|
| ||
|
|
||
Acid Clearance (acid + clearance)
Selected AbstractsAcid clearance, hiatal hernia size and oesophagitis: redress the egress regressNEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY & MOTILITY, Issue 6 2002Benson T. Massey No abstract is available for this article. [source] The nuclear bile acid receptor FXR as a novel therapeutic target in cholestatic liver diseases: Hype or hope?HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Michael Trauner M.D. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a bile acid,activated transcription factor that is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. FXR-null mice exhibit a phenotype similar to Byler disease, an inherited cholestatic liver disorder. In the liver, activation of FXR induces transcription of transporter genes involved in promoting bile acid clearance and represses genes involved in bile acid biosynthesis. We investigated whether the synthetic FXR agonist GW4064 could protect against cholestatic liver damage in rat models of extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholestasis. In the bile duct ligation and alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate models of cholestasis, GW4064 treatment resulted in significant reductions in serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase, as well as other markers of liver damage. Rats that received GW4064 treatment also had decreased incidence and extent of necrosis, decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, and decreased bile duct proliferation. Analysis of gene expression in livers from GW4064-treated cholestatic rats revealed decreased expression of bile acid biosynthetic genes and increased expression of genes involved in bile acid transport, including the phospholipid flippase MDR2. The hepatoprotection seen in these animal models by the synthetic FXR agonist suggests FXR agonists may be useful in the treatment of cholestatic liver disease. [source] Pharmacoepidemiologic investigation of a clonazepam-valproic acid interaction by mixed effect modeling using routine clinical pharmacokinetic data in Japanese patientsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2003E. Yukawa Summary Non-linear Mixed Effects Modeling (NONMEM) was used to estimate the effects of clonazepam,valproic acid interaction on clearance values using 576 serum levels collected from 317 pediatric and adult epileptic patients (age range, 0·3,32·6 years) during their clinical routine care. Patients received the administration of clonazepam and/or valproic acid. The final model describing clonazepam clearance was CL = 144·0 TBW,0·172 1·14VPA, where CL is total body clearance (mL/kg/h); TBW is total body weight (kg); VPA = 1 for concomitant administration of valproic acid and VPA = zero otherwise. The final model describing valproic acid clearance was CL (mL/kg/h) = 17·2 TBW,0·264 DOSE0·159 0·821CZP 0·896GEN, where DOSE is the daily dose of valproic acid (mg/kg/day); CZP = 1 for concomitant administration of clonazepam and CZP = zero otherwise; GEN = 1 for female and GEN = zero otherwise. Concomitant administration of clonazepam and valproic acid resulted in a 14% increase in clonazepam clearance, and a 17·9% decrease in valproic acid clearance. [source] Effect of hiatal hernia on proximal oesophageal acid clearance in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patientsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2006S. EMERENZIANI Summary Background Proximal acid reflux is common in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and is a determinant of symptoms. Patients with hiatal hernia complain of more symptoms than those without and are less responsive to proton-pump inhibitors. Aim To evaluate the role of hiatal hernia on spatiotemporal characteristics of acid reflux. Methods Thirty seven consecutive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients underwent endoscopy, videofluoroscopy, manometry and multichannel 24-h pH test. Data were compared with those of 15 asymptomatic controls. Multivariate linear regression was used for statistical analysis. Results At videofluoroscopy, hiatal hernia was found in 16 of 37 patients. The mean size of hiatal hernia was 3.4 cm. Patients showed significantly prolonged acid clearance time, both at proximal and distal oesophagus, compared with controls. Hiatal hernia patients showed a significantly delayed acid clearance, along the oesophageal body, compared with non-hiatal hernia patients. The prolonged acid exposure was maintained during upright and supine position. The presence of hiatal hernia significantly predicted acid clearance delay in the distal and proximal oesophagus [at 10 cm below upper oesophageal sphincter: , + 2.5 min (95% confidence interval: 0.4,4.5); P < 0.02]. Conclusions The presence of hiatal hernia is a strong predictor of more prolonged proximal oesophageal acid exposure and clearance. Hiatal hernia is likely to play a role in the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, and should be taken into greater consideration in the treatment strategies of the disease. [source] Anatomy of reflux: A growing health problem affecting structures of the head and neckTHE ANATOMICAL RECORD : ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 6 2006Michael J. Lipan Abstract Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are sibling diseases that are a modern-day plague. Millions of Americans suffer from their sequelae, ranging from subtle annoyances to life-threatening illnesses such as asthma, sleep apnea, and cancer. Indeed, the recognized prevalence of GERD alone has increased threefold throughout the 1990s. Knowledge of the precise etiologies for GERD and LPR is becoming essential for proper treatment. This review focuses on the anatomical, physiological, neurobiological, and cellular aspects of these diseases. By definition, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus; when excessive and damaging to the esophageal mucosa, GERD results. Reflux that advances to the laryngopharynx and, subsequently, to other regions of the head and neck such as the larynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and even middle ear results in LPR. While GERD has long been identified as a source of esophageal disease, LPR has only recently been implicated in causing head and neck problems. Recent research has identified four anatomical/physiological "barriers" that serve as guardians to prevent the cranial incursion of reflux: the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motor function and acid clearance, the upper esophageal sphincter, and pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosal resistance. Sequential failure of all four barriers is necessary to produce LPR. While it has become apparent that GER must precede both GERD and LPR, the head and neck distribution of the latter clearly separates these diseases as distinct entities warranting specialized focus and treatment. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 289B:261,270, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||