Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Critically Ill Patients (critically + ill_patient)
Selected AbstractsEmergency Air Evacuation of Critically Ill Patients from Cruise ShipsJOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, Issue 6 2002John A. Knowles MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Evaluation of Emergency Air Evacuation of Critically Ill Patients from Cruise ShipsJOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, Issue 6 2001Laurence D. Prina Background: The study objectives were to assess the ship physician's diagnostic accuracy in making the decision to air evacuate critically ill patients from cruise ships, to determine the outcome of these patients, and the overall benefit of air evacuation. Methods: From October 1999 to May 2000, we performed a prospective study of critically ill patients coming from cruise ships in the Caribbean and transported to our institution by air ambulance. Demographics, initial diagnosis, and treatment on board were collected by the triage officer at the time of the cruise physician's first call. In route complications and flight team composition were obtained from the air ambulance monitoring log. Patients were followed-up in the hospital for complications, outcome, and final diagnosis. Results: A consecutive series of 104 patients were considered for analysis. There were 65 men and 39 women (mean age: 68.7 years). Cruise physician's diagnosis was correct in more than 90% of the cases. Internal medicine and surgical conditions represented 80.8% and 19.2% of the cases respectively, falling mainly into three categories: cardiac (34.6%), neurological (20.2%), and digestive (14%). Two cardiac arrests and 1 ventricular fibrillation were successfully resuscitated and 5 of 15 myocardial infarctions received thrombolytic therapy on board. Air transfers were warranted in 96.1% of the cases and physician presence in the flight was considered appropriate in 97.6%. In route complications and mortality rate were 5.8% and 2.9% respectively, related to serious cardiac events. Among the 98 hospitalized patients, 10 patients developed new complications and 5 died. The overall mortality rate was 7.7%. Conclusion: The cruise industry appears off to a good start in the medical treatment of passengers needing air evacuation to a land based medical facility. There is room for improvement and adoption of American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and International Council of Cruise Lines (ICCL) Health Care Guidelines are meaningful first steps. Analysis of Caribbean medical facilities and implementation of active telemedicine conferencing represent alternatives to air evacuation that need to be studied. [source] Comparison of Sustained Hemodiafiltration With Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration for the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney InjuryARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 4 2010Masanori Abe Abstract Despite improvements in medical care, the mortality of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) who require renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains high. We describe a new approach, sustained hemodiafiltration, to treat patients who suffered from acute kidney injury and were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). In our study, 60 critically ill patients with AKI who required RRT were treated with either continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) or sustained hemodiafiltration (S-HDF). The former was performed by administering a postfilter replacement fluid at an effluent rate of 35 mL/kg/h, and the latter was performed by administering a postfilter replacement fluid at a dialysate-flow rate of 300,500 mL/min. The S-HDF was delivered on a daily basis. The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two treatment groups were similar. The primary study outcome,survival until discharge from the ICU or survival for 30 days, whichever was earlier,did not significantly differ between the two groups: 70% after CVVHDF and 87% after S-HDF. The hospital-survival rate after CVVHDF was 63% and that after S-HDF was 83% (P < 0.05). The number of patients who showed renal recovery at the time of discharge from the ICU and the hospital and the duration of the ICU stay significantly differed between the two treatments (P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between the mean number of treatments performed per patient, the mean duration of daily treatment in the S-HDF group was 6.5 ± 1.0 h, which was significantly shorter. Although the total convective volumes,the sum of the replacement-fluid and fluid-removal volumes,did not differ significantly, the dialysate-flow rate was higher in the S-HDF group. Our results suggest that in comparison with conventional continuous RRT, including high-dose CVVHDF, more intensive renal support in the form of postdilution S-HDF will decrease the mortality and accelerate renal recovery in critically ill patients with AKI. [source] Unexpected Events during the Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill PatientsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 6 2007Jonathan P.N. Papson MBBS Objectives:To examine unexpected events (UEs) that occur during the intrahospital transport of critically ill emergency department patients. Methods:This was a prospective observational study of consecutive intrahospital transports between March 2003 and June 2004. The escorting emergency physician completed the data collection document either during or immediately after the transport. This document detailed equipment-related UEs, patient instability and invasive line-related UEs, whether the UEs required intervention, and whether the UEs were potentially life threatening (serious UEs). Results:Of 339 transports observed, 230 (67.