|
| ||
|
|
||
Cardiovascular Safety (cardiovascular + safety)
Terms modified by Cardiovascular Safety Selected AbstractsIntroduction: Cardiovascular Safety and Triptans in the Acute Treatment of MigraineHEADACHE, Issue 2004David W. Dodick MD First page of article [source] Cardiovascular Tolerability and Safety of Triptans: A Review of Clinical DataHEADACHE, Issue 2004David W. Dodick MD Triptans are not widely used in clinical practice despite their well-established efficacy, endorsement by the US Headache Consortium, and the demonstrable need to employ effective intervention to reduce migraine-associated disability. Although the relatively restricted use of triptans may be attributed to several factors, research suggests that prescribers' concerns about cardiovascular safety prominently figure in limiting their use. This article reviews clinical data,including results of clinical trials, postmarketing studies and surveillance, and pharmacodynamic studies,relevant to assessing the cardiovascular safety profile of the triptans. These data demonstrate that triptans are generally well tolerated. Chest symptoms occurring during use of triptans are usually nonserious and usually not attributed to ischemia. Incidence of triptan-associated serious cardiovascular adverse events in both clinical trials and clinical practice appears to be extremely low. When they do occur, serious cardiovascular events have most often been reported in patients at significant cardiovascular risk or in those with overt cardiovascular disease. Adverse cardiovascular events also have occurred, however, in patients without evidence of cardiovascular disease. Several lines of evidence suggest that nonischemic mechanisms are responsible for sumatriptan-associated chest symptoms, although the mechanism of chest symptoms has not been determined to date. Importantly, most of the clinical trials and clinical practice data on triptans are derived from patients without known cardiovascular disease. Therefore, the conclusions of this review cannot be extended to patients with cardiovascular disease. The cardiovascular safety profile of triptans favors their use in the absence of contraindications. [source] Review article: new receptor targets for medical therapy in irritable bowel syndromeALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2010M. CAMILLERI Summary Background, Despite setbacks to the approval of new medications for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, interim guidelines on endpoints for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) trials have enhanced interest as new targets for medical therapy are proposed based on novel mechanisms or chemical entities. Aims, To review the approved lubiprostone, two targets that are not meeting expectations (tachykinins and corticotrophin-releasing hormone), the efficacy and safety of new 5-HT4 agonists, intestinal secretagogues (chloride channel activators, and guanylate cyclase-C agonists), bile acid modulation, anti-inflammatory agents and visceral analgesics. Methods, Review of selected articles based on PubMed search and clinically relevant information on mechanism of action, safety, pharmacodynamics and efficacy. Results, The spectrum of peripheral targets of medical therapy addresses chiefly the bowel dysfunction of IBS and these effects are associated with pain relief. The pivotal mechanisms responsible for the abdominal pain or visceral sensation in IBS are unknown. The new 5-HT4 agonists are more specific than older agents and show cardiovascular safety to date. Secretory agents have high specificity, low bioavailability and high efficacy. The potential risks of agents ,borrowed' from other indications (such as hyperlipidaemia, inflammatory bowel disease or somatic pain) deserve further study. Conclusions, There is reason for optimism in medical treatment of IBS with a spectrum of agents to treat bowel dysfunction. However, visceral analgesic treatments are still suboptimal. [source] Latest news and product developmentsPRESCRIBER, Issue 21 2007Article first published online: 3 DEC 200 NSAIDs and SSRIs increase GI bleeding Taking an NSAID and an SSRI increases the risk of GI bleeding more than six-fold compared with taking neither drug, a meta-analysis shows (Aliment Pharmacol Ther online: 5 Oct 2007; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.20 07.03541.x). The analysis included four observational studies involving a total of 153 000 patients, and 101 cases reported in postmarketing surveillance. Compared with nonuse, the odds ratio for upper GI haemorrhage in patients taking an SSRI alone was 2.36; the number needed to harm (NNH) was 411 for one year's treatment in patients aged over 50 with no risk factors. For those taking an SSRI and an NSAID, it was 6.33 (NNH 106). Of 22 cases where treatment duration was known, the median time to onset of bleeding was 25 weeks and five occurred within one month. The MHRA warns of