Bifurcation Lesions (bifurcation + lesion)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Bifurcation Lesions

  • coronary bifurcation lesion


  • Selected Abstracts


    A New Stent Design for the Treatment of True Bifurcation Lesions: H-Side Branch Stents

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010
    MYEONG-KI HONG M.D.
    Background:There has been much debate for the adequate treatment strategies for true bifurcation lesions. The purpose of this study is to introduce and test a novel stent design for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Methods:This side branch stent is composed of three parts: proximal, connecting, and distal parts. The distal part for the side branch vessel has a slope-side stent margin for circumferential coverage of the ostium and one radio-opaque marker for targeting the carina. The proximal part with two radio-opaque markers operates for safe stent delivery and useful guidance for a more precise placement of the distal part on the side branch ostium. Results of the in vitro test in the acrylic resin-made bifurcation phantom model were evaluated with microcomputer tomography. Animal experiments with this new stent platform were also performed in five pigs. Results:In vitro test and microcomputer tomography showed complete coverage of the side branch ostium circumferentially with stent struts, and the absence of stent struts in the main vessel above the side branch ostium level. This side branch stents were successfully deployed in all 5 pigs. The results of animal experiments were also similar to those of in vitro tests. Conclusions:In vivo and vitro tests demonstrated the effective modality of this side branch stent for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:54,59) [source]


    Physiologic Evaluation of Bifurcation Lesions Using Fractional Flow Reserve

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
    BON-KWON KOO M.D., Ph.D.
    Functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions is more difficult than usual lesions due to their complex anatomy. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound criteria for main branch intervention cannot be directly applied to side branch lesions due to the difference in underlying lesion characteristics, geometric changes during intervention, and the size of myocardial territory. Fractional flow reserve is a physiologic parameter which reflects both the degree of stenosis and the area of perfusion supplied by a specific coronary artery. The present review will focus on using fractional flow reserve in bifurcation lesions. [source]


    Immediate and 3-Month Follow-Up Outcome After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Bifurcation Lesions

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
    HIDEO TAKEBAYASHI M.D.
    Balloon angioplasty of a bifurcation lesion is associated with lower rates of success and higher rates of complications than such treatment of lesions of most other morphologies. To date, the best device or procedure for bifurcation lesions has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and 3-month follow-up outcome of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We treated 87 consecutive bifurcation lesions with CBA (n = 50) or PTCA (n = 37). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and angiographic follow-up was achieved for 93% of the lesions. The procedural success was 92% in the CBA group and 76% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two lesions in the CBA group and six in the PTCA group (P = 0.05). The incidence of bail-out stenting in the CBA group was lower than in the conventional PTCA (8% vs 24%, P < 0.05). At the 3-month follow-up, the restenosis rate was 40% in the CBA group versus 67% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, in comparison with PTCA, procedural success was greater and the restenosis rate lower with CBA. The results of this study support the use of the cutting balloon as optimal treatment for bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2004;17:1,7) [source]


    Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions: A Rational Approach

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 6 2001
    FSCAI, THIERRY LEFÈVRE M.D.
    The occurrence of stenosis in or next to coronary bifurcations is relatively frequent and generally underestimated. In our experience, such lesions account for 15%,18% of all percutaneous coronary intervention > (PCI). The main reasons for this are (1) the coronary arteries are like the branches of a tree with many ramifications and (2) because of axial plaque redistribution, especially after stent implantation, PCI of lesions located next to a coronary bifurcation almost inevitably cause plaque shifting in the side branches. PCI treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging. Balloon dilatation treatment used to be associated with less than satisfactory immediate results, a high complication rate, and an unacceptable restenosis rate. The kissing balloon technique resulted in improved, though suboptimal, outcomes. Several approaches were then suggested, like rotative or directional atherectomy, but these techniques did not translate into significantly enhanced results. With the advent of second generation stents, in 1996, the authors decided to set up an observational study on coronary bifurcation stenting combined with a bench test of the various stents available. Over the last 5 years, techniques, strategies, and stent design have improved. As a result, the authors have been able to define a rational approach to coronary bifurcation stenting. This bench study analyzed the behavior of stents and allowed stents to be discarded that are not compatible with the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Most importantly, this study revealed that stent deformation due to the opening of a strut is a constant phenomenon that must be corrected by kissing balloon inflation. Moreover, it was observed that the opening of a stent strut into a side branch could permit the stenting, at least partly, of the side branch ostium. This resulted in the provocative concept of "stenting both branches with a single stent." Therefore, a simple approach is currently implemented in the majority of cases: stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch, The technique consists of inserting a guidewire in each coronary branch. A stent is then positioned in the main branch with a wire being "jailed" in the side branch. The wires are then exchanged, starting with the main branch wire that is passed through the stent struts into the side branch. After opening the stent struts in the side branch, kissing balloon inflation is performed. A second stent is deployed in the side branch in the presence of suboptimal results only. Over the last 2 years, this technique has been associated with a 98% angiographic success rate in both branches. Two stents are used in 30%,35% of cases and final kissing balloon inflation is performed in > 95% of cases. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate is around 5% and 7-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) is 13%. Several stents specifically designed for coronary bifurcation lesions are currently being investigated. The objective is to simplify the approach for all users. In the near future, the use of drug-eluting stents should reduce the risk of restenosis. [source]


    Bifurcation lesion treated with a single stent: A new technique

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2005
    Deniz Kumbasar MD
    Abstract Treatment of bifurcation lesions by percutaneous coronary interventions is one of the challenging issues for the interventional cardiologists. The overall complication rate is higher than nonbifurcation lesions. We describe a new stenting technique for the so-called true bifurcation lesions. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Editorial: At the Bifurcation of the Last Frontiers

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2010
    THACH NGUYEN M.D.
    The concept of coronary angioplasty percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was pioneered by Andreas Gruntzig. Since then, several modifications, innovative devices, techniques, and advances have revolutionized the practice of interventional cardiology. Coronary bifurcation and chronic total occlusion are the last two frontiers that continue to challenge the skills of the interventional cardiologists. Proceedings of the second Bifurcation Summit held from November 26 to 28, 2009 in Nanjing, China are published in this symposium. In a general review, the state of the art in management of bifurcation lesion is summarized in the statement of the "Bifurcation Club in KOKURA." A new-presented concept was the "extension distance" between the main vessel and the sidebranch ostia and its association with restenosis. The results of two studies on shear stress (SS) after PCI showed that contradictory lower SS after stenting was associated with lower in-stent restenosis. There was better fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush technique than provisional one-stent technique. There was also lower rate of stent thrombosis after bifurcation stenting with excellent final angiographic results. In a negative note, the SYNTAX score had no predictive values on trifurcated left main stenting. In summary, different aspects of percutaneous management for bifurcated lesion are described seen from different perspectives and evidenced by novel techniques and strategies. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:293,294) [source]


    Recent Perspective on Coronary Bifurcation Intervention: Statement of the "Bifurcation Club in KOKURA"

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2010
    YOSHINOBU MURASATO M.D.
    The treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion remains a challenging issue even in the drug-eluting stent era. Frequent restenosis and stent thrombosis have been recently shown to be related not only to geometrical gap or stent structural deformation but also to rheological disturbance. Low wall shear stress at the lateral side of the bifurcation is likely to cause atherosclerotic changes due to easy access of the macrophages that induce chemical mediators. The turbulent flow over stent metal may facilitate accumulation of platelets, which results in thrombosis. The jailed strut and excess metal overlap may increase these risks. Since dramatic changes of the coronary flow pattern at the bifurcation are closely related to the genesis of atherosclerosis, future bifurcation intervention technique should be considered to restore the original physiological state as well as the anatomical structure. This article summarizes the global consensus of the members of the Asian Bifurcation Club and European Bifurcation Club at the KOKURA meeting. It also provides a perspective of basic sciences relating to bifurcation anatomy, physiology, and pathology, in the search for a best strategy for bifurcation intervention. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:295,304) [source]


