| |||
Acoustic Communication (acoustic + communication)
Selected AbstractsAcoustic communication in crocodilians: from behaviour to brainBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 3 2009A. L. Vergne ABSTRACT Crocodilians and birds are the modern representatives of Phylum Archosauria. Although there have been recent advances in our understanding of the phylogeny and ecology of ancient archosaurs like dinosaurs, it still remains a challenge to obtain reliable information about their behaviour. The comparative study of birds and crocodiles represents one approach to this interesting problem. One of their shared behavioural features is the use of acoustic communication, especially in the context of parental care. Although considerable data are available for birds, information concerning crocodilians is limited. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about acoustic communication in crocodilians, from sound production to hearing processes, and to stimulate research in this field. Juvenile crocodilians utter a variety of communication sounds that can be classified into various functional categories: (1) "hatching calls", solicit the parents at hatching and fine-tune hatching synchrony among siblings; (2) "contact calls", thought to maintain cohesion among juveniles; (3) "distress calls", induce parental protection; and (4) "threat and disturbance calls", which perhaps function in defence. Adult calls can likewise be classified as follows: (1) "bellows", emitted by both sexes and believed to function during courtship and territorial defence; (2) "maternal growls", might maintain cohesion among offspring; and (3) "hisses", may function in defence. However, further experiments are needed to identify the role of each call more accurately as well as systematic studies concerning the acoustic structure of vocalizations. The mechanism of sound production and its control are also poorly understood. No specialized vocal apparatus has been described in detail and the motor neural circuitry remains to be elucidated. The hearing capabilities of crocodilians appear to be adapted to sound detection in both air and water. The ear functional anatomy and the auditory sensitivity of these reptiles are similar in many respects to those of birds. The crocodilian nervous system likewise shares many features with that of birds, especially regarding the neuroanatomy of the auditory pathways. However, the functional anatomy of the telencephalic auditory areas is less well understood in crocodilians compared to birds. [source] A review of acoustic playback techniques for studying avian vocal duetsJOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, Issue 2 2010Sarah B. Douglas ABSTRACT Playback experiments involve the broadcast of natural or synthetic sound stimuli and provide a powerful tool for studying acoustic communication in birds. Playback is a valuable technique for exploring vocal duetting behavior because it allows investigators to test predictions of the various hypotheses for duet function. Here, we adopt a methodological perspective by considering various challenges specific to studying duetting behavior, and highlighting the utility of different playback designs for testing duet function. Single-speaker playback experiments allow investigators to determine how duetting birds react to different stimuli, but do not simulate duets in a spatially realistic manner. Multi-speaker playback experiments are superior to single-speaker designs because duet stimuli are broadcast with spatial realism and unique and additional predictions can be generated for testing duet function. In particular, multi-speaker playback allows investigators to evaluate how birds respond to male versus female duet contributions separately, based on reactions to the different loudspeakers. Interactive playback allows investigators to ask questions about the time- and pattern-specific singing behavior of birds, and to understand how singing strategies correspond to physical behavior during vocal interactions. Although logistically challenging, interactive playback provides a powerful tool for examining specific elements of duets (such as the degree of coordination) and may permit greater insight into their functions from an operational perspective. Interactive playback designs where the investigator simulates half of a duet may be used to describe and investigate the function of pair-specific and population-wide duet codes. Regardless of experimental design, all playback experiments should be based on a sound understanding of the natural duetting behavior of the species of interest, and should aim to produce realistic and carefully controlled duet simulations. Future studies that couple playback techniques with other experimental procedures, such as Acoustic Location System recordings for monitoring the position of birds in dense vegetation or multimodal techniques that combine acoustic with visual stimuli, are expected to provide an even better understanding of these highly complex vocal displays. RESUMEN Los experimentos de reproducción de sonidos grabados involucran el uso de sonido natural o sintético y proveen una herramienta poderosa para el estudio de la comunicación acústica de las aves. La reproducción de sonidos grabados es una técnica valiosa para explorar las duetas vocales porque permite probar las predicciones de varios hipótesis sobre la función de duetas. Aquí, adoptamos una perspectiva metodológica, considerando los varios retos específicos al estudio del comportamiento de duetas y resaltando la utilidad de diferentes diseños de reproducción de sonidos grabados para probar la función de las duetas. Experimentos de reproducción de sonidos grabados hechas con un parlante permiten una determinación de como las aves que realizan duetas reaccionan a diferentes estímulos, pero no simulan las duetas de una manera espacialmente realística. Experimentos de reproducción de sonidos grabados hechas con múltiples parlantes son superiores a diseños con un solo parlante porque transmiten el sonido de una manera espacialmente realística y generan predicciones únicas y adicionales para probar la función de la dueta. En particular, la reproducción de sonidos grabados con múltiples parlantes permite una evaluación de cómo las aves responden a las contribuciones del macho y de la hembra separadamente, basado en sus reacciones a los diferentes parlantes. La reproducción de sonidos grabados interactiva permite hacer preguntas temporalmente especificas y en relación a patrones especificas sobre el comportamiento de canto. También permite entender como las estrategias de canto corresponden al comportamiento físico durante las interacciones vocales. Aunque es un reto logístico, la reproducción de sonidos grabados interactiva provee una herramienta poderosa para examinar elementos específicos de las duetas (como el grado de coordinación) y podría permitir un mayor conocimiento sobre sus funciones de una perspectiva operacional. Los diseños de la reproducción de sonidos grabados