| |||
Carotid Stenosis (carotid + stenosis)
Kinds of Carotid Stenosis Selected AbstractsOphthalmic Artery Flow Direction on Color Flow Duplex Imaging Is Highly Specific for Severe Carotid StenosisJOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 1 2002Patrick S. Reynolds MD Background/Purpose. Collateral flow patterns are important risk factors for brain ischemia in the presence of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion. Ophthalmic artery (OA) flow reversal, routinely studied by transcranial Doppler sonography, is an important marker for high-grade ICA stenosis or occlusion. The authors sought to define the value of assessing OA flow direction with color flow duplex ultrasonography (CDUS) in the setting of significant ICA disease. Methods. Of all patients having routine carotid ultrasound in the neurosonology laboratory between July 1995 and November 2000, 152 had both carotid and orbital (OA flow direction by reduced power orbital CDUS) examinations as well as angiographic confirmation of stenosis to which North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria could be applied. Degree of angiographic stenosis in these 152 patients (304 arteries) was correlated with OA flow direction. Results. Of 304 arteries, 101 had greater than 80% stenosis by angiogram. In 56 of these 101 arteries with high-grade stenosis or occlusion, the ipsilateral OA was reversed; however, OA flow direction was never reversed ipsilateral to arteries with less than 80% stenosis (sensitivity 55%, specificity 100%, negative predictive value 82%, and positive predictive value 100% for OA flow reversal as a marker of high-grade carotid lesions). Discussion/Conclusions. OA flow direction is easily studied with CDUS. Reversed OA flow direction is highly specific (100%) for severe ipsilateral ICA stenosis or occlusion, with excellent positive predictive value, moderate negative predictive value, and limited sensitivity. OA flow reversal is not only quite specific for severe ICA disease, which may be helpful if the carotid CDUS is difficult or inadequate, but may also provide additional hemodynamic insights (ie, the inadequacy of other collateral channels such as the anterior communicating artery). OA evaluation can provide important hemodynamic information and should be included as part of carotid CDUS if there is any evidence of ICA stenosis or occlusion. [source] Carotid Stenosis as Detected by Ultrasound in a General Population is a Strong Predictor of DeathACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2001Oddmund Joakimsen Background and Purpose: In the last two decades, ultrasound examinations have increasingly been used as a noninvasive method to screen for carotid stenosis. Several clinical studies have shown that carotid stenosis is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease and death. However, there is scarce information about stenosis as detected in a general population and the relation with mortality. The purpose of this population-based study was to assess whether carotid stenosis is a predictor of death. Methods: In 1994 to 1995, 248 subjects with suspected carotid stenosis were identified among 6727 men and women 25 to 84 years of age who were examined with ultrasound as part of the population-based Tromsø Study. These subjects and 496 age- and sex-matched control subjects were followed for 4.2 years, and the number and causes of deaths were identified. Results: The unadjusted relative risk for death was 2.72 (95% CI, 1.57 to 4.75) for subjects with stenosis compared with control subjects. Adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors increased the relative risk to 3.47 (95% CI, 1.47 to 8.19). The adjusted relative risk in persons with stenosis and no cardiovascular disease or diabetes was 5.66 (95% CI, 1.53 to 20.90), which was higher than in subjects with stenosis and self-reported disease (1.79; 95% CI, 0.75 to 4.27). There was a dose-response relationship between degree of stenosis and risk of death (P=0.002 for linear trend). Conclusion: Carotid stenosis as detected in a general population is a strong and independent predictor of death. Carotid stenosis was a stronger predictor of death than self-reported cardiovascular disease or diabetes. [source] Prevalence of and risk factors for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis in Korean Type 2 diabetic patientsDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 12 2006J. H. Park Abstract Aims The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis in Type 2 diabetic patients. Methods This study included 406 patients aged 40,79 years with Type 2 diabetes (male 55.4%, female 44.6%). Both carotid arteries of each patient were examined by carotid duplex scanning. The duplex ultrasound criteria based on the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) measurement method were used for the identification of carotid stenosis. Results Extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis , 40% by velocity criteria was detected in 5.2% of the patients. The prevalence of carotid stenosis increased with advancing age: 1.0% at 40,49 years of age, 5.0% at 50,59 years, 7.3% at 60,69 years and 9.5% at 70,79 years. The degree of stenosis was > 70% in 42.9% of patients with stenosis, Bilateral stenosis was detected in 14% of patients. Of the patients with , 40% carotid stenosis, 33% had a decreased ankle-brachial index, 38% had a previous history of stroke, and only one patient (5%) had a documented history of coronary artery disease. Multivariate analysis, including variables determined to be significantly different by univariate analysis between patients with or without , 40% stenosis, indicated that age, systolic blood pressure and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (inverse correlation) were independent risk factors associated with carotid stenosis. Conclusions Carotid duplex scanning is a useful strategy in identifying carotid stenosis in older Type 2 diabetic patients with high systolic blood pressure, or low levels of HDL cholesterol. The early identification and subsequent appropriate management of carotid stenosis, particularly in this group of patients, may facilitate efforts to reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications. [source] Early treatment after a symptomatic event is not associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients undergoing carotid stentingEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 1 2008K. Gröschel A recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis carries a high risk of subsequent ischaemic events and thus requires