			Home About us Contact

Daily Performance (daily + performance)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Oral Impacts on Daily Performance in Norwegian adults: validity, reliability and prevalence estimates

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 4 2005
A. N. Åstrøm
The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) instrument was translated into Norwegian and reviewed for cultural and conceptual equivalence by a group of bilingual academics. A sample of employees from the University of Bergen completed the Norwegian OIDP frequency questionnaire twice. A total of 173 and 108 subjects participated in the first and the second administration, respectively, of this questionnaire. A two-stage proportionate random sample, comprising 2,000 residents (age-range 16,79 yr), was drawn from the national population register by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Information became available for 1,309 persons who completed telephone interviews. The Norwegian OIDP preserved the overall concept of the English version. Test,retest reliability, in terms of Cohen's kappa, was 0.65, and Cronbach's alpha was high (, 0.80). In both samples, variations in the OIDP scores were apparent in relation to self-reported oral health and number of remaining teeth, supporting construct and criterion validity of the inventory. Only three of the OIDP interviews were discarded, which supports face validity. A total of 18.3% confirmed that they had at least one oral impact. Age-specific rates were 17.5%, 19.0%, 17.9% and 18.4% among 16,24, 24,44, 45,66 and 67,79-yr-old participants. The satisfactory psychometric properties provide evidence for the cross-cultural use of the OIDP. The presence of a distinct floor effect indicates poor sensitivity of the OIDP to detect improvements of oral health-related quality of life at a population level. Prevalence estimates were low, suggesting that the current oral health status has little impact on the daily performance of the Norwegian adult population. [source]

Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, Issue 2 2003
Peter G. Robinson
Abstract , Objectives: To assess the validity of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) and the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP 14) in the UK. Setting: Primary care department at a UK dental hospital. Sample: Consecutive patients. Method: Cross-sectional comparison of impacts using OIDP and OHIP 14 against clinical findings, Global Oral Health Ratings and pain. Results: A total of 179 patients participated (83.2% response rate). OIDP had weak face validity because it contained contingency questions. Both instruments were developed from the same theoretical model and appeared to have reasonable content validity. In regression analyses, the number of impacts detected by each measure and the total score using OHIP 14 were related to the presence of oral disease and inversely related to age. No suitable transformation could be found to allow regression analysis of OIDP total scores. OHIP 14 correlated more closely with Global Oral Health Ratings but both measures correlated similarly to the experience of pain (0.43 < r < 0.47). The correlation between OHIP and OIDP scores was +0.78. The use of a simple additive method for calculating the total OHIP 14 score did not compromise its validity. Conclusion: Both instruments have some validity as measures of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) among dental hospital patients. The superior face, criterion and convergent validity and greater amenability to analysis of OHIP 14 render it more suitable for questionnaire-based research and for comparing groups. The additive method may be used to calculate the total score for OHIP 14. [source]

Factorial structure and cross-cultural invariance of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 3 2009
A. N. Åstrøm
The issue of cross-cultural construct validation and measurement invariance of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) questionnaire is important. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), this study evaluated a proposed three-factor structure of the OIDP questionnaire in Tanzanian adolescents and adults and assessed whether this model would be replicated in Ugandan adolescents. Between 2004 and 2007, OIDP data were collected from 1,601 Tanzanian adolescents, 1,031 Tanzanian adults, and 1,146 Ugandan adolescents. Model generation analysis was restricted to Tanzanian adolescents, and the model achieved was tested, without modification, in Tanzanian adults and in Ugandan adolescents. A modified three-factor solution with cross-loadings improved the fit of the OIDP model to the data compared with a one-factor model and the original three-factor model within the Tanzanian [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99] and Ugandan (CFI = 0.98) samples. Cross-validation in Tanzanian adults provided a reasonable fit (CFI = 0.98). Multiple-group CFA demonstrated acceptable fit [,2 = 140.829, degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 24, CFI = 0.98] for the unconstrained model, whereas unconstrained and constrained models were statistically significantly different. Factorial validity was confirmed for the three-factor OIDP model. The results provide evidence for cross-cultural equivalence of the OIDP, suggesting that this measure is comparable, at least to some extent, across Tanzanian and Ugandan adolescents. [source]

Assessing Levels of Agreement between Two Commonly Used Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Measures

