			Home About us Contact

Colorectal Procedures (colorectal + procedure)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Compartment syndrome associated with the Lloyd Davies position

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 10 2001
Three case reports, review of the literature
The Lloyd Davies position was developed to facilitate access to the pelvis for gynaecological, urological and colorectal procedures. Previous case reports have demonstrated that prolonged adoption (> 4 h) of this position has been associated with the development of bilateral compartment syndrome of the calves. All three patients reported here suffered severe bilateral calf pain despite the use of thoracic epidurals. All three cases required three-compartment fasciotomies and, 6 months after surgery, were all still severely disabled as a consequence of the compartment syndrome. These case reports stress the dangers of use of the Lloyd Davies position for prolonged procedures and demonstrate that some patients are at risk after relatively short periods (< 3 h). Previous case reports and clinical studies have focused on the effect of limb elevation in stirrups on the arterial pressure in the lower limb. We review the pathophysiology of compartment syndrome and consider factors other than a decrease in arterial pressure that may predispose to compartment syndrome during adoption of the Lloyd Davies position. [source]

Trends towards increased use of the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 10 2010
J. Lengyel
Abstract Aim, The aim of the study was to identify the trend towards laparoscopic resection in the practice of one surgeon and to determine whether the default approach to all colorectal procedures could be by means of minimally invasive techniques with an associated low rate of conversion. Method, A prospective database of primary colorectal resections under the care of one colorectal surgeon collected between July 2003 and December 2008 was analysed to determine the trend in the use of the laparoscopic approach and the rate of conversion of an intention-to-treat policy for laparoscopic procedures. Patients with recurrent rectal or colonic malignancy were excluded from the study. Results, A total of 598 patients underwent elective colorectal resection of which 371 (62%) were carried out laparoscopically with a rate of conversion of 3.2%. The proportion of all colorectal resections that were undertaken laparoscopically in the first 1 year was 26% (22/85) (no conversions). This proportion rose to 100% (127/127) in the fifth year of the study of which 4.0% were converted. The introduction of more complex procedures did not have an adverse effect on the trend towards more laparoscopic resections The commencement of a laparoscopic colorectal fellowship in 2006 was associated with a marked increase in the number of laparoscopic cases. Conclusion, A conscious decision to make the laparoscopic approach the default for all colorectal resections can be achieved safely with a low conversion rate. This can be achieved within the context of training a ,novice' laparoscopic colorectal surgeon. [source]

The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBI

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2009
K. E. Schwab
Abstract Objective, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recommended laparoscopic resection as an alternative to open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Method, A questionnaire was distributed to members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) regarding their current surgical practice. Results were analysed individually, by region, and nationwide. Results, Information was received on 436 consultants (in 155 replies), of whom 233 (53%) perform laparoscopic colorectal procedures. During the previous year, 25% of colorectal resections were performed laparoscopically by the respondents. However, of those surgeons who were performing laparoscopic resections, only 30% performed more than half of all their resections laparoscopically. Right hemicolectomy, left-sided resections, and rectopexy were the most frequently performed laparoscopic resections. There was an even distribution throughout the country of consultants performing laparoscopic resections (regional IQR 48,60%). The main reason for consultants not performing laparoscopic procedures was a lack of training or funding. Conclusion, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is being performed by more than half (53%) of colorectal consultants nationwide, although only a quarter of all procedures are being undertaken laparoscopically. [source]

Laparoscopic colonic surgery , mission accomplished or work in progress?

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 6 2006
H. Kehlet
Abstract Laparoscopic colonic resection may facilitate early postoperative recovery due to reduced surgical stress, pain and ileus. However, large randomised studies have only shown marginal improvements in outcome compared with open surgery, reporting a median hospital stay of about 5,7 days. Concomitant with these developments multimodal rehabilitation, which involves a revision of general postoperative care principles, improved pain relief with epidural analgesia and early oral nutrition and mobilization, has demonstrated greater improvements in recovery after open surgery, resulting in a median hospital stay of about 2,4 days. Recent single centre, randomised studies where laparoscopic and open colonic resection are combined with multimodal rehabilitation have not resolved the debate regarding which is the optimal operative technique. Therefore, new strategies are required to integrate laparoscopy with multimodal rehabilitation in order to establish its advantages, cost effectiveness and indications in specific groups of patients or colorectal procedures, thus justifying widespread application of the laparoscopic technique. [source]