|
| ||
|
|
||
Chromophobe RCC (chromophobe + rcc)
Selected AbstractsFine needle aspiration of renal cortical lesions in adultsDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 10 2010Adebowale J. Adeniran M.D. Abstract The role of fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of renal cortical lesions was controversial in the past because the result of the FNA did not affect clinical management. All renal cortical lesions, except metastasis, were subject to surgical resection. However, with the advances in neoadjuvant targeted therapies, knowledge of the renal cortical tumor histological subtype is critical for tailoring clinical trials and follow-up strategies. At present, there are clinical trials involving the use of novel kinase inhibitors for conventional (clear cell) and papillary renal cell carcinoma. We studied 143 consecutive cases of renal cortical lesions, evaluated after radical or partial nephrectomies over a 2-year period. An air-dried smear and a Thinprep® slide were prepared in all cases. The slides were Diff-Quick and Papanicolaou stained, respectively. The cytology specimens were reviewed and the results were then compared with the histologic diagnosis. Cytology was highly accurate to diagnose conventional RCC, while the accuracy for papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and papillary urothelial carcinoma was much lower. Our results indicate that ancillary studies might have an important role in the subclassification of renal cortical neoplasms for targeted treatment. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010;38:710,715. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The diagnostic utility of MOC31, BerEP4, RCC marker and CD10 in the classification of renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 328 casesHISTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 5 2004C-C Pan Aims:, To demonstrate the diagnostic utility of MOC31, BerEP4, renal cell carcinoma marker (RCC Ma) and CD10 in the classification of RCC and renal oncocytoma, based upon a comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis. Methods and results:, Immunohistochemistry was performed on 328 samples consisting of 256 clear cell/conventional, 27 papillary, 28 chromophobe, five collecting duct, five unclassified RCCs and seven renal oncocytomas using antibodies MOC31, BerEP4 and antibodies against cytokeratins (KL-1, CAM5.2, 34,E12, cytokeratin 7), RCC Ma, epithelial membrane antigen, E-cadherin, CD10, CD15 and vimentin. Multivariate analysis showed that MOC31, BerEP4, RCC Ma and CD10 have discriminatory value. MOC31 and BerEP4 chiefly labelled distal tubules of normal kidney while RCC Ma and CD10 labelled the proximal tubules. Twenty-three chromophobe RCCs (82%) were reactive for MOC31, while only four clear cell RCCs and three papillary RCCs were positive for this marker. Clear cell RCCs were characterized by a high positive rate for CD10 (82%) and a low positive rate for BerEP4 (27%). Papillary RCCs frequently coexpressed RCC Ma and BerEP4 (51%). All renal oncocytomas were negative for MOC31 and CD10. Conclusions:, MOC31 has diagnostic merit in discerning chromophobe RCC. The CD10+/BerEP4, profile and RCC Ma+/BerEP4+ profile achieve moderate sensitivity and good specificity for clear cell RCC and papillary RCC, respectively. The non-reactivity for both MOC31 and CD10 is helpful in distinguishing renal oncocytoma from RCC. When properly selected, antibodies have immunohistochemical diagnostic utility for the classification of renal cortical epithelial tumours. [source] Microsatellite allelotyping differentiates chromophobe renal cell carcinomas from renal oncocytomas and identifies new genetic changesHISTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 6 2004A Nagy Aims:, The diagnosis of renal oncocytomas (ROs) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) based on histological features is often uncertain. To assess the value of genetic analysis in their differential diagnosis we analysed 27 ROs and 21 chromophobe RCCs by microsatellite allelotyping. Methods and results:, Markers at the short and long arms of chromosomes specifically involved in the genetic changes of the four main types of renal cancers were selected. Allelic changes were identified by automated sequencing. Allelic changes at chromosome 1p occurred in 8/26 (31%) and at chromosome 14q in 4/27 (15%) ROs. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21 were seen in 90%, 90%, 96%, 86%, 85%, 90% and 72% of the chromophobe RCCs, respectively. Alterations of at least three of these chromosomal sites were detected in each chromophobe RCC. In addition, we found recurrent LOH at chromosomes 9p23 (43%), 18q22 (30%), 5q22 (28%) and 8p (28%) in chromophobe RCCs. Conclusions:, Chromophobe RCCs can be differentiated from ROs by analysing specific chromosomal regions with microsatellites. [source] Molecular pathology of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A reviewINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 7 2010Maria V Yusenko Abstract The recognition of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among other distinct types of renal cell tumors (RCT) based on light-microscopic features, such as cytoplasmic and nuclear characteristics, might pose a dilemma in some cases because of morphological pattern overlapping with renal oncocytoma or conventional RCC. The present article reviews chromophobe RCC with focus on aspects of its molecular pathology, which was shown using ancillary modern microarray-based technology that can distinguish it from its mimics and therefore be helpful for its correct