Home About us Contact | |||
Conditional Strategies (conditional + strategy)
Selected AbstractsVariation of reproductive behaviour and success of males adopting different tactics in Atlantic salmonJOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, Issue 2003B. De Gaudemar Six males and five females anadromous Atlantic salmon were released in two sections of the Lapitxuri experimental stream (Southwest France), where they could reproduce naturally. Females had all the same size and age, contrary to males. We focussed our attention on the variation with time of spawning tactics and success of males. Two factors affected male spawning behaviour in the short term. An increase of the OSR increased the level of male competition around redds which resulted in a larger number of males adopting sneaking rather than fighting tactics. Changes in female activities also seemed to be detected by males, since male aggressiveness increased when females were close to oviposition. But whatever their activities, males preferentially courted the earlier spawning female when two females were active at the same time. Fighting in males was confirmed to be the most successful tactic at a given time. However, males adopting sneaking tactic at the beginning of the spawning season could dramatically increase their reproductive success in the long-term. Fighting males invested much more energy in contests than secondary males, which may constitute a handicap in terms of longevity. They could quickly lose their status or strength with time which, although placed in a situation of high OSR, resulted in greater numbers of previously low-ranking males adopting satellite and fighting tactics during the period preceding oviposition. Age more than size affected male status and reproductive success. Females seemed to select their mate directly in relation to their physiological condition, since they only attacked dull coloured males showing obvious wound marks. They also could indirectly choose their mate by repeatedly leaving the redd during the period preceding oviposition in a situation of high OSR. This behaviour might incite male competition and also promoted, by incessant attempts of secondary males to rob the more successful status of primary males, their chance to spawn with fitter males. These results emphasized the importance of environment, physiological condition and energy expenditure in allocation tactics and variations in salmon reproductive success throughout the spawning season. This led us to hypothesize that the choice of sneaking through conditional strategies might provide greater average fitness in salmon alternative life histories. [source] Acoustic mimicry and disruptive alternative calling tactics in an Australian bushcricket (Caedicia; Phaneropterinae; Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera): does mating influence male calling tactic?PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 3 2006WINSTON BAILEY Abstract Male calling and searching tactics are described for a duetting Australian bushcricket, Caedicia sp. 12 (Phaneropterinae; Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera). The repertoire of Caedicia sp. 12 consists of the calling song and, by nonduetting males, a series of calling tactics that include short-click calling, disruptive over-singing and a call mimicking the entire duet. Nonduetting males respond to the production of a duet by another male and a female with short-click calls that mimic the female call at the conclusion of a duet. By manipulating the male's mating history, it is found that this form of calling behaviour is more likely to occur within the male's 6-day postmating refractory period; the low cost tactic allows males to re-mate during spermatophore replenishment. Males also produce disruptive calls in response to a duet, where the male may over-sing the duetting male's signal or produce a call that appears to mimic the entire duet; the male produces a calling song followed by a short signal that has the same latency as the female's reply within a duet. Males also over-sing crucial elements of the duetting-male's song that are normally critical for the female's conspecific recognition. There is no evidence that females search for the duetting male partner, but males unable to enter a duet will search for the call of a responding female. Searching by males is more common when these males are producing disruptive calls. Alternative male calling tactics are discussed as a set of conditional strategies for securing unmated females. [source] Spatial conditional discrimination learning in developing ratsDEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2005Kevin L. Brown Abstract The present study established an effective procedure for studying spatial conditional discrimination learning in juvenile rats using a T-maze. Wire mesh located on the floor of the maze as well as a second, identical T-maze apparatus served as conditional cues which signaled whether a left or a right response would be rewarded. In Experiment 1, conditional discrimination was evident on Postnatal Day (PND) 30 when mesh,+,maze or maze-alone were the conditional cues, but not when mesh-alone was the cue. Experiment 2 confirmed that mesh-alone was sufficiently salient to support learning of a simple (nonconditional) discrimination. Its failure to serve as a conditional cue in Experiment 1 does not reflect its general ineffectiveness as a stimulus. Experiment 3 confirmed that the learning shown in Experiment 1 was indeed conditional in nature by comparing performance on conditional versus nonconditional versions of the task. Experiment 4 showed that PND19 and PND23 pups also were capable of performing the task when maze,+,mesh was the cue; however, the findings indicate that PND19 subjects do not use a conditional strategy to learn this task. The findings suggest postnatal ontogeny of conditional discrimination learning and underscore the importance of conditional cue salience, and of identifying task strategies, in developmental studies of conditional discrimination learning. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 46: 97,110, 2005. [source] Effects of Social Structure on the Behaviour and Performance of Alternative Reproductive Phenotypes in Male Rock Shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typusETHOLOGY, Issue 4 2008Stefan Dennenmoser Males that adopt alternative mating tactics within a conditional strategy often undergo costly morphological changes when switching to the next phenotype during ontogeny. Whether costs of changing to a subsequent reproductive phenotype are outweighed by a higher mating probability may depend on the frequencies of different phenotypes in a group of competitors. Benefits and costs associated with different phenotype frequencies depend on interactions within and between alternative phenotypes, but the underlying behavioural mechanisms have rarely been studied. Herein, we used the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus as a model: ontogenetic male stages of this species differ in morphological and behavioural traits that indicate alternative reproductive phenotypes. The small, subordinate, male stage (typus) develops via several intermediate stages (intermedius) to the dominant male stage (robustus): in competitive interactions the typus males usually employ the sneaking tactic, while the robustus males invariably employ the monopolizing fighter tactic. In laboratory experiments, we manipulated phenotype frequencies to examine whether there are frequency-dependent effects on searching behaviour, aggressiveness and mating probability. With increasing frequency of robustus males, the rate of aggressive interactions among them increased. Furthermore, robustus males increased walking velocity when more than one robustus male was present. In contrast, typus males did not adjust their searching or aggressive behaviour. The increase of aggressive interactions among robustus males provided more opportunities for typus males to seize a temporarily unguarded female. While typus males exploit fights among robustus males that produce mating opportunities for them, robustus males benefit from typus males, which reveal the presence of receptive females. We suggest that each phenotype benefits from the presence of the other phenotype and suffers costly interference among individuals of the same phenotype. Whether frequency-dependent effects on the mating probability of subordinates also affect their ontogenetic switchpoint should be examined in future studies. [source] |