			Home About us Contact

Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (continuous + subcutaneous_insulin_infusion)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) 30 years later: still the best option for insulin therapy

DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 2 2009
Daniela Bruttomesso
Abstract Thirty years after its introduction, the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) keeps increasing, especially among children and adolescents. The technique, when used properly, is safe and effective. Compared with traditional NPH-based multiple daily injections (MDI), CSII provides a small but clinically important reduction of HbA1c levels, diminishes blood glucose variability, decreases severe hypoglycaemic episodes and offers a better way to cope with the dawn phenomenon. Insulin analogues have improved the treatment of diabetes, eroding part of the place previously occupied by CSII, but CSII still remains the first option for patients experiencing severe hypoglycaemic episodes, high HbA1c values or marked glucose variability while being treated with optimized MDI. Furthermore CSII is better than MDI considering the effects on quality of life and the possibility to adjust insulin administration according to physical activity or food intake. CSII may be limited by cost. Present estimates suggest that CSII may be cost-effective just for patients experiencing a marked improvement in HbA1c or a decrease in severe hypoglycaemic episodes, but the effects on quality of life are difficult to measure. CSII does not merely imply wearing an external device; it requires a multidisciplinary team, intensive patient education and continuous follow up. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with short-acting insulin analogues or human regular insulin: efficacy, safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness

DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 3 2004
Régis Pierre Radermecker
Abstract Portable insulin infusion devices are effective and safe insulin delivery systems for managing diabetes mellitus, especially type 1 diabetes. Rapidly absorbed insulin analogues, such as insulin lispro or insulin aspart, may offer an advantage over regular human insulin for insulin pumps. Several open-label randomised crossover trials demonstrated that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with insulin lispro provided a better control of postprandial hyperglycaemia and a slightly but significantly lower glycated haemoglobin level, with lower daily insulin requirement and similar or even less hypoglycaemic episodes. A CSII study comparing insulin lispro and insulin aspart demonstrated similar results with the two analogues, and better results than those with regular insulin. Because these analogues have a quicker onset and a shorter duration of action than regular insulin, one might expect an earlier and greater metabolic deterioration in case of CSII interruption, but a more rapid correction of metabolic abnormalities after insulin boluses when reactivating the pump. These expectations were confirmed in randomised protocols comparing the metabolic changes occurring during and after CSII interruption of various durations when the pump infused either insulin lispro or regular insulin. The extra cost resulting from the use of CSII and insulin analogues in diabetes management should be compensated for by better metabolic control and quality of life. In conclusion, CSII delivering fast-acting insulin analogues may be considered as one of the best methods to replace insulin in a physiological manner by mimicking meal and basal insulin requirements, without higher risk of hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis in well-educated diabetic patients. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2008
J. C. Pickup
Abstract Aims Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is a recommended treatment for reducing severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes, but the change in hypoglycaemia compared with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) is unclear. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comparing severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control during CSII and MDI. Methods Databases and literature (1996,2006) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before/after studies of , 6 months' duration CSII and with severe hypoglycaemia frequency > 10 episodes/100 patient years on MDI. Results In 22 studies (21 reports), severe hypoglycaemia during MDI was related to diabetes duration (P = 0.038) and was greater in adults than children (100 vs. 36 events/100 patient years, P = 0.036). Severe hypoglycaemia was reduced during CSII compared with MDI, with a rate ratio of 2.89 (95% CI 1.45 to 5.76) for RCTs and 4.34 (2.87 to 6.56) for before/after studies [rate ratio 4.19 (2.86 to 6.13) for all studies]. The reduction was greatest in those with the highest initial severe hypoglycaemia rates on MDI (P < 0.001). The mean difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between treatments was less for RCTs [0.21% (0.13,0.30%)] than in before/after studies [0.72% (0.55,0.90%)] but strongly related to the initial HbA1c on MDI (P < 0.001). Conclusions The severe hypoglycaemia rate in Type 1 diabetes was markedly less during CSII than MDI, with the greatest reduction in those with most severe hypoglycaemia on MDI and those with the longest duration of diabetes. The biggest improvement in HbA1c was in those with the highest HbA1c on MDI. [source]

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: boon or bane?