interactivas, en la cual el investigador simula la mitad de una dueta, podrían ser usadas para describir e investigar la función de los códigos de dueta específicos a una pareja y a una población. Sin importar el tipo de diseño experimental, todos los experimentos de reproducción de sonidos grabados deberían ser basadas en una buena comprensión del comportamiento natural de las duetas en la especie de interés, y deberían tener la meta de producir simulaciones de duetas realísticas y cuidadosamente controladas. Se espera que los estudios futuros cuales combinan técnicas de la reproducción de sonidos grabados con otros procedimientos experimentales, como grabaciones del Sistema de Ubicación Acústica para monitorear la posición de aves en vegetación densa, o técnicas multimodales que combinan estímulos acústicos con estímulos visuales, provean un mejor entendimiento de estos despliegues vocales altamente complejos. [source] Sound reasons for silence: why do molluscs not communicate acoustically?BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, Issue 3 2010GEERAT J. VERMEIJ Many adaptively beneficial states of form, behaviour and physiology are absent in large parts of the evolutionary tree of life. Although the causes of these absences can never be fully known, insights into the possibilities and limitations of adaptive evolution can be gained by examining the conditions that would be necessary for the forbidden phenotypes to evolve. Here, the case of acoustic communication in molluscs is considered. The production of sound as a warning to predators or as a means to attract mates is widespread among arthropods and vertebrates, both on land and in water, but is unknown among molluscs, even though many derived clades of gastropods and cephalopods are characterized by internal fertilization and by the evolution of long-distance visual and chemical signalling. Many molluscs possess suitable hard parts , shell, operculum and jaws , for producing sound, but most shell-bearing molluscs lack the agility or aggression necessary to cope with high-activity enemies attracted to an acoustic beacon. Their evolutionary background, arising from the generally passive adaptations of molluscs and other animals with low metabolic rates, prevents selection favouring communication by sound, and indeed favours silence. Several clades of shell-bearing gastropods and cephalopods were identified in which sound production has the greatest potential to arise or to be discovered. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 100, 485,493. [source] Acoustic communication in crocodilians: from behaviour to brainBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 3 2009A. L. Vergne ABSTRACT Crocodilians and birds are the modern representatives of Phylum Archosauria. Although there have been recent advances in our understanding of the phylogeny and ecology of ancient archosaurs like dinosaurs, it still remains a challenge to obtain reliable information about their behaviour. The comparative study of birds and crocodiles represents one approach to this interesting problem. One of their shared behavioural features is the use of acoustic communication, especially in the context of parental care. Although considerable data are available for birds, information concerning crocodilians is limited. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about acoustic communication in crocodilians, from sound production to hearing processes, and to stimulate research in this field. Juvenile crocodilians utter a variety of communication sounds that can be classified into various functional categories: (1) "hatching calls", solicit the parents at hatching and fine-tune hatching synchrony among siblings; (2) "contact calls", thought to maintain cohesion among juveniles; (3) "distress calls", induce parental protection; and (4) "threat and disturbance calls", which perhaps function in defence. Adult calls can likewise be classified as follows: (1) "bellows", emitted by both sexes and believed to function during courtship and territorial defence; (2) "maternal growls", might maintain cohesion among offspring; and (3) "hisses", may function in defence. However, further experiments are needed to identify the role of each call more accurately as well as systematic studies concerning the acoustic structure of vocalizations. The mechanism of sound production and its control are also poorly understood. No specialized vocal apparatus has been described in detail and the motor neural circuitry remains to be elucidated. The hearing capabilities of crocodilians appear to be adapted to sound detection in both air and water. The ear functional anatomy and the auditory sensitivity of these reptiles are similar in many respects to those of birds. The crocodilian nervous system likewise shares many features with that of birds, especially regarding the neuroanatomy of the auditory pathways. However, the functional anatomy of the telencephalic auditory areas is less well understood in crocodilians compared to birds. [source] Phylogeny and the modalities of acoustic diversification in extant Eneopterinae (Insecta, Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Eneopteridae)CLADISTICS, Issue 3 2004Tony Robillard Calling with a tegminal stridulatory apparatus is widespread in crickets. However, the evolution of cricket stridulums has been poorly studied and then only on the basis of prephylogenetic models, which are unable to account for the huge diversity recently documented for acoustic features in crickets. The present paper focuses on the evolution of acoustic devices in the subfamily Eneopterinae. This is the first attempt to reconstruct the phylogeny of a large and diverse cricket clade in order to analyze the evolution of emitting structures using precise homology statements. In the first step, we reconstruct the phylogeny of this clade using a morphological data set of 193 characters and 45 taxa. The resultant phylogeny supports the monophyly of the subfamily and that of the 13 genera represented by at least two species in our taxonomic sample. Phylogenetic relationships within the subfamily also support the definition of five tribes: Eurepini, Eneopterini, Nisitrini, Xenogryllini and Lebinthini. In the second step, the evolution of acoustic devices is studied by optimization of venation characters defined on precise homology statements. As hypothesized by previous authors, losses of acoustic communication occur independently in the course of eneopterine evolution; however, they happen abruptly with no intermediate state. Our results also document for the first time the modalities of forewing evolution: the diversification of male forewing venation originates from two processes, a continuous and regular modification process, responsible for slight venation change; and an irregular, more intense punctuated process, allowing the emergence of different venations. This diversification process with sudden changes could be related to the occurrence of acoustic novelties in advertisement calls. [source] |