			Home About us Contact

Cross-reactive Carbohydrate Determinants (cross-reactive + carbohydrate_determinant)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Immunoglobulin-E Reactivity to a Glycosylated Food Allergen (Peanuts) Due to Interference With Cross-Reactive Carbohydrate Determinants in Heavy Drinkers

ALCOHOLISM, Issue 8 2009
C. Vidal
Background:, N-glycans in plant and invertebrate glycoproteins can induce extensive IgE cross-reactivity therefore limiting the specificity of in vitro allergy tests. IgE sensitization to N-glycans (cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants, CCDs) may be increased in heavy drinkers, who therefore show IgE reactivity to aeroallergens, latex, and Hymenoptera venoms. The peanut, a CCD-bearing allergen, is the leading cause of severe food allergic reactions in many populations. Aim of the study:, To investigate the potential interference of CCDs with determinations of IgE to peanuts in heavy drinkers. Methods:, We determined IgE to peanuts and IgE to a CCD marker (MUXF3, the N-glycan from bromelain) in 41 heavy drinkers admitted to the hospital and 54 healthy controls. None of the participants reported symptoms of peanut allergy. In cases with positive (,0.35 kU/l) IgE to peanuts, we performed inhibition assays with a neoglycoprotein consisting of MUXF3 molecules coupled to bovine serum albumin (MUXF3 -BSA) and a similar neoglycoprotein lacking xylose and fucose (MM-BSA). In the same cases, we screened for IgE to a panel of recombinant nonglycosylated peanut allergens. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting and inhibition assays were performed in selected cases. Results:, The prevalence of positive IgE to peanuts was 22 and 3.7% in heavy drinkers and healthy controls, respectively (p < 0.001). Peanut-IgE positivity was closely related to the presence of IgE to CCDs. In most (8/9) heavy drinkers with positive IgE to peanuts, reactivity was inhibited by preincubation with MUXF3 -BSA, but not with MM-BSA. IgE binding to multiple bands on immunoblotting studies was also inhibited by MUXF3 -BSA preincubation. IgE to nonglycosylated recombinant peanut allergens was uniformly negative. Conclusion:, Heavy drinking is associated with clinically asymptomatic IgE reactivity to peanuts, a relevant food allergen, in relation to CCD interference. [source]

Cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in diagnostics of occupational allergy , preliminary results

ALLERGY, Issue 5 2010
M. Wiszniewska
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Immunoglobulin-E Reactivity to a Glycosylated Food Allergen (Peanuts) Due to Interference With Cross-Reactive Carbohydrate Determinants in Heavy Drinkers

Natural rubber latex and chestnut allergy: cross-reactivity or co-sensitization?

ALLERGY, Issue 11 2007
M. Raulf-Heimsoth
Background:, Chestnut and natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy are often associated in the latex-fruit syndrome. Aim of the study:, To establish whether the concurrent NRL and chestnut IgE antibody reactivity are the results of co-sensitization or cross-reactivity. Methods:, Sera from 19 patients with chestnut- and NRL-specific IgE were selected and tested for reactivity with recombinant (r) latex allergens. Cross-reactivity was explored by IgE-inhibition experiments using chestnut or NRL allergens as solid phase on ImmunoCAP. Results:, IgE-antibodies were detected to rHev b 6.01 (prohevein) in 58% of the sera, to rHev b 5 in 32%, to rHev b 12 in four of 13 sera, to rHev b 7.02 and rHev b 11 in four, and to rHev b 1 in two of 19 sera. rHev b 8-IgE antibodies were found in nine sera (47%), whereas six displayed mono-sensitization to rHev b 8 with regard to our test panel. Three of 16 sera showed IgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. In most sera recognizing rHev b 5 and/or rHev b 6.01 as major allergens the IgE-reactivity to NRL remained unaffected by chestnut extract and chestnut-IgE remained unaffected by NRL extract. Conversely, in sera with rHev b 8 as dominant allergen IgE-binding to NRL was nearly completely inhibited by chestnut and vice versa. IgE-binding to rHev b 8 was abolished by chestnut extract. Conclusions:, Although patients have concomitant IgE antibody reactivity to chestnut and NRL, cross-reactivity could be demonstrated mainly in those patients with IgE to Hev b 8 (profilin) from NRL. [source]

