Coronary Artery Stenoses (coronary + artery_stenose)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Testing Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Alcoholic Heart Muscle Disease

ALCOHOLISM, Issue 10 2001
Olli A. Kajander
Background: Although many heavy alcohol users have subclinical alcoholic heart muscle disease, only a very few develop severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Therefore, and because cardiac abnormalities correlate only weakly with the duration or quantity of drinking, individual susceptibility differences may exist. In this work we examined whether common gene variants previously associated with cardiac hypertrophy or altered alcohol metabolism could modify the effects of alcohol on the heart. Methods: We studied 700 middle-aged male victims of sudden death who underwent a medicolegal autopsy. In addition to routine postmortem examination, the weights and the cavity and wall dimensions of the left and right ventricle were measured. Coronary artery stenoses were determined from a silicone rubber cast of the arteries. Alcohol consumption and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed by a structured interview of the spouse. The following gene polymorphisms were determined by using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism and solid-phase minisequencing techniques: angiotensin converting enzyme I/D, angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166A/C, aldosterone synthase ,344C/T, alcohol dehydrogenases 2 and 3, acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2, and cytochrome P-450 2E1 Dra I, Pst I, Rsa I, and Msp I. Results: The most consistent effects of alcohol (p < 0.05) were a higher total heart weight and a larger right ventricle size with increasing daily drinking. However, these and other effects of alcohol were statistically fully independent of the studied genotypes. Conclusions: The gene polymorphisms selected for and analyzed in our study are unlikely to modify the effects of alcohol on the heart. Other unknown factors determine the individual susceptibility to alcoholic heart muscle disease. [source]


Review article: Coronary artery stenoses: Detection and revascularization in renal disease

NEPHROLOGY, Issue 6 2009
HELEN L PILMORE
SUMMARY Cardiovascular events are markedly elevated in those with all degrees of renal impairment compared to the general population. There are well established guidelines in the general population for the management of coronary artery disease, however, similar guidelines have not been established in the renal population. This review examines the current published work on the detection of coronary artery stenoses in addition to summarizing the outcomes of revascularization in patients with kidney disease. Testing for coronary artery disease in the renal population most commonly occurs in dialysis patients as part of their assessment for renal transplantation. While a positive myocardial stress test for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses is associated with an increased risk of cardiac events, there is no clear information currently showing that cardiovascular testing itself reduces the rate of adverse cardiac events after transplantation. Revascularization of coronary artery stenoses is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in all groups with kidney disease than in the general population, with the exception of renal transplant recipients where the mortality is likely to be similar to that of the general population. There appears to be a benefit in coronary artery bypass surgery compared to percutaneous intervention in those on dialysis and after renal transplant. Currently, there is little data to support coronary artery intervention prior to transplantation in those with asymptomatic coronary artery disease. [source]


Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess Moderately Severe Coronary Lesions: Correlation with Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001
MANUEL JIMÉNEZ-NAVARRO PH.D.
Background: New techniques to evaluate coronary artery disease, such as calculation of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a guidewire and pressure transducer, provide a functional assessment of coronary lesions. The present study was designed to determine the correlation between FFR and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with moderately severe coronary stenosis in order to judge the usefulness of FFR for commonly encountered clinical problems. Methods and Results: We studied 21 patients with 23 moderately severe coronary artery stenoses on angiography. The FFR was calculated and dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed to detect ischemia. Of the 16 stenoses with a negative FFR (, 0.75), dobutamine echocardiography also was negative. In the seven stenoses with a positive FFR (< 0.75), dobutamine echocardiography was positive in three. The efficacy of FFR in detecting ischemia that was confirmed with stress echocardiography was sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, positive and negative predictive value 42.8%, and 100%. respectively, with a global predictive value 82.6%. A moderate degree of correlation was found between the two diagnostic tests (kappa [k] = 0.51). Conclusions: FFR correlates moderately well with dobutamine stress echocardiography in the assessment of moderately severe lesions in patients for whom coronary arteriography is usually indicated. However, its high negative predictive value makes FFR a useful aid in reaching clinical decisions promptly in the hemodynamics laboratory. [source]


Review article: Coronary artery stenoses: Detection and revascularization in renal disease

NEPHROLOGY, Issue 6 2009
HELEN L PILMORE
SUMMARY Cardiovascular events are markedly elevated in those with all degrees of renal impairment compared to the general population. There are well established guidelines in the general population for the management of coronary artery disease, however, similar guidelines have not been established in the renal population. This review examines the current published work on the detection of coronary artery stenoses in addition to summarizing the outcomes of revascularization in patients with kidney disease. Testing for coronary artery disease in the renal population most commonly occurs in dialysis patients as part of their assessment for renal transplantation. While a positive myocardial stress test for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses is associated with an increased risk of cardiac events, there is no clear information currently showing that cardiovascular testing itself reduces the rate of adverse cardiac events after transplantation. Revascularization of coronary artery stenoses is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in all groups with kidney disease than in the general population, with the exception of renal transplant recipients where the mortality is likely to be similar to that of the general population. There appears to be a benefit in coronary artery bypass surgery compared to percutaneous intervention in those on dialysis and after renal transplant. Currently, there is little data to support coronary artery intervention prior to transplantation in those with asymptomatic coronary artery disease. [source]


