Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Craniodental Morphology (craniodental + morphology)
Selected AbstractsCenozoic environmental change in South America as indicated by mammalian body size distributions (cenograms)DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, Issue 6 2001Darin A. Croft Abstract. A cenogram is a rank-ordered body size distribution of non-predatory terrestrial mammal species within a community. Studies of cenograms for modern faunas have shown that certain quantifiable attributes of cenograms are correlated with environmental variables such as rainfall and vegetation structure. Based on these correlations, cenograms of fossil communities have been used to infer palaeoenvironments and palaeoenvironmental variables. The present study uses cenogram statistics to interpret palaeoenvironmental conditions for eight Cenozoic South American mammal faunas, ranging from Eocene to Pleistocene in age. Body sizes for fossil taxa were taken either from the literature or were estimated using regressions of body size on molar length (or femoral bicondylar width) for modern mammals. Cenogram statistics are calculated for the eight fossil faunas and compared to similar statistics calculated for 16 modern South American mammal faunas, allowing palaeoenvironmental interpretations to be made. The palaeoenvironmental interpretations based on cenogram analyses sometimes support and sometimes contradict interpretations based on herbivore craniodental morphology (e.g. levels of hypsodonty). Simulations of expected errors in body size estimates for fossil taxa suggest that the discrepancies do not result primarily from erroneous body size estimates. It is possible that some of the incongruity in interpretations results from certain non-analogue attributes of South American faunas during much of the Cenozoic (e.g. the relatively depauperate mammalian predator diversity prior to the Great American Biotic Interchange). [source] The human fossil record: Volume one: Terminology and craniodental morphology of genus Homo (Europe)AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, Issue 5 2003Karen R. Rosenberg No abstract is available for this article. [source] Craniodental mechanics and diet in Asian colobines: Morphological evidence of mature seed predation and sclerocarpyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Issue 1 2010Daisuke B. Koyabu Abstract Folivory has been accepted as the general dietary pattern for colobines. However, recent ecological studies have revealed that extensive seed eating is found in some colobine species. The ripeness of foraged seeds is also reported to differ between seed eaters. As seeds are generally stress-limited and may pose greater mechanical demands, seed-eating species are predicted to exhibit morphological features adaptive for seed predation. In addition, species that feeds on seeds from unripe fruits with hard pericarp is predicted to exhibit increased leverage for anterior dentition. To test these hypotheses, we compared the craniodental morphology of seed-eating Asian colobines (Presbytis rubicunda and Trachypithecus phayrei) with those of species that rarely exploit seeds (Presbytis comata, Trachypithecus obscurus, and Semnopithecus vetulus). The results show that the seed-eating colobines possess a masticatory system with enhanced leverage at postcanine bite points. The sclerocarpic forager P. rubicunda also exhibits markedly greater masticatory leverage at anterior dental bite points, while the mature-seed-eating T. phayrei shows no such advantage for canine and incisor use. These observations suggest that P. rubicunda is well adapted to husking the resistant pericarps of unripe fruits, using the anterior dentition and to gain access to the immature seeds, whereas such sclerocarpic feeding behavior may be less important for T. phayrei. Our findings indicate that the distinctive craniodental variations of colobines may be linked to mature and/or immature seed eating and suggest the significance of seed predation for the evolution of colobine monkeys. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The shape of the early hominin proximal femurAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Elizabeth H. Harmon Abstract Postcranial skeletal variation among Plio-Pleistocene hominins has implications for taxonomy and locomotor adaptation. Although sample size constraints make interspecific comparisons difficult, postcranial differences between Australopithecus afarensis and Australopithecus africanus have been reported (McHenry and Berger: J Hum Evol 35 1998 1,22; Richmond et al.: J Hum Evol 43 [2002] 529,548; Green et al.: J Hum Evol 52 2007 187,200). Additional evidence indicates that the early members of the genus Homo show morphology like recent humans (e.g., Walker and Leakey: The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton. Cambridge: Harvard, 1993). Using a larger fossil sample than previous studies and novel methods, the early hominin proximal femur is newly examined to determine whether new data alter the current view of femoral evolution and inform the issue of interspecific morphological variation among australopiths. Two- and three-dimensional data are collected from large samples of recent humans, Pan, Gorilla, and Pongo and original fossil femora of Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and femora of African fossil Homo. The size-adjusted shape data are analyzed using principal components, thin plate spline analysis, and canonical variate analysis to assess shape variation. The results indicate that femora of fossil Homo are most similar to modern humans but share a low neck-shaft angle (NSA) with australopiths. Australopiths as a group have ape-like greater trochanter morphology. A. afarensis differs from P. robustus and A. africanus in attributes of the neck and NSA. However, interspecific femoral variation is low and australopiths are generally morphologically similar. Although the differences are not dramatic, when considered in combination with other postcranial evidence, the adaptive differences among australopiths in craniodental morphology may have parallels in the postcranium. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Phylogenetic relationships among the Lorisoidea as indicated by craniodental morphology and mitochondrial sequence dataAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2007Judith C. Masters Abstract The phylogeny of the Afro-Asian Lorisoidea is controversial. While postcranial data attest strongly to the monophyly of the Lorisidae, most molecular analyses portray them as paraphyletic and group the Galagidae alternately with the Asian or African lorisids. One of the problems that has bedevilled phylogenetic analysis of the group in the past is the limited number of taxa sampled for both ingroup families. We present the results of a series of phylogenetic analyses based on 635 base pairs (bp) from two mitochondrial genes (12S and 16S rRNA) with and without 36 craniodental characters, for 11 galagid and five lorisid taxa. The outgroup was the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Analyses of the molecular data included maximum parsimony (MP), neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian methods. The model-based analyses and the combined "molecules+morphology" analyses supported monophyly of the Lorisidae and Galagidae. The lorisids form two geographically defined clades. We find no support for the taxonomy of Galagidae as proposed recently by Groves [Primate Taxonomy, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 350 p, 2001]. The taxonomy of Nash et al. [International Journal of Primatology 10:57,80, 1989] is supported by the combined "molecules+morphology" analysis; however, the model-based analyses suggest that Galagoides may be an assemblage of species united by plesiomorphic craniodental characters. Am. J. Primatol. 69:6,15, 2007. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||