rapid treatment. We investigated the influence of the time delay between the last symptomatic event of a carotid stenosis and subsequent carotid artery stenting (CAS) with respect to the combined 30-day outcome of stroke and death. In a group of 320 patients undergoing CAS the median delay before the intervention was 19 days (interquartile range 10,36) and the combined 30-day complication rate was 8.4%. Time delay was not significantly associated with peri-procedural complications, regardless of whether this variable was dichotomized (<14 days and ,14 days), separated into interquartile ranges or analysed as a continuous variable. Our results indicate that early CAS is not associated with an increased complication rate in patients with a recently symptomatic carotid stenosis. Thus, if CAS has been selected as the treatment modality for a patient, it should be performed as soon as possible to maximize the benefit of the intervention in reducing the risk of stroke. [source] EFNS guideline on neuroimaging in acute stroke.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 12 2006Report of an EFNS task force Neuroimaging techniques are necessary for the evaluation of stroke, one of the leading causes of death and neurological impairment in developed countries. The multiplicity of techniques available has increased the complexity of decision making for physicians. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature in English for the period 1965,2005 and critically assessed the relevant publications. The members of the panel reviewed and corrected an initial draft, until a consensus was reached on recommendations stratified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) criteria. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan is the established imaging procedure for the initial evaluation of stroke patients. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher sensitivity than CT for the demonstration of infarcted or ischemic areas and depicts well acute and chronic intracerebral hemorrhage. Perfusion and diffusion MRI together with MR angiography (MRA) are very helpful for the acute evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke. MRI and MRA are the recommended techniques for screening cerebral aneurysms and for the diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis and arterial dissection. For the non-invasive study of extracranial vessels, MRA is less portable and more expensive than ultrasonography but it has higher sensitivity and specificity for carotid stenosis. Transcranial Doppler is very useful for monitoring arterial reperfusion after thrombolysis, for the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis and of right-to-left shunts, and for monitoring vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Currently, single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography have a more limited role in the evaluation of the acute stroke patient. [source] Cerebral vasomotor reactivity of bilateral severe carotid stenosis: is stroke unavoidable?EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 2 2006A. Y. Gur We evaluated the cerebral hemodynamic features of severe bilateral carotid stenosis by assessing and comparing cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR) in the middle cerebral (MCA) and vertebral arteries (VA) by transcranial Doppler and the Diamox (1 g acetazolamide i.v.) test. VMR was evaluated by recording the percentage differences in peak systolic blood flow velocity in each MCA and VA at baseline and by the Diamox test. Twenty-eight symptomatic (SCAS) and 31 asymptomatic (ACAS) patients with bilateral severe (>70%) internal carotid artery stenosis were studied. The mean MCA VMR% was 29 ± 26.9% in SCAS and 43.2 ± 26.8% in ACAS patients (P < 0.01). Their respective mean VA VMR% was 30.2 ± 36.5% and 39.6 ± 24.4% (P = NS). VMR% of the symptomatic MCA side in SCAS patients was significantly lower than the opposite side (20.5 ± 31.1% and 39.2 ± 37.9% respectively; P < 0.03). In contrast, the VA VMR% of both sides in SCAS patients remained similar (28.1 ± 39.3% and 34.6 ± 47.9% respectively; P = NS). VMR% of the MCA and VA in ACAS patients was also similar for both sides of bilateral carotid stenosis. The cerebral hemodynamic features differ between SCAS and ACAS patients with bilateral carotid occlusive disease in the anterior part of the circle of Willis. An independent cerebral vascular reserve capacity of the posterior circulation is proposed. [source] Cognitive performance following endarterectomy in asymptomatic severe carotid stenosisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 5 2003J. Aharon-Peretz Cognition and the effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were evaluated in 22 non-demented subjects with vascular risk factors (VRF) and asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis (ASCAS), 14 volunteers with VRF but without stenosis, and 24 healthy controls (HC) without VRF. Non-demented subjects with VRF, with or without carotid stenosis scored inferior to HC. It is concluded that carotid stenosis is not a primary cause of cognitive deterioration and CEA does not improve cognition in patients with ASCAS. [source] Prevalence and outcome of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based ultrasonographic studyEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 4 2002P. P. Mineva The aims of this epidemiological population-based cohort study were to examine the prevalence and outcomes of asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) detected by duplex scanning and its relations to other vascular risk factors. A total of 500 volunteers, 200 men and 300 women, without signs and symptoms of cerebrovascular disease, aged 50,79 years, were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of ACS of 50% or greater was 6.4%. Only severe carotid stenosis was detected in 0.4% of the subjects examined. Significant relationships between ACS and coronary heart disease (CHD) [odds ratio (OR)=8.00], peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (OR=3.66), cigarette smoking in men (OR=4.39) and obesity in women (OR=0.31) were found. The biennial incidence rate of cerebral ischaemic events was 9.4%. A progression of ACS was revealed in 14% and a regression in 6.25% of the subjects. The patients with progressing ACS to more than 70% diameter reduction reached the end-points. Follow-up with repeated duplex scans in patients with advancing ACS of 50% or greater, especially smokers with CHD and PAD, is recommended. [source] Cerebral emboli and paradoxical embolisation in dementia: a pilot studyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 1 2005Nitin Purandare Abstract Background The causes of the common dementias remain unknown. Paradoxical embolisation of the cerebral circulation by venous thrombi passing through venous to arterial shunts (v-aCS) in the heart or pulmonary circulation is known to occur in cryptogenic stroke and post-operative confusion following hip replacement. Objectives To explore the role of paradoxical embolisation in dementia by investigating for cerebral emboli, venous to arterial circulation shunt (v-aCS) and carotid artery disease. Methods Forty-one patients with dementia (24 Alzheimer's AD and 17 vascular VaD) diagnosed using DSM-IV criteria and 16 controls underwent transcranial Doppler (TCD) detection of spontaneous cerebral emboli in both middle cerebral arteries. A v-aCS was detected by intravenous injection of an air/saline ultrasound contrast at rest and after provocation by coughing and Valsalva's manoeuvre. Carotid artery disease was assessed by duplex imaging. Results Cerebral emboli were detected in 11 (27.5%) dementia patients compared with one (7%) control (p,=,0.15) with emboli being most frequent in VaD (41%) compared to controls [OR (95% CI): 10.5 (1.1, 98.9), p,=,0.04]. A v-aCS was detected in 25 (61%) patients and seven (44%) controls (p,=,0.24). In dementia patients with cerebral emboli; v-aCS was detected in seven (64%) and moderate to severe carotid stenosis was present in three (30%). Conclusion Cerebral emboli and v-aCS may be more frequent in patients with both VaD and AD than in controls, which suggest paradoxical embolisation as a potential mechanism for cerebral damage. This pilot study justifies a definitive case-control study. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy: SPACE2 , a three-arm randomised-controlled clinical trialINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, Issue 4 2009T. Reiff Moderate to severe (,70%) asymptomatic stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery leads to an increased rate of stroke of approximately 11% in 5 years. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, however, are also at a higher risk of nonstroke vascular events. The estimated annual risks of such events in patients with asymptomatic stenosis are 7% for a coronary ischaemic event and 4,7% for overall mortality. The superiority of carotid endarterectomy compared with medical treatment in symptomatic carotid disease is established, provided that the surgical procedure can be performed with a perioperative morbidity and mortality of <6%. The advantage of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients is less established. An alternative treatment, carotid artery stenting, has been developed. This treatment is used frequently in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. In the last decade, major advantages in medical primary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease have been accomplished. The control groups in the large trials for asymptomatic carotid artery disease (ACAS and ACST) originate from more than a decade ago and, for the most part, have not received a medical primary prevention strategy that would now be considered the standard according to current national and international guidelines. For this reason, a three-arm trial (SPACE2; http://www.space-2.de) with a hierarchical design and a recruitment target of 3640 patients is chosen. Firstly, a superior trial of intervention (carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy) vs. state-of-the-art conservative treatment is designed. In case of superiority of the interventions, a noninferiority end-point will be tested between carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. This trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 78592017. [source] Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: Challenging patient scenarios,JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, Issue S4 2008Kiwon Lee MD Abstract The risk for recurrent stroke following a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is high. Prevention of a secondary event is a priority, as the associated morbidity and mortality are great. Antiplatelet agents have been shown to reduce this risk, but the choice of treatment modality depends on a number of factors, including the underlying cause of the stroke and the patient's comorbidities. For example, a cardioembolic stroke is best treated with anticoagulants, whereas one of noncardioembolic origin requires antiplatelet therapy. A number of challenging patient scenarios are explored in this article, and appropriate medical management is discussed, with the goal of examining the most recent trial data and information in the context of an actual case. Eight sample cases are presented: stroke prevention in a patient with recent stent placement, low ejection fraction, intracranial stenosis, carotid stenosis, atherosclerosis of the aortic arch, symptomatic coronary artery disease, antiplatelet failure, and stroke prevention in a patient already on warfarin. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2008;3(4 Suppl):S20,S28. © 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine. [source] Protected Carotid Stenting in High-Risk Patients: Results of the SpideRX Arm of the Carotid Revascularization with ev3 Arterial Technology Evolution TrialJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 5 2010ROBERT D. SAFIAN M.D. Purpose:,A prospective nonrandomized multicenter registry of 160 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted during the 3-month period from March to May 2005. Methods:,Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was performed with the SpideRXÔ Embolic Protection System (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) as part of an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. Results:,The primary end-point of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after CAS was observed in nine patients (5.6%), including death in four patients (2.5%), nonfatal stroke in five patients (3.1%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in one patient (0.6%). A secondary end-point of technical success (defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 156 of 160 patients (97.5%). The only independent predictor of death or stroke at 30 days was baseline stenosis severity (P < 0.05). Conclusion:,CAS with distal embolic protection using the SpideRXÔ Embolic Protection System is a reasonable alternative for revascularization of some high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:491,498) [source] Comparison