PEDIATRIC DIABETES, Issue 2 2001
Mark A. Sperling
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

A reduction in severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes in a randomized crossover study of continuous intraperitoneal compared with subcutaneous insulin infusion

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 11 2009
A. Liebl
Aim: Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with the DiaPort system using regular insulin was compared to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin Lispro, to investigate the frequency of hypoglycemia, blood glucose control, quality of life, and safety. Methods: In this open, randomized, controlled, cross-over, multinational, 12-month study, 60 type 1 diabetic patients with frequent hypoglycemia and/or HbA1c > 7.0% with CSII were randomized to CIPII or CSII. The aim was to obtain the best possible blood glucose while avoiding hypoglycemia. Results: The frequency of any hypoglycemia was similar (CIPII 118.2 (SD 82.6) events / patient year, CSII 115.8 (SD 75.7) p = 0.910). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia with CSII was more than twice the one with CIPII (CIPII 34.8 events / 100 patient years, CSII 86.1, p = 0.013). HbA1c, mean blood glucose, and glucose fluctuations were not statistically different. Treatment-related severe complications occurred mainly during CIPII: port infections (0.47 events / patient year), abdominal pain (0.21 events / patient year), insulin underdelivery (0.14 events / patient year). Weight gain was greater with CSII (+ 1.5 kg vs. , 0.1 kg, p = 0.013), quality of life better with CIPII. Conclusions: In type 1 diabetes CIPII with DiaPort reduces the number of severe episodes of hypoglycemia and improves quality of life with no weight gain. Because of complications, indications for CIPII must be strictly controlled. CIPII with DiaPort is an alternative therapy when CSII is not fully successful and provides an easy method of intraperitoneal therapy. [source]

Circulating insulin antibodies: influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion, and impact on glucose control

DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 6 2009
R. P. Radermecker
Abstract The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) 30 years later: still the best option for insulin therapy

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with short-acting insulin analogues or human regular insulin: efficacy, safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness

Diabetes management in the new millennium using insulin pump therapy

DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue S1 2002
Bruce W. Bode
Abstract Current goals of therapy of type 1 and 2 diabetes are to achieve near normal glycemia, minimize the risk of severe hypoglycemia, limit excessive weight gain, improve quality of life and delay or prevent late vascular complications. As discussed in this review, insulin pump or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy provides a treatment option that can dramatically aid in achieving all of these goals. In comparison to multiple daily injections (MDI), CSII uses only rapid-acting insulin, provides greater flexibility in timing of meals and snacks, has programmable basal rates to optimize overnight glycemic control, can reduce the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia, and enhances patients' ability to control their own diabetes. Most important, in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, CSII has been shown to lower HbA1c levels, reduce the frequency of severe hypoglycemia and limit excessive weight gain versus MDI without increasing the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. Similarly positive results are being seen with CSII in adults with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of CSII and improvements in pump technology have fueled a dramatic increase in the use of this therapy. Practical guidelines are presented for selection of patients, initiation of treatment, patient education, follow-up assessments and troubleshooting. The recent introduction of methods for continuous glucose monitoring provides a new means to optimize the basal and bolus capabilities of CSII and offers the hope of the development of a feedback-controlled artificial pancreas. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Measurement delay associated with the Guardian® RT continuous glucose monitoring system

