Home About us Contact | |||
Activity Restriction (activity + restriction)
Selected AbstractsFormal support of stroke survivors and their informal carers in the community: a cohort studyHEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, Issue 6 2008Chantal Simon PhD MSc MRCGP Abstract This cohort study, aims to explore formal care provision to stroke survivors and their informal carers in the community in the UK. An initial cohort of 105 cohabitant carers of first-time stroke patients was recruited while the stroke patient was in hospital. Structured face-to-face interviews were carried out with carers prior to discharge of the stroke patient home, at 6 weeks after discharge, and 15 months after stroke. Questionnaires included measures of psychological health (CIS-R), physical health (self-rated health), social well-being (relationship quality and Sarason's social support questionnaire), handicap of the stroke survivor (Oxford Handicap Scale) and formal community support (amount of formal support and carer satisfaction). Multiple services were involved with most survivor,carer pairs (mean 5.4; range 2,9; SD = 1.7), and 74% of carers were satisfied with formal support provided. Number of services decreased with time (5.5 versus 4.1, t = 4.201, d.f. = 52, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 0.71,2.01) but not time allocated. Using stepwise linear regression, service provision early after discharge was predicted by: level of handicap, recruitment centre, carer self-rated health, number of informal supporters and other care commitments. Satisfaction was predicted by quality of informal support and activity restriction. Fifteen months after stroke, predictors of formal care were: level of handicap, quality of informal support and previous caring experience. Predictors of satisfaction were: quality of the relationship between the stroke survivor and carer, age and mood. Quality of services was good, but carers lacked information, had insufficient help and were not consulted enough. Carer distress is common, yet not currently a factor influencing support provision. Formal care provided adapts with time reflecting the importance of quality of support from friends and family rather than quantity of informal supporters. These factors should be taken into consideration when planning and providing formal support for stroke survivors and their carers. [source] CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC TRAUMA IN CHILDRENANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2006Stephen R. Thompson Background: Non-operative management of the great majority of blunt splenic injuries in children has become routine. Debate continues on the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, follow-up imaging and the duration of physical activity restrictions following injury. The purpose of this study was to review the recent experience of an Australian Paediatric Trauma Centre with splenic trauma to define current practice. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with splenic trauma admitted to the Children's Hospital at Westmead between November 1995 and December 2003. Results: A total of 39 patients with blunt splenic trauma were identified: 20 (51%) were multiply injured. Thirty-three (85%) children were managed non-operatively. The most common initial imaging method was computed tomography (n = 28, 72%). Fourteen patients (36%) were admitted to the ICU with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 4.1 days (range 1,13 days). The overall mean LOS was 10.8 days (range 1,43 days). Nineteen patients (50%) had imaging studies performed after diagnosis but before discharge. Further post-discharge imaging was carried out in 21 cases (54%). There were no deaths, but 10 patients developed complications. The mean documented activity restriction was 7.4 weeks (range 1,16 weeks). Conclusion: The majority of children who had suffered blunt splenic trauma were safely managed non-operatively outside an ICU. In stable patients, there appeared to be no benefits associated with repeated imaging following the diagnosis of splenic trauma. Physical activity restriction in excess of 3,4 weeks did not appear to be warranted. [source] Disability following kidney transplantation: the link to medication coverageCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2007D.P. Slakey Abstract:, There is no uniformity regarding patient disability following kidney transplantation. Given improved results of patient and graft survival, and the link between insurance, medication coverage and disability, efforts must be made to define disability after a successful transplant. We conducted an individual questioner study of kidney transplant patients to determine factors relating to patient-perceived disability. Seventy patients participated in the study. Patient perception of disability did not correlate with education or ethnicity. Most patients believed they were disabled on dialysis and this did not change following transplantation. While 42 (60%) of the patients felt that they could work, either full-time or part-time, only 20 (28%) were actually working or in school. Most patients believe that working will eliminate disability status and, therefore, insurance and medication coverage. Patients considered disability more related to their status as a kidney transplant patient than any specific physical limitations. The link, whether real or perceived, between ,disability' and immunosuppressive medication coverage is a significant barrier for many patients. The transplant community must reach some degree of consensus regarding post-transplant activity restrictions. The transplant community needs to find a way to take an active role in post-transplant education and employment. [source] |