A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting versus bare metal stents in the treatment of diabetic patients with native coronary artery lesions: The DECODE study,

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 5 2008
Charles Chan MD
Abstract Objective: To compare the effects of sirolimus-eluting (SES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) on 6-month in-stent late luminal loss (LLL) and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in diabetics undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Background: In studies of unselected patients, coronary restenosis rates have been lower with SES than with BMS. Comparisons of SES versus BMS in diabetics with more than one stenosis or more than one vessel disease are few. Methods: This open-label trial randomly assigned 200 diabetics with de novo coronary artery stenoses to receive up to three SES versus BMS in a 2:1 ratio. The patients underwent repeat coronary angiography at 6 months after the index procedure and were followed-up for 1 year. The primary study endpoint was in-stent LLL at 6 months. Results: Between August 2002 and May 2004, 83 patients (mean age = 60 years) with 128 lesions (mean = 1.5 per patient) were enrolled at four U.S. and seven Asian medical centers. Enrollment was terminated early by the Safety Monitoring Board because of a statistically significant difference in rates of clinical endpoints. The mean in-stent LLL at 6 months was 0.23 mm in SES versus 1.10 mm in BMS recipients (P < 0.001). At 12 months, 8 patients (15%) assigned to SES had experienced MACE versus 12 patients (41%) assigned to BMS (P = 0.006). Conclusions: In diabetics, the mean 6-month in-stent LLL was significantly smaller, and 12-month MACE rate significantly lower, after myocardial revascularization with SES than with BMS. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 11 2003
Peter Ammann M.D.
Abstract Background: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) sestamibi (MIBI) is an excellent tool for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), preoperative risk assessment, and follow-up management after coronary revas-cularization. While the sensitivity of MIBI SPECT for detecting CAD has been reported to exceed 90%, the specificity ranges between 53,100%. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to assess characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT (MIBI) studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses (< 50%). Methods: Between January 1999 and November 2000, 270 consecutive patients were referred for coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects during exercise. In 41 patients (15%; 39% women, mean age 59 ± 9 years), reversible MIBI uptake defects were assessed although coronary angiography showed no significant CAD. These patients were compared with age- and gender-matched patients with perfusion abnormalities (39% women, mean age 60 ± 9 years), due to significant CAD (coronary artery stenosis > 50%). Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index, left bundle-branch block (LBBB), or method of stress test (dipyridamole in patients with LBBB or physical inactivity [n= 11] and exercise in all the others [n= 30]). Left ventricular hypertrophy (44 vs. 23%, p = 0.05) and left anterior fascicularblock (LAFB) (17 vs. 0%, p = 0.005) were more common in patients with perfusion abnormalities with no significant CAD, whereas ST-segment depression during exercise (17 vs. 37% p = 0.05) and angina during exercise (15 vs. 29%, p = 0.02) were significantly less common than in patients with abnormal MIBI perfusion studies and angiographically significant CAD. Sestamibi uptake defects during exercise were significantly smaller in patients without significant CAD than in matched controls with significant CAD (p < 0.0004). Conclusion: Of 270 consecutive patients, 41 (15%) referred to coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects showed coronary artery stenoses <50%. Twenty-six (10%) of these presented angiographically normal coronary arteries. The significantly higher proportion of left ventricular hypertrophy and LAFB in patients with reversible MIBI uptake defects without significant CAD suggest microvascular disease, angiographically underestimated CAD, and conduction abnormalities as underlying mechanisms. [source]


Effects of stent coating on platelets and endothelial cells after intracoronary stent implantation

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2001
Enver Atalar M.D.
Abstract Background: Adhesion molecules are known to be important in the regulation of endothelial cell and platelet functions. Increased platelets P-selectin expression is a marker of stent thrombosis after uncoated stent placement. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intracoronary placement of phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated, versus heparin-coated, versus uncoated stents on platelets and endothelial activity. Methods: Thirty patients (age 55 ± 10, 27 men) with significant proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses were randomized to elective implantation of PC-coated. versus heparin-coated. versus uncoated stents. Following stent placement, intravenous heparin and aspirin plus ticlopidine were administered. Venous plasma soluble E-selectin, sP-sclectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels were measured before the procedure and 24 and 48 h thereafter as markers of platelet and endothelial cell activation. Patients were excluded if they had a disease known to influence platelet and endothelial cell function. Results: Plasma sP-selectin levels decreased significantly after implantation of PC- and heparin-coated stents (p = 0.04), hut remained unchanged in patients randomized to uncoated stents. Plasma sE-selectin levels increased significantly after uncoated stent placement (p = 0.04) and remained unchanged after coated stent implantation. Conclusion: In patients treated with combined antiplatelet therapy, implantation of PC- and heparin-coated stents decreased platelet activity without activating endothelial cells, whereas placement of uncoated stents led to endothelial activation without changing platelet activity. These results suggest that PC-coated and heparin-coated stents may be advantageous in limiting thrombotic complications. [source]