			Home About us Contact

Contrast Sensitivity Function (contrast + sensitivity_function)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

The contrast sensitivity function for detection and resolution of blue-on-yellow gratings in foveal and peripheral vision

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 5 2002
R. S. Anderson
Abstract Previous studies using polychromatic gratings have shown that the peripheral grating contrast sensitivity function is significantly different when the task is resolution rather than detection. Specifically, in the middle frequency range, while resolution acuity drops suddenly to zero, detection performance continues up to much higher frequencies, accompanied by observations of aliasing. We wanted to determine if the same holds true for blue-cone isolating gratings in either foveal or peripheral vision. Contrast sensitivity function (CSFs) were measured at the fovea and 20 degrees eccentricity in the temporal retina under conditions of short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS)-cone pathway isolation using a two-alternative forced choice paradigm. The detection and resolution CSF were identical at the low frequency end but at higher frequencies resolution sensitivity falls abruptly while contrast detection remained possible till higher frequencies [cut-off frequencies: fovea detection 6.0 cycles (degree),1, resolution 4.6 cycles (degree),1; periphery detection 1.6 cycles (degree),1, resolution 1.05 cycles (degree),1]. Aliasing was observable when spatial frequency exceeded the resolution limit. Medium/high contrast blue-cone-mediated resolution acuity is sampling limited in both the fovea and periphery. Previous studies of blue-cone contrast sensitivity which employed a detection task do not reflect the true resolution limit. [source]

Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 4 2010
Cynthia L. Clark
Abstract Background:, Our lab has previously demonstrated losses in contrast sensitivity to low spatial frequencies under scotopic conditions with older adults. It is not clear, however, whether the temporal frequency of a stimulus alters the relation between age and the spatial contrast sensitivity function (sCSF) under scotopic conditions. Methods:, A maximum-likelihood, two-alternative, temporal forced-choice QUEST procedure was used to measure threshold to spatially and temporally modulated stimuli in both young (mean = 26 years) and old (mean = 75 years) adults. Results:, In general, the shapes of the spatial and temporal CSFs were low-pass for both young and old observers; contrast sensitivity decreased at approximately the same rate with increasing spatial frequency and temporal frequency for both age groups, although the overall sensitivity of the old group was lower than that of the young group. The high-frequency resolution limit was lower for the old group compared to the young group. Conclusions:, The differences in contrast sensitivity between the young and old groups suggest a uniform loss in sensitivity of the channels mediating spatial and temporal vision. Because of this loss, the spatial and temporal window of visibility for the older adults is compromised relative to the younger adults. [source]

The prospects for super-acuity: limits to visual performance after correction of monochromatic ocular aberration

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 6 2003
W. N. Charman
Abstract It has recently been suggested that correction of the monochromatic aberration of the eye could lead to substantial improvements in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function. After consideration of the best-corrected visual acuity of normal eyes, the optical and neural limits to visual performance are reviewed. It is concluded that, even if current problems with the accuracy of the suggested techniques of aberration correction, through corneal excimer laser ablation or customised contact lenses, can be overcome, changes in monochromatic ocular aberration over time, the continuing presence of chromatic aberration, errors of focus associated with lags and leads in accommodation, and other factors, are likely to result in only minor improvements in the high-contrast acuity performance of most normal eyes being produced by attempted aberration control. Significant gains in contrast sensitivity might, however, be achievable, particularly under mesopic and scotopic conditions when the pupil is large, provided that correct focus can be maintained. In the immediate future, reduction of the high levels of aberration that are currently found in eyes that have undergone refractive surgery and in some abnormal eyes should bring useful benefits. [source]

The contrast sensitivity function for detection and resolution of blue-on-yellow gratings in foveal and peripheral vision

Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction*

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 6 2000
Russell L. Woods
Summary Spatial frequency-selective minima (notches) in the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) because of defocus can mimic those that occur with ocular disease. We examined the influence of measurement conditions on CSF shape in simulated clinical testing. CSF notches occurred with almost all levels of defocus for all subjects. Multiple notches were found under some conditions. Notches were found with defocus as small as 0.50 D. Effects of induced astigmatism depended on the orientation of the target. Notches were apparent in defocus conditions after stimulus size and room illuminance were modified and when subjects had insufficient accommodation to compensate for hypermetropic defocus. The equivalent of notches was not noted with the Pelli-Robson chart. As defocus-induced CSF notches may be mistaken for functional loss, careful refractive correction should be conducted prior to clinical or experimental CSF measurement, even at low spatial frequencies. [source]

The value of contrast sensitivity in diagnosing central serous chorioretinopathy

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, Issue 4 2007
S Plainis MSc PhD
A 39-year-old hyperopic male was referred for laser refractive treatment. In the course of the pre-operative evaluation he complained of a recent deterioration of vision. The suspicion of unilateral central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) was confirmed by contrast sensitivity testing and by ocular fundus examination. Contrast sensitivity (CS) for six spatial frequencies (1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 c/deg) was evaluated using Gabor patches of gratings projected on a high-resolution display by means of a stimulus generator card. Although VA remained unaltered, the pattern of contrast sensitivity function varied at different stages of CSCR: during the acute stage, performance at all spatial frequencies was depressed, while at two-month follow up, intermediate and high spatial frequencies were mainly affected. It is concluded that the level of visual deficit in CSCR cannot be evaluated by measuring visual acuity. History and contrast sensitivity can play a central role in setting the correct diagnosis and characterising its stage. [source]