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 1 2010
C. Wei
Diabet. Med. Abstract Aims, Using compartment modelling, we assessed the time delay between blood glucose and sensor glucose measured by the Guardian® RT continuous glucose monitoring system in young subjects with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods, Twelve children and adolescents with T1D treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (male/female 7/5; age 13.1 ± 4.2 years; body mass index 21.9 ± 4.3 kg/m2; mean ± sd) were studied over 19 h in a Clinical Research Facility. Guardian® RT was calibrated every 6 h and sensor glucose measured every 5 min. Reference blood glucose was measured every 15 min using a YSI 2300 STAT Plus Analyser. A population compartment model of sensor glucose,blood glucose kinetics was adopted to estimate the time delay, the calibration scale and the calibration shift. Results, The population median of the time delay was 15.8 (interquartile range 15.2, 16.5) min, which was corroborated by correlation analysis between blood glucose and 15-min delayed sensor glucose. The delay has a relatively low intersubject variability, with 95% of individuals predicted to have delays between 10.4 and 24.3 min. Population medians (interquartile range) for the scale and shift are 0.800 (0.777, 0.823) (unitless) and 1.66 (1.47, 1.84) mmol/l, respectively. Conclusions, In young subjects with T1D, the total time delay associated with the Guardian® RT system was approximately 15 min. This is twice that expected on physiological grounds, suggesting a 5- to 10-min delay because of data processing. Delays above 25 min are rarely to be observed. [source]

Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009
A. Siebenhofer
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

NICE guidance on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion 2008: review of the technology appraisal guidance

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 1 2009
J. C. Pickup
First page of article [source]

Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Insulin and glucose profiles during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with injection of a long-acting insulin in Type 2 diabetes1

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 5 2008
T. Parkner
Abstract Aims To compare insulin and glucose profiles during basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue and once daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes. Methods Twenty-one patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized in this two-period crossover study to an equivalent 24-h dose of continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin aspart and subsequently once-daily bedtime subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine, or vice versa, for eight consecutive days. Plasma profiles of insulin and glucose were recorded. Results On the last day of each treatment period, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose was 10% lower on the continuous subcutaneous infusion regimen compared with the insulin injection regimen (P = 0.002). This was accomplished by a flat exogenous insulin infusion profile compared with a peaking profile with injected insulin (AUC was 74% higher after injection compared with pre-injection levels (P = 0.001)). During the last 6 days in each treatment period, the intra-subject variability of exogenous fasting insulin levels in the mornings was 41% lower during insulin infusion compared with insulin injection (P = 0.012). The corresponding intra-subject variability for fasting glucose only showed a tendency to be lower during infusion as compared to the injection regimen (28%; P = 0.104). Thirteen symptomatic-only or minor hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during the entire infusion period compared with three episodes during the injection period. Conclusions Basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue improved plasma insulin (more flat insulin profile with a lower variability) and glucose (lower AUC) profiles compared with once-daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes. [source]

Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI) in paediatric Type 1 diabetes: a multicentre matched-pair cohort analysis over 3 years

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 1 2008
B. I. Jakisch
Abstract Aims To conduct a multicentre, matched-pair cohort analysis comparing glycaemic control and adverse events of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with multiple daily injections (MDI) in paediatric patients. Methods Using standardized computer-based prospective documentation, HbA1c, insulin dose, body mass index,standard deviation score (BMI,SDS), rate of hypoglycaemia, rate of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and intensity of care were analysed in 434 matched pairs during a follow-up period of 3 years after initiation of MDI or CSII. Results HbA1c was significantly lower in the CSII group during the first year of new regimen (CSII 7.5 ± 0.05 vs. MDI 7.7 ± 0.06; P < 0.05), but rose to the same level as in the MDI group during year 3. Insulin requirement remained significantly lower in the CSII group. The BMI,SDS increased in both study groups, with no significant difference. The rate of severe hypoglycaemia decreased significantly after the change of regimen (CSII 17.87 ± 2.85 vs. MDI 25.14 ± 3.79; P < 0.05) and during year 3 of the regimen, particularly when compared with baseline (,21% vs. ,16%). The rate of DKA was lower at baseline in the CSII group and remained significantly lower over all 3 years. Intensity of care was the same in both subsets. Conclusions Employing a large cohort, this matched-pair analysis has demonstrated over a 3-year study period that CSII is a safe form of intensive insulin therapy with similar glycaemic effects, but with significantly reduced rates of hypoglycaemia and DKA and a lower insulin requirement when compared with MDI. [source]

Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetic patients, assessed with continuous glucose monitoring: frequency, duration and associations

