Demonstrated Efficacy (demonstrated + efficacy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator and placebo-controlled trial of a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 antagonist in generalized anxiety disorder,

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, Issue 5 2010
Vladimir Coric M.D.
Abstract Background: Antagonism of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors has been hypothesized as a potential target for the development of novel anxiolytics. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of pexacerfont, a selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator trial. Two hundred and sixty patients were randomly assigned to pexacerfont 100,mg/day (after a 1 week loading dose of 300,mg/day), placebo or escitalopram 20,mg/day in a 2:2:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to end point (week 8) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score. Results: Pexacerfont 100,mg/day did not separate from placebo on the primary outcome measure. The half-powered active comparator arm, escitalopram 20,mg/day, demonstrated efficacy with significant separation from placebo at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 (P<.02). Response rates for pexacerfont, placebo, and escitalopram were 42, 42, and 53%, respectively. Genetic and psychometric rating scale data was obtained in 175 randomized subjects. There was a significant association between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the gene encoding plexin A2 (PLXNA2-2016) with the HAM-A psychic subscale score for the entire cohort at baseline (FDR-adjusted P=.015). Conclusions: Pexacerfont did not demonstrate efficacy compared to placebo for the treatment of GAD. Whether these findings are generalizable to this class of agents remains to be determined. Our preliminary genetic finding of an association between a SNP for the gene encoding plexin A2 and an anxiety phenotype in this study merits further exploration. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00481325) before enrollment. Depression and Anxiety, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Pregabalin Drug Interaction Studies: Lack of Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Lamotrigine, and Valproate in Patients with Partial Epilepsy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 9 2005
Martin J. Brodie
Summary:,Purpose: Pregabalin (PGB) is an ,2 -, ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. Methods: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). Results: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB,AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug,drug interactions. [source]


Lack of effects between rupatadine 10,mg and placebo on actual driving performance of healthy volunteers

HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, Issue 5 2007
Eric Vuurman
Abstract Introduction Rupatadine fumarate is a potent, selective, histamine H1 -receptor antagonist and PAF inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy for the relief of allergic rhinitis. Rupatadine does not easily cross the blood,brain barrier and is believed to be non-sedating at therapeutic doses. Consequently, rupatadine should show no impairment on car driving. Objective This study compared the acute effects of rupatadine, relative to placebo and hydroxyzine (as an active control), on healthy subjects' driving performance. Methods Twenty subjects received a single dose of rupatadine 10,mg, hydroxyzine 50,mg, or placebo in each period of this randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study. Two hours postdosing, subjects operated a specially instrumented vehicle in tests designed to measure their driving ability. Before and after the driving tests ratings of sedation were recorded. Results There was no significant difference between rupatadine and placebo in the primary outcome variable: standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP); however, hydroxyzine treatment significantly increased SDLP (p,<,0.001 for both comparisons). Objective (Stanford sleepiness scale) and subjective sedation ratings (Visual Analogue Scales) showed similar results: subjects reported negative effects after hydroxyzine but not after rupatadine. Conclusion Rupatadine 10,mg is not sedating and does not impair driving performance. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


WHO'S DRAGGING THEIR FEET?

JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, Issue 2 2003
HUSBANDS AND WIVES SEEKING MARITAL THERAPY
Despite its demonstrated efficacy, marital therapy's impact has been limited by couples' general reluctance to seek help unitl their problems become severe. To understand this delay, 147 married couples (294 individuals) in the process of seeking marital therapy were surveyed. Using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis, three relatively independent steps (problem recognition, treatment consideration, and treatment seeking) were identified. On average, wives were rated as completing all three steps before their husbands. Gender-role orientation, demographics, relationship satisfaction, and specific relationship problems (especially husbands' dissatisfaction with sex) were also predictive of the steps toward therapy. Implications for marital therapy are discussed. [source]


Regulatory T cells in bronchial asthma

ALLERGY, Issue 3 2009
K. Ryanna
The main focus of this review was the role of a specific subset of T cells with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive activities, termed regulatory T cells (Tregs), in the pathogenesis and treatment of bronchial asthma. Evidence that these cells are important in maintaining immune homeostasis in health and exhibit impaired activity in active disease will be discussed. Their therapeutic potential is perhaps best highlighted by evidence that therapies with demonstrated efficacy in allergic and asthmatic disease are associated with the induction or restoration of regulatory T-cell function, e.g. glucocorticoids, allergen immunotherapy. Strategies to improve the safety and efficacy of these treatments and that induce or boost Tregs in bronchial asthma are discussed. [source]


(203) Manufacturing Process for a Highly Purified, Stable Liquid Formulation of Botulinum Toxin Type B (MyoblocÔ)

PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 3 2001
Andrew Grethlein
Botulinum toxin type B (BoNT-B; MyoblocÔ) is a new botulinum toxin with demonstrated efficacy in patients with cervical dystonia, and has been found to decrease neck pain associated with this disorder. Developmental work has led to the commercial-scale production of a uniform, highly purified toxin complex in a liquid formulation. Production of BoNT-B involves fermentation, recovery and purification from Clostridium botulinum. The reliability and robustness of the process were tested by altering critical process parameters (eg, pH, temperature) and showing that a high-quality product resulted even in conditions detrimental to C botulinum fermentation. Consistency and key quality attributes (purity, complex integrity, percent nicking, specific activity) of the toxin were assessed using a series of biochemical tests, which were validated as precise and accurate and are now routinely used in quality control analysis. Results confirmed production of an intact, uniform toxin complex with consistent purity, percentage nicking (a measure of toxin activation) of over 70%, and specific activity over 90 U/ng in three manufacturing runs. BoNT-B is manufactured as a slightly acidic liquid formulation that maintains complex integrity, reducing the potential for generating neutralizing antibodies. The potency of drug substance, dilute bulk solution, and finished product was shown to be reliable using the validated mouse intraperitoneal LD50 potency assay. The liquid formulation of BoNT-B was found to be stable for at least 9 months at 25°C and at least 3 years at 2,8°C. BoNT-B has a long shelf-life and may be produced on a commercial scale reliably and reproducibly, making it readily available and convenient to store and use. Support of Elan Pharmaceuticals is gratefully acknowledged. [source]


Are Statistical Contributions to Medicine Undervalued?

BIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2003
Norman E. Breslow
Summary. Econometricians Daniel McFadden and James Heckman won the 2000 Nobel Prize in economics for their work on discrete choice models and selection bias. Statisticians and epidemiologists have made similar contributions to medicine with their work on case-control studies, analysis of incomplete data, and causal inference. In spite of repeated nominations of such eminent figures as Bradford Hill and Richard Doll, however, the Nobel Prize in physiology and medicine has never been awarded for work in biostatistics or epidemiology. (The "exception who proves the rule" is Ronald Ross, who, in 1902, won the second medical Nobel for his discovery that the mosquito was the vector for malaria. Ross then went on to develop the mathematics of epidemic theory,which he considered his most important scientific contribution,and applied his insights to malaria control programs.) The low esteem accorded epidemiology and biostatistics in some medical circles, and increasingly among the public, correlates highly with the contradictory results from observational studies that are displayed so prominently in the lay press. In spite of its demonstrated efficacy in saving lives, the "black box" approach of risk factor epidemiology is not well respected. To correct these unfortunate perceptions, statisticians would do well to follow more closely their own teachings: conduct larger, fewer studies designed to test specific hypotheses, follow strict protocols for study design and analysis, better integrate statistical findings with those from the laboratory, and exercise greater caution in promoting apparently positive results. [source]