Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Defect Coverage (defect + coverage)
Selected AbstractsAcne inversa of the anogenital region: early radical surgical excision with plastic defect coverage is treatment of choiceJOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY & VENEREOLOGY, Issue 6 2008EC Prandl [source] Versatility of vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flapsMICROSURGERY, Issue 5 2006Markus V. Küntscher M.D., Ph.D. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate a variety of indications for the vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap with respect to donor-site morbidity and alternative procedures. Fifteen VRAM flaps were performed in 15 patients during a 4-year period. The average age of patients was 58 years (range, 34,76 years). Inferiorly based VRAM flaps were used for defect coverage after tumor resection and for penile reconstruction in 7 cases. Superiorly based VRAM flaps were performed in 7 cases for reconstruction of osteocutaneous defects following sternal osteomyelitis and tumor resection. Arterial and venous "supercharging" was necessary in one case. One free VRAM flap was performed in a patient suffering from an osteocutaneous defect after resection of a malignant melanoma metastasis with infiltration of the brain and skull. The reconstructive goals were achieved in all cases using VRAM flap procedures. No total flap loss occurred. Minor complications as well as abdominal wall bulging and hernias were observed in four cases. The pedicled VRAM flap provides a reliable tool for coverage of large soft-tissue defects of the chest wall, groin, hip, and perineum even in a high-risk population, in which a safe and fast forward flap procedure is the primary reconstructive goal. Arterial and/or venous supercharging may be necessary, particularly in superiorly based VRAM flaps. An inferiorly based VRAM flap is a reliable tool for phalloplasty under special circumstances. The indication for free VRAM flaps is given in rare clinical situations. Stabilization of the donor site using artificial mesh is highly recommended. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2006. [source] Biodegradable polylactide membranes for bone defect coverage: biocompatibility testing, radiological and histological evaluation in a sheep modelCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 4 2006Gerhard Schmidmaier Abstract: Large bony defects often show a delayed healing and have an increasing risk of infection. Several materials are used for the coverage of large defects. These materials must be biocompatible, easy to use, and must have an appropriate stability to present a mechanical hindrance. Aim of this study was to investigate two different biodegradable membranes for defect coverage in a sheep model. Round cranial defects (1.5 cm diameter) were created in sheep. Six different treatments were investigated: defects without membrane, defects covered with a poly(d,l -lactide) or with a 70/30 poly(l/d,l -lactide) membrane and all defects with or without spongiosa filling. The sheep were sacrificed 12 or 24 weeks postoperatively. Bone formation in the defects was quantified by computer-assisted measurements of the area of the residual defect on CT radiographs. Histomorphometry and host-tissue response were evaluated by light microscopy. The biocompatibility was investigated by analyzing the amount of osteoclasts and foreign body cells. Both membranes served as a mechanical hindrance to prevent the prolapse of soft tissue into the defect. The biocompatibility test revealed no differences in the amount and distribution of osteoclasts at the two investigated time points and between the investigated groups. No negative effect on the tissue regeneration was detectable between the investigated groups related to the type of membrane, but a foreign body reaction around the two membrane types was observed. In the membrane-covered defects, the spongiosa showed a progressing remodeling to the native bony structure of the cranium. The groups without spongiosa partly revealed new bone formation, without complete bridging in any group or at any time point. Comparing the 12 and 24 weeks groups, an increased bone formation was detectable at the later time point. In conclusion, the results of the present in vivo study reveal a good biocompatibility and prevention of soft tissue prolapse of the two used membranes without differences between the membranes. An enhanced remodeling of the spongiosa into native bony structures under the membranes was detectable, but no osteopromoting effect was observed due to the membranes. [source] | ||||||||||