lower dose maintenance phase for 48 weeks was feasible in children with Stage III melanoma and was associated with tolerable toxicity. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source]

Clinical benefit of interventions driven by therapeutic drug monitoring

HIV MEDICINE, Issue 5 2005
AL Rendón
Background Adequate plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs are key to achieving and maintaining long-term suppression of HIV replication. Multiple factors may influence drug levels, causing increases or reductions that may, respectively, result in toxicity or virological failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might help to detect and correct such abnormalities. Objective To evaluate the usefulness of TDM in the care of HIV-infected patients in an out-patient clinical setting. Methods All the requests for TDM of protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) for patients attending our HIV out-patient clinic from October 2000 to August 2003 were analysed. Blood samples were collected before the morning dose. Drug concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography by ultraviolet waves (HPLC-UV). Results A total of 151 requests from 137 patients were assessed. The reasons for requesting TDM were drug toxicity (59%), virological failure (39%) and possible drug interactions (2%). NNRTI levels were more often requested because of toxicity, while PI levels were more often requested because of virological failure. Elevated drug levels were confirmed in 36% of patients with suspected drug toxicity, while subtherapeutic levels were found in 37% of patients failing virologically. Based on the results of TDM, dose modifications were made in 37% of patients, allowing correction of such abnormalities in 80% of cases. Moreover, adequate plasma concentrations were confirmed in 79% of patients whose levels were assessed again. Conclusions Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful tool to identify toxic levels of NNRTI and subtherapeutic concentrations of PI. Dose adjustments following TDM may ameliorate drug-related toxicities or improve virological response rates. [source]

Comparing the safety, tolerability and quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis B vs chronic hepatitis C treated with peginterferon alpha-2a

LIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2008
Patrick Marcellin
Abstract Background/Aims: Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) are two clinically distinct but related diseases. Pooled data from five studies of peginterferon alpha-2a in patients with chronic HCV infection (CHC) were compared with two studies of the drug in patients with chronic HBV infection (CHB). Method: The HBV studies included both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n=271) and HBeAg-negative (n=177) patients; 791 patients took part in the HCV trials. In all studies, patients were treated with 180 ,g peginterferon alpha-2a monotherapy once weekly for 48 weeks. The number of adverse events (AEs), discontinuations and dose modifications were documented. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed using the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Safety was assessed throughout the treatment period. A 24-week treatment-free follow-up period was also included. Results: Differences (HBV vs HCV) were observed in the incidence of AEs (88,89 vs 96,100%), serious AEs (4,5 vs 7,16%) and treatment withdrawals (6,8 vs 17,33%). The frequency of depression-related events was lower in CHB patients (4 vs 22%, P<0.001), as was the impact of treatment on HRQL. Conclusions: The safety and tolerability of peginterferon alpha-2a in patients with CHB compares favourably with that observed in CHC patients, with a lower incidence of common interferon-related AEs and a significantly lower incidence of depression. [source]

L-asparaginase as a marker of chemotherapy dose modification in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

CANCER, Issue 12 2005
Jacques Baillargeon Ph.D.
Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of the current study was to compare chemotherapy dose modifications in obese (a body mass index [BMI] > 95%) and nonobese (a BMI , 95%) pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS The study cohort was comprised of 199 pediatric patients diagnosed with ALL who were treated at 1 of 2 South Texas pediatric oncology centers between 1990,2000. The relative chemotherapy dose modification during the induction phase of chemotherapy was calculated as the ratio of 1) the actual administered dose of L-asparaginase and 2) the protocol-calculated dose of L-asparaginase. The extent to which the chemotherapy dose modification varied according to obesity status was assessed using stratified Student t tests and an ordinary least-squares regression analysis. RESULTS Obese ALL patients were found to exhibit a 7% decrease in the mean relative modification of L-asparaginase during induction chemotherapy compared with their nonobese counterparts. This finding was statistically significant (P = 0.009), even after adjustment for gender, age, ethnicity, and clinical institution. CONCLUSIONS To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first published report of an obesity-associated chemotherapy dose modification in pediatric patients with ALL, the most common childhood malignancy. It will be important to examine whether these findings are consistent with those observed in future studies, and ultimately to assess the association between obesity-related dose modifications and long-term cancer outcomes. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source]