|
| ||
|
|
||
Cancer Predisposition Syndrome (cancer + predisposition_syndrome)
Selected AbstractsA mouse embryonic stem cell model of Schwann cell differentiation for studies of the role of neurofibromatosis type 1 in Schwann cell development and tumor formationGLIA, Issue 11 2007Therese M. Roth Abstract The neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) gene functions as a tumor suppressor gene. One known function of neurofibromin, the NF1 protein product, is to accelerate the slow intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras to increase the production of inactive rasGDP, with wide-ranging effects on p21ras pathways. Loss of neurofibromin in the autosomal dominant disorder NF1 is associated with tumors of the peripheral nervous system, particularly neurofibromas, benign lesions in which the major affected cell type is the Schwann cell (SC). NF1 is the most common cancer predisposition syndrome affecting the nervous system. We have developed an in vitro system for differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) that are NF1 wild type (+/+), heterozygous (+/,), or null (,/,) into SC-like cells to study the role of NF1 in SC development and tumor formation. These mES-generated SC-like cells, regardless of their NF1 status, express SC markers correlated with their stage of maturation, including myelin proteins. They also support and preferentially direct neurite outgrowth from primary neurons. NF1 null and heterozygous SC-like cells proliferate at an accelerated rate compared to NF1 wild type; this growth advantage can be reverted to wild type levels using an inhibitor of MAP kinase kinase (Mek). The mESC of all NF1 types can also be differentiated into neuron-like cells. This novel model system provides an ideal paradigm for studies of the role of NF1 in cell growth and differentiation of the different cell types affected by NF1 in cells with differing levels of neurofibromin that are neither transformed nor malignant. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Broad tumor spectrum in a mouse model of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 2 2007Kelly A. Loffler Abstract Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome typified by development of tumors in parathyroid, pituitary and endocrine pancreas, as well as less common sites including both endocrine and nonendocrine organs. Deletion or mutation of the tumor suppressor gene MEN1 on chromosome 11 has been identified in many cases of MEN1 as well as in sporadic tumors. The molecular biology of menin, the protein encoded by MEN1, remains poorly understood. Here we describe a mouse model of MEN1 in which tumors were seen in pancreatic islets, pituitary, thyroid and parathyroid, adrenal glands, testes and ovaries. The observed tumor spectrum therefore includes types commonly seen in MEN1 patients and additional types. Pancreatic pathology was most common, evident in over 80% of animals, while other tumor types developed with lower frequency and generally later onset. Tumors of multiple endocrine organs were observed frequently, but progression to carcinoma and metastasis were not evident. Tumors in all sites showed loss of heterozygosity at the Men1 locus, though the frequency in testicular tumors was only 36%, indicating that a different molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis occurs in those Leydig tumors that do not show loss of the normal Men1 allele. Menin expression was below the level of detection in ovary, thyroid and testis, but loss of nuclear menin immunoreactivity was observed uniformly in all pancreatic islet adenomas and in some hyperplastic islet cells, suggesting that complete loss of Men1 is a critical point in islet tumor progression in this model. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Screening for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes: A cost-effective model,PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, Issue 4 2001D. Elizabeth McNeil MD Abstract Background We undertook a cost-benefit analysis of screening for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma in children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), a known cancer predisposition syndrome. The purpose of this analysis was twofold: first, to assess whether screening in children with BWS has the potential to be cost-effective; second, if screening appears to be cost-effective, to determine which parameters would be most important to assess if a screening trial were initiated. Procedures We used data from the BWS registry at the National Cancer Institute, the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS), and large published series to model events for two hypothetical cohorts of 1,000 infants born with BWS. One hypothetical cohort was screened for cancer until a predetermined age, representing the base case. The other cohort was unscreened. For our base case, we assumed: (a) sonography examinations three times yearly (triannually) from birth until 7 years of age; (b) screening would result in one stage shift downward at diagnosis for Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma; (c) 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting clinical stage I Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma; (d) a 3% discount rate; (e) a false positive result cost of $402. We estimated mortality rates based on published Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma stage specific survival. Results Using the base case, screening a child with BWS from birth until 4 years of age results in a cost per life year saved of $9,642 while continuing until 7 years of age results in a cost per life-year saved of $14,740. When variables such as cost of screening examination, discount rate, and effectiveness of screening were varied based on high and low estimates, the incremental cost per life-year saved for screening up until age four remained comparable to acceptable population based cancer screening ranges (<,$50,000 per life year saved). Conclusions Under our model's assumptions, abdominal sonography examinations in children with BWS represent a reasonable strategy for a cancer screening program. A cancer screening trial is warranted to determine if, when, and how often children with BWS should be screened and to determine cost-effectiveness in clinical practice. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;37:349,356. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] DNA repair and cancer: Lessons from mutant mouse modelsCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 2 2004Takatoshi Ishikawa DNA damage, if the repair process, especially nucleotide excision repair (NER), is compromised or the lesion is repaired by some other error-prone mechanism, causes mutation and ultimately contributes to neoplastic transformation. Impairment of components of the DNA damage response pathway (e.g., p53) is also implicated in carcinogenesis. We currently have considerable knowledge of the role of DNA repair genes as tumor suppressors, both clinically and experimentally. The deleterious clinical consequences of inherited defects in DNA repair system are apparent from several human cancer predisposition syndromes (e.g., NER-compromised xeroderma pigmentosum [XP] and p53 -deficient Li-Fraumeni syndrome). However, experimental studies to support the clinical evidence are hampered by the lack of powerful animal models. Here, we review in vivo experimental data suggesting the protective function of DNA repair machinery in chemical carcinogenesis. We specifically focus on the three DNA repair genes, O6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene (MGMT), XP group A gene (XPA) and p53. First, mice overexpressing MGMT display substantial resistance to nitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition, a reduction of spontaneous liver tumors and longer survival times were evident. However, there are no known mutations in the human MGMT and therefore no associated cancer syndrome. Secondly, XPA mutant mice are indeed prone to spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in internal organs (which are not exposed to sunlight). The concomitant loss of p53 resulted in accelerated onset of carcinogenesis. Finally, p53 null mice are predisposed to brain tumors upon transplacental exposure to a carcinogen. Accumulated evidence in these three mutant mouse models firmly supports the notion that the DNA repair system is vital for protection against cancer. [source] | ||||||||||