|
| ||
|
|
||
Care Enrollees (care + enrollee)
Selected AbstractsHealthcare Cost Differences with Participation in a Community-Based Group Physical Activity Benefit for Medicare Managed Care Health Plan MembersJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 8 2008Ronald T. Ackermann MD OBJECTIVES: To determine whether participation in a physical activity benefit by Medicare managed care enrollees is associated with lower healthcare utilization and costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Medicare managed care. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 1,188 older adult health maintenance organization enrollees who participated at least once in the EnhanceFitness (EF) physical activity benefit and a matched group of enrollees who never used the program. MEASUREMENTS: Healthcare costs and utilization were estimated. Ordinary least squares regression was used, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity, indicators of preventive service use, and baseline utilization or cost. Robustness of findings was tested in sensitivity analyses involving continuous propensity score adjustment and generalized linear models with nonconstant variance assumptions. RESULTS: EF participants had similar total healthcare costs during Year 1 of the program, but during Year 2, adjusted total costs were $1,186 lower (P=.005) than for non-EF users. Differences were partially attributable to lower inpatient costs (,$3,384; P=.02), which did not result from high-cost outliers. Enrollees who attended EF an average of one visit or more per week had lower adjusted total healthcare costs in Year 1 (,$1,929; P<.001) and Year 2 (,$1,784; P<.001) than nonusers. CONCLUSION: Health plan coverage of a preventive physical activity benefit for seniors is a promising strategy to avoid significant healthcare costs in the short term. [source] Partnering Managed Care and Community-Based Services for Frail Elders: The Care Advocate ProgramJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 6 2003Kathleen H. Wilber PhD OBJECTIVES: To describe a demonstration program that uses master's-level care managers (care advocates) to link Medicare managed care enrollees to home- and community-based services, testing whether referrals to noninsured services can reduce service usage and increase member satisfaction and retention. DESIGN: Using an algorithm designed to target frail, high-cost users of Medicare insured healthcare services, the program partners PacifiCare's Secure Horizons and four of its medical groups with two social service organizations. SETTING: Three care advocates located in two community-based social services agencies using telephone interviews to interact with targeted elders living in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred ninety PacifiCare members aged 69 to 96 receiving care from four PacifiCare-contracted medical groups. INTERVENTION: The 12-month intervention provides telephone assessment, links to eight types of home- and community-based services, and monthly follow-up contacts. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics of intervention participants, types of service referrals, and acceptance rates. RESULTS: Lessons learned included the importance of building a shared vision among partners, building on existing relationships between members and providers, and building trust without face-to-face interactions. CONCLUSION: The program builds on current insured case management services and offers a practical bridge to community-based services. [source] Drug switching patterns among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis using COX-2 specific inhibitors and non-specific NSAIDs,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 5 2004Sean Z. Zhao MD Abstract Purpose To compare RA and OA patients' time-to-switch after newly initiating treatment with three most commonly used non-specific (NS)-NSAIDs and two COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib. Methods Managed care enrollees newly prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, ibuprofen, naproxen or diclofenac were identified. Time to switch to a different NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor was determined using time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) after controlling for potential confounders. Results The time to 25% of the cohort switching was longer for rofecoxib and celecoxib (159 and 205 days respectively) compared to the three NS-NSAIDs (49,78 days). Patients were at the highest risk of switching within the first 100 days of therapy. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the OR for switching to another NS-NSAID or COX-2 specific inhibitor ranged from 1.74 to 2.35 for the three NS-NSAIDs compared to celecoxib (all comparisons, p,<,0.01). Similar findings were obtained when comparing rofecoxib to each of the three NS-NSAIDS (all comparisons, p,<,0.01). When COX-2 inhibitors combined were compared to NS-NSAIDS combined, the OR for switching was 1.53 (95% confidence interval=1.42,1.65; p,<,0.01) after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions Patients on the COX-2 specific inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) were significantly less likely to switch their therapy than patients on NS-NSAIDS (ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac). These results suggest that COX-2 specific inhibitors may be a more effective treatment option when compared with NS-NSAIDs in usual clinical practice. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Practical and Policy Implications of Using Different Rural-Urban Classification Systems: A Case Study of Inpatient Service Utilization Among Veterans Administration UsersTHE JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, Issue 3 2009Ethan M. Berke MD ABSTRACT:,Context: Several classification systems exist for defining rural areas, which may lead to different interpretations of rural health services data. Purpose: To compare rural classification systems on their implications for estimating Veterans Administration (VA) utilization. Methods: Using 7 classification systems, we counted VA health care enrollees who lived in each category, and number admitted to VA hospitals or non-VA hospitals under Medicare. For dual VA-Medicare enrollees over age 65, we compared VA and private sector hospitalizations on numbers of admissions and bed-days of care. We compared VA enrollees' relative proportions across rural to urban categories for each classification system and evaluated discordance between systems at the veterans-integrated service networks (VISN) level. Findings: Enrollment and inpatient utilization counts for rural veterans vary considerably from one classification system to another, though the systems generally agree that admission rates, length of stay, and reliance on the VA for care are lower for rural veterans. Among older dual VA and Medicare enrollees, rural residents rely on non-VA facilities more, though this effect also varies widely depending on the classification scheme. VISNs vary greatly in the proportions of patients who are rural residents, and in the degree to which classification systems are discordant in designating patients as rural. Conclusions: Decisions about allocating VA health care resources to target "rural" patients may be affected greatly by the rural classification system chosen, and the impact of this choice will affect some hospital networks much more than others. [source] | ||||||||||