|
| ||
|
|
||
Blood Glucose Profiles (blood + glucose_profile)
Selected AbstractsA method for assessing quality of control from glucose profilesDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2007N. R. Hill Abstract Aim As the practice of multiple assessments of glucose concentration throughout the day increases for people with diabetes, there is a need for an assessment of glycaemic control weighted for the clinical risks of both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Methods We have developed a methodology to report the degree of risk which a glycaemic profile represents. Fifty diabetes professionals assigned risk values to a range of 40 blood glucose concentrations. Their responses were summarised and a generic function of glycaemic risk was derived. This function was applied to patient glucose profiles to generate an integrated risk score termed the Glycaemic Risk Assessment Diabetes Equation (GRADE). The GRADE score was then reported by use of the mean value and the relative percent contribution to the weighted risk score from the hypoglycaemic, euglycaemic, hyperglycaemic range, respectively, e.g. GRADE (hypoglycaemia%, euglycaemia%, hyperglycaemia%). Results The GRADE scores of indicative glucose profiles were as follows: continuous glucose monitoring profile non-diabetic subjects GRADE = 1.1, Type 1 diabetes continuous glucose monitoring GRADE = 8.09 (20%, 8%, 72%), Type 2 diabetes home blood glucose monitoring GRADE = 9.97 (2%, 7%, 91%). Conclusions The GRADE score of a glucose profile summarises the degree of risk associated with a glucose profile. Values < 5 correspond to euglycaemia. The GRADE score is simple to generate from any blood glucose profile and can be used as an adjunct to HbA1c to report the degree of risk associated with glycaemic variability. [source] Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trialDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 11 2000P. D. Home SUMMARY Aims To compare the efficacy of insulin aspart, a rapid-acting insulin analogue, with that of unmodified human insulin on long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Methods Prospective, multi-centre, randomized, open-labelled, parallel-group trial lasting 6 months in 88 centres in eight European countries and including 1070 adult subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Study patients were randomized 2:1 to insulin aspart or unmodified human insulin before main meals, with NPH-insulin as basal insulin. Main outcome measures were blood glucose control as assessed by HbA1c, eight-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, insulin dose, quality of life, hypoglycaemia, and adverse events. Results After 6 months, insulin aspart was superior to human insulin with respect to HbA1c with a baseline-adjusted difference in HbA1c of 0.12 (95% confidence interval 0.03,0.22) %Hb, P < 0.02. Eight-point blood glucose profiles showed lower post-prandial glucose levels (mean baseline-adjusted ,0.6 to ,1.2 mmol/l, P < 0.01) after all main meals, but higher pre-prandial glucose levels before breakfast and dinner (0.7,0.8 mmol/l, P < 0.01) with insulin aspart. Satisfaction with treatment was significantly better in patients treated with insulin aspart (WHO Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) baseline-adjusted difference 2.3 (1.2,3.3) points, P < 0.001). The relative risk of experiencing a major hypoglycaemic episode with insulin aspart compared to human insulin was 0.83 (0.59,1.18, NS). Major night hypoglycaemic events requiring parenteral treatment were less with insulin aspart (1.3 vs. 3.4% of patients, P < 0.05), as were late post-prandial (4,6 h) events (1.8 vs. 5.0% of patients, P < 0.005). Conclusions These results show small but useful advantage for the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin aspart as a tool to improve long-term blood glucose control, hypoglycaemia, and quality of life, in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. [source] The Effect of Metformin in Overweight Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Poor Metabolic ControlBASIC AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, Issue 3 2009Iben Brock Jacobsen Double-blinded intervention with 2000 mg metformin or placebo daily in 24 type 1 diabetic patients as adjunct to intensive insulin therapy. Primary endpoint was HbA1c, while secondary endpoints were body weight, frequency of hypoglycaemia, blood pressure, lipids, insulin dosage and self-monitored blood glucose profiles were measured. After 24 weeks, no difference in HbA1c was seen between the metformin and placebo groups (,0.5 ± 0.3 vs. ,0.2 ± 0.2%, P = 0.26. , mean ± S.E.M). Mean diurnal blood glucose profiles showed no statistical significant difference between the groups. The total daily insulin dose (IU) was significantly reduced in the metformin group compared to placebo after 24 weeks (,5.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.9 ± 1.7, P = 0.004. , mean ± S.E.M). An increase in the frequency of hypoglycaemia was seen in the metformin group (0.7 ± 0.9 vs. 0.3 ± 0.5 events patient,1 week,1, P = 0.005), and a reduction in body weight was found using metformin compared to placebo (,3.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.8 ± 1.1, P = 0.02. , mean ± S.E.M). Lipids and blood pressure did not differ significantly after intervention. Metformin, as adjunct to intensive insulin therapy, was associated with a reduction in the total daily insulin dose and a significant weight loss in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. [source] Effect of the urotensin-II receptor antagonist palosuran on secretion of and sensitivity to insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitusBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2009Patricia N. Sidharta WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT , Urotensin-II (U-II) is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors identified thus far. , Although differences in both U-II blood levels and U-II receptor (UT-receptor) expression have been observed in patients with cardiovascular and cardiorenal disease, the precise function in humans has not been elucidated. , U-II and its receptor have been reported to be involved in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance, which can lead to the development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. , In rat models of diabetes, palosuran, a selective, potent antagonist of the human UT-receptor, improved several disease markers. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS , In this study in diabetic patients, the effects of palosuran on insulin secretion and sensitivity were investigated using a hyperglycaemic glucose clamp and a meal tolerance test and daily glucose levels were also studied. , Although no obvious beneficial effect of palosuran in this patient population was observed, the study contributes to providing more insight inro the human U-II/UT-receptor system. AIMS To investigate the effects of palosuran, a nonpeptidic, potent and selective antagonist of the urotensin-II receptor, on insulin and glucose regulation in 20 diet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, proof-of-concept study. METHODS After 4 weeks' oral treatment with 125 mg palosuran or placebo b.i.d., effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity and blood glucose levels were assessed by means of a hyperglycaemic glucose clamp, meal tolerance test, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance score, and daily self-monitoring of blood glucose. Plasma concentrations of palosuran were determined for 12 h on the last day of intake. RESULTS Palosuran did not affect second-phase insulin response (primary end-point) during the hyperglycaemic glucose clamp in comparison with placebo [paired difference of ,1.8 µU ml,1, 95% confidence interval (CI) ,7.8, 4.2]. Likewise, no effects of palosuran were detected on the first-phase insulin response, or on insulin secretion and blood glucose levels during the meal tolerance test or on homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance score. No clinically significant effects on daily blood glucose profiles were observed during the study. Geometric mean Cmax and AUC, (95% CI) and median tmax (range) in this patient population were 180 ng ml,1 (125, 260), 581 ng·h ml,1 (422, 800) and 3.0 h (0.67, 4.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that antagonism of the urotensin-II system does not influence insulin secretion or sensitivity or daily blood glucose levels in diet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. [source] | ||||||||||