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 5 2007
I. M. E. Wentholt
Abstract Aims, We quantified the occurrence and duration of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in individuals with Type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple-injection therapy (MIT) using a continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Methods, A microdialysis sensor was worn at home by 24 patients on CSII (mean HbA1c 7.8 ± 0.9%) and 33 patients on MIT (HbA1c 8.7 ± 1.3%) for 48 h. Occurrence and duration of nocturnal hypoglycaemia were assessed and using multivariate regression analysis, the association between HbA1c, diabetes duration, treatment type (CSII vs. MIT), fasting and bedtime blood glucose values, total daily insulin dose and mean nocturnal glucose concentrations, and hypoglycaemia occurrence and duration was investigated. Results, Nocturnal hypoglycaemia , 3.9 mmol/l occurred in 33.3% of both the CSII- (8/24) and MIT-treated patients (11/33). Mean (± sd; median, interquartile range) duration of hypoglycaemia , 3.9 mmol/l was 78 (± 76; 57, 23,120) min per night for the CSII- and 98 (± 80; 81, 32,158) min per night for the MIT-treated group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that bedtime glucose value had the strongest association with the occurrence (P = 0.026) and duration (P = 0.032) of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Conclusions, Microdialysis continuous glucose monitoring has enabled more precise quantification of nocturnal hypoglycaemia occurrence and duration in Type 1 diabetic patients. Occurrence and duration of nocturnal hypoglycaemia were mainly associated with bedtime glucose value. [source]

Persistent poor glycaemic control in adult Type 1 diabetes.

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 12 2004
A closer look at the problem
Abstract Around 25% of the adult Type 1 diabetes population is in persistent poor glycaemic control and thus at increased risk of developing microvascular complications. We here discuss correlates of long-standing poor glycaemic control and review the efficacy of clinical strategies designed to overcome persistent poor control. Only a few studies have identified determinants and correlates of long-standing poor glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes. There is some evidence implicating genetic factors, as well as lower economic status, and psychological factors, including lack of motivation, emotional distress, depression and eating disorders. Ways of improving glycaemic control include strategies to enable self-management, e.g. motivational strategies, coping-orientated education, psychosocial therapies, and/or intensifying insulin injection therapy plus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Long-standing poor glycaemic control appears to be a heterogeneous and complex phenomenon, for which there is no simple, single solution. Comprehensive psycho-medical assessment in diabetes care may prove useful in tailoring interventions. Further research is warranted, to increase our understanding how psychosocial and biomedical factors, separately and in interaction, determine poor outcomes in Type 1 diabetes. [source]

The cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with multiple daily injections for the management of diabetes

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2003
P. Scuffham
Abstract Aims To estimate the cost effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) compared with multiple daily injections (MDI) for patients using insulin pumps. Methods We constructed a Markov model to estimate the costs and outcomes for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) treated with CSII using an insulin pump compared with MDI. Key parameters were obtained from the published scientific literature. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Monte Carlo simulations were undertaken for 10 000 hypothetical patients over 8 years of monthly cycles (the expected life of a pump). Results Over an 8-year period an average patient could expect to gain 0.48 [standard deviation (sd) 0.20] QALYs using CSII compared with MDI. The additional cost over 8 years for this gain was £5462 (sd£897). The incremental cost per QALY was £11 461 (sd£3656). CSII was most cost-effective in patients who had more than two severe hypoglycaemic events per year and who required admission to hospital at least once every year. Cases where CSII might be not economically viable are cases where diabetes is well controlled with few severe hypoglycaemic events. Results were most sensitive to the number of hypoglycaemic events per patient and the utility weights used to estimate QALYs. Conclusion CSII is a worthwhile investment when targeted to those who might benefit most. Diabet. Med. 20, 586,593 (2003) [source]

Post-prandial glucose excursions following four methods of bolus insulin administration in subjects with Type 1 diabetes

