Home About us Contact | |||
Crown Group (crown + group)
Selected AbstractsGeobiological analysis using whole genome-based tree building applied to the Bacteria, Archaea, and EukaryaGEOBIOLOGY, Issue 1 2003Christopher H. House ABSTRACT We constructed genomic trees based on the presence and absence of families of protein-encoding genes observed in 55 prokaryotic and five eukaryotic genomes. There are features of the genomic trees that are not congruent with typical rRNA phylogenetic trees. In the bacteria, for example, Deinococcus radiodurans associates with the Gram-positive bacteria, a result that is also seen in some other phylogenetic studies using whole genome data. In the Archaea, the methanogens plus Archaeoglobus form a united clade and the Euryarchaeota are divided with the two Thermoplasma genomes and Halobacterium sp. falling below the Crenarchaeota. While the former appears to be an accurate representation of methanogen-relatedness, the misplacement of Halobacterium may be an artefact of parsimony. These results imply the last common ancestor of the Archaea was not a methanogen, leaving sulphur reduction as the most geochemically plausible metabolism for the base of the archaeal crown group. It also suggests that methanogens were not a component of the Earth's earliest biosphere and that their origin occurred sometime during the Archean. In the Eukarya, the parsimony analysis of five Eukaryotes using the Crenarchaeota as an outgroup seems to counter the Ecdysozoa hypothesis, placing Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda) below the common ancestor of Drosophila melanogaster (Arthropoda) and Homo sapiens (Chordata) even when efforts are made to counter the possible effects of a faster rate of sequence evolution for the C. elegans genome. Further analysis, however, suggests that the gene loss of ,animal' genes is highest in C. elegans and is obscuring the relationships of these organisms. [source] Estimating ancestral distributions of lineages with uncertain sister groups: a statistical approach to Dispersal,Vicariance Analysis and a case using Aesculus L. (Sapindaceae) including fossilsJOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS EVOLUTION, Issue 5 2009A.J. HARRIS Abstract, We propose a simple statistical approach for using Dispersal,Vicariance Analysis (DIVA) software to infer biogeographic histories without fully bifurcating trees. In this approach, ancestral ranges are first optimized for a sample of Bayesian trees. The probability P of an ancestral range r at a node is then calculated as where Y is a node, and F(rY) is the frequency of range r among all the optimal solutions resulting from DIVA optimization at node Y, t is one of n topologies optimized, and Pt is the probability of topology t. Node Y is a hypothesized ancestor shared by a specific crown lineage and the sister of that lineage "x", where x may vary due to phylogenetic uncertainty (polytomies and nodes with posterior probability <100%). Using this method, the ancestral distribution at Y can be estimated to provide inference of the geographic origins of the specific crown group of interest. This approach takes into account phylogenetic uncertainty as well as uncertainty from DIVA optimization. It is an extension of the previously described method called Bayes-DIVA, which pairs Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with biogeographic analysis using DIVA. Further, we show that the probability P of an ancestral range at Y calculated using this method does not equate to pp*F(rY) on the Bayesian consensus tree when both variables are <100%, where pp is the posterior probability and F(rY) is the frequency of range r for the node containing the specific crown group. We tested our DIVA-Bayes approach using Aesculus L., which has major lineages unresolved as a polytomy. We inferred the most probable geographic origins of the five traditional sections of Aesculus and of Aesculus californica Nutt. and examined range subdivisions at parental nodes of these lineages. Additionally, we used the DIVA-Bayes data from Aesculus to quantify the effects on biogeographic inference of including two wildcard fossil taxa in phylogenetic analysis. Our analysis resolved the geographic ranges of the parental nodes of the lineages of Aesculus with moderate to high probabilities. The probabilities were greater than those estimated using the simple calculation of pp*F(ry) at a statistically significant level for two of the six lineages. We also found that adding fossil wildcard taxa in phylogenetic analysis generally increased P for ancestral ranges including the fossil's distribution area. The ,P was more dramatic for ranges that include the area of a wildcard