			Home About us Contact

Common Name (common + name)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	83%

Selected Abstracts

Common names for Australian ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
Alan N Andersen
Abstract Most insects do not have common names, and this is a significant barrier to public interest in them, and to their study by non-specialists. This holds for even highly familiar insect groups such as ants. Here, I propose common names for all major native Australian ant genera and species-groups, as well as for many of the most abundant and distinctive species. Sixty-two genera, 142 species-groups and 50 species are given names. The naming system closely follows taxonomic structure; typically a genus is given a general common name, under which species-group and species names are nested. [source]

Comparative measures of the toxicity of component chemicals in aircraft deicing fluid

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY, Issue 6 2000
Jeffrey S. Cornell
Abstract Acraft deicingoperationsarea necessarypart of safe air travel, but release large quantities of aircraft deicing fluids (ADFs) to the environment. Effective measures to mitigate the environmental impacts of deicing operations are hindered because of the negative effects some ADF chemicals have on treatment systems and because of the poorly characterized toxicity of ADF components. This research investigated the contributions of environmentally significant concentrations of selected ADF components to the toxicity of ADF-containing waste streams, and to the inhibition of biodegradation of propylene glycol (PG), the most important component of ADF. The component chemicals studied were PG, the corrosion inhibitor 4(5)-methylbenzotriazole (MeBT; common name: tolyltriazole), and proprietary mixes of corrosion inhibitors, buffers, and surfactants referred to as the additive package or AdPack. Relative to PG alone, the different additives increased the toxicity of ADF and decreased PG biodegradation rates. In enrichments of soil microorganisms acclimated to ADF, the MeBT component significantly decreased cell growth rates and yields, and inhibited PG biodegradation to a greater extent than the AdPack. Microtox® tests indicated that MeBT is the ADF component most toxic to microorganisms. However, acute aquatic toxicity tests indicated that the AdPack components were more toxic than MeBT to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas, although both components were more toxic than PG alone. [source]

The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity

AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, Issue 5 2005
Gabrielle C. Canonico
Abstract 1.The common name ,tilapia' refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2.Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ,aquatic chicken' because of their potential as an affordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments , from subsistence or ,backyard' units to intensive fish hatcheries. In some countries, particularly in Asia, nearly all of the introduced tilapias produced are consumed domestically; tilapias have contributed to basic food security for such societies. 3.This review indicates that tilapia species are highly invasive and exist under feral conditions in every nation in which they have been cultured or introduced. Thus, the authors have concluded that, despite potential or observed benefits to human society, tilapia aquaculture and open-water introductions cannot continue unchecked without further exacerbating damage to native fish species and biodiversity. Recommendations include restricting tilapia culture to carefully managed, contained ponds, although exclusion is preferred when it is feasible. Research into culture of indigenous species is also recommended. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Common names for Australian ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Review of the ethnobotany, chemistry, biological activity and safety of the botanical dietary supplement Morinda citrifolia (noni)*

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY: AN INTERNATI ONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE, Issue 12 2007
Alison D. Pawlus
Morinda citrifolia, commonly called noni, has a long history as a medicinal plant and its use as a botanical dietary supplement has grown tremendously in recent years. This has prompted a concomitant increase in research on the phytochemical constituents and biological activity of noni. A relatively large number of scientific publications on noni have been published in recent years, including a number of review articles. The goals of this review are to provide an updated categorization of the phytochemical constituents found in noni and to provide perspective for its extensive utilization as a major botanical dietary supplement. Included herein are a comprehensive list of known ethno-botanical uses and common names of M. citrifolia, a brief summary of relevant biological studies and a discussion of the safety of noni as a supplement. [source]