    Perspective on Bifurcation PCI

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
    SHAO-LIANG CHEN M.D.
    Coronary bifurcation lesion is a complex lesion with suboptimal angiographic and clinical results. There has been no satisfactory classification of the lesion that can guide selection of strategies and predict short- and long-term outcomes. The difference between left main (LM) bifurcation lesions and non-LM bifurcation is striking. So many stenting strategies have been proposed and tried in trials. They include the V, T, Y, one-stent, two-stent, crush, mini-crush, DK, and SKS techniques. However, because these techniques are time and labor intensive, dedicated bifurcated stents have been invented and trialed in humans. This review presents a historical perspective of interventions in bifurcated lesions, with the strengths and weaknesses of the major strategies and of the new dedicated stents. [source]


    Immediate and 3-Month Follow-Up Outcome After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Bifurcation Lesions

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
    HIDEO TAKEBAYASHI M.D.
    Balloon angioplasty of a bifurcation lesion is associated with lower rates of success and higher rates of complications than such treatment of lesions of most other morphologies. To date, the best device or procedure for bifurcation lesions has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and 3-month follow-up outcome of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We treated 87 consecutive bifurcation lesions with CBA (n = 50) or PTCA (n = 37). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and angiographic follow-up was achieved for 93% of the lesions. The procedural success was 92% in the CBA group and 76% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two lesions in the CBA group and six in the PTCA group (P = 0.05). The incidence of bail-out stenting in the CBA group was lower than in the conventional PTCA (8% vs 24%, P < 0.05). At the 3-month follow-up, the restenosis rate was 40% in the CBA group versus 67% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, in comparison with PTCA, procedural success was greater and the restenosis rate lower with CBA. The results of this study support the use of the cutting balloon as optimal treatment for bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2004;17:1,7) [source]


    Use of a branch wire to anchor stents for exact placement proximal to bifurcation stents: The reverse Szabo technique

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 6 2006
    Henry Lo MD
    Abstract This report describes a technique for correct positioning of a stent proximal to a bifurcation lesion treated with V-stents. A second wire passed through the first cell of a stent, the opposite end of the anchor wire technique as first described by Szabo et al, facilitated precise stent placement and eliminated erroneous positioning inside or outside the treated bifurcation lesion. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    A New Stent Design for the Treatment of True Bifurcation Lesions: H-Side Branch Stents

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2010
    MYEONG-KI HONG M.D.
    Background:There has been much debate for the adequate treatment strategies for true bifurcation lesions. The purpose of this study is to introduce and test a novel stent design for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Methods:This side branch stent is composed of three parts: proximal, connecting, and distal parts. The distal part for the side branch vessel has a slope-side stent margin for circumferential coverage of the ostium and one radio-opaque marker for targeting the carina. The proximal part with two radio-opaque markers operates for safe stent delivery and useful guidance for a more precise placement of the distal part on the side branch ostium. Results of the in vitro test in the acrylic resin-made bifurcation phantom model were evaluated with microcomputer tomography. Animal experiments with this new stent platform were also performed in five pigs. Results:In vitro test and microcomputer tomography showed complete coverage of the side branch ostium circumferentially with stent struts, and the absence of stent struts in the main vessel above the side branch ostium level. This side branch stents were successfully deployed in all 5 pigs. The results of animal experiments were also similar to those of in vitro tests. Conclusions:In vivo and vitro tests demonstrated the effective modality of this side branch stent for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:54,59) [source]


    Perspective on Bifurcation PCI

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
    SHAO-LIANG CHEN M.D.
    Coronary bifurcation lesion is a complex lesion with suboptimal angiographic and clinical results. There has been no satisfactory classification of the lesion that can guide selection of strategies and predict short- and long-term outcomes. The difference between left main (LM) bifurcation lesions and non-LM bifurcation is striking. So many stenting strategies have been proposed and tried in trials. They include the V, T, Y, one-stent, two-stent, crush, mini-crush, DK, and SKS techniques. However, because these techniques are time and labor intensive, dedicated bifurcated stents have been invented and trialed in humans. This review presents a historical perspective of interventions in bifurcated lesions, with the strengths and weaknesses of the major strategies and of the new dedicated stents. [source]