fossil with a distribution area underrepresented among extant taxa. This indicates the importance of including fossils in biogeographic analysis. Exmination of range subdivision at the parental nodes revealed potential range evolution (extinction and dispersal events) along the stems of A. californica and sect. Parryana. [source] Cladistic Analysis of A Problematic Ammonite Group: the Hamitidae (Cretaceous, Albian,turonian) and Proposals for New Cladistic TermsPALAEONTOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Neale MonksArticle first published online: 24 NOV 200 The Hamitidae are a family of mid,Cretaceous heteromorph ammonites including lineages leading to four other families. Problems are outlined in trying to describe the phylogeny of completely extinct groups such as these heteromorph ammonites using the existing cladistic terminology, which is largely concerned with extant taxa and their ancestors. To solve these problems, two new terms are proposed: ,crown groups and ,stem groups, which are equivalent to crown and stem groups in terms of the evolutionary history of a clade, but are not defined on the basis of extant taxa. Instead they are defined by the topology of the phylogenetic tree, the ,crown group being a clade defined by synapomorphies but which gave rise to no descendants. A ,stem group is a branch of a phylogenetic tree which comprises the immediate sister groups of a given ,crown group but is not itself a clade. Examples of these terms are described here with reference to the phylogeny of the Hamitidae and their descendants. The Hamitidae are paraphyletic and form ,stem groups to a number of ,crown groups, namely the Anisoceratidae, Baculitidae, Scaphitidae, and Turrilitidae. The definitions of the genera and subgenera are refined with respect to the type species and the clades within which they occur, and four new genera are described: Eohamites, Helicohamites, Sziveshamites, and Planohamites. [source] {4,10-Bis[2-(2-oxidobenzylideneamino-,2N,O)benzyl]-1,7-dioxa-4,10-diazacyclododecane-,4O1,N4,O3,N10}ytterbium(III) perchlorate acetonitrile solvateACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION C, Issue 8 2006Marina González-Lorenzo In the crystal structure of the title compound, [Yb(C36H38N4O4)]ClO4·CH3CN, the ytterbium ion is eight-coordinated and deeply buried in the cavity of the dianionic Schiff base ligand. The coordination polyhedron may be described as a distorted square antiprism that shows a twist angle of 29.5,(1)° between the two square planes. The receptor adopts a syn arrangement, with both pendent arms on the same side of the crown group, and there are two helicities (one associated with this layout of the pendent arms and the other with the conformation of the crown ring), which give rise to enantiomeric pairs of diastereoisomers, viz. ,(,,,,) and ,(,,,,). [source] The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Bayesian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequencesBIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, Issue 3 2005MASAKI MIYA In a previous study based on 100 whole mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) sequences, we sought to provide a new perspective on the ordinal relationships of higher ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii). The study left unexplored the phylogenetic ,position, of, toadfishes, (order, Batrachoidiformes),, as, data, were, unavailable, owing, to, technical, difficulties. In the present study, we successfully determined mitogenomic sequences for two toadfish species (Batrachomoeus trispinosus and Porichthys myriaster) and found that the difficulties resulted from unusual gene arrangements and associated repetitive non-coding sequences. Unambiguously aligned, concatenated mitogenomic sequences (13 461 bp) from 102 higher actinopterygians (excluding the ND6 gene and control region) were divided into five partitions (1st, 2nd and 3rd codon positions of the protein-coding genes, tRNA genes and rRNA genes) and partitioned Bayesian analyses were conducted. The resultant phylogenies strongly suggest that the toadfishes are not members of relatively primitive higher actinopterygians (Paracanthopterygii), but belong to a crown group of actinopterygians (Percomorpha), as was demonstrated for ophidiiform eels (Ophidiiformes) and anglerfishes (Lophiiformes) in the previous study. We propose revised limits of major unranked categories for higher actinopterygians and a new name (Berycomorpha) for a clade comprising two reciprocally paraphyletic orders (Beryciformes and Stephanoberyciformes) based on the present mitogenomic phylogenies. © 2005 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 85, 289,306. [source] |