Quantitative analysis of immunoglobulin E reactivity profiles in patients allergic or sensitized to natural rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis)

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, Issue 11 2007
M. Raulf-Heimsoth
Summary Background Characterized native and recombinant Hevea brasiliensis (rHev b) natural rubber latex (NRL) allergens are available to assess patient allergen sensitization profiles. Objective Quantification of individual IgE responses to the spectrum of documented NRL allergens and evaluation of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) for more definitive diagnosis. Methods Sera of 104 healthcare workers (HCW; 51 German, 21 Portuguese, 32 American), 31 spina bifida patients (SB; 11 German, 20 Portuguese) and 10 Portuguese with multiple surgeries (MS) were analysed for allergen-specific IgE antibody (sIgE) to NRL, single Hev b allergens and CCDs with ImmunoCAPÔ technology. Results In all patient groups rHev b 5-sIgE concentrations were the most pronounced. Hev b 2, 5, 6.01 and 13 were identified as the major allergens in HCW and combined with Hev b 1 and Hev b 3 in SB. In MS Hev b 1 displayed an intermediate relevance. Different sIgE antibody levels to native Hevea brasiliensis (nHev b) 2 and rHev b 6.01 allowed discrimination of SB with clinical relevant latex allergy vs. those with latex sensitization. Sensitization profiles of German, Portuguese and American patients were equivalent. rHev b 5, 6.01 and nHev b 13 combined detected 100% of the latex-allergic HCW and 80.1% of the SB. Only 8.3% of the sera showed sIgE response to CCDs. Conclusions Hev b 1, 2, 5, 6.01 and 13 were identified as the major Hev b allergens and they should be present in standardized latex extracts and in vitro allergosorbents. CCDs are only of minor relevance in patients with clinical relevant latex allergy. Component-resolved diagnostic analyses for latex allergy set the stage for an allergen-directed immunotherapy strategy. [source]

Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and the ubiquitous protein profilin: mimickers of allergy

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, Issue 1 2004
D. G. Ebo
Summary Background During the last decade, evidence has been provided for profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) to be capable of inducing cross-reactive IgE antibodies with little clinical relevance. Objective To investigate the prevalence of sensitization to CCD and profilin in isolated allergies (birch, timothy grass, house dust mite, pets (cat and/or dog), natural rubber latex (NRL) and hymenoptera venom). To study the contribution of anti-CCD and anti-profilin IgE antibodies as a cause of clinically irrelevant IgE for NRL and apple. Methods For the first part of the study, 100 patients with inhalant allergy, 17 patients with NRL allergy and 40 patients with venom anaphylaxis were enrolled. Diagnosis was based on a questionnaire and a positive IgE determination and skin test for relevant allergen. Patients were identified as sensitized to CCD if they had a negative prick test and positive IgE for the glycoprotein bromelain. Sensitization to profilin was assessed by IgE for rBet v 2 (recombinant birch profilin). For the second part of the study, sera containing IgE against apple (n=82) or NRL (n=38) were classified as true-negative or false-positive according to the presence or absence of an oral allergy syndrome (OAS) or NRL-induced anaphylaxis. In these patients, sensitization to CCD and profilin was evaluated as described above. Results No sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin was found in isolated birch pollen or NRL allergy. In contrast, sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was found in 4/17 patients with isolated grass pollinosis, 5/24 patients with combined pollinosis (birch, timothy, mugwort) and 7/33 patients with venom anaphylaxis. Sensitization to profilin was almost restricted to patients with combined pollen allergy (5/24). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE against NRL the prevalence of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin IgE was higher than in NRL-allergic patients (P<0.00001 and P=0.0006, respectively). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE to apple, the frequency of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was higher than in OAS patients (P=0.004). Clinically irrelevant NRL and apple were also found in four and five out of the seven patients sensitized to venom CCD, respectively. In pollinosis, clinically irrelevant NRL and apple IgE antibodies were inhibited by bromelain and recombinant birch profilin, whereas in isolated venom anaphylaxis these antibodies were inhibited by bromelain. Conclusions Patients monoallergic to NRL or birch pollen showed no sensitization to bromelain-type CCD or profilin. Sensitization to profilin and/or bromelain-type CCD, caused by pollen (timothy grass, mugwort) or hymenoptera venom allergens, can elicit false-positive IgE antibodies against NRL and apple. [source]