Bone Crest (bone + crest)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Bone Crest

  • alveolar bone crest
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Orthodontic extrusion of subgingivally fractured incisor before restoration.

    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2005
    A case report: 3-years follow-up
    Abstract,,, Orthodontic forced eruption may be a suitable approach without risking the esthetic appearance in tooth fracture below the gingival attachment or alveolar bone crest. Extrusion of such teeth allows elevating the fracture line above the epithelial attachment and so the proper finishing margins can be prepared. Restoration after orthodontic eruption may present a more conservative treatment choice in young patients compared with the prosthetic restoration after extraction. This case describes a multidisciplinary approach using the orthodontic forced eruption facilitating the composite restoration of a fractured upper permanent central incisor. [source]

    Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 6 2009
    Jürgen Becker
    Abstract Objectives: To investigate the influence of platform switching on crestal bone level changes at non-submerged titanium implants over a period of 6 months. Material and Methods: Titanium implants (n=72) were placed at 0.4 mm above the alveolar crest in the lower jaws of 12 dogs and randomly assigned to either matching or non-matching (circumferential horizontal mismatch of 0.3 mm) healing abutments. At 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, dissected blocks were processed for histomorphometrical analysis. Measurements were made between the implant shoulder (IS) and the apical extension of the long junctional epithelium (aJE), the most coronal level of bone in contact with the implant (CLB), and the level of the alveolar bone crest (BC). Results: At 24 weeks, differences in the mean IS,aJE, IS,CLB, and IS,BC values were 0.2 ± 1.2, 0.3 ± 0.7, and 0.3 ± 0.8 mm at the buccal aspect, and 0.2 ± 0.9, 0.3 ± 0.5, and 0.3 ± 0.8 mm at the lingual aspect, respectively. Comparisons between groups revealed no significant differences at either the buccal or the lingual aspects. Conclusions: It was concluded that (i) bone remodelling was minimal in both groups and (ii) platform switching may not be of crucial importance for maintenance of the crestal bone level. [source]

    An improved cost-effective, reproducible method for evaluation of bone loss in a rodent model

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
    Daniel H. Fine
    Abstract Aim: This study was designed to investigate the utility of two "new" definitions for assessment of bone loss in a rodent model of periodontitis. Material and Methods: Eighteen rats were divided into three groups. Group 1 was infected by Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), group 2 was infected with an Aa leukotoxin knock-out, and group 3 received no Aa (controls). Microbial sampling and antibody titres were determined. Initially, two examiners measured the distance from the cemento-enamel-junction to alveolar bone crest using the three following methods; (1) total area of bone loss by radiograph, (2) linear bone loss by radiograph, (3) a direct visual measurement (DVM) of horizontal bone loss. Two "new" definitions were adopted; (1) any site in infected animals showing bone loss >2 standard deviations above the mean seen at that site in control animals was recorded as bone loss, (2) any animal with two or more sites in any quadrant affected by bone loss was considered as diseased. Results: Using the "new" definitions both evaluators independently found that infected animals had significantly more disease than controls (DVM system; p<0.05). Conclusions: The DVM method provides a simple, cost effective, and reproducible method for studying periodontal disease in rodents. [source]

    Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 12 2007
    Jürgen Becker
    Abstract Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate histomorphometrically the influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged wide-body titanium implants in a dog model. Material and Methods: One-stage insertion of sand-blasted and acid-etched screw-type implants with either matching (CAM) or smaller-diameter healing abutments (CPS) were randomly assigned to the lower jaws of nine beagle dogs. The animals were killed after 7, 14, and 28 days of non-submerged healing. Dissected blocks were processed for histomorphometrical analysis. Measurements were made between the implant shoulder (IS) and: , the apical extension of the long junctional epithelium (aJE), , the most coronal level of bone in contact with the implant (CLB), and , the level of the alveolar bone crest (BC). Results: At 7, 14, and 28 days, the mean IS,aJE values were significantly the lowest at CPS implants. However, after 28 days of healing, both groups revealed significantly increased mean IS,BC values at the buccal aspect of the alveolar bone. The difference in IS,CLB and IS,BC between groups was not significant. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that both CAM and CPS implants revealed crestal bone-level changes after 28 days of healing. [source]