diagnosis. Although the high resolution DNA-microarray analyses excluded with all certainty the occurrence of small specific alterations, the loss of entire chromosomes 2, 10, 13, 17 and 21 occurs exclusively in chromophobe RCC and therefore probes localized at these chromosomes might be used to establish the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC in cases with uncertain histology. The usefulness of proposed candidate genes selected by the global gene expression analyses in the diagnostic pathology is far below expectations. The conflicting staining patterns, together with the poor specificity of used antibodies, leads us to believe that these candidate immunomarkers might not help in the separation of chromophobe RCC, with the exception of CD82, which has recently been suggested to be used for routine histological diagnosis. [source] Mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene refine differential diagnostic criteria in renal cell carcinomaJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 1 2002Nandita Barnabas PhD Abstract Background and Objectives Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) with abundant granular cytoplasm include oncocytomas, eosinophillic variants of chromophobe RCC, papillary RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, and some conventional (clear cell) RCC. Tumors with predominantly clear cell cytoplasm include typical chromophobe RCC and conventional (clear cell) RCC. The objective of this study was to determine if mutations in the VHL gene can serve as auxiliary diagnostic criteria in refining histology based subtyping of renal epithelial neoplasia. Methods The study cohort of 67 cases included 24 conventional RCC, 14 chromophobe RCC, 14 papillary RCC, and 15 oncocytomas. Single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) was used as a screening procedure for mutations followed by automated sequencing to identify mutations. Results Thirteen of the 14 mutations identified were novel, seven of which were in the coding region. In chromophobe RCC, mutations clustered in the 5,UTR/promoter region and have not been previously reported. Exon 3 appeared to favor conventional (clear cell) RCC and correlated with a more aggressive phenotype. Mutations were absent in the papillary and oncocytoma RCC subtypes. Conclusions Exon 3 mutations permitted a morphological distinction between conventional (clear cell) RCC and chromophobe RCC with clear cells. Mutations in the VHL gene refine histologic diagnostic criteria in RCC serving as adjuncts to the present morphology based diagnosis of RCC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2002;80:52,60. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Low-grade renal cell carcinoma arising from the lower nephron: A case report with immunohistochemical, histochemical and ultrastructural studiesPATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 12 2001Masako Otani Most renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are composed of clear cells with sinusoid-like vasculatures and originate from the proximal tubule. On the other hand, collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and chromophobe RCC are thought to originate from the lower nephron. In the present study, we present a case of unusual RCC. The patient was a 68-year-old Japanese woman who had developed general fatigue with hematuria. Computed tomography revealed a left renal tumor suggesting sarcoma. The resected tumor was located in the renal parenchyma, measuring 12 × 10 × 8 cm in size. Histologically, the tumor consisted principally of cuboidal cells forming parallel or radiating arrays, continuous with the spindle-shaped cells. Most parts of the tumor showed hemorrhagic necrosis. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for high molecular weight cytokeratins, vinculin, vimentin, CD15 and epithelial membrane antigen, and showed affinities with some kinds of lectins. N- and E-cadherins and , -catenin were diffusely positive in tumor cells. Nuclear positivity for Ki-67 and p53 protein were approximately 2.0 and 1.7%, respectively. Considering its morphological and histochemical natures, this tumor is considered to have originated from the lower nephron, which is unique for a tumor of low-grade malignancy. [source] Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Clinical, pathological and molecular biological aspectsPATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 11 2000Yoji Nagashima Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a newly established subtype of renal neoplasm, is composed of tumor cells with characteristically cloudy, weakly eosinophilic and reticular cytoplasm. The tumor should be distinguished from the common clear cell RCC, because of the unique clinicopathological and molecular biological features. The tumor does not show gender bias. Patient ages are similar to those of clear cell RCC, but might occur in the 20- to 40-year-old age group. Grossly, the tumor tends to be beige in color, which is different from the yellowish color of common RCC. Electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry indicate the intercalated cell of the collecting duct as the cellular origin. Cytogenetic study shows non-random multiple chromosome loss, with mitochondrial DNA rearrangement. Alteration of the von Hippel,Lindau (VHL) gene, a cancer suppressor gene relating with clear cell RCC, has not yet been observed. In order to adopt the most appropriate treatment, including gene therapy, recognition and correct pathological diagnosis of chromophobe RCC are extremely important. [source] | ||||||||||