Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Developing Mouse Brain (developing + mouse_brain)
Selected AbstractsDifferential expression of polycomb repression complex 1 (PRC1) members in the developing mouse brain reveals multiple complexesDEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS, Issue 9 2006Tanja Vogel Abstract Polycomb group (PcG) genes are regulators of body segmentation and cell growth, therefore being important players during development. PcG proteins form large complexes (PRC) that fulfil mostly repressive regulative functions on homeotic gene expression. Although expression of PcG genes in the brain has been noticed, the involvement of PcG genes in the processes of brain development is not understood. In this study, we analysed the expression patterns of PRC1 complex members to reveal PcG proteins that might be relevant for mouse brain development. Using in situ hybridisation, we show PRC1 activity in proliferative progenitor cells during neurogenesis, but also in maturated neuronal structures. PRC1 complex compositions vary in a spatial and temporal controlled manner during mouse brain development, providing cellular tools to act in different developmental contexts of cell proliferation, cell fate determination, and differentiation. Developmental Dynamics 235:2574,2585, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Distinct expression of C1q-like family mRNAs in mouse brain and biochemical characterization of their encoded proteinsEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 9 2010Takatoshi Iijima Abstract Many members of the C1q family, including complement C1q and adiponectin, and the structurally related tumor necrosis factor family are secreted and play crucial roles in intercellular signaling. Among them, the Cbln (precerebellin) and C1q-like (C1ql) subfamilies are highly and predominantly expressed in the central nervous system. Although the Cbln subfamily serve as essential trans-neuronal regulators of synaptic integrity in the cerebellum, the functions of the C1ql subfamily (C1ql1,C1ql4) remain unexplored. Here, we investigated the gene expression of the C1ql subfamily in the adult and developing mouse brain by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution in-situ hybridization. In the adult brain, C1ql1,C1ql3 mRNAs were mainly expressed in neurons but weak expression was seen in glia-like structures in the adult brain. The C1ql1 mRNA was predominantly expressed in the inferior olive, whereas the C1ql2 and C1ql3 mRNAs were strongly coexpressed in the dentate gyrus. Although the C1ql1 and C1ql3 mRNAs were detectable as early as embryonic day 13, the C1ql2 mRNA was observed at later embryonic stages. The C1ql1 mRNA was also expressed transiently in the external granular layer of the cerebellum. Biochemical characterization in heterologous cells revealed that all of the C1ql subfamily proteins were secreted and they formed both homomeric and heteromeric complexes. They also formed hexameric and higher-order complexes via their N-terminal cysteine residues. These results suggest that, like Cbln, the C1ql subfamily has distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns and may play diverse roles by forming homomeric and heteromeric complexes in the central nervous system. [source] The spatio-temporal and subcellular expression of the candidate Down syndrome gene Mnb/Dyrk1A in the developing mouse brain suggests distinct sequential roles in neuronal developmentEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 5 2008Barbara Hämmerle Abstract It is widely accepted that the neurological alterations in Down syndrome (DS) are principally due to modifications in developmental processes. Accordingly, a large part of the research on DS in recent years has focused on chromosome 21 genes that influence brain development. MNB/DYRK1A is one of the genes on human chromosome 21 that has raised most interest, due to its relationship with the brain functions that are altered in DS. Although a number of interesting experimental mouse models for DS are being developed, we still know little about the expression of Mnb/Dyrk1A during mouse brain development. Here, we report that Mnb/Dyrk1A displays a rather dynamic spatio-temporal expression pattern during mouse central nervous system development. Our data indicate that Mnb/Dyrk1A is specifically expressed in four sequential developmental phases: transient expression in preneurogenic progenitors, cell cycle-regulated expression in neurogenic progenitors, transient expression in recently born neurones, and persistent expression in late differentiating neurones. Our results also suggest that the subcellular localization of MNB/DYRK1A, including its translocation to the nucleus, is finely regulated. Thus, the MNB/DYRK1A protein kinase could be a key element in the molecular machinery that couples sequential events in neuronal development. This rich repertoire of potential functions in the developing central nervous system is suitable to be linked to the neurological alterations in DS through the use of mouse experimental models. [source] Differential distribution of Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in the developing mouse brain: implications for a role of Rac3 in Purkinje cell differentiationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 9 2003Annalisa Bolis Abstract Rac3 is one of the three known Rac GTPases in vertebrates. Rac3 shows high sequence homology to Rac1, and its transcript is specifically expressed in the developing nervous system, where its localization and function are unknown. By using Rac3-specific antibodies, we show that the endogenous Rac3 protein is differentially expressed during mouse brain development, with a peak of expression at times of neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis. Comparison with Rac1 shows clear-cut differences in the overall distribution of the two GTPases in the developing brain, and in their subcellular distribution in regions of the brain where both proteins are expressed. At P7, Rac3 staining is particularly marked in the deep cerebellar nuclei and in the pons, where it shows a discontinuous distribution around the neuronal cell bodies, in contrast with the diffuse staining of Rac1. Rac3 does not evidently co-localize with pre- and post-synaptic markers, nor with GFAP-positive astrocytes, but it clearly co-localizes with actin filaments, and with the terminal portions of calbindin-positive Purkinje cell axons in the deep cerebellar nuclei. Our data