of lipid-rich necrotic core size in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Initial resultsJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 6 2008Vincent C. Cappendijk MD Abstract Purpose To investigate the potential difference in the size of the lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) in carotid plaques of symptomatic patients versus asymptomatic patients. Pathological studies established that a large LRNC is an important feature of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Previously, we have demonstrated a high correlation between semiquantitative analysis of the LRNC size in T1-weighted (w) turbo field echo (TFE) MR images and histology. Materials and Methods Thirty-seven patients with carotid stenosis >70% with (n = 26) or without (n = 11) symptoms were included. Three independent MR readers quantified the amount of LRNC with a T1w TFE pulse sequence. The relative amount of LRNC (LRNC score) was defined as sum of cross-sectional area percentages LRNC per carotid plaque. Results Interreader agreement for the three MR readers was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.72 (0.57,0.83). All three MR readers on average found a larger LRNC in the symptomatic group of patients, although this was not statistically significant. The mean LRNC score was 116 ± 129 and 59 ± 62 for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, respectively (P = 0.13). Symptomatic patients showed wide ranges in LRNC scores (0,424), while the range was much lower in the asymptomatic group (0,170). Conclusion Single-sequence T1w TFE may be a promising technique to study atherosclerotic plaque at risk of stroke. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these promising results. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;27:1356,1361. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Comparison between 2D and 3D high-resolution black-blood techniques for carotid artery wall imaging in clinically significant atherosclerosisJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 4 2008Niranjan Balu PhD Abstract Purpose To compare two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) black-blood imaging methods for morphological measurements of the carotid artery wall and atherosclerotic plaque. Materials and Methods A total of 18 subjects with 50% to 79% carotid stenosis were scanned with 2D (2-mm slice thickness) and 3D (1-mm/0.5-mm actual/interpolated slice thickness) T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) black-blood imaging sequences with double inversion-recovery (DIR) blood suppression. Morphological measurements (lumen area, wall area, vessel area, mean wall thickness, and maximal wall thickness), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the wall and lumen, and wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between 2D and 3D images. The effect of improved slice resolution in 3D imaging was evaluated for visualization of small plaque components. Results Lumen SNR (P = 0.16), wall SNR (P = 0.65), and CNR (P = 0.94) were comparable between 2D/3D. There was no difference in average lumen area (P = 0.16), average wall area (P = 0.99), average vessel area (P = 0.0.58), mean wall thickness (P = 0.09), and maximum wall thickness (P = 0.06) between 2D/3D. Distributions of small plaque components such as calcification were better characterized by the 3D acquisition. There was a higher sensitivity to motion artifacts with 3D imaging, resulting in three examinations with low image quality. Conclusion 2D and 3D protocols provided comparable morphometric measurements of the carotid artery. The major advantage of 3D imaging is improved small plaque component visualization, while the 2D technique provides higher reliability for image quality. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;27:918,924. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Visual Analysis or Semi-Automated Gray-Scale-Based Color Mapping of the Carotid Plaque: Which Method Correlates the Best with the Presence of Cerebrovascular Symptoms and/or Lesions on MRI?JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 2 2009Isabelle Momjian MD ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the correlation between carotid plaque morphology, assessed by two different ultrasonographic methods, and presence of cerebrovascular events and/or lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Visual analysis of plaque echogenicity using a five-type classification was performed. Further, a semi-automated gray-scale-based color mapping of the whole plaque and of its surface was achieved. RESULTS There were 31 (35%) symptomatic (23 strokes and 8 transitory ischemic attacks [TIAs]) and 58 (65%) asymptomatic carotid stenoses. MRI lesions related to the carotid stenosis if located in the ipsilateral cortical, subcortical, or watershed area, were present in 27 cases (30%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, degree of stenosis (P= .03) and a predominant red color on the surface (P= .04) were independent factors associated with the presence of cerebrovascular events and/or lesions on MRI. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 80% and 63% by combining degree of stenosis and color mapping of plaque surface. CONCLUSION Degree of stenosis and a predominant red color on plaque surface were independent factors associated with the presence of cerebrovascular events and/or lesions on MRI. No correlation was observed with any particular type of plaque based on visual analysis alone. [source] A Broad Diagnostic Battery for Bedside Transcranial Doppler to Detect Flow Changes With Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis or OcclusionJOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 3 2001Ioannis Christou MD ABSTRACT Background and Purpose. The authors establish accuracy parameters of a broad diagnostic battery for bedside transcranial Doppler (TCD) to detect flow changes due to internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion. Methods. The authors prospectively studied consecutive patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack referred for TCD. TCD was performed and interpreted at bedside using a standard insonation protocol. A broad diagnostic battery included major criteria: collateral flow signals, abnormal siphon or terminal carotid signals, and delayed systolic flow acceleration in the middle cerebral artery. Minor criteria included a unilateral decrease in pulsatility index (, 0.6 or , 70% of contralateral side), flow diversion signs, and compensatory velocity increase. Angiography or carotid duplex ultrasound (CDU) was used to grade the degree of carotid stenosis using North American criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TCD findings were determined. Results. Seven hundred and twenty patients underwent TCD, of whom 517 (256 men and 261 women) had angiography and/or CDU within 8.8 ± 0.9 days. Age was 63.1 ± 15.7 years. For a 70% to 99% carotid stenosis or occlusion, TCD had sensitivity of 79.4%, specificity of 86.2%, PPV of 57.0%, NPV of 94.8%, and accuracy of 84.7%. For a 50% to 99% carotid stenosis or occlusion, TCD had sensitivity of 67.5%, specificity of 83.9%, PPV of 54.5%, NPV of 90.0%, and accuracy of 81.6%. TCD detected intracranial carotid lesions with 84.9% accuracy and extracranial carotid lesions with 84.4% accuracy (sensitivity of 88% and 79%, specificity of 85% and 86%, PPV of 24% and 54%, and NPV of 99% and 95%, respectively). The prevalence of the ophthalmic artery flow reversal was 36.4% in patients with , 70% stenosis or occlusion. If present, this finding indicated a proximal ICA lesion location in 97% of these patients. Conclusions. In symptomatic patients, bedside TCD can accurately detect flow changes consistent with hemodynamically significant ICA obstruction; however, TCD should not be a substitute for direct carotid evaluation. Because TCD is sensitive and specific for , 70% carotid stenosis or occlusion in both extracranial and intracranial carotid segments, it can be used as a complementary test to refine other imaging findings and detect tandem lesions. [source] Carotid plaque computed tomography imaging in stroke and nonstroke patientsANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 2 2008Max Wintermark MD Objective To identify a set of computed tomographic (CT) features of carotid atherosclerotic plaques that is significantly associated with ischemic stroke. Methods In a cross-sectional study, we retrospectively identified 136 consecutive patients admitted to our emergency department with suspected stroke who underwent a CT-angiogram of the carotid arteries. CT-angiographic studies of the carotid arteries were processed automatically using automated computer classifier algorithm that quantitatively assesses a battery of carotid CT features. Acute stroke patients were categorized into "acute carotid stroke patients" and "nonacute carotid stroke patients" independent of carotid wall CT features, using the Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke, which includes the neuroradiologist's review of the imaging studies of the brain parenchyma and of the degree of carotid stenosis, and charted test results (such as electrocardiogram). Univariate followed by multivariate analyses were used to build models to differentiate between these patient groups and to differentiate between the infarct and unaffected sides in the "acute carotid stroke patients." Results Forty "acute carotid stroke" patients and 50 "nonacute carotid stroke" patients were identified. Multivariate modeling identified a small number of the carotid wall CT features that were significantly associated with acute carotid stroke, including wall volume, fibrous cap thickness, number and location of lipid clusters, and number of calcium clusters. Interpretation Patients with acute carotid stroke demonstrate significant differences in the appearance of their carotid wall ipsilateral to the side of their infarct, when compared with either nonacute carotid stroke patients or the carotid wall contralateral with the infarct side. Ann Neurol 2008;64:149,157 [source] Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid artery stentingANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2010The Carotid Stenting Guidelines Committee Abstract Background:, The endovascular treatment of carotid atherosclerosis with carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains controversial. Carotid endarterectomy remains the benchmark in terms of procedural mortality and morbidity. At present, there are no consensus Australasian guidelines for the safe performance of CAS. Methods:, We applied a modified Delphi consensus method of iterative consultation between the College representatives on the Carotid Stenting Guidelines Committee (CSGC). Results:, Selection of patients suitable for CAS needs careful consideration of clinical and patho-anatomical criteria and cannot be directly extrapolated from clinical indicators for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Randomized controlled trials (including pooled analyses of results) comparing CAS with CEA for treatment of symptomatic stenosis have demonstrated that CAS is more hazardous than CEA. On current evidence, the CGSC therefore recommends that CAS should not be performed in the majority of patients requiring carotid revascularisation. The evidence for CAS in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis who are considered medically high risk is weak, and there is currently no evidence to support CAS as a treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The use of distal protection devices during CAS remains controversial with increased risk of clinically silent stroke. The knowledge requirements for the safe performance of CAS include an understanding of the evidence base from randomized controlled trials, carotid and aortic arch anatomy and pathology, clinical stroke syndromes, the differing treatment options for stroke and carotid atherosclerosis, and recognition and management of periprocedural complications. It is critical that all patients being considered for a carotid intervention have adequate pre-procedural neuro-imaging and an independent, standardized neurological assessment before and after the procedure. Maintenance of proficiency in CAS requires active involvement in surgical/endovascular audit and continuing medical education programs. These standards should apply in the public and private health care settings. Conclusion:, These guidelines represent the consensus of an inter-collegiate committee in order to direct appropriate patient selection and the range of cognitive and technical requirements to perform CAS. Advances in endovascular technologies and the results of randomized controlled trials will guide future revisions of these guidelines. [source] Critical evaluation: review of the SAPPHIRE trial and the role of stenting in carotid stenosisANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2009Yi-Yi Chen First page of article [source] Regional anaesthesia and propofol sedation for carotid endarterectomyANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 7 2005Christopher Barringer Background: Many