Capture II (capture + ii)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Capture II

  • hybrid capture ii


  • Selected Abstracts


    Stability of PreservCyt® for Hybrid Capture® (HC II) HPV test,

    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 5 2005
    J. Sailors M.D.
    Abstract The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the Hybrid Capture® II (HC II) assay to test for the presence of high-risk types of human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA using specimens in PreservCyt® fixative for up to 21 days after collection. The ability of HC II to determine the presence of HPV DNA in actual patient samples after longer periods of storage has not been shown. To determine if specimens older than 21 days can yield useful results, 207 patient specimens that had been tested for HPV DNA by HC II (primary test) were tested again after a significant period of storage ranging from approximately 2.5 to 13.5 mo (retest). The results of the primary test and the retest agreed in 86% of the cases. The high level of agreement in the results suggests that the presence of high-risk types of HPV DNA can be determined from actual cervical cytology material in PreservCyt® with the HC II assay for at least 3 mo after specimen collection. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2005;32:260,263. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir for chronic hepatitis B,infected Chinese patients: A viral dynamics study

    HEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2000
    George Ka Lau M.D.
    In vitro studies have shown that lamivudine and penciclovir (the active metabolite of famciclovir) act synergistically to inhibit hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We compared the effectiveness of HBV viral suppression by lamivudine monotherapy versus lamivudine plus famciclovir combination therapy in Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection. Twenty-one Chinese hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, with detectable HBV DNA (Digene Hybrid Capture II), were randomized to receive either lamivudine 150 mg/d orally (group 1, 9 patients) or lamivudine 150 mg/d plus famciclovir 500 mg 3 times a day orally (group 2, 12 patients) for 12 weeks, with a follow-up period of at least 16 weeks. Serial serum HBV-DNA levels were determined and a mathematical model with provision for incomplete inhibition of virus production during therapy was applied to analyze the dynamics of viral clearance. The mean antiviral efficacy was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 (0.988 ± 0.012 vs. 0.94 ± 0.03, P = .0012). HBV DNA returned to pretreatment level within 16 weeks after the end of initial treatment in 4 patients (66.7%) in group 1 and none in group 2 (P = .08), who remained HBeAg positive and received no further treatment after week 12. Hence, in Chinese chronic HBeAg-positive patients, combination therapy using lamivudine and famciclovir was superior to lamivudine monotherapy in inhibiting HBV replication. Further studies of longer duration are needed to define whether combination therapy will increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate and decrease the rate of emergence of lamivudine-resistant variants. [source]


    Effectiveness of Prophylactic Anti-HBV Therapy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with HBsAg Positive Donors

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005
    Chee-kin Hui
    Use of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) causes serious hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver morbidity and mortality in the recipient. We compared the effectiveness of anti-HBV therapy in 29 recipients who underwent HSCT using HBsAg positive marrow (group I) against a historical control group of 25 patients who received HBsAg positive marrow without pre-HSCT prophylaxis (group II). Anti-HBV therapy consisted of lamivudine for HBsAg-positive donors and all recipients (n = 29) as well as HBV vaccination to all HBsAg-negative recipients (n = 10) before HSCT. After transplantation, HBV-related hepatitis was significantly higher in group II than group I recipients [12 of 25 recipients (48%) vs. 2 of 29 recipients (6.9%), p = 0.002] and in recipients whose donors had detectable serum HBV DNA by Digene Hybrid Capture II assay [8 of 14 recipients (57.1%) vs. 6 of 40 recipients (15.0%), p = 0.02]. Six recipients in group II and none in group I died of HBV-related hepatic failure (24.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). By multivariate Cox analysis, anti-HBV therapy effectively reduces post-HSCT HBV-related hepatitis (p = 0.01, adjusted hazards ratio 7.27, 95%CI 1.62,32.58). Our data support the use of prophylactic therapy in preventing HBV-related hepatitis after allogeneic HSCT from HBsAg-positive donor. [source]


    DNA ploidy compared with human papilloma virus testing (Hybrid Capture II) and conventional cervical cytology as a primary screening test for cervical high-grade lesions and cancer in 1555 patients with biopsy confirmation

    CANCER, Issue 2 2006
    Martial Guillaud PhD
    Abstract BACKGROUND. Because 80% of cervical cancers arise in low-resource settings, many inexpensive strategies are being tested. In that spirit, the authors are testing large-scale genomic or DNA ploidy measurements as an inexpensive and semiautomated strategy. METHODS. Patients entered either a screening or diagnostic study of several optical technologies: quantitative cytology, quantitative histopathology, and fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy using a point probe, a multispectral digital colposcope, or a combination of the two. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and their confidence interval testing conventional cytology, Hybrid Capture (HC) II testing, and DNA ploidy measured on the Feulgen-stained quantitative Pap smear. RESULTS. The current investigation reports on 1555 patients for whom colposcopically directed biopsies were read 3 times by study pathologists. The final histopathologic diagnosis was high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 2, CIN 3, carcinoma in situ [CIS], and cancer) in 16% of patients. Using high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) histopathology as the threshold and gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were: 0.47 and 0.96 for conventional cytology, 0.91 and 0.80 for HC II, and 0.59 and 0.93 for DNA ploidy. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for conventional cytology were 0.70 and 0.90, 0.46 and 0.98 for HC II, and 0.63 and 0.92 for DNA ploidy. CONCLUSIONS. DNA ploidy shows comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values to conventional cytology and HC II. Unlike conventional cytology, DNA ploidy is semiautomated and can be performed in less than 8 hours. Cost effectiveness studies are under way, but in the authors' laboratory DNA ploidy is inexpensive. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society. [source]