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 4 2002
H. P. Chase
Abstract Aims To determine if one method of short-acting insulin bolus administration is superior to other methods in managing a meal high in carbohydrates, calories and fat. Methods Nine subjects receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin lispro (Humalog®) agreed to consume the same meal high in carbohydrates, calories and fat on four occasions 1 week apart. They received the same dose of bolus insulin on each of the four occasions randomly assigned and beginning 10 min prior to the meal as either a single bolus, two separate boluses of one-half the same total dose (the second after 90 min), the entire bolus given as a square-wave (over 2 h) or a dual-wave (70% as a bolus and 30% as a square-wave over 2 h). Blood glucose levels were measured at ,60 and ,30 min and at zero time, and then every half-hour for 6 h using the Hemacue® in the out-patient clinic. Results Changes in blood glucose values from fasting were the lowest after 90 and 120 min (P < 0.01) when the dual wave was administered. When the dual or square-wave methods of insulin administration were used, subjects had significantly lower glucose levels after 4 h in comparison with when the single or double boluses were used (P = 0.04). Conclusions We conclude that the dual wave provided the most effective method of insulin administration for this meal. The dual- and square-wave therapies resulted in lower glucose levels 4 h after the meal in comparison with the single and double-bolus treatments. [source]

Recent advances in treatment of youth with Type 1 diabetes: better care through technology

DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 11 2001
W. V. Tamborlane
Abstract While treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in children and adolescents is especially difficult, recent technological advances have provided new therapeutic options to clinicians and patients. The urgency to achieve strict diabetes control and the introduction of new and improved insulin pumps have been accompanied by a marked increase in use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in youth with diabetes. Results of clinical outcome studies indicate that CSII provides a safe and effective alternative to multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy, even when employed in a regular clinic setting in a large number of children. The safety and efficacy of CSII is further enhanced by the introduction of lispro and aspart insulin. The sharper peaks and shorter duration of action of these very rapid-acting insulin analogues provides a means to achieve better control of post-prandial hyperglycaemia with less late post-prandial and nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Glargine insulin, a soluble and essentially peakless long-acting insulin analogue, may provide a better basal insulin for MDI regimens, but there are limited published data with this agent in children with T1DM. A number of systems for pulmonary delivery of insulin are in development and preliminary results of Phase III studies have been promising. Like CSII, inhaled insulin allows the child to take bolus insulin doses before each meal without having to take a premeal injection. A major obstacle to effective treatment is that self-monitoring of three to four blood glucose levels a day often misses the marked glycaemic excursions that characterize T1DM in young patients. On the other hand, new continuous glucose sensing systems provide a wealth of data that can be used to optimize basal and bolus therapy, regardless of how insulin is administered. Even more important, we may finally be at the threshold of development of a practically applicable artificial pancreas. Diabet. Med. 18, 864,870 (2001) [source]

Increased plasma fibrin gel porosity in patients with Type I diabetes during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 6 2003
G. Jörneskog
Summary.,Background:,Patients with Type 1 diabetes have a tighter plasma fibrin gel structure, to which impaired glycemic control might contribute. Improved glycemic control can be achieved with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Objectives:,The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CSII on plasma fibrin gel properties and circulating markers of inflammatory activity in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Patients and methods:,Twenty-eight patients were investigated before and after 4,6 months' treatment with CSII. Fibrin gel structure formed in vitro from plasma samples was investigated by liquid permeation of hydrated fibrin gel networks. P-fibrinogen was analyzed by a syneresis method. Comparisons were made between patients with improved (> 0.5%) and unchanged (< 0.5%) glucosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) during CSII. Results:,Eighteen patients showed improved and 10 patients unchanged HbA1c during CSII. P-fibrinogen, high sensitive C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A-antigen were not significantly changed, while fibrin gel permeability (Ks) and fiber mass,length ratio (µ) increased in both groups (P < 0.02). P-insulin and triglycerides decreased (P < 0.05) in both groups, while reductions of total cholesterol and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were seen only in patients with improved HbA1c (P < 0.05). Absolute changes in Ks were inversely correlated to changes in plasma fibrinogen (r = 0.50; P < 0.01) and in LDL-cholesterol (r = 0.46; P < 0.05). Conclusions:,Treatment with CSII in patients with Type 1 diabetes is associated with increased plasma fibrin gel porosity. Slight attenuation of the inflammatory activity was also observed. The changes in fibrin gel porosity seem to be mainly mediated by changes in plasma fibrinogen and blood lipids, and are probably secondary to improved insulin sensitivity. [source]