this interaction in its latest issue of Drug Safety Update, noting: ,corticosteroids, antiplatelet agents, and SSRIs may increase the risk of GI ulceration or bleeding. NSAIDs may enhance the effects of anticoagulants, such as warfarin'. MHRA warning on NSAID safety The MHRA reminds prescribers of new restrictions on prescribing piroxicam and the risks associated with ketorolac and ketoprofen in its latest Drug Safety Update (2007;1:Issue 3). Treatment with piroxicam should now only be initiated by a specialist as a second-line drug; patients currently taking it should be reviewed at the next routine appointment. Piroxicam is no longer indicated for any acute indications. These restrictions do not apply to topical piroxicam (Feldene gel). Ketorolac and ketoprofen are associated with a higher risk of adverse GI effects than other NSAIDs. The MHRA advises prescribers to adhere to the licensed indications that limit oral ketorolac therapy to seven days (two days for continuous iv or im use) and the maximum dose of ketoprofen to 100-200mg. Inhaled steroids may increase the risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD. In the TORCH study (N Engl J Med 2007;356:775-89), fluticasone (Flixotide) and fluticasone plus salmeterol (Seretide) were associated with a significantly increased risk compared with salmeterol alone. The MHRA recommends vigilance for signs of pneumonia or bronchitis in patients with COPD who are treated with inhaled steroids; affected patients should have their treatment reconsidered. Other issues reviewed in Drug Safety Update include: a more intense reaction after revaccination with the pneumococcal vaccine, Pneumovax II; exacerbation of osteonecrosis of the jaw by dental surgery in patients taking a bisphosphonate; a lower maximum dose for lorazepam (4mg for severe anxiety, 2mg for severe insomnia) rare reactions with botulinum toxin; and the cardiovascular safety and risk of fractures with the glitazones. Antibiotic resistance GPs who reduce their antibiotic prescribing achieve a significant reduction in bacterial resistance, a study from Wales has shown (Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:785-92). The analysis of 164 225 coliform isolates from urine samples submitted from 240 general practices found a 5.2 per cent decrease in ampicillin resistance in practices with the greatest reductions in total antibiotic prescribing. Overall, ampicillin resistance decreased by 1 per cent for every reduction of 50 amoxicillin prescriptions per 1000 patients. Trimethoprim resistance showed a similar trend. Mortality risk with discontinuing statins Patients who discontinue statin therapy after acute stroke are almost three times more likely to die than those who do not, an Italian study shows (Stroke 2007;38:2652-7). Follow-up of 631 patients discharged after acute stroke revealed that 39 per cent discontinued statin therapy. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the first 12 months was 2.78 compared with those who continued treatment; this compared with a hazard ratio of 1.81 for stopping antiplatelet therapy. The authors argue that patient care should be improved during the transition from hospital to outpatient primary care. ACEI ± ARB = ADRs Combining an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin-II receptor blocker increases the risk of adverse effects in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, according to a US study (Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1930-6). Meta-analysis of four trials involving a total of 17 337 patients followed up for about two years showed that, compared with therapy including an ACE inhibitor, combined treatment increased the risk of stopping treatment due to adverse events by 38 per cent in patients with heart failure and by 17 per cent in patients with MI. The authors estimate that, for every 1,000 patients treated, 25 will discontinue treatment due to adverse effects and 17 will develop renal dysfunction. WOSCOPS: statin protection continues Pravastatin reduces the risk of death years after treatment has stopped, according to a follow-up of the WOSCOPS study (N Engl J Med 2007;357:1477-86). The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study originally randomised men with hypercholesterolaemia but no history of myocardial infarction (MI) to treatment with pravastatin or placebo. After five years, the combined incidence of death from CHD or nonfatal MI was reduced from 7.9 to 5.5 per cent in the treatment group. During the 10 years after completion of the trial, the incidence of the combined end-point was 8.6 per cent in those originally assigned to pravastatin and 10.3 per cent in the placebo group. All- cause mortality was also reduced over the entire 15-year period. The proportions of patients still taking a statin in the middle of this period, ie five years after the trial ended, were 39 per cent of the placebo group. Prescribing policies