Home  About us  Contact
 

Cost Considerations (cost + consideration)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences80%

Selected Abstracts

COST CONSIDERATION BY MEDICARE PART D PLANS MAY PROMOTE THE USE OF POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE MEDICATIONS

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 5 2010
Adam G. Golden MD
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Advanced Opportunities for Student Education in Emergency Medicine

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 10 2004
Charissa B. Pacella MD
Abstract Many medical students are excited about emergency medicine (EM) following a standard clerkship and seek out additional learning opportunities. An advanced EM elective may accomplish several educational goals, including development of clinical skills in evaluating the undifferentiated patient, broader exploration of the field of EM, and more focused study of one particular aspect of EM. Previously cited examples include pediatric EM, medical toxicology, occupational medicine, sports medicine, and EM research. Numerous other EM specialty courses for senior medical students are emerging, as reflected in the "Undergraduate Rotations" listings on the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. A few examples drawn from the list include emergency ultrasound, international EM, wilderness medicine, disaster medicine, geriatric EM, and hyperbaric medicine. Educators aspiring to develop, or in the process of developing, an advanced EM elective may benefit from a brief overview of necessary course considerations, including didactic format, the clinical role of the medical student in the emergency department, and involvement with patient procedures. Suggestions are made regarding additional educational opportunities, including follow-up of patients seen in the emergency department and development of an emergency department radiology case file. This article also addresses several related concerns, including suggested prerequisites, administration and cost considerations, appropriate didactic topics, and methods for evaluating students. Several EM subspecialty areas, namely pediatric EM, medical toxicology, and out-of-hospital care, are specifically discussed. Formal advanced cardiac life support training is also often included in an advanced EM elective and is briefly discussed. The overall intent of this article is to provide medical student educators with resources and ideas to assist them in developing a unique advanced EM elective. [source]

Biomarkers in Migraine: Their Promise, Problems, and Practical Applications

HEADACHE, Issue 7 2006
Elizabeth Loder MD
Biomarkers are physical signs or laboratory measurements that "occur in association with a pathological process and have putative diagnostic and/or prognostic utility." Biomarkers hold considerable promise for understanding and intervening in the disease process of migraine. They may permit recognition of individuals at risk of developing migraine, improve the timing, accuracy, and precision of migraine diagnosis, and serve as indicators of treatment response and disease progression. Furthermore, they hold great promise for research. At the same time, there are important limitations to the use of biomarkers in migraine, including problems with validity, reliability, accuracy, and precision. Legal, ethical, and cost considerations are also important. This review describes the potential uses and limitations of biomarkers in migraine diagnosis, treatment, and research. [source]

Early stopping by using stochastic curtailment in a three-arm sequential trial

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY: SERIES C (APPLIED STATISTICS), Issue 2 2003
Denis Heng-Yan Leung
Summary. Interim analysis is important in a large clinical trial for ethical and cost considerations. Sometimes, an interim analysis needs to be performed at an earlier than planned time point. In that case, methods using stochastic curtailment are useful in examining the data for early stopping while controlling the inflation of type I and type II errors. We consider a three-arm randomized study of treatments to reduce perioperative blood loss following major surgery. Owing to slow accrual, an unplanned interim analysis was required by the study team to determine whether the study should be continued. We distinguish two different cases: when all treatments are under direct comparison and when one of the treatments is a control. We used simulations to study the operating characteristics of five different stochastic curtailment methods. We also considered the influence of timing of the interim analyses on the type I error and power of the test. We found that the type I error and power between the different methods can be quite different. The analysis for the perioperative blood loss trial was carried out at approximately a quarter of the planned sample size. We found that there is little evidence that the active treatments are better than a placebo and recommended closure of the trial. [source]

How do we achieve optimal cardiovascular risk reduction?

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S3 2001
Antonio M. Gotto Jr. M.D., D.PHIL
Abstract Summary: Optimizing coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction requires the application of clinical evidence to patient care, as well as the refinement of risk assessment. Clinical evidence indicates that most patients are not treated to optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goals. Despite the efficacy of statin therapy in reducing the incidence of CHD, many treated patients still experience CHD events. Targeting other lipid factors such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides may augment the risk reduction achieved by lowering LDL cholesterol. Refined global risk assessment can lead to more accurate determinations of absolute risk and to the identification both of high-risk patients needing aggressive intervention and intermediate-risk patients who appear to be at low risk. Previous global risk assessment measures failed to identify a substantial proportion of primary prevention patients who would benefit from therapy. However, revised guidelines issued by the National Cholesterol Education Program introduce new criteria for more precise risk assessment and advocate use of the Framingham scoring system to calculate absolute risk. Although intensified treatment is recommended for high-risk patients, cost considerations may limit drug therapy for some lower-risk individuals. [source]