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.6% to 72.7%) were associated with 604 UEs. Overall, there was a median of 1.0 UE per transport (range, 0,16). There were 277 (45.9%; 95% CI = 41.8% to 49.9%) UEs related to equipment, 158 (26.2%; 95% CI = 22.7% to 29.9%) related to patient instability, 156 (25.8%; 95% CI = 22.4% to 29.6%) related to equipment lines, and 13 (2.2%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 3.8%) miscellaneous UEs. The most common UEs were oxygen saturation probe failures, lead and line tangles, hypotension, and the wearing off of sedation and/or paralysis. Most UEs (478 [79.1%]; 95% CI = 75.6% to 82.3%) required an intervention. Emergency physicians had a significantly lower UE rate than residents. Thirty serious UEs occurred; 5.0% (95% CI = 3.4% to 7.1%) of UEs and 8.9% (95% CI = 6.2% to 12.5%) of transports were associated with a serious UE. The most common were severe hypotension, decreasing consciousness requiring intubation, and increased intracranial pressure. Conclusions:Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients from the emergency department are common and can be potentially life threatening. Transporting physician experience is associated with UE rate. Strict adherence to and review of existing transport guidelines is recommended. [source] Long-term effect of the ICU-diary concept on quality of life after critical illnessACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2010C. G. BÄCKMAN Background: Critically ill patients often spend time in the intensive care unit (ICU) either unconscious or sedated. On recovery, they are often in a state of confusion with memory loss that may be associated with a longstanding reduction in health-related quality of life (QoL). We hypothesised that the ICU-diary concept could improve their QoL by filling in their memory gaps. Methods: A non-randomised, prospective study in a non-academic eight-bedded general ICU. A group of patients (n=38) were selected to receive the ICU-diary concept (keeping a diary with photos while on the ICU plus a follow-up meeting) when a long and complicated course was expected. Health-related QoL at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months was compared with a group that did not receive the ICU-diary (n=224). The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) was used to measure health-related QoL. Multiple regression models adjusted for age, sex, illness severity, pre-existing disease and diagnostic category was used to analyse the effects of the ICU-diary concept at 6 months, and changes over time were analysed using repeated measures MANOVA. Results: Crude and adjusted scores for two dimensions of SF-36 (general health and vitality) and the physical component summary score were significantly higher at 6 months in the ICU-diary group (P<0.05) and some of the effects remained during the 3-year follow-up period (P<0.05). Conclusion: The ICU-diary concept was associated with improved health-related QoL during the 3-year follow-up period after a critical illness. The effect of this intervention needs to be confirmed in a larger randomised study. [source] Item selection and content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal adultsJOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, Issue 1 2009Céline Gélinas Abstract Title.,Item selection and content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal adults. Aim., This paper is a report of the item selection process and evaluation of the content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal critically ill adults. Background., Critically ill patients experience moderate to severe pain in the intensive care unit. While critical care clinicians strive to obtain the patient's self-report of pain, many factors compromise the patient's ability to communicate verbally. Pain assessment methods often need to match the communication capabilities of the patient. In non-verbal patients, observable behavioural and physiological indicators become important indices for pain assessment. Method., A mixed method study design was used for the development of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in 2002,2003. More specifically, a four-step process was undertaken: (1) literature review, (2) review of 52 patients' medical files, (3) focus groups with 48 critical care nurses, and interviews with 12 physicians, and (4) evaluation of content validity with 17 clinicians using a self-administered questionnaire. Results., Item selection was derived from different sources of information which were convergent and complementary in their content. An initial version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool was developed including both behavioural and physiological indicators. Because physiological indicators received more criticism than support, only the four behaviours with content validity indices >0·80 were included in the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: facial expression, body movements, muscle tension and compliance with the ventilator. Conclusion., Item selection and expert opinions are relevant aspects of tool development. While further evaluation is planned, the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool appears as a useful instrument to assess pain in critically ill patients. [source] Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery diseaseCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001Nasser Jowhar Hayat M.D., Ph.D. Abstract Background: Critically ill patients undergoing bypass surgery experience a higher mortality and morbidity. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and value of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as a bridge to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in high-risk patients with refractory unstable angina or cardiogenic shock. Methods: We present 11 seriously unstable patients with severe multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing culprit vessel PTCA. Angioplasty was performed not as a definitive procedure but rather as a bridge to surgical revascularization. All the patients had sustained at least one myocardial infarction prior to catheterization, all had refractory unstable angina, eight patients had only a single patent coronary artery, and five patients were in cardiogenic shock. Results: Following PTCA, all patients enjoyed a stable in-hospital period. One patient died 12 weeks after successful PTCA while awaiting second CABG. Seven patients subsequently underwent CABG and are doing well. The remaining three patients were also advised to undergo CABG, but elected to continue medical management. Conclusions: Coronary angioplasty of the culprit vessel may play a role as a bridge to surgery in critically ill patients. [source] | ||||||||||