Home About us Contact | |||
Crossmatch Tests (crossmatch + test)
Selected AbstractsA Newly Recognized Blood Group in Domestic Shorthair Cats: The Mik Red Cell AntigenJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007Nicole M. Weinstein Background:Naturally occurring alloantibodies produced against A and B red cell antigens in cats can cause acute hemolytic transfusion reactions. Blood incompatibilities, unrelated to the AB blood group system, have also been suspected after blood transfusions through routine crossmatch testing or as a result of hemolytic transfusion reactions. Hypothesis:Incompatible crossmatch results among AB compatible cats signify the presence of a naturally occurring alloantibody against a newly identified blood antigen in a group of previously never transfused blood donor cats. The associated alloantibody is clinically important based upon a hemolytic transfusion reaction after inadvertent transfusion of red cells expressing this red cell antigen in a feline renal transplant recipient that lacks this red cell antigen. Methods: Blood donor and nonblood donor cats were evaluated for the presence of auto-and alloantibodies using direct antiglobulin and crossmatch tests, respectively, and were blood typed for AB blood group status. Both standard tube and novel gel column techniques were used. Results: Plasma from 3 of 65 cats and 1 feline renal transplant recipient caused incompatible crossmatch test results with AB compatible erythrocytes indicating these cats formed an alloantibody against a red cell antigen they lack, termed Mik. The 3 donors and the renal transplant recipient were crossmatch-compatible with one another. Tube and gel column crossmatch test results were similar. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: The absence of this novel Mik red cell antigen can be associated with naturally occurring anti- Mik alloantibodies and can elicit an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction after an AB-matched blood transfusion. [source] Canine Dal Blood Type: A Red Cell Antigen Lacking in Some DalmatiansJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007Marie-Claude Blais Background:Based upon alloantibodies produced after sensitizing dogs with transfused blood, more than a dozen blood group systems have been recognized thus far, and some have been classified as dog erythrocyte antigens (DEA). Hypothesis:A new canine red cell antigen was suspected, based on the development of specific alloantibodies in a Dalmatian previously sensitized by blood transfusions. Animals:Twenty-six Dalmatians (including 1 Dalmatian in need of blood compatibility studies); 55 canine blood donors. Methods:Serologic tests, including blood typing, crossmatching, and direct Coombs' test were performed by standard tube techniques and a novel gel column technology adapted from human blood banking. Results:By day 40 after transfusion of an anemic Dalmatian, all major crossmatch tests to 55 non-Dalmatian dogs were incompatible. The 2 initial donors, who were compatible before transfusion, were also now incompatible, suggesting the development of an alloantibody to a common red cell antigen. No siblings were available, but 4 of 25 unrelated Dalmatians were crossmatch compatible, suggesting that they were missing the same red cell antigen. The patient was blood typed DEA 1.1, 3, 4, and 5 positive, but DEA 7 negative. Further blood typing and crossmatching results did not support an association to any of these known blood types. The alloantibodies produced were determined to be of the immunoglobulin G class. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Based upon the identification of an acquired alloantibody in a Dalmatian, a presumably new common blood type named Dal was identified. Dalmatians lacking the Dal antigen are likely at risk of delayed and acute hemolytic transfusion reactions. [source] A Newly Recognized Blood Group in Domestic Shorthair Cats: The Mik Red Cell AntigenJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007Nicole M. Weinstein Background:Naturally occurring alloantibodies produced against A and B red cell antigens in cats can cause acute hemolytic transfusion reactions. Blood incompatibilities, unrelated to the AB blood group system, have also been suspected after blood transfusions through routine crossmatch testing or as a result of hemolytic transfusion reactions. Hypothesis:Incompatible crossmatch results among AB compatible cats signify the presence of a naturally occurring alloantibody against a newly identified blood antigen in a group of previously never transfused blood donor cats. The associated alloantibody is clinically important based upon a hemolytic transfusion reaction after inadvertent transfusion of red cells expressing this red cell antigen in a feline renal transplant recipient that lacks this red cell antigen. Methods: Blood donor and nonblood donor cats were evaluated for the presence of auto-and alloantibodies using direct antiglobulin and crossmatch tests, respectively, and were blood typed for AB blood group status. Both standard tube and novel gel column techniques were used. Results: Plasma from 3 of 65 cats and 1 feline renal transplant recipient caused incompatible crossmatch test results with AB compatible erythrocytes indicating these cats formed an alloantibody against a red cell antigen they lack, termed Mik. The 3 donors and the renal transplant recipient were crossmatch-compatible with one another. Tube and gel column crossmatch test results were similar. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: The absence of this novel Mik red cell antigen can be associated with naturally occurring anti- Mik alloantibodies and can elicit an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction after an AB-matched blood transfusion. [source] Lymphocytotoxic crossmatch in pediatric living donor liver transplantationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009Takeshi Saito Abstract:, To investigate the relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and the outcome after pediatric LDLT in a single center. The clinical data of 76 children undergoing 79 LDLTs including three retransplantations from May 2001 to January 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. All of the children had end-stage liver disease, and their median age was 1.4 yr (range, six months to 16.5 yr). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine- or FK-based regimens with steroids. The children were classified into two groups (positive or negative) according to the pretransplant LCT results. The incidences of post-transplant surgical complications and of rejection episodes were compared. The relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and patient and graft survival rates was also analyzed. Seventy-nine pretransplant crossmatch tests were done; 13 (16.5%) were positive, and 66 (83.5%) were negative. No significant difference was found in the pretransplant clinical factors between two crossmatch groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of vascular and biliary tract complications, in the rate of early or steroid-resistant cellular rejections, or in one- and three-yr patient (91.7%, 91.7%, respectively, in the positive group, 93.5%, 93.5%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.80) and graft (92.3%, 92.3%, respectively, in the positive group, 88.8%, 86.4%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.63) survival. The present study demonstrates that there is no reason to do pretransplant LCT to select the living donor for pediatric LDLT. [source] Baseline Donor-Specific Antibody Levels and Outcomes in Positive Crossmatch Kidney TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010J. M. Gloor Renal transplant candidates with donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) have increased risk of antibody-mediated allograft injury. The goal of this study was to correlate the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), transplant glomerulopathy (TG) and graft survival with the baseline DSA level (prior to initiation of pretransplant conditioning). These analyses include 119 positive crossmatch (+XM) compared to 70 negative crossmatch (,XM) transplants performed between April 2000 and July 2007. Using a combination of cell-based crossmatch tests, DSA level was stratified into very high +XM, high +XM, low +XM and ,XM groups. In +XM transplants, increasing DSA level was associated with increased risk for AMR (HR = 1.76 [1.51, 2.07], p = 0.0001) but not TG (p = 0.18). We found an increased risk for both early and late allograft loss associated with very high DSA (HR = 7.71 [2.95, 20.1], p = 0.0001). Although lower DSA recipients commonly developed AMR and TG, allograft survival was similar to that of ,XM patients (p = 0.31). We conclude that the baseline DSA level correlates with risk of early and late alloantibody-mediated allograft injury. With current protocols, very high baseline DSA patients have high rates of AMR and poor long-term allograft survival highlighting the need for improved therapy for these candidates. [source] |