    Physiologic Evaluation of Bifurcation Lesions Using Fractional Flow Reserve

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
    BON-KWON KOO M.D., Ph.D.
    Functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions is more difficult than usual lesions due to their complex anatomy. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound criteria for main branch intervention cannot be directly applied to side branch lesions due to the difference in underlying lesion characteristics, geometric changes during intervention, and the size of myocardial territory. Fractional flow reserve is a physiologic parameter which reflects both the degree of stenosis and the area of perfusion supplied by a specific coronary artery. The present review will focus on using fractional flow reserve in bifurcation lesions. [source]


    Immediate and 3-Month Follow-Up Outcome After Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Bifurcation Lesions

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
    HIDEO TAKEBAYASHI M.D.
    Balloon angioplasty of a bifurcation lesion is associated with lower rates of success and higher rates of complications than such treatment of lesions of most other morphologies. To date, the best device or procedure for bifurcation lesions has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and 3-month follow-up outcome of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) versus conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We treated 87 consecutive bifurcation lesions with CBA (n = 50) or PTCA (n = 37). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and angiographic follow-up was achieved for 93% of the lesions. The procedural success was 92% in the CBA group and 76% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two lesions in the CBA group and six in the PTCA group (P = 0.05). The incidence of bail-out stenting in the CBA group was lower than in the conventional PTCA (8% vs 24%, P < 0.05). At the 3-month follow-up, the restenosis rate was 40% in the CBA group versus 67% in the PTCA group (P < 0.05). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, in comparison with PTCA, procedural success was greater and the restenosis rate lower with CBA. The results of this study support the use of the cutting balloon as optimal treatment for bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2004;17:1,7) [source]


    Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions: A Rational Approach

    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 6 2001
    FSCAI, THIERRY LEFÈVRE M.D.
    The occurrence of stenosis in or next to coronary bifurcations is relatively frequent and generally underestimated. In our experience, such lesions account for 15%,18% of all percutaneous coronary intervention > (PCI). The main reasons for this are (1) the coronary arteries are like the branches of a tree with many ramifications and (2) because of axial plaque redistribution, especially after stent implantation, PCI of lesions located next to a coronary bifurcation almost inevitably cause plaque shifting in the side branches. PCI treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging. Balloon dilatation treatment used to be associated with less than satisfactory immediate results, a high complication rate, and an unacceptable restenosis rate. The kissing balloon technique resulted in improved, though suboptimal, outcomes. Several approaches were then suggested, like rotative or directional atherectomy, but these techniques did not translate into significantly enhanced results. With the advent of second generation stents, in 1996, the authors decided to set up an observational study on coronary bifurcation stenting combined with a bench test of the various stents available. Over the last 5 years, techniques, strategies, and stent design have improved. As a result, the authors have been able to define a rational approach to coronary bifurcation stenting. This bench study analyzed the behavior of stents and allowed stents to be discarded that are not compatible with the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Most importantly, this study revealed that stent deformation due to the opening of a strut is a constant phenomenon that must be corrected by kissing balloon inflation. Moreover, it was observed that the opening of a stent strut into a side branch could permit the stenting, at least partly, of the side branch ostium. This resulted in the provocative concept of "stenting both branches with a single stent." Therefore, a simple approach is currently implemented in the majority of cases: stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch, The technique consists of inserting a guidewire in each coronary branch. A stent is then positioned in the main branch with a wire being "jailed" in the side branch. The wires are then exchanged, starting with the main branch wire that is passed through the stent struts into the side branch. After opening the stent struts in the side branch, kissing balloon inflation is performed. A second stent is deployed in the side branch in the presence of suboptimal results only. Over the last 2 years, this technique has been associated with a 98% angiographic success rate in both branches. Two stents are used in 30%,35% of cases and final kissing balloon inflation is performed in > 95% of cases. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate is around 5% and 7-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) is 13%. Several stents specifically designed for coronary bifurcation lesions are currently being investigated. The objective is to simplify the approach for all users. In the near future, the use of drug-eluting stents should reduce the risk of restenosis. [source]


    Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter,

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2008
    BM BCh, DPhil, M.A. Mamas MA, MRCP
    Abstract The Asahi sheathless guide catheter system is a hydrophilic catheter with a central dilator that does not require an introducer sheath during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. Conventional sheath introducers are often 1- to 2F larger than the catheter itself; therefore, this system enables the use of a larger French catheter during procedures than would otherwise be possible using conventional techniques. We describe the use of a 7.5F sheathless guide catheter system with a smaller outer diameter than a conventional 6F introducer sheath in 16 cases performed transradially involving rotablation, crush stent bifurcation lesions, 7F proximal protection, and thrombectomy devices. Such cases would otherwise not always be possible if performed using conventional transradial techniques in patients with smaller radial artery sizes. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    The AST petal dedicated bifurcation stent: First-in-human experience

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 3 2007
    John Ormiston MBChB
    Abstract The aim of this first-in-human study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the novel AST petal side-access bifurcation stent. Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcations remain inferior to those of nonbifurcated lesions. Even with drug-eluting stents, restenosis occurs especially at the side-branch (SB) ostium. The petal stent uniquely deploys strut elements into the SB, supporting the ostium and carina. The primary endpoint of this 13-patient prospective registry was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary end points included acute minimum lumen diameter (MLD) at the SB ostium, lesion success, device success, procedural success, 30-day MACE, and 4-month SB ostial MLD. The study lesion was successfully treated in 13 patients with the study stent being successfully implanted in 12. Target lesions were left anterior descending coronary artery in nine subjects, left circumflex in three, and right coronary artery in one. In-hospital MACE were limited to two non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. In-stent main branch MLD increased from a mean of 0.63 ± 0.45 mm to 2.61 ± 0.47 mm at the index procedure and for this initial bare metal version of the stent, 4-month mean MLD measured 1.02 ± 0.42mm and there was target vessel revascularization on two patients. The feasibility of safely deploying this first-generation petal stent was demonstrated in selected patients with challenging coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a promising platform for drug delivery, with unique scaffolding of the side-branch ostium. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Long-term outcomes of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug-eluting stents with the "mini-crush technique"

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 2007
    Alfredo R. Galassi MD, FSCAI
    Abstract Objectives: To evaluate clinical and angiographic long-term outcome of "the mini-crush" technique for treating bifurcation lesions. Background: Despite proven efficacy of drug-eluting stent (DES) within most lesions subsets, bifurcation lesions continue to exhibit high restenosis rate using current DES stenting technique. Methods: We report a new stenting technique which was employed in 45 consecutive patients (52 lesions) between April 2004 and July 2005 to treat true bifurcation lesions using DES in both branches. Results: Using this technique procedural success was obtained in 100% of cases, without complications and with excellent angiographic result in 96.1% and 98.1% of main vessel and side branch. Preprocedure reference vessel diameter and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were 2.68 ± 0.48 and 0.90 ± 0.55 mm for the main branch, respectively and 2.28 ± 0.34 and 1.14 ± 0.47 mm for the side branch, respectively. Postprocedure MLD was 2.56 ± 0.39 mm for the main branch and 2.16 ± 0.29 mm for the side branch. There were no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). At 72 days after procedure there was one case of side branch stent thrombosis (2.2%), which resulted in non Q-wave MI. Angiographic follow up was obtained in 100% of patients at 7.5 ± 1.3 months. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 12.2%; no death and Q-wave MI were observed; reference vessel diameter and MLD for the main branch were 2.79 ± 0.51 and 1.99 ± 0.65 mm respectively and for the side branch 2.28 ± 0.40 and 1.63 ± 0.48 mm respectively. Restenosis rate in the main branch was 12.2% while in the side branch was 2.0%. Conclusions: In-hospital outcome indicates that the mini-crush technique for bifurcation lesions with DES can be easily performed. It provides very low total MACE rate and restenosis at 8-month follow-up. These results confirmed the advantage of this specific technique to give complete coverage of the ostium of the side branch using two stents technique. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Outcome in the real-world of coronary high-risk intervention with drug-eluting stents (ORCHID),A single-center study comparing CypherÔ sirolimus-eluting with TaxusÔ paclitaxel-eluting stents

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 5 2006
    S. Kumar MRCP
    Abstract Objective: We present real world experience from a single center registry comparing the 6-month outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in unselected high-risk individuals using either sirolimus-eluting (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Methods/Results: We compared clinical outcome at 6 months follow-up in two cohorts of 156 consecutive patients(total n = 312) who underwent SES (June 2002,Februrary 2003) and PES(march 2003,July 2003) implantation. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Baseline clinical characteristics were well matched. The 6-month target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates were 1.9% (SES) and 2.6% (PES) and MACE rates were similar in the two groups (SES 4.5% vs. PES 3.2%, P = NS). In the PES group, intervention for multivessel disease, bifurcation lesions and in small vessels was more common, and for in-stent restenosis less common, reflecting the impact of drug eluting stents on indications for PCI. The incidence of sub-acute stent thrombosis, related to inadequate antiplatelet therapy in 3 of the 6 cases, was 0.95% with no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of SES and PES in unselected high risk patients undergoing PCI. Clinical outcomes of both stents are equivalent at 6 months with low rates of MACE and TVR. These data provide important complementary information to forthcoming randomized studies. © 2006 Wiley-Liss., Inc. [source]


    Bifurcation stenting with drug eluting stents: Illustration of the crush technique

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 6 2006
    Georgios Sianos MD
    Abstract A number of percutaneous stenting techniques have been proposed for optimal treatment of bifurcation lesions. However, to date the most favorable interventional approach still remains controversial, since bifurcation lesions are associated with high procedural complication and restenosis rates. In the era of drug-eluting stents, crush stenting technique simplified the procedure, concurrently allowing full lesion coverage. The purpose of the present report is to review three cases treated with crush stenting and to describe in detail the technique and its variations. © 2006 Wiley-Liss., Inc. [source]


    Bifurcation lesion treated with a single stent: A new technique

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2005
    Deniz Kumbasar MD
    Abstract Treatment of bifurcation lesions by percutaneous coronary interventions is one of the challenging issues for the interventional cardiologists. The overall complication rate is higher than nonbifurcation lesions. We describe a new stenting technique for the so-called true bifurcation lesions. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Sequential vs. kissing balloon angioplasty for stenting of bifurcation coronary lesions

    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2002
    Martin Brueck
    Abstract Coronary angioplasty of bifurcation lesions remains a technical challenge and is believed to result in low procedural success associated with the risk of side-branch occlusion. Furthermore, long-term results are associated with a high rate of reintervention. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic results of sequential vs. simultaneous balloon angioplasty (kissing balloon technique) for stenting of bifurcation coronary lesions. Between December 1999 and January 2001, 59 patients underwent coronary angioplasty because of symptomatic bifurcation lesions type III (i.e., side branch originates from within the target lesion of the main vessel, and both main and side branch are angiographically narrowed more than 50%). Twenty-six patients were treated with simultaneous and 33 patients with sequential balloon angioplasty. Main-vessel stent placement was mandatory; side-branch stenting and platelet IIb/IIIa antagonists were allowed at the discretion of the operator. Kissing balloon technique offered no advantage in terms of procedural success or need for repeat target vessel revascularization due to restenosis at 6-month follow-up. Using sequential balloon angioplasty, permanent or transient side-branch compromise rate (TIMI flow < 3) was significantly higher than after kissing balloon technique (33% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.003). Major clinical events in-hospital or at 6-month follow-up, however, showed no significant differences. Kissing balloon angioplasty reduces the rate of transient side-branch occlusion compared to sequential PTCA but does not improve immediate or long-term outcome compared to sequential PTCA for stenting of bifurcation lesions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;55:461,466. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


    Present Status of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting

    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2008
    Rishi Sukhija M.D.
    Abstract Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions is technically limited by the risk of side branch occlusion. In comparison with nonbifurcation interventions, bifurcation interventions have a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs and a higher rate of clinical and angiographic restenosis. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has resulted in reduced incidence of main vessel restenosis compared with historical controls. However, side-branch ostial residual stenosis and long-term restenosis still remain problematic. In the era of DES, techniques employing two stents have emerged that allow stenting of the large side branch in addition to the main artery. Stenting of the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach. This paper reviews outcome data with different treatment modalities for this complex lesion with particular emphasis on the use of DES as well as potential new therapeutic approaches. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source]