Past, present, and future of insulin pump therapy: better shot at diabetes control

MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE: A JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2008
Jennifer Sherr MD
Abstract With the advent of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy and the findings of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, the management of type 1 diabetes has changed drastically. Over the past 30 years since its development, the effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion has been assessed in comparison with other modes of intensive treatment. Additionally, improvements in pump delivery systems have been made. Here, the findings of the studies on pump therapy are reviewed. Selection criteria of patients for pump use and how to initiate pump therapy are presented. Finally, newer findings on continuous glucose sensors are discussed as the next era of pump therapy continues to focus on the goal of developing an artificial pancreas. Mt Sinai J Med 75:352,361, 2008. © 2008 Mount Sinai School of Medicine [source]

Prolonged use of continuous glucose monitors in children with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intensive multiple-daily injection therapy

PEDIATRIC DIABETES, Issue 2 2009
Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group
Objective:, For continuous glucose sensors to improve the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), they must be accurate, comfortable to wear, and easy to use. We conducted a pilot study of the FreeStyle NavigatorÔ Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Abbott Diabetes Care) to examine the feasibility of daily use of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in an extended ambulatory setting. Methods:, Following a 13-wk trial of daily Navigator use, 45 children with T1D [10.7 ± 3.7 yr, range 4.6,17.6, 24 using insulin pumps; continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and 21 using glargine-based multiple daily injections (MDI)] used the Navigator for an additional 13 wk. Results:, Navigator use was initially slightly higher in the CSII users than in the MDI users but declined similarly in both groups by 22,26 wk. After 26 wk, 11 (46%) of 24 CSII users and 7 (33%) of 21 MDI users were using the CGM at least 5 d a week. No baseline demographic or clinical factors were predictive of the amount of sensor use at 26 wk. However, Navigator use during weeks 1,13 and scores on a CGM satisfaction survey at 13 wk were predictive of use in weeks 22,26. Conclusions:, CGM was generally well-tolerated in children with T1D for more than 6 months, and early acceptance of CGM was predictive of extended use of the device. Although many subjects and parents found CGM valuable, the declining usage over time underscores the need to develop new technologies and strategies to increase acceptance, effectiveness, and long-term use of these devices in youth with T1D. [source]

Assessment of glycemic control by continuous glucose monitoring system in 50 children with type 1 diabetes starting on insulin pump therapy

PEDIATRIC DIABETES, Issue 3 2004
Dorothee Deiss
Abstract:, Objective:, To report experience with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to identify factors influencing glycemic control in a large cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and change to insulin pump therapy via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Research design and methods:, In 50 patients [21 boys, 29 girls; median age 12.6 yr (range: 1.3,16.4 yr); diabetes duration 5.0 yr (0.2,13.3)], hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and ambulatory CGMS were performed before and 6 wk after starting CSII. Average glucose concentration per 24 h, during day and night time as well as number of excursions, duration, and area under the curve (AUC) of glucose values above 180 mg/dL and below 60 mg/dL were calculated from CGMS data. Simultaneously, metabolic control was documented by standardized self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Results:, In the total cohort, HbA1c improved from 8.1 ± 1.2% at baseline to 7.7 ± 0.9% after 6 wk of CSII (p < 0.001). This effect was more distinct in boys (8.0 ± 1.4 vs. 7.5 ± 1.1%, p = 0.007) than in girls (8.1 ± 1.1 vs. 7.8 ± 0.7%, p = 0.039) as well as in patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 8.0%) at baseline (8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.1 ± 0.8%, p < 0.001) and in those older than 12 yr (8.2 ± 1.2 vs. 7.7 ± 1.0%, p < 0.001). At 6 wk of CSII, the values of glucose average per 24 h, AUC and time above 180 mg/dL, particularly during the day, improved. HbA1c was correlated with AUC above 180 mg/dL (r = 0.742, p < 0.001) and CGMS average glucose per 24 h (r = 0.628, p = 0.002), but to a lesser extent with SMBG values (r = 0.418, p = 0.054). Conclusion:, With the change to CSII, HbA1c improved significantly after 6 wk of therapy. CGMS usage provided additional information about glycemic control in these patients. [source]

