| |||
Cancer Cell Types (cancer + cell_type)
Selected AbstractsEffect of differences in cancer cells and tumor growth sites on recruiting bone marrow-derived endothelial cells and myofibroblasts in cancer-induced stromaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 6 2005Takafumi Sangai Abstract Cancer-stromal interaction is well known to play important roles during cancer progression. Recently we have demonstrated that bone marrow-derived vascular endothelial cells (BMD-VE) and myofibroblasts (BMD-MF) are recruited into the human pancreatic cancer cell line Capan-1 induced stroma. To assess the effect of the difference in cancer cell types on the recruitment of BMD-VE and BMD-MF, 10 kinds of human cancer cell line were implanted into the subctaneous tissue of the immunodeficient mice transplanted with bone marrow of double-mutant mice (RAG-1,/, ,-gal Tg or RAG-1,/, GFP Tg). The recruitment frequency of BMD-VE (%BMD-VE) and BMD-MF (%BMD-MF), and tumor-associated parameters [tumor volume (TV), microvessel density (MVD) and stromal proportion (%St)] were measured. The correlation among them was analyzed. Although %BMD-VE and %BMD-MF varied (from 0 to 21.6%, 0 to 29.6%, respectively), depending on the cancer cell line, both parameters were significantly correlated with %St (p < 0.005). Furthermore %BMD-VE and %BMD-MF also significantly correlated (p < 0.005). In order to assess the effect of tumor growth sites on the recruitment of the cells of interest, a human pancreatic cancer cell line, Capan-1, was transplanted into 5 different sites: subcutaneous tissue, peritoneum, liver, spleen and lung. Tumors in the subcutaneous tissue and peritoneum induced desmoplastic stroma (%St = 22.7%, 19.5%, respectively) and contained BMD-VE (%BMD-VE = 21.6%, 16.5% respectively) and BMD-MF (%BMD-MF = 29.6%, 24.5%, respectively), but weak stromal induction without recruitment of BMD-VE or -MF was observed in the tumors at of the liver, spleen and lung (%St = 9.7%, 9.1%, 5.4%, respectively). cDNA microarray analysis identified the 29 genes that expression was especially up- or down-regulated in the cell line that induced an abundant stromal reaction. However they did not encoded the molecules that were directly involved in stromal cell recruitment (chemokines), differentiation (cytokines) or proliferation (growth factors). These results indicate that the recruitment of BMD-VE and -MF is required for stromal formation during cancer progression and that the cancer microenvironment is important in stromal reaction and the recruitment of BMD-VE and -MF. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Paradoxical roles for lysyl oxidases in cancer,A prospectJOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, Issue 6 2007Stacey L. Payne Abstract Lysyl oxidase (LOX) is an extracellular matrix (ECM) enzyme that catalyzes the cross-linking of collagens or elastin in the extracellular compartment, thereby regulating the tensile strength of tissues. However, recent reports have demonstrated novel roles for LOX, including the ability to regulate gene transcription, motility/migration, and cell adhesion. These diverse functions have led researchers to hypothesize that LOX may have multiple roles affecting both extra- and intracellular cell function(s). Particularly noteworthy is aberrant LOX expression and activity that have been observed in various cancerous tissues and neoplastic cell lines. Both down and upregulation of LOX in tumor tissues and cancer cell lines have been described, suggesting a dual role for LOX as a tumor suppressor, as well as a metastasis promoter gene,creating a conundrum within the LOX research field. Here, we review the body of evidence on LOX gene expression, regulation, and function(s) in various cancer cell types and tissues, as well as stromal,tumor cell interactions. Lastly, we will examine putative mechanisms in which LOX facilitates breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Taken together, the literature demonstrates the increasingly important role(s) that LOX may play in regulating tumor progression and the necessity to elucidate its myriad mechanisms of action in order to identify potentially novel therapeutics. J. Cell. Biochem. 101: 1338,1354, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Chrysophanol induces necrosis through the production of ROS and alteration of ATP levels in J5 human liver cancer cellsMOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH (FORMERLY NAHRUNG/FOOD), Issue 7 2010Chi-Cheng Lu Abstract Anthraquinone compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in different cancer cell types. Effects of chrysophanol, an anthraquinone compound, on cancer cell death have not been well studied. The goal of this study was to examine if chrysophanol had cytotoxic effects and if such effects involved apoptosis or necrosis in J5 human liver cancer cells. Chrysophanol induced necrosis in J5 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Non-apoptotic cell death was induced by chrysophanol in J5 cells and was characterized by caspase independence, delayed externalization of phosphatidylserine and plasma membrane disruption. Blockage of apoptotic induction by a general caspase inhibitor (z-VAD-fmk) failed to protect cells against chrysophanol-induced cell death. The levels of reactive oxygen species production and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (,,m) were also determined to assess the effects of chrysophanol. However, reductions in adenosine triphosphate levels and increases in lactate dehydrogenase activity indicated that chrysophanol stimulated necrotic cell death. In summary, human liver cancer cells treated with chrysophanol exhibited a cellular pattern associated with necrosis and not apoptosis. [source] Non-redundant inhibitor of differentiation (Id) gene expression and function in human prostate epithelial cellsTHE PROSTATE, Issue 9 2006Ananthi J. Asirvatham Abstract BACKGROUND The four Id (inhibitor of differentiation) proteins (Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4) dimerize and neutralize the transcriptional activity of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. The Id proteins negatively regulate differentiation and promote proliferation hence the expression of specific subsets of Id proteins is high in many different types of cancers. However, the expression of all the Id isoforms and their potential function in specific cancer cell types is not known. In this study, the expression and function of all four Id isoforms in prostate cancer cell lines was investigated to gain a better understanding of the role of each Id isoform in normal prostate epithelial and prostate cancer cells. METHODS Id gene and protein expression was evaluated in the context of androgen response. The cellular function of Id isoforms was evaluated by targeted loss of function of Id genes. RESULTS The four Id isoforms are differentially expressed and regulated in normal human prostate epithelial cells versus prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and LNCaP. Id4 is present only in AR positive cells (normal and LNCaP) and its expression regulated by androgens. Loss of Id1 and Id3 expression by siRNA results in loss of proliferation. Loss of Id2 had no effect on proliferation but increased apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS A complex equilibrium between Id isoforms determines the cell fate. Id1 and Id3 target cellular proliferation, Id2 targets apoptosis, and Id4 may act as a potential tumor suppressor in prostate epithelial cells. Prostate 66: 921,935, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |