Dietetic Provision (dietetic + provision)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Survey of dietetic provision for patients with diabetes

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 8 2000
M. Nelson
SUMMARY Aims To survey dietitians involved in diabetes care regarding the provisions for patients with diabetes. Methods A national survey of 512 dietitians known to be engaged in provision of diabetes care was conducted in 1997 and 391 (76%) responded. Results Nationally the median provision of dietetic care for diabetes reported was 10.7 h per 100 000 general population per week, but the provision was uneven ranging from 2.0 to 27.6 h per 100 000. Eighty-five per cent of dietitians worked in areas where the provision was less than 22 h per 100 000 general population per week (the current recommended minimum standard). Dietetic provision was greater in secondary care (median 9.1 h per 100 000 general population per week) than in general practice, residential homes and other locations (median 4.4 h per 100 000 general population per week). Provision was greater in those areas in which a designated dietitian had responsibility for co-ordinating the dietetic service for diabetes than in areas where the co-ordinator was not a dietitian or where there was no co-ordinator. Over 90% of dietitians reported following British Diabetic Association (BDA) recommendations regarding advice on carbohydrate, sugar, fat and fibre consumption, but only one-third routinely advised on salt restriction. Of the 17% of dietitians who continue to use carbohydrate exchanges, all combine this method with other approaches. Of the recommendations made by the Clinical Standards Group, only 69% of dietitians reported seeing more than half of newly diagnosd adult patients within four weeks, and less than 50% reported offering half or more of their patients an annual review. Amongst the literature in current use, 98% of dietitians use BDA literature for teaching patients and 90% use BDA publications in their own education. Seventy-six per cent of dietitians believed that there was a role for commercial slimming organizations in weight management of people with diabetes Conclusions Given the proven value of dietetic input in diabetes management, there would be advantages to correcting the regional inequalities in dietetic provision for diabetes care in the UK. [source]


A survey of provision of dietetic services for coeliac disease in the UK

JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION & DIETETICS, Issue 5 2007
M. Nelson
Abstract Background, Management guidelines for care of coeliac patients published by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), 2002 recommend that patients should see a dietitian at diagnosis and at least at annual review. In the absence of information on dietetic provision in coeliac disease management in the UK and with surveys in other countries suggesting that patients with coeliac disease gain most information from coeliac support groups (Green et al., 2001), Coeliac UK set out to investigate dietetic services for coeliac patients in the UK. Methods, Questionnaires were sent to dietetic departments in the UK via the Regional Managers Group of the British Dietetic Association (BDA) by email. The questionnaires were in two parts, the first was completed by the dietetic manager and the second by the dietitian with the main responsibility for the management of coeliac patients within the department. Results, Over one-quarter of departments reported allocating a maximum of 1 h of dietitians' time per month per 100 000 population to seeing coeliac patients. More hours were allocated to coeliac patients in departments where dietitians had attended coeliac disease training, where dietitians were professional members of Coeliac UK or where coeliac patient care was undertaken by a multi-disciplinary team. Conclusion, There is wide variation in dietetic provision for diagnosed coeliac patients in the UK. The Coeliac UK survey suggests that the current level of dietetic provision is in the region of one-third of what is required according to the BSG management guidelines (British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), 2002) to provide diagnosed coeliacs with only basic support and annual review. [source]