implicate Rac3 in neuronal differentiation, and support a specific role of this GTPase in actin-mediated remodelling of Purkinje cell neuritic terminals at time of synaptogenesis. [source] Role of histamine in short- and long-term effects of methamphetamine on the developing mouse brainJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 4 2008Summer F. Acevedo Abstract With the rise in methamphetamine (MA) use among women of childbearing age, the potential consequences of MA exposure to the developing brain for cognition in adulthood is a major concern. Histamine might mediate these MA effects. Following MA administration in neonatal mice, histamine levels in brain were elevated and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was activated. Co-administration of MA with the H3 receptor agonist immepip antagonized these effects. The effects of MA on histamine levels and on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation at P20 were more pronounced in female than male mice. These sex differences could have contributed to the increased susceptibility of female mice to the detrimental long-term cognitive effects of MA and the H3/H4 antagonist thioperamide. Following behavioral testing, mice neonatally treated with MA or thioperamide showed reduced levels of the dendritic marker microtubule-associated protein 2 in the CA3 region of the hippocampus and the enthorhinal cortex. This was not seen in mice neonatally treated with immepip and MA who did not show cognitive impairments, suggesting that these brain areas might be particularly important for the long-term effects of MA on cognitive function. These data support a role for histamine in the effects of MA on the developing brain. [source] Microglial colonization of the developing mouse brain: the effect of CD11b deletionNEUROPATHOLOGY & APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2002J. K. Jeetle Introduction:, Microglia are resident mononuclear phagocytes of the central nervous system, which colonize the brain both prenatally and after birth. It is proposed that they enter the brain initially via the surrounding mesenchyme, via ventricles and later through blood vessels, but the mechanisms of entry and signals used for migration are still to be established. Previous studies have shown that ligands for some integrin adhesion molecules expressed on blood vessels in the developing nervous system (particularly ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 which bind CD11a/LFA-1 and CD11b/Mac-1), may act as potential recruiting signals for microglial precursors. This study addressed whether CD11b is influential on the migration of microglial precursors into the developing CNS. Material and methods:,Ricinus communis agglutinin-1 (RCA-1) lectin histochemistry was employed to anatomically map the distribution of amoeboid and ramified microglia from embryonic day 15 (E15) to birth. Embryonic mouse brains from CD11b knockout (,/,) (n = 42), and heterozygote (+/,) (n = 52) mice generated on a C57/BL6 background (Melo et al. Cell Immunol 2000; 205: 13,23) and wild-type (+/+) (n = 37) litter mates were fixed in Bouin's solution, processed to paraffin wax and serially sectioned at 15,40 µm. To investigate further potential signals for recruiting microglial precursors, brains were immunochemically screened for integrins CD11a, CD11b, CD18, ,X, VLA-4 and the chemokine MCP-1. Results:, Microscopic analysis revealed the morphological transition of microglia from predominantly amoeboid forms at E15,E16 to a flourishing population of ramified cells at E19,E20. RCA-1 histochemistry showed no clear differences in microglial distribution or timing of colonization between CD11b (,/,) and wild-type mice from E15 to birth. Although CD11b deletion did not influence the timing of microglial ramification, there appeared to be fewer ramified cells in (,/,) mice within comparative brain regions. This requires further quantitative morphometric analysis. Of the integrins investigated, none were restricted to microglia and only VLA-4 and ,X showed reactivity within the CNS. However, MCP-1 was notably localized to the cortical plate within all genotypes, consistent with previous findings in human foetal CNS (Rezaie & Male. Microsc Res Tech 1999; 45: 359,382). Conclusion:, The results suggest that CD11b has little influence on the timing or regional distribution of microglia in the developing murine CNS. It is more likely that CD11b is only one of several factors that influence the migration and differentiation of these cells. [source] Nuclear factor I gene expression in the developing forebrainTHE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, Issue 3 2008Céline Plachez Abstract Three members of the Nuclear Factor I (Nfi) gene family of transcription factors; Nfia, Nfib, and Nfix are highly expressed in the developing mouse brain. Nfia and Nfib knockout mice display profound defects in the development of midline glial populations and the development of forebrain commissures (das Neves et al. [1999] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11946,11951; Shu et al. [2003] J Neurosci 23:203,212; Steele-Perkins et al. [2005] Mol Cell Biol 25:685,698). These findings suggest that Nfi genes may regulate the substrate over which the commissural axons grow to reach targets in the contralateral hemisphere. However, these genes are also expressed in the cerebral cortex and, thus, it is important to assess whether this expression correlates with a cell-autonomous role in cortical development. Here we detail the protein expression of NFIA and NFIB during embryonic and postnatal mouse forebrain development. We find that both NFIA and NFIB are expressed in the deep cortical layers and subplate prenatally and display dynamic expression patterns postnatally. Both genes are also highly expressed in the developing hippocampus and in the diencephalon. We also find that principally neither NFIA nor NFIB are expressed in callosally projecting neurons postnatally, emphasizing the role for midline glial cell populations in commissure formation. However, a large proportion of laterally projecting neurons express both NFIA and NFIB, indicating a possible cell-autonomous role for these transcription factors in corticospinal neuron development. Collectively, these data suggest that, in addition to regulating the formation of axon guidance substrates, these genes also have cell-autonomous roles in cortical development. J. Comp. Neurol. 508:385,401, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||