| |||
Bifurcation Stenting (bifurcation + stenting)
Selected AbstractsPresent Status of Coronary Bifurcation StentingCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2008Rishi Sukhija M.D. Abstract Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions is technically limited by the risk of side branch occlusion. In comparison with nonbifurcation interventions, bifurcation interventions have a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs and a higher rate of clinical and angiographic restenosis. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has resulted in reduced incidence of main vessel restenosis compared with historical controls. However, side-branch ostial residual stenosis and long-term restenosis still remain problematic. In the era of DES, techniques employing two stents have emerged that allow stenting of the large side branch in addition to the main artery. Stenting of the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach. This paper reviews outcome data with different treatment modalities for this complex lesion with particular emphasis on the use of DES as well as potential new therapeutic approaches. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] Bifurcation stenting with drug eluting stents: Illustration of the crush techniqueCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 6 2006Georgios Sianos MD Abstract A number of percutaneous stenting techniques have been proposed for optimal treatment of bifurcation lesions. However, to date the most favorable interventional approach still remains controversial, since bifurcation lesions are associated with high procedural complication and restenosis rates. In the era of drug-eluting stents, crush stenting technique simplified the procedure, concurrently allowing full lesion coverage. The purpose of the present report is to review three cases treated with crush stenting and to describe in detail the technique and its variations. © 2006 Wiley-Liss., Inc. [source] Editorial: At the Bifurcation of the Last FrontiersJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2010THACH NGUYEN M.D. The concept of coronary angioplasty percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was pioneered by Andreas Gruntzig. Since then, several modifications, innovative devices, techniques, and advances have revolutionized the practice of interventional cardiology. Coronary bifurcation and chronic total occlusion are the last two frontiers that continue to challenge the skills of the interventional cardiologists. Proceedings of the second Bifurcation Summit held from November 26 to 28, 2009 in Nanjing, China are published in this symposium. In a general review, the state of the art in management of bifurcation lesion is summarized in the statement of the "Bifurcation Club in KOKURA." A new-presented concept was the "extension distance" between the main vessel and the sidebranch ostia and its association with restenosis. The results of two studies on shear stress (SS) after PCI showed that contradictory lower SS after stenting was associated with lower in-stent restenosis. There was better fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush technique than provisional one-stent technique. There was also lower rate of stent thrombosis after bifurcation stenting with excellent final angiographic results. In a negative note, the SYNTAX score had no predictive values on trifurcated left main stenting. In summary, different aspects of percutaneous management for bifurcated lesion are described seen from different perspectives and evidenced by novel techniques and strategies. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:293,294) [source] Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions: A Rational ApproachJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 6 2001FSCAI, THIERRY LEFÈVRE M.D. The occurrence of stenosis in or next to coronary bifurcations is relatively frequent and generally underestimated. In our experience, such lesions account for 15%,18% of all percutaneous coronary intervention > (PCI). The main reasons for this are (1) the coronary arteries are like the branches of a tree with many ramifications and (2) because of axial plaque redistribution, especially after stent implantation, PCI of lesions located next to a coronary bifurcation almost inevitably cause plaque shifting in the side branches. PCI treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging. Balloon dilatation treatment used to be associated with less than satisfactory immediate results, a high complication rate, and an unacceptable restenosis rate. The kissing balloon technique resulted in improved, though suboptimal, outcomes. Several approaches were then suggested, like rotative or directional atherectomy, but these techniques did not translate into significantly enhanced results. With the advent of second generation stents, in 1996, the authors decided to set up an observational study on coronary bifurcation stenting combined with a bench test of the various stents available. Over the last 5 years, techniques, strategies, and stent design have improved. As a result, the authors have been able to define a rational approach to coronary bifurcation stenting. This bench study analyzed the behavior of stents and allowed stents to be discarded that are not compatible with the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Most importantly, this study revealed that stent deformation due to the opening of a strut is a constant phenomenon that must be corrected by kissing balloon inflation. Moreover, it was observed that the opening of a stent strut into a side branch could permit the stenting, at least partly, of the side branch ostium. This resulted in the provocative concept of "stenting both branches with a single stent." Therefore, a simple approach is currently implemented in the majority of cases: stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch, The technique consists of inserting a guidewire in each coronary branch. A stent is then positioned in the main branch with a wire being "jailed" in the side branch. The wires are then exchanged, starting with the main branch wire that is passed through the stent struts into the side branch. After opening the stent struts in the side branch, kissing balloon inflation is performed. A second stent is deployed in the side branch in the presence of suboptimal results only. Over the last 2 years, this technique has been associated with a 98% angiographic success rate in both branches. Two stents are used in 30%,35% of cases and final kissing balloon inflation is performed in > 95% of cases. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate is around 5% and 7-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) is 13%. Several stents specifically designed for coronary bifurcation lesions are currently being investigated. The objective is to simplify the approach for all users. In the near future, the use of drug-eluting stents should reduce the risk of restenosis. [source] |