Home  About us  Contact
 

D15 Test (d15 + test)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Occupational colour vision requirements for police officers

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 6 2008
Jennifer Birch
Abstract Inclusion of public service professions in the UK Disability Discrimination Act in 2004 prompted a review of occupational colour vision requirements for police officers. Changes in the regulations which existed prior to 2003 were proposed. The aim of this study was to obtain the views of serving police officers in Northern Ireland on the importance of good colour discrimination in everyday police work and on the recruitment regulations for patrol constables introduced in 2003 in mainland UK. These views were obtained by means of a questionnaire and informal discussions. More than 65% of police officers who responded to the questionnaire considered that good colour vision was very important for effective policing. Fewer than 2% considered that colour vision was unimportant. Experienced police officers agreed that the employment of colour-deficient patrol constables, as permitted in the new regulations, would lead to reduced efficiency and organisational difficulties at the local level. A number of everyday activities were described which showed the need for accurate colour discrimination. The change in recruitment policy and the lack of clarity in the new regulations show inadequate appreciation of the needs of the occupation, of different types of colour vision anomalies and of the diagnostic function of colour vision tests. Failure to provide guidance on appropriate colour vision tests, examination procedures and counselling services is likely to result in inconsistent employment policies in different police forces. It is recommended that the colour vision standard in place prior to 2003 is reinstated at the recruitment stage. The Ishihara test should be used for screening, and colour-deficient applicants further examined with the Farnsworth D15 test as a replacement for the City University Test 2nd edition. [source]

Which color vision test should be used in progressive cone dystrophy?

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2007
AAHJ THIADENS
Purpose: The early manifestation of progressive cone dystrophy (COD) can remain unrecognized due to the relatively normal macular appearance. Color vision testing can be very useful as a first diagnostic step. The many available color vision tests have different benefits and shortcomings. We aimed to identify which test would be preferred to use in a clinical setting as a first step towards diagnosis of COD. Methods: We compared patients (n=18) derived from the ophthalmogenetic unit of Erasmus Medical Center and University Medical Center Nijmegen, with various levels of cone dysfunction. Golden Standard for diagnosis of COD was a diminished photopic ERG and a relative central scotoma on Goldmann perimetry. Controls (n=33) were patients from these clinics with other diagnoses or healthy companions of COD patients. We estimated sensitivity and specificity of the Ishihara test, Lanthony Desaturated and Saturated Panel D15 test, the Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) pseudo-isochromatic plates, and the Nagel anomaloscope. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity and the predictive value with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results: The HRR test had the highest sensitivity and specificity for protan and deutan axes. HRR and Ishihara had the highest predictive value. Lanthony Panel D15 test did not have an additional predictive value for severe color vision defects. The Nagel anomaloscope was not reliable due to low specificity. Its results showed high variations among both healthy and afflicted individuals. Conclusions: The HRR test was the most useful for COD. This test had the highest sensitivity in detecting early dysfunction of all three cone types, and it adequately quantifies the level of cone dysfunction in the course of the disease. [source]

Abnormal colour vision is a handicap to playing cricket but not an insurmountable one

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, Issue 6 2007
Ross W Harris BAppSc LOSc FVCO
Background:, Two studies have reported that abnormal colour vision is under-represented among cricketers, presumably because cricketers with abnormal colour vision have difficulty seeing the red ball against the green grass of the cricket field and the green foliage around it. We have previously reported on the difficulties of five cricketers with abnormal colour vision but we have also reported that one of Australia's finest cricketers was a protanope. This survey was undertaken to confirm the under-representation of abnormal colour vision among cricketers and to ascertain whether those playing tend to be (1) those with a mild colour vision deficiency, (2) bowlers rather than batsman and (3) prefer to field close to the batsman rather than in the outfield. Methods:, The colour vision of 293 members of seven Melbourne Premier cricket clubs was tested using the Ishihara test. Those who failed were examined further to confirm their abnormal colour vision, to assess its severity with the Farnsworth D15 test and to classify it as either protan or deutan using the Medmont C100 test. A questionnaire about cricketing ability and problems playing cricket was administered. Results:, Twenty-six (8.9 per cent) of the cricketers had abnormal colour vision, of whom six played in the First Grade (6.7 per cent of First Grade players). The proportion of cricketers with a severe deficiency was significantly less than expected for the First Grade players. There were only two protans. Bowlers were not over-represented among the colour vision defective cricketers but those preferring to field close to the batsman were significantly over-represented. Conclusion:, Abnormal colour vision is a modest handicap to playing cricket, especially at the higher levels of the game. It may impede batting and the ability to field in the outfield. [source]

Assessment of inherited colour vision defects in clinical practice

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, Issue 3 2007
Barry L Cole PhD MAppSc BSc LOSc
Background:, Colour vision deficiency (CVD) has a high prevalence and is often a handicap in everyday life. Those who have CVD will be better able to adapt and make more informed career choices, if they know about their deficiency. The fact that from 20 to 30 per cent of adults with abnormal colour vision do not know they have CVD suggests that colour vision is not tested as often as it should be. This may be because of practitioner uncertainty about which tests to use, how to interpret them and the advice that should be given to patients on the basis of the results. The purpose of this paper is to recommend tests for primary care assessment of colour vision and provide guidance on the advice that can be given to patients with CVD. Methods:, The literature on colour vision tests and the relationship between the results of the tests and performance at practical colour tasks was reviewed. Results:, The colour vision tests that are most suitable for primary care clinical practice are the Ishihara test, the Richmond HRR 4th edition 2002 test, the Medmont C-100 test and the Farnsworth D15 test. These tests are quick to administer, give clear results and are easy to interpret. Tables are provided summarising how these tests should be interpreted, the advice that can be given to CVD patients on basis of the test results, and the occupations in which CVD is a handicap. Conclusion:, Optometrists should test the colour vision of all new patients with the Ishihara and Richmond HRR (2002) tests. Those shown to have CVD should be assessed with the Medmont C-100 test and the Farnsworth D15 test and given appropriate advice based on the test results. [source]