Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Concomitant Antiepileptic Drugs (concomitant + antiepileptic_drug)
Selected AbstractsIntravenous lacosamide as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide in partial-onset seizuresEPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2010Gregory Krauss Summary Purpose:, Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug effective for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of an intravenous (i.v.) formulation of lacosamide (200,800 mg/day) infused over 10, 15, and 30 min as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures. Methods:, This multicenter, open-label, inpatient trial enrolled 160 patients from ongoing open-label, long-term trials who were taking stable doses of oral lacosamide and up to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Serial cohorts of patients were converted from oral lacosamide treatment to the same intravenous doses infused over progressively shorter infusion durations: 30, 15, and 10 min for 2,5 days. A data monitoring committee (DMC) reviewed safety data for each cohort. The safety of intravenous lacosamide was assessed from adverse events (AEs), laboratory variables, electrocardiography findings, and physical/neurologic examinations. Results:, A total of 160 patients received lacosamide 200,800 mg/day, i.v., for 2,5 days, of which 69% received 400,800 mg/day doses. The most common AEs (reported by ,10% of patients) were headache, dizziness, and somnolence. There was no increase in frequency or severity of AEs with shorter durations of infusion or increased days of exposure. AEs were similar, but more frequent, with higher doses (,400 mg/day). Injection-site events were rare and did not appear to be linked to infusion doses or rates. Lacosamide plasma concentrations were linearly related to dose across the cohorts. Discussion:, This comprehensive evaluation supports the safety of an intravenous lacosamide infusion duration as short as 15 min for short-term (2,5 days) replacement for patients temporarily unable to take oral lacosamide. [source] Adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures: Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trialEPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2009Péter Halász Summary Purpose:, To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (200 and 400 mg/day) when added to one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Methods:, This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients (age 16,70 years) with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization to placebo, lacosamide 200, or lacosamide 400 mg/day. The trial consisted of an 8-week baseline, a 4-week titration, and a 12-week maintenance period. Results:, Four hundred eighty-five patients were randomized and received trial medication. Among these, 87% were taking two or more concomitant AEDs. Median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance period (intent-to-treat, ITT) was 20.5% for placebo, 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.02), and 36.4% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.03). In the per protocol population, the reductions were 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.04) and 44.9% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.01) compared to placebo (25.4%). The 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (40.5%) was significant (p = 0.01) over placebo (25.8%), but was not for 200 mg/day (35.0%). In the per protocol population, the 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (46.3%) was significant (p < 0.01) compared with the placebo responder rate (27.5%). Dose-related adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Clinically relevant changes in the mean plasma concentrations of commonly used AEDs were not observed. Discussion:, Results of this trial demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide 200 and 400 mg/day and support that lacosamide may be an advantageous option for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy. [source] Defining success in clinical trials , profiling pregabalin, the newest AEDEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 2005P. Ryvlin The efficacy and safety of pregabalin as adjunctive therapy for patients with partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalization has been established by four randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (n = 1396) and four long-term open-label studies (n = 1480). Patients in the three fixed-dose trials were ,12 years of age, had ,6 partial seizures and no 4-week seizure-free period during the 8-week baseline period. Seventy-three per cent of patients were taking ,2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Responder rates across the effective doses (150,600 mg/day) ranged from 14% to 51% and demonstrated a significant dose,response relationship. The most common adverse events were central nervous system related, generally mild or moderate, transient, and tended to be dose related. The fourth placebo-controlled trial compared a fixed dose of pregabalin 600 mg/day with a flexible-dose regimen (150,600 mg/day). Responder rates were greater for both the fixed dose (45.3%, P < 0.001) and flexible dose (31.3%, P < 0.001) when compared with placebo (11.0%). Compared with the fixed-dose group, the flexible-dose patients had a lower incidence of adverse events and study discontinuations. In long-term open-label trials, the efficacy of pregabalin was maintained with respect to 50% responder rates suggesting no obvious tolerance developing over 2 years. Seizure-free rates were 8.9% and 5.8% for the last 6 months and 1 year of pregabalin treatment, respectively. Long-term open-label pregabalin treatment was well tolerated. [source] Interindividual variation of serum haloperidol concentrations in Japanese patients , clinical considerations on steady-state serum level,dose ratiosJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2003E. Yukawa Summary Objective:, Marked interpatient variability in haloperidol (HAL) level,dose (L/D) ratios makes