    Cervical sympathectomy causes alveolar bone loss in an experimental rat model

    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, Issue 6 2009
    Y. Kim
    Background and Objective:, Periodontal disease, a pathological destructive inflammatory condition, is characterized by alveolar bone loss. Recent studies have suggested a correlation between the sympathetic nervous system and bone remodeling. To confirm the importance of the sympathetic nervous system in bone resorption, we investigated the effects of superior cervical ganglionectomy and oral challenge with Porphyromonas gingivalis on alveolar bone loss in rats. Material and Methods:, Rats were divided into three groups: group A underwent a sham operation as the control group; group B underwent superior cervical ganglionectomy; and group C underwent a sham operation and oral challenge with P. gingivalis. Horizontal alveolar bone loss was evaluated by measuring the distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the alveolar bone crest. Cytokine gene expression in the gingival tissues was assessed using reverse transcription,polymerase chain reaction analyses. The furcation areas of the mandibular molars were examined histologically. Results:, Both superior cervical ganglionectomy and oral challenge with P. gingivalis resulted in accelerated alveolar bone loss. Gingival tissues in the superior cervical ganglionectomy group showed increased expression of the cytokines interleukin-1alfa, tumor necrosis factor-alfa and interleukin-6. The density of neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive fibers was decreased following superior cervical ganglionectomy. Osteoclasts were observed in the superior cervical ganglionectomy and P. gingivalis- challenged groups. Conclusion:, Both superior cervical ganglionectomy and oral challenge with P. gingivalis induced alveolar bone loss. These results provide new information on the occurrence of alveolar bone loss, in that both oral challenge with P. gingivalis and superior cervical ganglionectomy are important accelerating factors for alveolar bone loss. Thus, we suggest that the sympathetic nervous system is linked with the prevention of alveolar bone loss. [source]

    Subcrestal placement of two-part implants

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2009
    Maria Welander
    Abstract Objective: The aim of the present experiment was to study the healing around two-part implants that were placed in a subcrestal position. Material and methods: Five mongrel dogs, about 2 years old, were included. The mandibular premolars and the first, second and third maxillary premolars were extracted. Three months later two test and two control implants (OsseoSpeedÔ, 3.5 mm × 8 mm) were placed in one side of the mandible. The implants were placed in such a way that the implant margin was located 2 mm apical to the bone crest. In the test implants, the surface modification extended to the implant margin and, thus, included the shoulder part of the implant. Regular abutments with a turned surface (ZebraÔ) were connected to the control implants, while experimental abutments with a modified surface (TiOblastÔ) were connected to the test implants. A plaque control program that included cleaning of implants and teeth every second day was initiated. Four months later the dogs were euthanized and biopsies were obtained and prepared for histological analysis. Results: The marginal bone level at the test implants was identified in a more coronal position than that at the control implants. In 40% of the test implants, the bone-to-implant contact extended coronal of the abutment/fixture (A/F) border, i.e. in contact with the abutment part of the implant. The connective tissue portion of the peri-implant mucosa that was facing the test abutments contained a higher density of collagen and a smaller proportion of fibroblasts than that at the control sites. Conclusion: It is suggested that osseointegration may occur coronal to the A/F interface of two-part implants. Such a result, however, appears to depend on the surface characteristics of the implant components. [source]

    Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 6 2006
    Mauricio G. Araújo
    Abstract Objective: To determine whether the reduction of the alveolar ridge that occurs following tooth extraction and implant placement is influenced by the size of the hard tissue walls of the socket. Material and methods: Six beagle dogs were used. The third premolar and first molar in both quadrants of the mandible were used. Mucoperiostal flaps were elevated and the distal roots were removed. Implants were installed in the fresh extraction socket in one side of the mandible. The flaps were replaced to allow a semi-submerged healing. The procedure was repeated in the contra later side of the mandible after 2 months. The animals were sacrificed 1 month after the final implant installation. The mandibles were dissected, and each implant site was removed and processed for ground sectioning. Results: Marked hard tissue alterations occurred during healing following tooth extraction and implant installation in the socket. The marginal gap that was present between the implant and the walls of the socket at implantation disappeared as a result of bone fill and resorption of the bone crest. The modeling in the marginal defect region was accompanied by marked attenuation of the dimensions of both the delicate buccal and the wider lingual bone wall. Bone loss at molar sites was more pronounced than at the premolar locations. Conclusion: Implant placement failed to preserve the hard tissue dimension of the ridge following tooth extraction. The buccal as well as the lingual bone walls were resorbed. At the buccal aspect, this resulted in some marginal loss of osseointegration. [source]

    Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 6 2006
    Mauricio G. Araújo
    Abstract Objective: To study whether osseointegration once established following implant placement in a fresh extraction socket may be lost as a result of tissue modeling. Material and methods: Seven beagle dogs were used. The third and fourth premolars in both quadrants of the mandible were used as experimental teeth. Buccal and lingual full-thickness flaps were elevated and distal roots were removed. Implants were installed in the fresh extraction socket. Semi-submerged healing of the implant sites was allowed. In five dogs, the experimental procedure was first performed in the right side of the mandible and 2 months later in the left mandible. These five animals were sacrificed 1 month after the final implant installation. In two dogs, the premolar sites on both sides of the mandible were treated in one surgical session and biopsies were obtained immediately after implant placement. All biopsies were processed for ground sectioning and stained. Results: The void that existed between the implant and the socket walls at surgery was filled at 4 weeks with woven bone that made contact with the SLA surface. In this interval, (i) the buccal and lingual bone walls underwent marked surface resorption and (ii) the height of the thin buccal hard tissue wall was reduced. The process of healing continued, and the buccal bone crest shifted further in the apical direction. After 12 weeks, the buccal crest was located>2 mm apical of the marginal border of the SLA surface. Conclusion: The bone-to-implant contact that was established during the early phase of socket healing following implant installation was in part lost when the buccal bone wall underwent continued resorption. [source]

    Influence of preimplant surgical intervention and implant placement on bone wound healing