surgeons now perform carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to review a sedation technique using a computer-controlled infusion of propofol. Methods: A consecutive series of 84 carotid endarterectomies done by a single surgeon and commenced under regional anaesthesia with sedation was studied. There were 54 men and 27 women (three bilateral procedures), with a median age of 71 years (range 48,87 years). All patients had carotid stenosis >70% 80 procedures were done for symptomatic disease and three asymptomatic patients were treated before cardiac surgery (one bilateral). Results: Seventy-seven procedures were completed under regional anaesthesia and sedation alone; seven required conversion to general anaesthetic, usually for intolerance of the operation. An intraoperative shunt was required on only four occasions (5%). Postoperatively eight patients required critical care monitoring, usually for blood pressure control. The remainder were nursed on the vascular ward, and 68% were discharged home on the day after surgery. No patient died, but there were two neurological complications. One patient had a cerebellar stroke 10 days after surgery, but recovered fully after 4 months. A second developed cerebral oedema due to severe intraoperative hypertension and required intensive care for 15 days. He too recovered fully. Five patients had a further episode of transient cerebral ischaemia within 1 month of operation, but in all cases duplex imaging showed a widely patent carotid and there were no sequelae. Conclusion: Target controlled propofol infusion is an effective method of sedation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. [source] Carotid redo surgery: both safe and durableANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2003Richard A. Harris Aim: To examine the outcomes and complications of surgery for recurrent carotid stenosis. Methods: From 1974 to 2000, 1922 carotid endarterectomies were performed in our unit. A retrospective cohort analysis of these records identified 24 patients (1.2%) who underwent surgery for recurrent stenosis. Results: There were 13 men and 11 women in the group. Median follow up was 7.2 years (interquartile range 4.4,12.4 years). The indication for redo surgery was either symptomatic severe (80,99%) or moderate (50,79%) restenosis, or severe asymptomatic (80,99%) restenosis. Repair was performed by patch angioplasty (88%), endarterectomy alone (8%) or interposition grafting (4%). Within the 30 day perioperative period there were no deaths, no strokes (major or minor), or significant cardiac morbidity. One patient (4%) developed a permanent spinal accessory nerve deficit. Another patient (4%) required further re-intervention for recurrent disease. Conclusions: Very low surgical morbidity and mortality was achieved in our unit by implementing a policy of selective re-intervention for carotid restenosis. Redo carotid endarterectomy can therefore be recommended as having no greater morbidity than primary carotid endarterectomy. Carotid angioplasty and stenting are not recommended as a routine alternative treatment. [source] RISK FACTORS FOR PERI-OPERATIVE STROKE COMPLICATING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY: SELECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE AUDIT OF 1000 CONSECUTIVE OPERATIONSANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1 2000J. E. Frawley Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of potential clinical risk factors in the causation of peri-operative stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy. With the change in carotid endarterectomy practice from the use of a shunt to high-dose thiopental for cerebral protection (a previously undocumented method), it was essential to identify accurately the causes of all peri-operative strokes. Methods: A prospective audit was undertaken of 1000 carotid endarterectomies in which the causes and pathology of all peri-operative strokes were documented. The roles of advanced age, female gender, hypertension, previous stroke, contralateral carotid stenosis > 70%, and contralateral carotid occlusion as potential causes of peri-operative stroke were defined. Results were statistically analysed using odds ratio and Fisher's exact test. Results: None of the potential risk factors was statistically significant for peri-operative stroke. Female gender was associated with a significant risk of peri-operative stroke due to operative site thrombosis. Complications at the endarterectomy site were the commonest cause of stroke. Conclusions: Prospective audit is a useful tool for identifying causes of peri-operative stroke and indicating the need for modifications to surgical clinical management which might improve outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. [source] Cost-effectiveness analysis of general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA Trial)BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 8 2010M. Gomes Background: Health outcomes and costs are both important when deciding whether general (GA) or local (LA) anaesthesia should be used during carotid endarterectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy under LA or GA in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis for whom surgery was advised. Methods: Using patient-level data from a large, multinational, randomized controlled trial (GALA Trial) time free from stroke, myocardial infarction or death, and costs incurred were evaluated. The cost-effectiveness outcome was incremental cost per day free from an event, within a time horizon of 30 days. Results: A patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy under LA incurred fewer costs (mean difference £178) and had a slightly longer event-free survival (difference 0·16 days, but the 95 per cent confidence limits around this estimate were wide) compared with a patient who had GA. Existing uncertainty did not have a significant impact on the decision to adopt LA, over a wide range of willingness-to-pay values. Conclusion: If cost-effectiveness was considered in the decision to adopt GA or LA for carotid endarterectomy, given the evidence provided by this study, LA is likely to be the favoured treatment for patients for whom either anaesthetic approach is clinically appropriate. