Home About us Contact | |||
Day Cases (day + case)
Terms modified by Day Cases Selected AbstractsDay case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoidsCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 1 2006G. C. Beattie Abstract Objective, Conventional surgical management of prolapsing haemorrhoids is by excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain has restricted the application of such procedures in the day case setting. These operations remain associated with a period of restricted activity. The use of circular stapling devices as an alternative to the excisional approach in the management of haemorrhoids has been described. This study reports our experience of stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day case procedure. Methods, Patients with third or fourth degree haemorrhoids were eligible for the procedure. Patients were considered suitable candidates for day case surgery based on conventional parameters. Symptoms were assessed using a previously validated symptom severity rating score. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy was carried out using a circular stapling device. Pain scores were obtained prior to discharge. Patients were admitted if pain was uncontrolled despite oral analgesia. Symptoms were re-scored at six-week follow-up. Results, Over a 70-month period 168 consecutive stapled haemorrhoidopexies were performed or directly supervised by one consultant colorectal surgeon. One hundred and ten (65%) patients were considered appropriate candidates for day case surgery by conventional criteria. Ninety-six (87.3%) patients successfully underwent stapled haemorrhoidopexy on a day case basis. Fourteen (12.7%) patients required admission on the day of surgery (5 for early postoperative bleeding, 4 for pain necessitating continuing opiate analgesia, two for urinary retention and three for surgery performed late in the day). Six (5%) patients were re-admitted postoperatively; four for pain relief and two because of urinary retention. Of the day case patients, 91 (82.7%) and 56 (50.9%) had been seen for 6 week and 6 month review, respectively, at the time of analysis. Symptom scores were 6 (pre-operatively) vs 0 (postoperatively) (P < 0.01). 76/91 (83.5%) patients reviewed at 6/52 were asymptomatic. Conclusion, Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective procedure that can be carried out on selected patients on a day case basis. Complications are of a similar nature to excisional haemorrhoidectomy. [source] Implementation of a short-stay programme after breast cancer surgery,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 2 2010M. de Kok Background: Short-stay breast cancer surgery (24 h or day case) is not common practice in Europe. This before,after comparative study was carried out to test the feasibility of systematically implementing a care programme incorporating short-stay admission using strategies tailored to individual hospital needs, and to assess safety and facilitating factors. Methods: Patients with breast cancer from four Dutch hospitals participated. The intervention concerned the programme developed by the Maastricht University Medical Centre. This was implemented through local multidisciplinary meetings and educational outreach visits. Results: Of 421 eligible patients, 324 (77·0 per cent) gave consent to participate. The proportion of patients who had short-stay treatment increased from 45·3 per cent before to 82·2 per cent after implementation of the programme (P < 0·001). No increase was observed in the rate of complications, readmissions, reoperations or number of visits to the emergency department. Factors associated with an increased chance of short-stay treatment were: breast-conserving surgery, having children and being employed. Being aged over 64 years showed a trend towards a decreased chance. Conclusion: Introducing a care programme incorporating short stay following breast cancer surgery in four hospitals was feasible and safe. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery as a day caseCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 2 2010M.J. Porter No abstract is available for this article. [source] Seasonal variation of enteric infections and inflammatory bowel diseaseINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 7 2008Amnon Sonnenberg MD Abstract Background: The time trends of inflammatory bowel disease are characterized by short-term variations that affect Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis alike. The aim of the present study was to test whether these variations might be related to exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease secondary to superimposed gastrointestinal infection. Methods: The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) comprises a data set of all patients admitted to hospitals throughout England, which includes inpatients and day cases. This data set was used to analyze the monthly variations in all hospital admissions for Crohn's disease (ICD10 code K50), ulcerative colitis (K51), bacterial intestinal infections (A04), viral intestinal infections (A08), diarrhea and infectious gastroenteritis (A09), upper respiratory infections (J06), pneumonia secondary to unspecified organism (J18), and unspecified acute lower respiratory infection (J22). Results: The temporal analysis revealed similar monthly fluctuations of hospital admissions for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and bacterial intestinal infections. Viral intestinal infections and infectious gastroenteritis were characterized by different seasonal variations that showed no relationship with any of the fluctuations of inflammatory bowel disease or bacterial intestinal infections. Similarly, respiratory infections resulted in marked cyclical variations in hospital admissions unrelated to any changes in inflammatory bowel disease or enteric infections. Conclusions: The similarity in the time trends of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and bacterial intestinal infections suggests that superinfection by intestinal bacteria are responsible for the fluctuations in hospital admissions for inflammatory bowel disease. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008) [source] Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2004P. C. Leeder Background: A prospective study was carried out to assess the feasibility of performing true day-case laparoscopic surgery in a district general hospital. Methods: All patients admitted consecutively under the care of one surgeon for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. Selection criteria for a day-case procedure included an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I or II and the availability of a responsible carer at home. Patients were discharged 4,6 h after surgery with a standard analgesia pack and a contact number for advice. All patients were contacted by telephone on the day after discharge. A postal questionnaire was sent to the first 100 patients to assess satisfaction with the day-case process. Results: Of 357 patients admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 24-month period, 154 (43·1 per cent) were operated on as day cases on a morning theatre list. Twenty-two patients required an overnight stay (14·3 per cent), three because of conversion to an open procedure. One patient was readmitted for neck pain. Eighty-two (92·1 per cent) of 89 patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the day-case procedure. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated a low rate of overnight stay (14·3 per cent) and readmission (1·9 per cent), and a high degree of patient satisfaction for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Cancellation of surgical day cases in an ophthalmic centreACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 3 2009Bertie S. Fernando No abstract is available for this article. [source] |