|
| ||
|
|
||
Calcium Hydroxide Suspension (calcium + hydroxide_suspension)
Selected AbstractsComparative assessment of time-related bioactive glass and calcium hydroxide effects on mechanical properties of human root dentinDENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Monika Marending These materials have a disinfecting capacity similar to Ca(OH)2, but bear the advantage of bioactivity. However, because bioactive glasses initially act as alkaline biocides just as Ca(OH)2 does, they may also negatively affect mechanical dentin properties over time. This was assessed in the current study using standardized human root dentin bars. Specimens were immersed in 1:20 (wt vol,1) suspensions of nanometric bioactive glass 45S5 or calcium hydroxide for 1, 10, or 30 days. Control specimens were immersed in pure saline for 30 days (n = 20 per group). Subsequently, modulus of elasticity (E) and flexural strength (FS) of the specimens were determined. Results were compared between groups using one-way anova and Scheffé's post-hoc test. Ca(OH)2 caused a significant (P < 0.001) 35% drop in mean flexural strength values compared to the control treatment after 10 days. No further change was observed between 10 days and 30 days. Bioactive glass caused a 20% drop in mean flexural strength as compared to the control after 10 days. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). No effects of either material on dentin modulus of elasticity values were observed. It was concluded that the calcium hydroxide suspension affected the dentin more than the bioactive glass counterpart; however, the effect was self-limiting and probably restricted to superficial dentin layers, as suggested by the mere decrease in flexural strength but not in modulus of elasticity values. [source] A comparison of the pH changes in root dentine following root canal dressing between calcium hydroxide gutta-percha points and a conventional calcium hydroxide suspensionINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 3 2000S. M. Ardeshna [source] Oily calcium hydroxide suspension (Osteoinductal) used as an adjunct to guided bone regeneration: an experimental study in ratsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 6 2007Andreas Stavropoulos Abstract Objectives: To evaluate whether an oily calcium hydroxide suspension (OCHS) promotes bone healing when used as an adjunct to guided bone regeneration (GBR). Material and methods: Rigid, hemispherical, teflon capsules were placed with their open part facing the lateral surface of the ramus on both sides of the mandible in 10 adult Wistar rats. In each animal, one capsule was filled out with an OCHS (test) before placement, while the capsule on the other side was left empty (control). After 4 months of healing, the animals were sacrificed and histological sections containing the capsules and the neighboring soft and hard tissues were prepared. On three to four sections taken by uniformly random sampling from each specimen, the relative volumes of (1) the newly formed bone (mineralized bone and marrow), (2) the soft connective tissue, (3) the residual OCHS, and (4) the acellular (empty) space inside the capsule were estimated by a point-counting technique, and expressed as percentage of the space originally created by the capsule. Results: There was no new bone formation inside the capsules in all but one test specimen, where only a minimal amount of newly formed bone could be observed in continuation with the lateral surface of the ramus. OCHS had a homogenous appearance and occupied the major portion (79.4%) of the space created by the capsule. No signs of active resorption of the material could be observed. On the contrary, 31.5% of the space provided by the capsule was filled out with newly formed bone in the control group. The new bone had a trabecular appearance with large marrow spaces filled with hematopoietic and fatty marrow. The rest of the capsule space in the controls appeared empty. Conclusion: OCHS may hamper bone healing when used as an adjunct to GBR. [source] | ||||||||||