it difficult to use the administered dose for predicting serum concentrations. Objective:, To investigate the effect of dose, age, total body weight and co-medication on steady-state HAL L/D ratios. Method:, Retrospective analysis of dose and HAL blood level data from 168 patients. Results:, The HAL L/D ratio decreased curvilinearly with increasing daily dose of HAL. The patients treated with concomitant antiparkinsonian drugs showed a mean HAL L/D ratio that was 24·9% higher than those without antiparkinsonian drugs. The patients treated with concomitant antiepileptic drugs showed a mean HAL L/D ratio that was 27·2% lower than those without antiepileptic drugs. The mean HAL L/D ratio of patients treated with concomitant CYP2D6 substrates was not significantly different from those without CYP2D6 substrates. Conclusion:, There is a wide interindividual variability in blood levels of HAL in patients given the same dose. Routine monitoring of HAL serum level is useful, especially in patients who require associated antiepileptic and/or antiparkinsonian medication. [source] Adjunctive rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a long-term, open-label extension studyACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2010G. Kluger Kluger G, Glauser T, Krauss G, Seeruthun R, Perdomo C, Arroyo S. Adjunctive rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a long-term, open-label extension study. Acta Neurol Scand: 122: 202,208. © 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objective,,, This open-label extension evaluated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of rufinamide in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) who had previously completed a 12-week double-blind study. Materials and methods,,, In total, 124 patients (aged 4,37 years), receiving 1,3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs, were treated with rufinamide ,25,60 mg/kg/day. Efficacy was assessed by seizure frequency; tolerability by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Results,,, Overall, patients were treated with rufinamide for a median (range) of 432 (10,1149) days. Reductions in seizure frequency were observed throughout the study; during the last 12 months of treatment, 41.0% and 47.9% of patients had ,50% reduction in total and tonic,atonic seizure frequency, respectively. The most common AEs were vomiting (30.6%) and pyrexia (25.8%). Conclusions,,, In this open-label extension, rufinamide appeared to be an effective long-term adjunctive therapy for the treatment of LGS-associated seizures in children and young adults. [source] Epilepsy and comorbidity: infections and antimicrobials usage in relation to epilepsy managementACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2003J. W. Sander Infections are probably the most common preventable cause of epilepsy worldwide. There are concerns that endemic infections and infestations, such as malaria and neurocysticercosis, could be responsible for the increased incidence of epilepsy in the developing world. Cases of epilepsy associated with neurocysticercosis are also being seen increasingly in developed countries due to migration from, and travel to, endemic areas. When prescribing antimicrobial agents in patients with epilepsy a number of issues need to be considered, such as potential adverse effects on seizure control and interactions with concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Some antimicrobial agents, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones and antimalarials, can have proconvulsant activity and may precipitate seizures, even in patients who do not have epilepsy. Moreover, many antimicrobials increase or decrease the plasma levels of AEDs, whereas some AEDs may adversely affect the efficacy of antimicrobials. [source] A pooled analysis of adjunctive topiramate in refractory partial epilepsyACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2003K. Peeters Objectives , To evaluate the impact of different dosages of topiramate (TPM) add-on to stable antiepileptic therapy for refractory partial epilepsy in adults. Material and methods , Pooled intention-to-treat analysis of six similarly designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, including 481 patients treated with doses of TPM 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg/day, and 265 patients receiving placebo. Results , Seizures were reduced by ,50% from baseline in 41% of TPM-treated patients and 15% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001); 5 and 0.8%, respectively, were seizure-free (P < 0.003). TPM was significantly better than placebo regardless of gender, age, baseline seizure rate as well as number and type of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Efficacy was statistically significant in favour of TPM at all dose levels: at least 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 40% of patients with 200 mg, 41% with 400 mg, 44% with 600 mg and 41% with 800 mg TPM when compared with 15% with placebo (P , 0.001 for each dosage arm vs placebo). The median reduction in monthly seizure frequency was 38%, 42%, 45% and 38% vs 8%, respectively (P , 0.001). Moreover, response to TPM was significantly superior to placebo at each of the dose levels tested for most of the baseline variables. The total percentage of withdrawals increased with the dosage, and the withdrawals caused by adverse events increased from 3% with placebo to 7% with 200 mg TPM (not significant vs placebo), 15% with 400 mg TPM (P = 0.08), 16% with 600 mg TPM (P = 0.002) and 15% with 800 mg TPM (P = 0.003). Conclusion , The efficacy of TPM add-on in partial epilepsy is consistent across efficacy endpoints and independent of study population characteristics. The response at 200 mg TPM is similar to the response at higher doses, but as drop-outs caused by adverse events are more frequent above the 200 mg dose, this pooled analysis supports that 200 mg daily is a good target dose for add-on therapy in most patients with partial epilepsy, showing an excellent balance between efficacy and tolerability. [source] | ||||||||||