|
| ||
|
|
||
Cabin Crew (cabin + crew)
Selected AbstractsCommercial aviation in-flight emergencies and the physicianEMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, Issue 1 2007Robert Cocks Abstract Commercial aviation in-flight emergencies are relatively common, so it is likely that a doctor travelling frequently by air will receive a call for help at some stage in their career. These events are stressful, even for experienced physicians. The present paper reviews what is known about the incidence and types of in-flight emergencies that are likely to be encountered, the international regulations governing medical kits and drugs, and the liability, fitness and indemnity issues facing ,Good Samaritan' medical volunteers. The medical and aviation literature was searched, and information was collated from airlines and other sources regarding medical equipment available on board commercial aircraft. Figures for the incidence of significant in-flight emergencies are approximately 1 per 10,40 000 passengers, with one death occurring per 3,5 million passengers. Medically related diversion of an aircraft following an in-flight emergency may occur in up to 7,13% of cases, but passenger prescreening, online medical advice and on-board medical assistance from volunteers reduce this rate. Medical volunteers may find assisting with an in-flight emergency stressful, but should acknowledge that they play a vital role in successful outcomes. The medico-legal liability risk is extremely small, and various laws and industry indemnity practices offer additional protection to the volunteer. In addition, cabin crew receive training in a number of emergency skills, including automated defibrillation, and are one of several sources of help available to the medical volunteer, who is not expected to work alone. [source] Advantages for passengers and cabin crew of operating a gas-phase adsorption air purifier in 11-h simulated flightsINDOOR AIR, Issue 3 2008P. Strøm-Tejsen First page of article [source] Psychosocial work environment and medical symptoms among Swedish commercial airline cabin crewAMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, Issue 7 2010Kurt Wahlstedt MD Abstract Background Associations between stress measured by the demands-control model, iso-strain model, and stress-related symptoms among cabin crew were studied. Methods A questionnaire about psychosocial work environment and symptoms was answered by 918 (82%) flight attendants, stewards, and pursers at one airline company in 2005. Adjustment was made for age, gender, smoking, job category, and flight length using multiple logistic regression. Results Weekly headaches, concentration difficulties, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms were reported at rates of 18%, 10%, 56%, and 13%, respectively. Pursers scored higher on control than the others and they had lower associations between the strain measured by the demands-control model and symptoms than stewards and flight attendants. All symptoms were more common in the high strain situation than in the low strain (reference). An active situation was related to an excess of symptoms. Low social support in the iso-strain model increased risk of symptoms. Conclusions Demands-control and iso-strain models are useful in studying stress-related symptoms in cabin crews. The dimension of social support adds explanatory value. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:716,723, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||