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 5 2003
    Christer Slotte
    Abstract: The aims of the present investigation were to study (1) the influence of preimplant (4 weeks) surgical intervention and (2) the influence of the implant placement per se on bone density and mineralized bone,implant contact (BIC) at implant sites in the rabbit jawbone. The experiment was performed in the edentulous area of the maxillas of 16 adult rabbits. In eight rabbits, the alveolar bone on the left side (test) was surgically exposed and a groove was prepared in the bone crest. Trabecular bone and marrow tissue were removed, and a bioabsorbable barrier membrane was placed to cover the groove. The right side underwent no treatment and served as the control. Four weeks later, a screw-shaped titanium implant was placed transversally through the maxilla, penetrating both the test and the control areas. After another 4 weeks of healing, the animals were killed to obtain ground sections for histomorphometry. Untreated jaws from eight rabbits served as reference specimens. In the rabbits subjected to surgery, the areas (mm2) of both mineralized bone and marrow tissue were similar for test and control (4.9 ± 1.7 vs. 5.1 ± 2.2 and 6.3 ± 5.7 vs. 6.8 ± 5.7 for bone and marrow, respectively). The BIC (%) for all threads was significantly lower on the test side than on the control side (32.1 ± 27.7 vs. 47.7 ± 20.3). The bone density (%) of the total experimental area was similar for test and control (48.5 ± 12.1 vs. 46.5 ± 9.3), as was the bone density in the area within the implant thread valleys and their mirror areas (43.0 ± 13.9 vs. 41.3 ± 13.5, and 40.2 ± 11.0 vs. 40.3 ± 7.2 for thread area and mirror area, respectively). The bone density of the total experimental area in the untreated rabbits was 35.9 ± 5.2%. This value was significantly lower than the values in the total experimental areas (test and control) of the surgically treated rabbits. Similarly, the density of the reference area in the untreated rabbits was 25.4 ± 5.3%, which was also significantly lower than the bone density of the periimplant area of the surgically treated rabbits. We conclude that the surgical trauma caused by the placement of implants in the maxilla of rabbits significantly enhanced the bone density of the implant sites. Surgical intervention in the implant sites 4 weeks prior to the implant placements, however, did not further enhance bone density or BIC. Résumé Les buts de cette étude ont été d'étudier 1) l'influence d'une intervention chirurgicale préimplantaire (4 semaines) et 2) l'influence du placement de l'implant per se sur la densité osseuse et le contact implant-os minéralisé (BIC). Cette expérience a été effectuée dans la région édentée du maxillaire de seize lapins adultes. Chez huit lapins, l'os alvéolaire du côté gauche (test) était chirurgicalement exposé et une marque a été faite dans la crête osseuse. L'os trabéculaire et le tissu spongieux ont été enlevés et une membrane biorésorbable a été placée pour couvrir ce trou. Le côté droit ne subissait aucun traitement et a servi de contrôle. Quatre semaines après, un implant en titane vis a été placé transversalement à travers le maxillaire pénétrant tant la zone test que contrôle. Après quatre semaines de guérison les animaux ont été tués pour obtenir des coupes pour l'histomorphométrie. Les mâchoires non-traitées de huit lapins ont servi de spécimens de référence. Chez les lapins soumis à la chirugie les zones d'os minéralisé et de tissu spongieux étaient semblables pour le test et le contrôle (respectivement 4,9±1,7 mm2 vs 5,1±2,2 mm2 et 6,3±5,7 mm2 vs 6,8±5,7mm2). Les BIC pour tous les filetages étaient significativement moins importants au niveau des tests que des contrôles (32,1±27,7% vs 47,7±20,3%). La densité osseuse du total de l'aire expérimentale était semblable pour les tests et les contrôles (48,5±12,1%vs 46,3±9,3%) comme l'était la densité osseuse dans la zone à l'intérieur du filetage de l'implant et de leurs aires mineures (43,0±13,9%vs 41,3±13,5% pour les filetages et 40,2±11,0% vs40,3±7,2% pour les aires mineures). La densité osseuse de l'aire expérimentale totale chez les lapins nont-traités était de 35,9 ±5,2%. Cette valeur était significativement inférieure à celles dans les aires expérimentales totales (tests et contrôles) des lapins traités chirurgicalement. Parallèlement, la densité de l'aire de référence des lapins non-traités était de 25,4±5,3% c.-à-d. inférieure à la densité osseuse de la zone paroïmplantaire des lapins traités chirurgicalement. Le trauma chirurgical causé par le placement d'implants dans le maxillaire de lapins augmente significativement la densité osseuse au niveau des sites implantaires. L'intervention chirurgicale des sites à implanter quatre semaines avant le placement des implants n'avait cependant augmenté ni la densité osseuse ni le BIC. Zussammenfassung Der Einfluss eines praeimplantären chirurgischen Eingriffes und der Implantation per se auf die Heilung der Knochenwunde. Eine Studie am Kieferknochen des Kaninchens. Ziel: Das Ziel dieser Studie war es 1) den Einfluss eines praeimplantären chirurgischen Eingriffes (4 Wochen vorher) und 2) den Einfluss der Implantation per se auf die Knochendichte und den mineralisierten Knochen-Implantatkontakt (BIC) an einer Implantationsstelle im Kieferknochen des Kaninchens zu untersuchen. Material und Methode: Die Testregion war der zahnlose Oberkieferabschnitt von 16 ausgewachsenen Kaninchen. Bei 8 Kaninchen wurde der Alveolarknochen der linken Seite (Test) chirurgisch freigelegt und eine Vertiefungen in den Knochenkortex präpariert. Dann entfernte man den trabekulären Knochen und das Knochenmark und deckte die Vertiefung mit einer bioresorbierbaren Membran ab. Die rechte Seite wurde unbehandelt belassen und diente als Kontrolle. Vier Wochen später implantierte man ein schraubenförmiges Titanimplantat transversal durch die