Corresponding Confidence Intervals (corresponding + confidence_interval)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Cervical carcinoma in Algiers, Algeria: Human papillomavirus and lifestyle risk factors

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 3 2005
Doudja Hammouda
Abstract We conducted a hospital-based case-control study in Algiers, Algeria. A total of 198 cervical carcinoma (CC) cases (including 15 adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas) and 202 age-matched control women were included. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical cells was evaluated using a PCR assay. Odds ratios and corresponding confidence intervals were computed by means of unconditional multiple logistic regression models. HPV infection was detected in 97.7% of CC cases and 12.4% of control women (OR = 635). Nineteen different HPV types were found. HPV 16 was the most common type in both CC cases and control women, followed by HPV 18 and 45. Twelve types (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 66 and 73) were found as single infections in CC cases. Multiple HPV infections did not show a higher odds ratio for CC than single infections. In addition to HPV infection, husband's extramarital sexual relationships with other women (OR = 4.8) or prostitutes (OR = 3.2), residing in a rural environment for most of one's life (OR = 4.9) and indicators of poor sanitation or poor hygiene were the strongest risk factors for CC. Oral contraceptive use was unrelated to CC risk, while multiparity emerged as a significant risk factor after adjustment for sexual habits. Intrauterine device users showed a lower CC risk than nonusers. The role of major risk factors, except inside toilet, was confirmed in the analysis restricted to HPV-positive women. The distribution of HPV types in CC cases and control women in Algeria is more similar to the one found in Europe than the one in sub-Saharan Africa, where HPV 16 is less prevalent. A vaccine against HPV 16 and 18 may be effective in more than 3/4 of CCs in Algeria. [source]


Comparing Accuracy in an Unpaired Post-market Device Study with Incomplete Disease Assessment

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, Issue 3 2009
Todd A. Alonzo
Abstract The sensitivity and specificity of a new medical device are often compared relative to that of an existing device by calculating ratios of sensitivities and specificities. Although it would be ideal for all study subjects to receive the gold standard so true disease status was known for all subjects, it is often not feasible or ethical to obtain disease status for everyone. This paper proposes two unpaired designs where each subject is only administered one of the devices and device results dictate which subjects are to receive disease verification. Estimators of the ratio of accuracy and corresponding confidence intervals are proposed for these designs as well as sample size formulae. Simulation studies are performed to investigate the small sample bias of the estimators and the performance of the variance estimators and sample size formulae. The sample size formulae are applied to the design of a cervical cancer study to compare the accuracy of a new device with the conventional Pap smear. [source]


Application of Penalized Splines in Analyzing Neuronal Data

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, Issue 1 2009
John T. Maringwa
Abstract Neuron experiments produce high-dimensional data structures. Therefore, application of smoothing techniques in the analysis of neuronal data from electrophysiological experiments has received considerable attention of late. We investigate the use of penalized splines in the analysis of neuronal data. This is first illustrated when interested in the temporal trend of a single neuron. An approach to investigate the maximal firing rate, based on the penalizedspline model is proposed. Determination of the time of maximal firing rate is based on non-linear optimization of the objective function with the corresponding confidence intervals constructed based on the first-order derivative function. To distinguish between the curves from different experimental conditions in a moment-by-moment sense, bias adjusted simulation-based simultaneous confidence bands leading to global inference in the time domain are constructed. The bands are an extension of the approach proposed by Ruppert et al. (2003). These methods are in a second step extended towards the analysis of a population of neurons via a marginal or population-averaged model (© 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) [source]


Estimating Disease Prevalence Using Relatives of Case and Control Probands

BIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2010
Kristin N. Javaras
Summary We introduce a method of estimating disease prevalence from case,control family study data. Case,control family studies are performed to investigate the familial aggregation of disease; families are sampled via either a case or a control proband, and the resulting data contain information on disease status and covariates for the probands and their relatives. Here, we introduce estimators for overall prevalence and for covariate-stratum-specific (e.g., sex-specific) prevalence. These estimators combine the proportion of affected relatives of control probands with the proportion of affected relatives of case probands and are designed to yield approximately unbiased estimates of their population counterparts under certain commonly made assumptions. We also introduce corresponding confidence intervals designed to have good coverage properties even for small prevalences. Next, we describe simulation experiments where our estimators and intervals were applied to case,control family data sampled from fictional populations with various levels of familial aggregation. At all aggregation levels, the resulting estimates varied closely and symmetrically around their population counterparts, and the resulting intervals had good coverage properties, even for small sample sizes. Finally, we discuss the assumptions required for our estimators to be approximately unbiased, highlighting situations where an alternative estimator based only on relatives of control probands may perform better. [source]


A New Method for Choosing Sample Size for Confidence Interval,Based Inferences

BIOMETRICS, Issue 3 2003
Michael R. Jiroutek
Summary. Scientists often need to test hypotheses and construct corresponding confidence intervals. In designing a study to test a particular null hypothesis, traditional methods lead to a sample size large enough to provide sufficient statistical power. In contrast, traditional methods based on constructing a confidence interval lead to a sample size likely to control the width of the interval. With either approach, a sample size so large as to waste resources or introduce ethical concerns is undesirable. This work was motivated by the concern that existing sample size methods often make it difficult for scientists to achieve their actual goals. We focus on situations which involve a fixed, unknown scalar parameter representing the true state of nature. The width of the confidence interval is defined as the difference between the (random) upper and lower bounds. An event width is said to occur if the observed confidence interval width is less than a fixed constant chosen a priori. An event validity is said to occur if the parameter of interest is contained between the observed upper and lower confidence interval bounds. An event rejection is said to occur if the confidence interval excludes the null value of the parameter. In our opinion, scientists often implicitly seek to have all three occur: width, validity, and rejection. New results illustrate that neglecting rejection or width (and less so validity) often provides a sample size with a low probability of the simultaneous occurrence of all three events. We recommend considering all three events simultaneously when choosing a criterion for determining a sample size. We provide new theoretical results for any scalar (mean) parameter in a general linear model with Gaussian errors and fixed predictors. Convenient computational forms are included, as well as numerical examples to illustrate our methods. [source]