on HRT need reappraisal Health authorities should reconsider their policy on prescribing HRT, the International Menopause Society (IMS) says. In an open letter, the IMS says current safety concerns over HRT use are founded, but have been misinterpreted in observational studies, such as the Women's Health Initiative, that led to changes in guidelines. The IMS says HRT is the most effective treatment for vasomotor and urogenital symptoms and the risk:benefit profile is favourable until age 60. Low-dose oestrogen or the transdermal route of administration may lead to a more favourable risk profile. Flu vaccine does cut morbidity and mortality Following The Lancet's commentary doubting the effectiveness of flu vaccination (Lancet Infectious Diseases 2007;7:658-66), a US cohort study has found that it does reduce morbidity and mortality (N Engl J Med 2007;357:1373-81). The observational study included 713 872 person-seasons in older people living in the community over a 10year period from 1990 to 2000. Vaccination was associated with a 48 per cent reduction in the risk of death and a 27 per cent reduction in admission for pneumonia or flu. These benefits changed little in subgroups or with age. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Interface Ltd [source] ThiaZolidineDiones and the Influence of Media Adverse Reporting on Prescribing Attitudes in PraCTice (TZD-IMPACT) StudyCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2009Jacob George Prescribing behavior may be linked to media influence rather than to scientific evidence. Recently, the oral diabetic drug class of thiazolidinedione has been under the spotlight because of concerns over their cardiovascular safety. We have therefore conducted an electronic questionnaire survey among prescribing physicians in Tayside, Scotland to evaluate the prescribing attitudes and knowledge of the available evidence regarding the cardiovascular safety of thiazolidinedione use. Nationally representative prescribing data thoughout Scotland and Tayside from the IMS Health RSA dataset were also examined. Prescriptions for rosiglitazone alone or in combination with metformin have steadily decreased since the publication of a meta-analysis suggesting harm from rosiglitazone. This was mirrored by a gradual increase in prescriptions of pioglitazone. However, when questioned, the majority of doctors rate the level of information received regarding drug safety information on thiazolidinediones to be low with 68% of respondents scoring 5 or less (scale 1,10) on the level of information received. The source of information regarding drug safety warning was highly varied ranging from journals (21%), scientific meetings (19%) and the news media (15%). The findings of this study clearly show a need to disseminate reliable drug safety information more effectively to prescribers. [source] Reassessing the Cardiovascular Risks and Benefits of ThiazolidinedionesCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 9 2008Andrew Zinn MD Abstract This article is designed for the general cardiologist, endocrinologist, and internist caring for patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. Despite the burden of coronary disease in diabetics, little is known about the impact of commonly used oral hypoglycemic agents on cardiovascular outcomes. As the untoward effects of insulin resistance (IR) are increasingly recognized, there is interest in targeting this defect. Insulin resistance contributes to dyslipidemia, hypertension, inflammation, hypercoagulability, and endothelial dysfunction. The aggregate impact of this process is progression of systemic atherosclerosis and an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. As such, much attention has been paid to the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARg) agonists rosiglitazone and pioglitazone (thiazolidinediones [TZDs]). Many studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect on the atherosclerotic process; specifically, these agents have been shown to reduce markers of inflammation, retard progression of carotid intimal thickness, prevent restenosis after coronary stenting, and prevent cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in 1 large trial. Such benefits come at the risk of fluid retention and heart failure (HF) exacerbation, and the net effect on plasma lipids is still poorly understood. Thus, the aggregate risk-benefit ratio is poorly defined. A recent meta-analysis has raised significant concerns regarding the overall cardiovascular safety of 1 particular PPARg agonist (rosiglitazone), prompting international debate and regulatory changes. This review scrutinizes the clinical evidence regarding the cardiovascular risks and benefits of PPARg agonists. Future studies of PPARg agonists, and other emerging drugs that treat IR and diabetes, must be designed to look at cardiovascular outcomes. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||