			Home About us Contact

Craniofacial Surgery (craniofacial + surgery)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors

CANCER, Issue 6 2003
Report of an International Collaborative Study
Abstract BACKGROUND Malignant tumors of the skull base are rare. Therefore, no single center treats enough patients to accumulate significant numbers for meaningful analysis of outcomes after craniofacial surgery (CFS). The current report was based on a large cohort that was analyzed retrospectively by an International Collaborative Study Group. METHODS One thousand three hundred seven patients who underwent CFS in 17 institutions were analyzable for outcome. The median age was 54 years (range, 1,98 years). Definitive treatment prior to CFS had been administered in 59% of patients and included radiotherapy in 367 patients (28%), chemotherapy in 151 patients (12%), and surgery in 523 patients (40%). The majority of tumors (87%) involved the anterior cranial fossa. Squamous cell carcinoma (29%) and adenocarcinoma (16%) were the most common histologic types. The margins of surgical resection were reported close/positive in 412 patients (32%). Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy was received by 510 patients (39%), and chemotherapy was received by 57 patients (4%). RESULTS Postoperative complications were reported in 433 patients (33%), with local wound complications the most common (18%). The postoperative mortality rate was 4%. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 54%, 60%, and 53%, respectively. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins were independent predictors of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS CFS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with malignant tumors of the skull base. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins are independent determinants of outcome. Cancer 2003;98:1179,87. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11630 [source]

Intraoperative hyponatremia during craniofacial surgery

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 4 2009
K. RANDO MD
Summary Background:, Hyponatremia is an important cause of morbidity in some groups of hospitalized children. Our aim is to describe the incidence and severity of intraoperative hyponatremia in children undergoing craniofacial surgery, and determine the associated risk factors. Methods:, A descriptive retrospective study of children who underwent primary craniofacial surgery between March 1994 and February 2008 was performed. All administered fluids contained a minimum sodium concentration of 140 mmol·l,1. Hyponatremia was classified as follows: severe ,125 mmol·l,1; moderate 126,130 mmol·l,1; and, mild 131,134 mmol·l,1. Results:, Hundred and seven cases are reported. Severe, moderate and mild intraoperative hyponatremia occurred in 14 (13%), 21 (19%) and 23 (22%) children respectively. Mannitol was given to 31 (29%) children, but was not associated with the development of hyponatremia. Neither the type nor duration of surgery, type of fluid replacement nor hourly urinary output, was associated with development of hyponatremia. Most episodes of significant intraoperative hyponatremia (44%) were detected between the 2nd and the 4th hour of surgery. There were no identified neurological sequelae (e.g. coma, neurological deficit) attributable to the hyponatremia. Conclusion:, Despite strict avoidance of low sodium solutions (<140 mmol·l,1), hyponatremia occurs frequently in children undergoing craniofacial surgery in our practice; and is unrelated to the administration of mannitol. Although the mechanisms are yet to be determined, anesthesiologists should be aware of this issue and be prepared to monitor and treat this potentially serious complication. [source]

Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of intravenous propacetamol vs rectal paracetamol in children after major craniofacial surgery

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 7 2008
SANDRA A. PRINS MD PhD
Summary Background:, The pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of intravenous and rectal paracetamol were compared in nonventilated infants after craniofacial surgery in a double-blind placebo controlled study. Methods:, During surgery all infants (6 months,2 years) received a rectal loading dose of 40 mg·kg,1 paracetamol 2 h before anticipated extubation. On admittance to the pediatric surgical ICU, the children were randomized to receive either a 15 min intravenous infusion of 40 mg·kg,1 propacetamol, a prodrug of paracetamol, or 20 mg·kg,1 paracetamol rectally every 6 h. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of the paracetamol plasma concentration time-profiles was undertaken using nonlinear mixed effects models. The visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0,10 cm) and COMFORT Behavior scale (score 6,30) were used to monitor analgesia in the 24-h period following surgery. Results:, Twelve infants received intravenous propacetamol and 14 paracetamol suppositories. Paracetamol pharmacokinetics were described according to a two-compartmental model with linear disposition. Pharmacokinetic parameters were standardized to a 70 kg person using allometric ,1/4 power' models. Parameter estimates were: absorption half-life from the rectum 4.6 h, propacetamol hydrolysis half-life 0.028 h, clearance 12 l·h,1·70 kg,1, intercompartmental clearance 116 l·h,1·70 kg,1, central and peripheral volume of distribution 7.9 and 44 l·70 kg,1, respectively. During the 24-h study period 22 infants exhibited VAS scores <4 cm, which was considered a cutoff point. On single occasions four patients, two in each group, exhibited a VAS score ,4 cm. Nine patients in the rectal treatment group and three patients in the intravenous treatment group received midazolam for COMFORT-B scores exceeding 17 (P < 0.05). Conclusions:, Intravenous propacetamol proved to be more effective than rectal paracetamol in infants after craniofacial surgery. Midazolam was more frequently administered to patients receiving paracetamol suppositories, indicating that these children experienced more distress, possibly caused by pain. [source]