Maxilla, so dass es Test- oder Kontrollregion durchdrang. Nach einer Heilphase von weiteren vier Wochen wurden die Tiere geopfert und von der zu untersuchenden Region Grundschnitte für die Histologie hergestellt. Als Referenz dienten unbehandelte (jungfräuliche) Kiefer von weiteren 8 Kaninchen. Resultate: Bei den Kaninchen, welche die oben beschriebenen chirurgischen Schritte durchlaufen haben, waren sowohl bei der Test- wie auch bei der Kontrollgruppe die Fläche von mineralisiertem Knochen und Knochenmark (in mm2) ähnlich gross (4.9+1.7 gegenüber 5.1+2.2 beim Knochen und 6.3+5.7 gegenüber 6.8+5.7 beim Knochenmark). Der BIC (%) war in allen Schraubenwindungen auf der Testseite signifikant tiefer als auf der Kontrollseite (32.1+27.7 gegenüber 47.7+20.3). Die Knochendichte (%) war in der untersuchten Region bei der Test- und Kontrollseite etwa gleich gross (48.5+12.1 gegenüber 46.5+9.3) wie die Knochendichte in den Vertiefungen der Schraubenwindungen und ihrer spiegelbildlichen Regionen (43.0+13.9 gegenüber 41.3+13.5 in den Schraubenwindungen und 40.2+11.0 gegenüber 40.3+7.2 in den spiegelbildlichen Regionen). Die Knochendichte in der gesamten Region der unbehandelten (jungfräulichen) Kaninchen betrug 35.9+5.2%. Dieser Wert war signifikant tiefer als die Werte der gesamten untersuchten Region der chirurgisch behandelten Kaninchen (Test- und Kontrollseite). Ganz ähnlich war die Dichte in der Referenzregion der unbehandelten Kaninchen 25.4+5.3%, ein Wert der auch signifikant tiefer war als die Knochendichte in der periimplantären Region von chirurgisch behandelten Kaninchen. Zusammenfassung: Das chirurgische Trauma, das beim Setzen eines Implantates im Oberkiefer von Kaninchen entsteht, begünstigt die Knochendichte an den Stellen der Implantate signifikant. Der chirurgischen Eingriff vier Wochen vor der Implantation jedoch, förderte an den zur Implantation vorgesehenen Stellen weder Knochendichte noch BIC. Resumen Objetivos: La intención de la presente investigación fue estudiar 1) la influencia de la intervención quirúrgica (4 semanas) periimplantaria y 2) la influencia de la colocación de implantes per se en la densidad ósea y el contacto del hueso mineralizado al implante (BIC) en los lugares de implante en el hueso mandibular del conejo. Material y métodos: El experimento se realizó en el área edéntula del maxilar de 16 conejos adultos. Se expuso quirúrgicamente el hueso alveolar en el lado izquierdo (test) de 8 conejos y se preparó un hueco en la cresta ósea. Se retiró el hueso trabecular y el tejido de médula ósea, colocándose una membrana de barrera biorreabsorbible para cubrir el hueco. El lado derecho no sufrió ningún tratamiento y sirvió de control. Cuatro semanas mas tarde, se colocó un implante de forma roscada transversalmente a través del maxilar, penetrando las áreas de prueba y de control. Tras otras 4 semanas de cicatrización, los animales se sacrificaron para obtener cortes histológicos para histomorfometría. Las mandíbulas sin tratar de los 8 conejos sirvieron como especímenes de referencia. Resultados: En los conejos sometidos a cirugía las áreas (mm2) del hueso mineralizado y del tejido medular fueron similares para la prueba y el control (4.9 ± 1.7 vs. 5.1 ± 2.2 y 6.3 ± 5.7 vs. 6.8 ± 5.7, hueso y médula respectivamente). El BIC (%) para todas las roscas fue significativamente mas bajo en el lado de prueba que en el de control (32.1 ± 27.7 vs. 47.7 ± 20.3). La densidad de ósea (%) de toda el área experimental fue similar para la prueba y el control (48.5 ± 12.1 vs. 46.5 ± 9.3) así como la densidad ósea en el área en los valles entre las roscas y en su área espejo (43.0 ± 13.9 vs. 41.3 ± 13.5, y 40.2 ± 11.0 vs. 40.3 ± 7.2, área de roscas y área espejo respectivamente). La densidad ósea en el área total experimental en los conejos no tratados (vírgenes) fue del 35.9 ± 5.2%. Este valor fue significativamente mas bajo que los valores en el total de las áreas experimentales (test y control) de los conejos tratados quirúrgicamente. Del mismo modo, la densidad del área de referencia de los conejos no tratados fue de 25.4 ± 5.3%, que también fue significativamente mas baja que la densidad ósea del área periimplantaria de los conejos tratados quirúrgicamente. Conclusión: El trauma quirúrgico causado por la colocación de implantes en el maxilar de conejos estimuló significativamente la densidad ósea de los lugares de implantes. Sin embargo, la intervención quirúrgica de los lugares de implantes 4 semanas antes de la colocación de los implantes no estimuló mas la densidad ósea o el BIC. [source]

    Dog model for study of supracrestal bone apposition around partially inserted implants

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 5 2002
    Ann-Marie Roos-Jansåker
    Abstract: A dog model for study of supracrestal bone growth around partially inserted implants is described. The mandibular premolar teeth (P1, P2, P3 and P4) were extracted on both sides of the mandible in four dogs. At a surgical exposure 12 weeks later, two 10 mm titanium implants were partially inserted on each side, 15 mm apart, in the areas of the P1 and the P3 so that five threads protruded from the bone crest. A titanium mesh was fastened to the coronal aspect of the two fixtures and covered with an ePTFE membrane. Thus, a space for potential bone formation was created between the two implants. The surgical flaps were coronally positioned and secured with vertical mattress sutures. After 12 weeks of healing, biopsy specimens were retrieved and examined histologically. In three of the four dogs under study, the partially inserted implants had integrated and the intended large wound spaces had been created around the noninserted parts of the implants. However, bone was not formed around the protruding implants. Accordingly, this experimental model may prove useful for future studies on the use of various procedures that hypothetically may enhance bone formation. [source]