Life with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy: child and parental perspectives and predictors of metabolic control

PEDIATRIC DIABETES, Issue 2 2001
Aristides k Maniatis
Abstract: Objective:, The purpose of this study was twofold (i): to evaluate metabolic control in patients receiving CSII therapy in a routine pediatric diabetes clinic by describing reasons for initiating therapy and daily management issues, including needle fear; and (ii) to assess the change in parental involvement and anxiety once their child initiated CSII therapy. Research design and methods: The study included 52 subjects (aged 7.6,23.6 yr) from a general pediatric diabetes clinic. Management issues were defined as diet, exercise, home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM) frequency, and self/staff assessment of needle fear. Characteristics were analyzed both according to a 0.5% change in HbA1c status (decreased vs. stable vs. increased) compared with pre-CSII therapy, and final HbA1c achieved (, 8.1 vs. > 8.1%). Results: The primary recommendation source for CSII use was most often the physician/diabetes team (48.1%), followed by a combination of the former with a personal referral source (32.7%). The most common reason (71.2%) for CSII initiation was a combination of wanting to achieve better metabolic control, dislike of insulin injections, and/or increased flexibility in daily living. Over one-quarter (26.9%) of subjects were identified as being needle-fearful, and this characteristic was predictive of final metabolic control (3/25 subjects ,,8.1% vs. 11/27 subjects >,8.1%, p =,0.03). On CSII therapy, dietary carbohydrate consistency was highly variable, and most subjects (65.3%) exclusively used an insulin to carbohydrate ratio for insulin bolus dosage calculation. The most common adjustment strategy (63.5%) for exercise was a combination of decreasing the insulin basal rate, disconnecting the pump, and/or eating extra carbohydrates. For the total cohort, the frequency of HBGM significantly increased on CSII therapy (4.31,4.85 tests/day, p =,0.02). Females did not have a significant change in HBGM frequency, while the youngest subjects had the highest HBGM frequency. Parental involvement and anxiety primarily stayed the same or decreased, regardless of the child's age (, 18 vs. > 18 yr) or metabolic control. Conclusions:, Analyses of the various characteristics identified only needle fearfulness as being predictive of poor metabolic control. Interestingly, poor control with CSII therapy did not result in a significant increase in parental involvement and/or anxiety. [source]

Age-dependent basal insulin patterns in children with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 3 2009
Agnieszka Szypowska
Aims: Identifying age-dependent basal rates in type 1 diabetic children treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Methods: CSII-treated children with type 1 diabetes exhibiting insulin requirement > 0.5U/kg and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 8%. The study population was composed of 198 Caucasian children (111 girls) with mean age of 9.8 ± 3.8 years, mean duration of diabetes of 4.3 ± 3.1 years and mean HbA1c value of 6.7 ± 0.7%. Data were evaluated for four age groups (0,6; 6,9; 9,12, 12,18 years). Basal rates records were downloaded from pump memory. HbA1c, weight, height were measured at scheduled visits. Results: Significant differences in the average hourly basal rate between groups were observed: I gr. 0.14 versus II gr. 0.24 versus III gr. 0.39 versus IV gr. 0.72 units/h; p < 0.0001. The average hourly basal rate correlated with age, body weight, BMI, diabetes duration and total insulin daily dose. Insulin peaks were observed for: I gr. , before midnight, II gr. , before midnight and in the early morning, gr. III and IV , in the early morning. Conclusion: Basal insulin infusion rate profiles in well-controlled paediatric patients on CSII reflect the age-dependent amount of basal insulin (20,40%) and affect circadian distribution of insulin needs. [source]