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography-directed intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist therapy to control transient cerebral microemboli before and after carotid endarterectomy,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 6 2008D. van Dellen Background: Patients with a transient focal neurological deficit, critical carotid stenosis and/or microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) have a significant risk of stroke. The effect of tirofiban, a selective glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was assessed in patients with microembolic signals on TCD after transient ischaemic attacks or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: Thirty-three patients with microemboli on TCD (13 symptomatic preoperative, 19 postoperative, one both) were treated with tirofiban between 2002 and 2007. All patients had carotid stenosis greater than 70 per cent. TCD monitoring was used during and after tirofiban therapy. Results: The median (range) rate of microemboli decreased from 22 (4,260) per h before surgery and 81 (44,216) per h after surgery to 0 (0,9) per h in both groups (P < 0·001, Mann,Whitney U test). This occurred rapidly (preoperative median 30 min; postoperative median 45 min) and was well tolerated in all patients, with no serious adverse effects. Conclusion: Cerebral microemboli were controlled by tirofiban both before and after CEA. Further study is required to compare the relative efficacy of tirofiban and dextran. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Genetic profile of ischemic cerebrovascular disease and carotid stenosisACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2008K. Kostulas Objectives,,, Carotid artery stenosis (CS) is a major risk factor for ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) and is therefore of interest in genetic investigating. Here we report the distribution of 100 polymorphisms in 47 suspected susceptibility genes for ICVD and its risk factors. Materials and methods,,, Previously published markers in suspected susceptibility genes were genotyped in ICVD patients and controls (928/602). Genotyping was performed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and linear immobilized probe array assays. ICVD cases were subtyped according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) or subdivided into CS and non-CS patients by ultrasonography in a separate analysis. Results,,, Three polymorphisms located in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL), angiotensinogen (AGT) and guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta-3 (GNB3) genes were significantly associated with ICVD after correction for age and gender. The strongest association was found for the protective LPL Ser447Term polymorphism. All the significant markers showed varying frequencies in different subphenotypes of ICVD. Factor VII, apolipoprotein E and two renin polymorphisms were differentially frequent in patients with evidence of CS compared with non-CS patients. Conclusions,,, We have found that some previously described susceptibility polymorphisms are weakly associated with ICVD and that subdivision of patients into CS and non-CS groups may help to identify new candidate polymorphisms. [source] Prospective analysis of carotid artery flow in breast cancer patients treated with supraclavicular irradiation 8 or more years previously,CANCER, Issue 2 2008No increase in ipsilateral carotid stenosis after radiation noted Abstract BACKGROUND. To the authors' knowledge, the effects of supraclavicular fossa radiation on the carotid artery are not well described. In the current study, the authors performed a prospective study to examine the long-term risk of carotid artery stenosis after supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer. METHODS. A total of 46 breast cancer patients who were treated with adjuvant radiation to the supraclavicular fossa with >8 years of follow-up underwent bilateral Doppler imaging of the carotid artery. Two independent cardiologists interpreted each ultrasound study with no knowledge of which side was treated. RESULTS. The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 14.6 years and the mean patient age at the time of ultrasound was 55 years. The median prescribed dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 50 grays. Four patients were found to have clinically relevant, asymptomatic carotid stenosis, for which a cardiology referral was necessary. Only 1 of these 4 patients had stenosis involving the irradiated carotid artery only; 1 patient had bilateral stenosis and 2 patients had only contralateral stenosis. There was no difference noted with regard to isolated ipsilateral versus contralateral medial intimal thickening of the carotid artery (5 patients vs 6 patients, respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences noted with regard to ipsilateral versus contralateral peak systolic flow in the internal (83.5 vs 85.6 cm/seconds; P = .522 by the Student t test and P = .871 by the signed rank test) or common (74.4 vs 77.0 cm/seconds; P = .462 by the Student t test and P = .246 by the signed rank test) carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS. In this prospective study of breast cancer patients with long follow-up, there was no evidence of late, clinically relevant stenosis, increased intimal thickening, or increased peak systolic carotid artery flow secondary to supraclavicular irradiation. Cancer 2008. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source] Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA® proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: Results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 1 2010Gary M. Ansel MD Abstract Objective: The multicenter ARMOUR (ProximAl PRotection with the MO.MA Device DUring CaRotid Stenting) trial evaluated the 30-day safety and effectiveness of the MO.MA® Proximal Cerebral Protection Device (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) utilized to treat high surgical risk patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background: Distal embolic protection devices (EPD) have been traditionally utilized during CAS. The MO.MA device acts as a balloon occlusion "endovascular clamping" system to achieve cerebral protection prior to crossing the carotid stenosis. Methods: This prospective registry enrolled 262 subjects, 37 roll-in and 225 pivotal subjects evaluated with intention to treat (ITT) from September 2007 to February 2009. Subjects underwent CAS using the MO.MA device. The primary endpoint, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death through 30 days (30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) was compared to a performance goal of 13% derived from trials utilizing distal EPD. Results: For the ITT population, the mean age was 74.7 years with 66.7% of the cohort being male. Symptomatic patients comprised 15.1% and 28.9% were octogenarians. Device success was 98.2% and procedural success was 93.2%. The 30-day MACCE rate was 2.7% [95% CI (1.0,5.8%)] with a 30-day major stroke rate of 0.9%. No symptomatic patient suffered a stroke during this trial. Conclusions: The ARMOUR trial demonstrated that the MO.MA® Proximal Cerebral Protection Device is safe and effective for high surgical risk patients undergoing CAS. The absence of stroke in symptomatic patients is the lowest rate reported in any independently adjudicated prospective multicenter registry trial to date. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 5 2010Arthur Grant MD Abstract Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients at high risk for complications from surgery. The very elderly (,80-year-old) are one subgroup of patients identified as being at increased risk for carotid surgery. However, there is concern that the very elderly are also at increased risk for complications of CAS. A stroke and death rate of 12% was reported in very elderly patients during the roll-in phase of Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST). We are reporting on a large clinical series of CAS with independent neurological assessment in the very elderly. Methods: Between 1994 and 2008, a consecutive series of 418 CAS patients (,80-year-old) were treated at four high-volume centers with extensive CAS experience. Independent neurologic assessment was performed after CAS procedures. Thirty-day follow-up information was available in 389 patients. Results: The average age was 83.2 ± 2.8 years. Most patients were male (63.2%), and the target lesion carotid stenosis was asymptomatic in two-thirds (68.2%) of patients. The majority of patients treated with CAS had a history of coronary artery disease (74.4%), hypertension (87.8%), and dyslipidemia (71.1%). One third (30.1%) were diabetic and more than half (56.5%) were current or former smokers. Embolic protection devices (EPD) were used in 78.7% of cases with the CAS procedure being performed before EPD availability being the most common reason for not using them. The overall 30-day incidence of stroke and death was 2.8% (11/389). The cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events (stroke, death, or myocardial infarction) during that time period was 3.3% (13/389). Conclusions: This large series of CAS with independent neurologic assessment is convincing evidence that the very elderly (,80 years) can safely undergo CAS with stroke and death rates comparable to younger patients. The key to obtaining these excellent results is that CAS be performed by high volume, experienced operators who exercise restraint regarding patient selection. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Carotid angioplasty and stenting in octogenarians: Is it safe?CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2008M. Henry MD Abstract Purpose: Elderly patients have a higher risk of complications in carotid endarterectomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed in octogenarians also increases the procedure related risk. Methods: 870 patients (male 626) mean age 70.9 ± 9.3 years underwent 930 CAS for de novo lesions (n = 851) restenoses (n = 54) post radiation (n = 14) inflammatory arteritis (n = 9) post trauma aneurysms (n = 2). Indications for treatment: symptomatic carotid stenosis , 70% (n = 577) or asymptomatic stenosis , 80%. Patients were separated into two age groups: <80 years (749 patients, 806 CAS) and >80 years (121 patients, 124 CAS). 187 CAS performed without protection (N.P,) 6 patients >80 years, 743 with protection (NP+) (occlusion balloon: 334, filters: 404, reversal flow: 6) 118 patients >80 years. Data analysis included neurological complications, death and myocardial infarction (MI) rate at 30 days, anatomical particularities. Technical points will be described depending on the age of the patient. Results: Technical success 804/806 in patients <80 years, 123/124 in patients >80 years (NS). 30 days outcomes: in the patient group <80 years we observed 9 TIA (1.1%) 3 without NP (1.7%) 6 with NP (0.9%), 5 minor strokes (0.6%) 2 without NP (1.1%) 3 with NP (0.5%), 3 major strokes: 2 without NP (1.1%) 1 with NP (0.2%), 5 deaths (0.6%) 2 without NP (1.1%) 3 with NP (0.5%). Death/stroke/MI: 14 (1.8%) 6 without NP (3.3%), 8 with NP (1.3%). In the group >80 years, we observed 2 TIA (1.7%) 1 without NP 1 with NP (0.92%) 1 minor stroke without NP (17%) no major stroke, no death. Death/stroke/MI 1 without NP (17%). Conclusion: CAS can be performed in elderly patients without higher risk than in younger patients. But good indications, a meticulous technique, protection devices are mandatory and some technical points must be pointed out to avoid neurological complications and failures. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 20081-Year results in the CABERNET trial Abstract Objective: The multicenter, single-arm CABERNET trial evaluated outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the NexStent® plus FilterWire EX®/EZÔ Emboli Protection System. Background: For patients at high surgical risk, carotid artery stenting (CAS) offers a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: The trial enrolled 454 high-surgical-risk patients with carotid stenosis by angiography ,50% for symptomatic patients and ,60% for asymptomatic patients. The comparator primary endpoint was the 1-year major adverse event (MAE, defined as any death, stroke, or myocardial infarction [MI]) rate. It was compared with a proportionally weighted objective performance criterion (OPC) of 12.1% representative of published CEA results in similar patients plus a prespecified noninferiority margin (delta) of 4%. A second primary endpoint was the composite rate of 30-day MAE plus late (31,365 days) ipsilateral stroke. Results: Symptoms of carotid stenosis were present in 24.2% of patients; 36.6% of patients were considered high-surgical-risk due to comorbid risk factors and 63.4% due to anatomic risk factors. The rate of 30-day MAE plus late ipsilateral stroke was 4.7% (20/438). The comparator primary endpoint of 1-year MAE was 11.6% (51/438) and was noninferior to the OPC of 12.1% (95% upper confidence interval of 14.5% versus OPC plus delta of 16.1%, P = 0.005). Late ipsilateral stroke was 0.7% and target vessel revascularization at 1 year was 2.4%. Conclusions: The CABERNET trial demonstrates that CAS with NexStent and FilterWire is noninferior to (equivalent or better than) traditional CEA at 1 year in high-surgical-risk patients based on historical controls. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |