Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Common Mistakes (common + mistake)
Selected AbstractsThe Juvenile Drug Court Judge and Lawyer: Four Common Mistakes in Treating Drug Court AdolescentsJUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, Issue 4 2000C.A.C., MICHAEL D. CLARK M.S.W. ABSTRACT This article will present information gleaned from anecdotal experience of existing juvenile drug treatment courts regarding several common mistakes often made by those new to the drug court. The mistakes discussed include: 1) Believing the work and role responsibilities in a traditional juvenile court will not change significantly when entering a juvenile drug court; 2) Citing the elimination of drug and alcohol use as a final outcome goal when developing the mission statement for a juvenile drug court; 3) Believing that a juvenile drug court ensures accountability by keeping a close eye on participants and setting immediate consequences for any break in program rules; 4) Using vicarious learning to "teach a lesson",making an example of an individual participant who has broken program rules in front of the large group. The goal of this article is not only to raise caution to these pitfalls, but also to help incoming judges and lawyers become aware of the changes that working in a juvenile drug court will demand. [source] Why Smart Companies Do Dumb Things: Avoiding Eight Common Mistakes in New Product Development by Calvin L. HodockPERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Article first published online: 4 FEB 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Doctrine and fairness in the law of contract*LEGAL STUDIES, Issue 4 2009Andrew Phang This paper explores, through illustrations from the law of contract, the important central theme to the effect that the rules and principles, which constitute the doctrine of the law, are not ends in themselves but are, rather, the means through which the courts arrive at substantively fair outcomes in the cases before them. The paper focuses on the concept of ,radicalism', which relates to the point at which the courts decide that it is legally permissible to hold that a contract should come to an end because a radical or fundamental ,legal tipping point' has not only been arrived at but has, in fact, been crossed. It explores the role of this concept as embodied in the doctrines of frustration, common mistake, discharge by breach, as well as fundamental breach in the context of exception clauses , in particular, how ,radicalism' with regard to these doctrines can be viewed from the (integrated) perspectives of structure, linkage and fairness. The paper also touches briefly on linkages amongst the doctrines of economic duress, undue influence and unconscionability, as well as the ultimate aim these doctrines share of achieving fair outcomes in the cases concerned. [source] SALES MAXIMIZATION AND PROFIT MAXIMIZATION: A NOTE ON THE DECISION OF A SALES MAXIMIZER TO THE INCREASE OF PER UNIT COSTPACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, Issue 5 2007Ke Li A common mistake in currently used textbooks is pointed out, and a new proposition is proposed for replacing a false statement there. [source] Hackers don't take vacationsJOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING & FINANCE, Issue 3 2009Gordon Smith Cutting costs is good,but don't scrimp on information technology security. The author of this article warns that you may take vacations, but hackers never do. And he discusses other common mistakes that can place your firm in danger. © 2008 Canaudit, Inc. Reprinted with permission. [source] Multivariate exploratory analysis of ordinal data in ecology: Pitfalls, problems and solutionsJOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, Issue 5 2005János Podani Abstract Questions: Are ordinal data appropriately treated by multivariate methods in numerical ecology? If not, what are the most common mistakes? Which dissimilarity coefficients, ordination and classification methods are best suited to ordinal data? Should we worry about such problems at all? Methods: A new classification model family, OrdClAn (Ordinal Cluster Analysis), is suggested for hierarchical and non-hierarchical classifications from ordinal ecological data, e.g. the abundance/dominance scores that are commonly recorded in relevés. During the clustering process, the objects are grouped so as to minimize a measure calculated from the ranks of within-cluster and between-cluster distances or dissimilarities. Results and Conclusions: Evaluation of the various steps of exploratory data analysis of ordinal ecological data shows that consistency of methodology throughout the study is of primary importance. In an optimal situation, each methodological step is order invariant. This property ensures that the results are independent of changes not affecting ordinal relationships, and guarantees that no illusory precision is introduced into the analysis. However, the multivariate procedures that are most commonly applied in numerical ecology do not satisfy these requirements and are therefore not recommended. For example, it is inappropriate to analyse Braun-Blanquet abudance/dominance data by methods assuming that Euclidean distance is meaningful. The solution of all problems is that the dissimilarity coefficient should be compatible with ordinal variables and the subsequent ordination or clustering method should consider only the rank order of dissimilarities. A range of artificial data sets exemplifying different subtypes of ordinal variables, e.g. indicator values or species scores from relevés, illustrate the advocated approach. Detailed analyses of an actual phytosociological data set demonstrate the classification by OrdClAn of relevés and species and the subsequent tabular rearrangement, in a numerical study remaining within the ordinal domain from the first step to the last. [source] 2255: Inflammatory neovascular membraneACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2010P NERI Purpose To describe the most common mistakes in the management of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Methods The current literature is reviewed and the experience of a tertiary referral centre is reported. Results CNV is a potentially sight-threatening sequela of uveitis. Several mistakes can be done during patients examination: CNV might not be recognized both at biomicroscopy and at fluorescein angiography (FA), for instance. Moreover, since some doctors are not aware of the importance of Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA), the choroidal involvement during inflammatory CNV might not be appreciated. These are just some examples of possible errors which can be done during the daily practice. The outcome of subfoveal CNV is poor if untreated: several procedures have been considered, even though there is lack of guidelines. The most important mistake can be represented by the lack of criticism on the treatment techniques: several methods have been proposed, albeit some of them should not be used on the basis of the treatment rationale and on the better knowledge of CNV pathophysiology. The presentation shows the most typical cases where the above mentioned mistakes have been done, suggesting some methods in order to avoid them. Conclusion CNV secondary to uveitis is a severe sequela, which can lead to significant visual impairment. Several mistakes can be done during both the diagnosis and the therapeutic procedures. Although no guideline is provided, the current medical literature can give the basis for a successful treatment strategy. [source] | |||||||||||||