|
| ||
|
|
||
Cell Cycle Stage (cell + cycle_stage)
Selected AbstractsFluctuation of chromatin unfolding associated with variation in the level of gene expressionGENES TO CELLS, Issue 7 2004Noriko Sato We examined whether spontaneous alteration of chromatin structure, if any, correlates with variation in gene expression. Gene activation is associated with changes in chromatin structure at different levels. Large-scale chromatin unfolding is one such change detectable under the light microscope. We established cell clones carrying tandem repeats (more than 50 copies spanning several hundred kb) of the GFP (green fluorescent protein)-ASK reporter genes driven by a tetracycline responsive promoter. These clones constitutively express the transcriptional transactivator. Flow cytometry and live-recording fluorescence microscopy revealed that, although fully activated by a saturating amount of doxycycline, GFP-ASK expression fluctuated in individual cell clones, regardless of the cell cycle stage. The GFP-ASK expression changed from lower to higher levels and vice versa within a few cell cycles. Furthermore, the levels of GFP-ASK expression were correlated with the degrees of chromatin unfolding of the integrated array as detected by FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization). The chromatin unfolding was not coupled to a mitotic event; around one-third of the daughter-pairs exhibited dissimilar degrees of chromatin unfolding. We concluded that fluctuation of chromatin unfolding was likely to result in variation in gene expression, although the source of the fluctuation of chromatin unfolding remains to be studied. [source] Cell cycle mechanisms of sister chromatid separation; Roles of Cut1/separin and Cut2/securinGENES TO CELLS, Issue 1 2000Mitsuhiro Yanagida The correct transmission of chromosomes from mother to daughter cells is fundamental for genetic inheritance. Separation and segregation of sister chromatids in growing cells occurs in the cell cycle stage called ,anaphase'. The basic process of sister chromatid separation is similar in all eukaryotes: many gene products required are conserved. In this review, the roles of two proteins essential for the onset of anaphase in fission yeast, Cut2/securin and Cut1/separin, are discussed with regard to cell cycle regulation, and compared with the postulated roles of homologous proteins in other organisms. Securin, like mitotic cyclins, is the target of the anaphase promoting complex (APC)/cyclosome and is polyubiquitinated before destruction in a manner dependent upon the destruction sequence. The anaphase never occurs properly in the absence of securin destruction. In human cells, securin is an oncogene. Separin is a large protein (MW ,180 kDa), the C-terminus of which is conserved, and is thought to be inhibited by association with securin at the nonconserved N-terminus. In the budding yeast, Esp1/separin is thought to be a component of proteolysis against Scc1, an essential subunit of cohesin which is thought to link duplicated sister chromatids up to the anaphase. Whether fission yeast Cut1/separin is also implicated in proteolysis of cohesin is discussed. [source] Sister chromatid cohesion: the cohesin cleavage model does not ring trueGENES TO CELLS, Issue 6 2007Vincent Guacci Sister chromatid cohesion is important for high fidelity chromosome segregation during anaphase. Gene products that provide structural components (cohesin complex or cohesin) and regulatory components responsible for cohesion are conserved through eukaryotes. A simple model where cohesion establishment occurs by replication through static cohesin rings and cohesion dissolution occurs by Esp1p/separase mediated cleavage of the cohesin rings (Mcd1p/Rad21p/Scc1p sub-unit cleavage) has become widespread. A growing body of evidence is inconsistent with this ring cleavage model. This review will summarize the evidence showing that cohesin complex is not static but is regulated at multiple cell cycle stages before anaphase in a separase independent manner. Separase is indeed required at anaphase for complete chromosome segregation. However, multiple mechanisms for cohesion dissolution appear to act concurrently during anaphase. Separase is only one such mechanism and its importance varies from organism to organism. The idea that cohesin is a dynamic complex subjected to regulation at various cell cycle stages by multiple mechanisms makes sense in light of the myriad functions in which it has been implicated, such as DNA damage repair, gene silencing and chromosome condensation. [source] UNCOUPLING OF SILICON COMPARED WITH CARBON AND NITROGEN METABOLISMS AND THE ROLE OF THE CELL CYCLE IN CONTINUOUS CULTURES OF THALASSIOSIRA PSEUDONANA (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) UNDER LIGHT, NITROGEN, AND PHOSPHORUS CONTROL1JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, Issue 5 2002Pascal Claquin The elemental composition and the cell cycle stages of the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana Hasle and Heimdal were studied in continuous cultures over a range of different light- (E), nitrogen- (N), and phosphorus- (P) limited growth rates. In all growth conditions investigated, the decrease in the growth rate was linked with a higher relative contribution of the G2+M phase. The other phases of the cell cycle, G1 and S, showed different patterns, depending on the type of limitation. All experiments showed a highly significant increase in the amount of biogenic silica per cell and per cell surface with decreasing growth rates. At low growth rates, the G2+M elongation allowed an increase of the silicification of the cells. This pattern could be explained by the major uptake of silicon during the G2+M phase and by the independence of this process on the requirements of the other elements. This was illustrated by the elemental ratios Si/C and Si/N that increased from 2- to 6-fold, depending of the type of limitation, whereas the C/N ratio decreased by 10% (E limitation) or increased by 50% (P limitation). The variations of the ratios clearly demonstrate the uncoupling of the Si metabolism compared with the C and N metabolisms. This uncoupling enabled us to explain that in any of the growth condition investigated, the silicification of the cells increased at low growth rates, whereas carbon and nitrogen cellular content are differently regulated, depending of the growth conditions. [source] | ||||||||||