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, Issue 3 2009
Eduardo Bernabé MSc
Abstract Objective: This study aimed to assess the level of agreement between two commonly used oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measures, the short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP14) and the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP). Methods: A sample of 1,675 15- to 16-year-old students attending all schools in Bauru (Sao Paulo, Brazil) was selected. The impact of oral conditions on quality of life in the last 6 months was reported using both OHIP14 and OIDP. To allow for comparison with the 100 percent OIDP score, OHIP14 scores were converted to percentages. Then, agreement between the two OHRQoL measures was analyzed using the Bland and Altman method. Results: The mean difference between OHIP14 and OIDP was 6.48 percent [confidence interval95% (6.08; 6.89)], with higher scores reported for OHIP14 than for OIDP. Besides, 95 percent of the differences between the two OHRQoL measures were between ,10.59 and 23.56 percent. Finally, differences between OHIP14 and OIDP increased significantly as the magnitude of their average increased (P < 0.001). Conclusion: There was a moderate level of agreement between OHIP14 and OIDP, which may be partly due to the fact that both OHRQoL measures assess different levels of oral impacts on quality of life in addition to having different scoring systems. [source]

Oral Impacts on Daily Performance in Norwegian adults: validity, reliability and prevalence estimates

Applicability of an abbreviated version of the oral impacts on daily performances (OIDP) scale for use among Tanzanian students

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, Issue 1 2003
J. R. Masalu
Abstract , Objectives: The objective was to examine the applicability of an abbreviated version of the oral impact of daily performances (OIDP) inventory to Tanzanian adults attending the University of Dar es Salaam. Method: A total of 1123 students (mean age 26.4 years, response rate 58%) completed a survey instrument designed to measure subjective oral health indicators including the eight-item OIDP frequency scores. After a period of 4 weeks, 228 students (mean age 24.6 years, response rate 65%) were examined clinically for the presence or absence of oral disorders. Results: A total of 51% of the participants reported that an oral problem had affected them on at least one daily performance in the 6 months preceding the survey. Cronbach's alpha for the OIDP frequency items was 0.83 and 0.87 on the first and second administration of the questionnaire. A reliability coefficient (Spearman's rho) of 0.87 was obtained for the OIDP frequency scores. For five of the eight OIDP frequency items, the kappa values ranged from 0.60 to 1.0, whereas one scale item had the less satisfactory value of 0.22. Construct validity was demonstrated in that the OIDP frequency scores were statistically significantly associated in the expected direction with clinically observed oral problems and a global self-report indicator of oral health status, respectively. Conclusion: The OIDP frequency scale seems to have acceptable psychometric properties in the context of a descriptive questionnaire survey among Tanzanian university students. [source]

A sociodental approach to assessing dental needs of children: concept and models

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, Issue 2 2006
S. GHERUNPONG
Summary. Objectives., Traditional normative methods of assessing dental needs do not correspond to current concepts of ,health' and ,need'. Although there is dental research on quality of life, evidence-based practice, and oral behaviours, those concepts are rarely applied to dental needs estimation. Dental needs are usually calculated mainly from clinical data and are likely to be inaccurate. A structured comprehensive method for assessing dental needs is required. The objectives of this study are to develop and test a new sociodental system of needs assessment for overall dental needs of primary schoolchildren. Furthermore, normative and sociodental estimates of need are compared. Design., The study developed a theoretical framework and pathway algorithms of sociodental needs assessment and applied them to assessing overall dental needs. Normative dental needs were assessed using standard normative criteria. The child oral impacts on daily performances (Child-OIDP) was used to assess oral impacts, and a self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information on demographic variables and oral behaviours. Data were analysed according to the developed algorithms. Setting., A cross-sectional survey in Suphanburi Province, Thailand. Participants., All 1126 children aged 11,12 years in a town. Main results., The sociodental approach was acceptable and not costly. In all, 54·4% had normative need under the dental needs model for life-threatening and progressive conditions, but only 16·6% had high propensity-related need; the remaining 37·8% would require dental health education or oral health promotion (DHE/OHP) or both and appropriately adjusted clinical interventions. Under the basic model of dental needs, 45·1% had normative need. Two-thirds of them (30·9%) had impact-related need and the remaining 14·2% did not have oral impacts and therefore should only receive dental health education. Only one-third of those with impact-related need had high propensity and were suitable for evidence-based conventional treatments; the remaining two-thirds should receive DHE/OHP and alternative clinical interventions. Conclusions., A sociodental system of dental needs assessment was developed and tested on school children. It decreased the estimates of conventionally assessed dental treatment needs and introduced a broader approach to care. [source]