Cancer Presentation (cancer + presentation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Patterns of Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment in Older Patients with Colon Cancer and Comorbid Dementia

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 10 2004
Supriya K. Gupta MD
Objectives: To estimate patterns of colon cancer presentation, diagnosis, and treatment according to history of dementia using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Result (SEER) Medicare data. Design: Population-level cohort study. Setting: NCI's SEER-Medicare database. Participants: A total of 17,507 individuals aged 67 and older with invasive colon cancer (Stage I-IV) were identified from the 1993,1996 SEER file. Medicare files were evaluated to determine which patients had an antecedent diagnosis of dementia. Measurements: Parameters relating to the cohort's patterns of presentation and care were estimated using logistic regressions. Results: The prevalence of dementia in the cohort of newly diagnosed colon cancer patients was 6.8% (1,184/17,507). Adjusting for possible confounders, dementia patients were twice as likely to have colon cancer reported after death (i.e., autopsy or death certificate) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.79,3.00). Of those diagnosed before death (n=17,049), dementia patients were twice as likely to be diagnosed noninvasively than with tissue evaluation (i.e., positive histology) (AOR=2.02 95% CI=1.63,2.51). Of patients with Stage I -III disease (n=12,728), patients with dementia were half as likely to receive surgical resection (AOR=0.48, 95% CI=0.33,0.70). Furthermore, of those with resected Stage III colon cancer (n=3,386), dementia patients were 78% less likely to receive adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (AOR=0.22, 95% CI=0.13,0.36). Conclusion: Although the incidences of dementia and cancer rise with age, little is known about the effect of dementia on cancer presentation and treatment. Elderly colon cancer patients are less likely to receive invasive diagnostic methods or curative-intent therapies. The utility of anticancer therapies in patients with dementia merits further study. [source]


History of Smoking is Associated with Younger Age at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 4 2010
Mathew C Abramowitz MD
Abstract:, Smoking tobacco has been associated with incidence, response and outcomes after treatment of some cancers. We hypothesized that tobacco use could result in an observable effect on breast cancer stage and characteristics at diagnosis. There were 6,000 patients with Tis-4, N0-3 breast cancers who presented to a comprehensive cancer center at initial diagnosis between 1970 and 2006. Patients were included who had a known smoking history, and subdivided into any tobacco use 2683 (45%) or never tobacco use 3317 (55%). Analyses were performed to evaluate the association of smoking with clinical, pathologic and treatment-related factors at cancer presentation. Median age at diagnosis for all breast cancers was 55 years, for nonsmokers was 56 years, for any smoking history was 55 years, and the subgroup of current smokers was 52 years. The difference in median age for current smokers versus nonsmokers was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The probability of age <55 years at breast cancer diagnosis for any smoking history compared to nonsmokers was 1.2 for white patients (p < 0.0003) but 0.81 for black patients (p = 0.25). There was no statistically significant association between smoking and T stage, N stage, ER/PR status, or Her-2/neu status, although smokers were less likely to utilize breast-conserving treatment. Smoking was associated with a younger age at diagnosis and lower utilization of breast conservation, and observed in the subgroup of white patients but not black patients. Further efforts to clarify potential reasons for any racial differences and lower utilization of breast conservation with smoking are warranted. [source]


Treatment Variation by Insurance Status for Breast Cancer Patients

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 2 2008
Natalie Coburn MD
Abstract:, Few studies have examined the relationship of insurance status with the presentation and treatment of breast cancer. Using a state cancer registry, we compared tumor presentation and surgical treatments at presentation by insurance status (private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured). Student's t -test, Chi-square test, and ANOVA were used for comparison. P-values reflect a comparison to insured patients. From 1996 to 2005, there were 6876 cases of invasive breast cancer with either private (n = 3975), Medicare (n = 2592), Medicaid (n = 193), or no insurance (n = 116). The median age (years) at presentation was 55 for private, 76 for Medicare, 54 for Medicaid and 54 for uninsured. The mean and median tumor size (mm) were 18.5 and 15 for private; 20.9 and 15 for Medicare; 24.2 and 18 for Medicaid; and 29.5 and 17 for uninsured, respectively; (p < 0.001 for all). Fewer women with Medicare and Medicaid presented with node negative breast cancers: private, 73.4% node negative; Medicare, 79.5% (p < 0.001); Medicaid, 60.9% (p < 0.001); and uninsured, 58% (p = 0.005). Significantly more uninsured women had no surgical treatment of their breast cancer: 15.5% versus 4.3% for private (p < 0.001). Among women with non-metastatic T1/T2 tumors, 71.5% with private insurance underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), compared with 64.2% of Medicare (p < 0.001), 65% of Medicaid (p = 0.097), and 65.4% of uninsured (p = 0.234). The rate of reconstruction following mastectomy was higher for private insurance (36.6%), compared with Medicare (3.8%, p < 0.0001), Medicaid (26.1%, p = 0.31), and uninsured (5.0%, p = 0.0038). The presentation of breast cancer in women with no insurance and Medicaid is significantly worse than those with private insurance. Of concern are the lower proportions of BCS and reconstruction among patients who are uninsured or have Medicaid. Reduction of disparities in breast cancer presentation and treatment may be possible by increasing enrollment of uninsured, program-eligible women in a state-supported screening and treatment program. [source]