			Home About us Contact

Consecutive Dyspeptic Patients (consecutive + dyspeptic_patient)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Accuracy of a new ultrafast rapid urease test to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in 1000 consecutive dyspeptic patients

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2010
D. VAIRA
Summary Background, Rapid diagnostic tools for Helicobacter pylori are important in endoscopy. Aims, To assess the accuracy of a new 5 min rapid urease test (UFT300, ABS Srl, Cernusco sul Naviglio, Milan, Italy) and to compare it with the 1 h Pyloritek (Serim Laboratories, Elkhart, IN, USA) and the 24 h CLO test (Kimberly-Clark Ballard Medical Products, Roswell, GA, USA). Method, Consecutive dyspeptic patients referred to our unit for endoscopy were prospectively studied. All patients underwent a 13C-urea-breath test, histology and the UFT300 (ABS Srl; Cernusco sul Naviglio, Milan, Italy). In a sub-set of patients (n = 375), two additional RUTs were performed. Patients were deemed infected if both 13C-UBT and histology were positive. RUTs were read at 1, 5, and 60 min. Results, Of 1000 enrolled patients 45.3% were infected with H. pylori. The sensitivity of the UFT 300 was 90.3%, 94.5% and 96.2% at 1, 5 and 60 min respectively (specificity 100%). The Pyloritek and the UFT were comparable, but the CLO test was not reliable at 5 and 60 min. Conclusion, The UFT 300 test is comparable to the Pyloritek test, but the CLO test is significantly less sensitive at early time points. Reading test results at 1 min may increase false negative results, thereby decreasing sensitivity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 331,338 [source]

An evaluation of invasive and non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2001
B. C. Y. Wong
Background: Different tests are available for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. Aim: To compare the most commonly used tests either alone or in combination in Chinese patients with respect to routine clinical use or research purpose. Methods: A total of 294 consecutive dyspeptic patients without previous H. pylori treatment were recruited. During upper endoscopy, biopsies were taken from the antrum and corpus, for a commercially available CLO-test, an in-house rapid urease test, culture, polymerase chain reaction and histological examination. Patients then received a 13C-urea breath test. The H. pylori status of each patient was determined by a concordance of test results. Results: For routine clinical use, histology (antral plus corpus biopsies) had an accuracy of 100%, whilst the rapid urease test had an accuracy of 99.7%. The 13C-urea breath test was equally reliable, with an accuracy of 94.5%. Combinations of two tests did not confer additional advantage over the most accurate single test. For research purposes, the accuracy of using the criteria of two positives out of three diagnostic tests was 100% and equivocal results were not found. Conclusion: Histology with or without a rapid urease test was highly accurate for routine clinical use. Alternatively, the 13C-urea breath test was an equally reliable non-invasive test. The two positives out of three tests approach was highly reliable in predicting H. pylori status of untreated Chinese patients in a research setting. [source]

Seropositivity to a major allergen of Anisakis simplex, Ani s 1, in dyspeptic patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: histological and laboratory findings and clinical significance

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Issue 5 2006
C. Toro
Abstract Previous studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of seropositivity to the Ani s 1 protein in dyspeptic patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, but it is not known whether this represents episodes of anisakiasis misdiagnosis or previous exposure to the parasite without clinical relevance. To investigate the clinical significance of seropositivity to the Ani s 1 protein, a cohort study was performed with 87 consecutive dyspeptic patients who were treated for H. pylori infection. Fourteen (16.5%) patients were seropositive for the Ani s 1 protein, which was associated with the consumption of uncooked fish (p 0.0002). There were no differences in histological findings between subjects seropositive or seronegative for Ani s 1, but seropositive patients had increased eosinophil and basophil leukocyte counts (p < 0.05). Anti-Ani s 1 IgE was associated with a lack of improvement in the group of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia after successful eradication of H. pylori (p 0.016). Thus, in at least a subset of patients with H. pylori infection, seropositivity to Ani s 1 could have clinical relevance. In addition, these data highlight that only anisakiasis associated with severe allergic or gastric symptoms is currently being diagnosed. [source]