Home About us Contact | |||
Cost Studies (cost + studies)
Selected AbstractsEstimating the Costs of Epilepsy: An International Comparison of Epilepsy Cost StudiesEPILEPSIA, Issue 5 2001Irene A. W. Kotsopoulos Summary: ,Purpose: To compare systematically the national and per capita estimates of the cost of epilepsy in different countries. Methods: Studies for this literature review were selected by conducting a Medline literature search from January 1966 to March 2000. Key methodologic, country-related, and monetary issues of the selected epilepsy cost studies were evaluated to compare their direct cost estimates and to explore their distribution. The results of the selected studies were made comparable by converting them with different types of conversion factors and expressing them as a proportion of the national expenditure on health care. Results: Ten epilepsy cost studies were reviewed. The proportion of national health care expenditure on epilepsy shows a range of 0.12,1.12% or 0.12,1.05% depending on the type of conversion factor. The list of cost components included in the estimation of the direct costs of epilepsy differs from study to study. A comprehensive list is associated with a decrease in the contribution of drug and hospital costs to the total direct costs of epilepsy. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of studying the economic consequences of epilepsy and of interpreting the results on the international level. The results of epilepsy cost studies can provide insight into the distribution of the costs of epilepsy and the impact of epilepsy on the national expenditure on health care. [source] Cost Analysis: Concepts and ApplicationPUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, Issue 1 2001Christine A Brosnan Dr.P.H., R.N.C. Public health nurses are increasingly called upon to justify the cost of care or to decide which of two alternative programs is more cost-effective. Cost studies can be complex and difficult to conduct, but an understanding of the basic techniques allows nurses to fully participate in planning, implementing, and evaluating programs that greatly impact the health of the community. This article defines some of the basic terms used in health economics, discusses standard methods of cost analysis, and provides an example of neonatal screening to illustrate methods of describing, measuring, and assigning a value to cost items. [source] Estimating the Costs of Epilepsy: An International Comparison of Epilepsy Cost StudiesEPILEPSIA, Issue 5 2001Irene A. W. Kotsopoulos Summary: ,Purpose: To compare systematically the national and per capita estimates of the cost of epilepsy in different countries. Methods: Studies for this literature review were selected by conducting a Medline literature search from January 1966 to March 2000. Key methodologic, country-related, and monetary issues of the selected epilepsy cost studies were evaluated to compare their direct cost estimates and to explore their distribution. The results of the selected studies were made comparable by converting them with different types of conversion factors and expressing them as a proportion of the national expenditure on health care. Results: Ten epilepsy cost studies were reviewed. The proportion of national health care expenditure on epilepsy shows a range of 0.12,1.12% or 0.12,1.05% depending on the type of conversion factor. The list of cost components included in the estimation of the direct costs of epilepsy differs from study to study. A comprehensive list is associated with a decrease in the contribution of drug and hospital costs to the total direct costs of epilepsy. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of studying the economic consequences of epilepsy and of interpreting the results on the international level. The results of epilepsy cost studies can provide insight into the distribution of the costs of epilepsy and the impact of epilepsy on the national expenditure on health care. [source] Review Article: Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigenINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 4 2008Tomoaki Imamura Abstract: Economic issues cannot be ignored in conducting prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Through an electronic search, we reviewed five descriptive cost studies and nine cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analyses concerning PSA screening. Most of the existing evidence was based on mathematical model analysis and the results are enormously disparate. The cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained was estimated to be $US 63.37 to $68.32, and $8400 to $23 100, respectively, or was dominated by no screening. Economic studies evaluating PSA screening are still far from sufficient. Urologists, epidemiologists and health economists must jointly conduct further studies on not only mortality but also quality of life assessment and economic evaluation, using randomized clinical trials, for a strict evaluation of the actual efficacy of PSA screening. At present, patients should be thoroughly informed of the limitations of PSA screening and, in consultation with urological specialists, make the personal decision of whether to receive it. [source] Building a Consistent and Reliable Expenditure DatabaseNEW DIRECTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, Issue 106 2000Kelli J. Armstrong Campus cost studies are effective only when key constituencies have been involved in building the data elements that drive those studies. This chapter is a practical guide to that building process. [source] |